necro_nemesis
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:31:46 PM |
|
Many thanks. I am delighted to see a plan for Gen 4 is already underway and AM's interests in building a sustainable future.
|
|
|
|
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:38:14 PM |
|
Lots of text
Thanks for the report. Always good to read your write-up
|
|
|
|
kololo
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:41:23 PM |
|
Also, we plan to increase the center pad size to at least 7mmx7mm,
Any ideas what this means? What does the center pad do, why and how will it be increased in size? Improved heat transfer from chip to PCB. Some info on the QFN package and board mounting of a QFN packaged chip. http://www.atmel.com/images/doc8583.pdfDoes this mean that AM implicitly acknowledged that power consumption is greater than expected? I think you are right.
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:44:22 PM |
|
1) What is the status, size, and expected delivery of the next batch of chips? What about the one after that? re 1) This month: 850k, next month: 3.35m (order size), June: 6.7m (order size), assuming each chip is 10G. 100Ph at $0.5 profit per gh = $50,000,000 or 100,000 btc 100,000/400,000 = 0.25 btc per share. Not bad.
|
|
|
|
Franktank
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:53:41 PM |
|
1) What is the status, size, and expected delivery of the next batch of chips? What about the one after that? re 1) This month: 850k, next month: 3.35m (order size), June: 6.7m (order size), assuming each chip is 10G. 100Ph at $0.5 profit per gh = $50,000,000 or 100,000 btc 100,000/400,000 = 0.25 btc per share. Not bad. That's under the assumption if they sold ALL the chips, which is not going to be the case. There's going to be at least 3 PH/s for mining in the datacenter, plus whatever is used for decentralized mining. Unless I misread something, of course.
|
|
|
|
neilol-real
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:56:29 PM |
|
1) What is the status, size, and expected delivery of the next batch of chips? What about the one after that? re 1) This month: 850k, next month: 3.35m (order size), June: 6.7m (order size), assuming each chip is 10G. 100Ph at $0.5 profit per gh = $50,000,000 or 100,000 btc 100,000/400,000 = 0.25 btc per share. Not bad. Where are we assuming $0.5 profit per GH - constant over the life of the generation?
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:57:59 PM |
|
1) What is the status, size, and expected delivery of the next batch of chips? What about the one after that? re 1) This month: 850k, next month: 3.35m (order size), June: 6.7m (order size), assuming each chip is 10G. 100Ph at $0.5 profit per gh = $50,000,000 or 100,000 btc 100,000/400,000 = 0.25 btc per share. Not bad. Where are we assuming $0.5 profit per GH - constant over the life of the generation? Profit per gh is $0.25-0.75. I assume it will be nearer to the higher end during the first 3 months.
|
|
|
|
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:02:20 PM |
|
1) What is the status, size, and expected delivery of the next batch of chips? What about the one after that? re 1) This month: 850k, next month: 3.35m (order size), June: 6.7m (order size), assuming each chip is 10G. 100Ph at $0.5 profit per gh = $50,000,000 or 100,000 btc 100,000/400,000 = 0.25 btc per share. Not bad. And that assumes that the bitcoin / $ is constant.
|
|
|
|
Franktank
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:06:13 PM |
|
1) What is the status, size, and expected delivery of the next batch of chips? What about the one after that? re 1) This month: 850k, next month: 3.35m (order size), June: 6.7m (order size), assuming each chip is 10G. 100Ph at $0.5 profit per gh = $50,000,000 or 100,000 btc 100,000/400,000 = 0.25 btc per share. Not bad. And that assumes that the bitcoin / $ is constant. And assuming that ASICMiner decides to just stop ordering chips after June.
|
|
|
|
ThunderSheep
Member
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
The sheep who walks through walls.
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:10:42 PM |
|
Thank you Jutarul. I am pleased with this news. I suspect anyone who acquired shares around 0.3 is doing a bit of a happy dance. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfPg5LjGYz8
|
|
|
|
chairforce1
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:47:56 PM |
|
Excellent update, great news. Thanks
|
Death is nothing to us, since when we are, death has not come, and when death has come, we are not. #yolo
-Epicuru$
|
|
|
Franktank
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:53:34 PM |
|
i am missing dividends for all of april, is that correct for everyone?!? or did something happen?! (direct shares)
The last dividend distributed was on March 30th. As for updates, read Jutarul's latest post.
|
|
|
|
superduh
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:59:09 PM |
|
i am missing dividends for all of april, is that correct for everyone?!? or did something happen?! (direct shares)
The last dividend distributed was on March 30th. As for updates, read Jutarul's latest post. haha thanks, AM really needs at least a blog or something. would save people like me a panic attack.
|
ok
|
|
|
aahzmundus
|
|
April 22, 2014, 12:00:50 AM |
|
Disappointed in the non answer to question 7, but overall happy. Thank you jutarul for keeping the little guy informed.
|
|
|
|
cs54
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
April 22, 2014, 12:52:56 AM |
|
Seems like we're in for some stormy weather on Havelock :/
|
|
|
|
JoTheKhan
|
|
April 22, 2014, 01:02:22 AM |
|
FC plans to maintain a farm at max of 3PH?
|
|
|
|
Jutarul
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 22, 2014, 01:12:54 AM |
|
Disappointed in the non answer to question 7, but overall happy. Thank you jutarul for keeping the little guy informed.
If there are follow up questions or unsatisfactory answers I encourage to resubmit more specific questions. I have no control over either questions nor answers. In this particular case I guess you're asking whether AM is invested in Allied Control or owns their technology. To my latest knowledge Allied Control is an independent entity with no profit sharing mechanism with AM, other than AM retaining profit rights on the mining chips. As such, bundled products sold by Allied Control (container+hashing tech) will both create a revenue stream for Allied Control and AM. I hope that answers the question somewhat.
|
|
|
|
willBTC
|
|
April 22, 2014, 01:25:49 AM |
|
Seems like we're in for some stormy weather on Havelock :/
I can't understand why people dump the shares on havelock .
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ASICMINERTUBE The Best $/Gh Bitcoin Miner So Far Discover now! ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|
|
|
101111
|
|
April 22, 2014, 01:28:35 AM |
|
Fabulous news, thanks.
|
|
|
|
necro_nemesis
|
|
April 22, 2014, 01:35:47 AM |
|
Would like to know when we could realistically see PR in a more persistent form.
Also offer up a suggestion to improve brand recognition, product loyalty and revenue. It appears there is enough C of G again to independently mine. What I suggest is providing a pool in association with AM's efforts as there will be sufficient power to jump start a pool. Mining still remains apportioned to contributions but it's a source of a potential 2% on the increased size of the network of which AM will contribute.
|
|
|
|
|