elrippo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 06:47:24 PM |
|
|
For Advertisement. PM me to discuss.
|
|
|
quakefiend420
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 07:01:59 PM |
|
http://gekkoscience.com/misc/compac/Lboard_S5_parallel.JPGSurprisingly enough, this works perfectly. What we have is our L-board, with some modifications - 5V is now tied directly to 3.3V, reset is now controller-driven and the whole UART level shifting is jerryrigged. The thing is powered off a hacked-up BTCGarden AM-V1 VRM, which is also forwarding 12VDC into an S5 controller board. I've had to hack up the cable a bit to make it think there's a proper board plugged in, but the thing no mines away just fine in standalone. I've got to assemble a couple more L-boards (one for Novak to use for software testing, and one with series chips so I can get that ironed out) but for the time being I'll just leave this guy mining. First fully successful test of a two-chip mining board. If I didn't care about the extra couple percent efficiency boost of running series chips instead of parallel (or the necessary dev step of mastering string'd comms and power) this could become an Amita. But the point of the Amita is to demonstrate string topology. Tell you guys what, if I wasn't doing stickminers and went straight for the TypeZero it'd probably be done already. I never expected to have lost so much time figuring out particulars for that daggum Compac. Hopefully I have a final design done for that soon. That's an awesome pic ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
chiguireitor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 872
Merit: 1010
Coins, Games & Miners
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 07:55:43 PM |
|
[...] an S5 controller board. I've had to hack up the cable a bit to make it think there's a proper board plugged in, but the thing no mines away just fine in standalone[..]
Is that hack related to the "test" pin the controller expects? Is it that resistor on the L board, or something else? This is exciting... a question, do you think you could attach one of these bad boys https://www.sparkfun.com/products/9235 to a string of controllers and address them from a standard USB port, or have you seen the controller do other funky things with the chips themselves?
|
|
|
|
sidehack (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 08:09:58 PM |
|
That will absolutely not work, because these chips do not use SPI protocol. Or whatever it is you're asking - a string of controllers? I don't know what that means.
Also, when you say "that resistor on the L board", there are currently ten resistors on the L board but I don't think any of them are doing what you're asking about.
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4830
Merit: 4535
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 08:14:16 PM |
|
Congratulations! When will you accept our money?
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
sidehack (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 08:16:44 PM |
|
When I have a final manufacturable design that's independently proven to work as advertised, and when I have secured a chip source. Not before both of those conditions are met.
|
|
|
|
ZenFr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 08:26:15 PM |
|
Congratulation Sidehack and Novak : very happy for you... and for us :-).
|
|
|
|
TheRealSteve
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 08:36:46 PM |
|
Congratulations! When will you accept our money? See above, but just as a reminder.. they do accept burgers; Sandwich donations can be forwarded to 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr We tend to lean pretty heavily on the Bacon Texas Cheesesteak Melt from Waffle House. Just throwing that out there.
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 09:17:53 PM |
|
The thing is powered off a hacked-up BTCGarden AM-V1 VRM, which is also forwarding 12VDC into an S5 controller board. I've had to hack up the cable a bit to make it think there's a proper board plugged in, but the thing no mines away just fine in standalone.
I'd love to know more about that VRM and how/why you managed it. I have one of those units sitting on a shelf turned off right now, and with <$200 resale value it seems
|
|
|
|
sidehack (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 09:24:55 PM |
|
The how wasn't too difficult, with a shear and an hour with the soldering iron. The why is because it's a simple regulator that'll take in 5-12V (so I can test with USB or 12V power) and output 0.6-0.8V at 30A, which is really handy for testing miner chips.
|
|
|
|
ManeBjorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2015, 10:46:49 PM |
|
Looking forward to this very much. Nice work on these. When I have a final manufacturable design that's independently proven to work as advertised, and when I have secured a chip source. Not before both of those conditions are met.
|
|
|
|
sidehack (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2015, 12:56:02 AM |
|
Well, my string L-board worked pretty well. The 3.3V RX for some reason decided to crap out pretty much without ever actually working, which becomes a chip problem. All that left me was a 1.8V RX, which was fine for the CP2102 adapter into cgminer, which so far doesn't work with dual chips. The S5 controller uses 3.3V logic, so I needed that 3.3V RX line. Feeding it from the 1.8V RX line gave it enough, apparently, to know there was a board attached with some chips and to start mining but I never saw any recorded hashes. And then the 1.8V RX started wigging out, possibly an internal high-tie resistor on the S5 controller. So, technically, the board worked - but now I have to replace the first ASIC in order to make it work for real.
I refit the schfifty-three regulator to run 0.8-1.3V and tested balance on the board. It was pretty good. And then when the chips start to initialize, the bottom chip kicked up first and drowned itself out with the 200uF node-level caps I had. So I slapped a couple 1800uF 6.3V cans on there and that gave it enough buffer to fully initialize. But that's gonna be seriously annoying if I have to do that on the Amita.
Anyway, it's about lunchtime so I'm gonna head out. The parallel L-board is hooked up on the S5 now, back how it was this afternoon, and running at the 1BURGER if anyone's paying attention to that. I had hoped the string L would work and I could leave it going, but it won't be worth messing with until I get that chip replaced and figure out what went wrong with the RF line hosing up my 3.3V RX.
Oh, also, when it was working briefly off cgminer and the USB adapter, I was seeing about 800mA off the 5V line into the regulator and should have been getting 16.5GH so that's pretty balls. That 800mA is surely not accurate (20 year old analog gauge), but it was in the neighborhood.
|
|
|
|
Xian01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2015, 01:08:20 AM |
|
When I have a final manufacturable design that's independently proven to work as advertised, and when I have secured a chip source. Not before both of those conditions are met.
Very cool, dude. Grats on getting your 2 chip design working ! Looking forward to your 'big' miner, and hoping Bitmain will be reasonable with chip pricing for you.
|
|
|
|
|
sidehack (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2015, 04:46:21 AM |
|
If everything's working proper it should level out around 16.5GH. I don't have remote access to the stats page (shifted it off the VPN-capable subnet so Novak could play with the code more readily) to verify it right now, but I am admittedly disappointed in the 3-hour average currently presented. It's been running at speed for right around 4 hours. Of course, 16GH on a min-diff 128 makes for some pretty gnarley variance. The 12-hour should look much better.
Hopefully tomorrow early I can get the string L working, swap a fresh chip on and get the 3.3V RX back up. If it ends up working like I'm pretty sure it should, all I need to do after that is iron out the Compac regulator noise issue, get some solid numbers on minimum node-level capacitance to maintain balance during a two-chip initialization (testing so far indicates it's somewhere between 200 and 2000uF) and lay into some PCB redesigns. Heck, if the Compac gets to working, the Amita should be a single revision because the chip extension is pretty trivial compared to the friggin' month I've lost to regulator issues.
|
|
|
|
cavaliersrus
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2015, 01:49:14 PM |
|
hey hack very excited to see how well project is coming along and cant wait to see future upgrades and progress reports
|
|
|
|
sidehack (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 21, 2015, 05:58:31 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgekkoscience.com%2Fmisc%2Fcompac%2FLboard_S5_string.JPG&t=665&c=PFNPJdPbDHUXiA) The L-board over there on the left. We call it the L-board because it's a three-chip breakout board so the chips make a right angle. Like the letter "L". The first chip will always be the first chip, but you can put a second chip either in parallel (alongside, as in the previous picture) or in series (above, as in this picture). Two power inputs, one for Vcore and one for 2x Vcore to be split by the string configuration. I also wired up the LED circuit from the Compac design onto it so I can see the flashing LEDs. Whoever said that was a good idea was right. Except that something with the 3.3V comms on the S5 controller sorta prevents the LED from working properly, or it strobes so sporadically I don't wait long enough to see it. In any case, I rewired the schfifty-three to output 0.8 to 1.3V so I could safely take the string voltage up from safe-for-one-chip-if-something-is-very-very-wrong to can-operate-at-150MHz-at-half-this-voltage without anything exploding. I just checked the per-chip voltages in operation with my trusty crappy DMM and they're within 2mV of each other, so that's a pretty good split (less than half a percent difference). I did light this up on my bench supply to watch the power consumption and the power draw profile on chip init is pretty cool. It goes from very low to full in about a linear sweep of several seconds, which tells me they coded the init to ramp up the power slowly to avoid severe imbalances. If that works how I think that works, I could probably pull the 1800uF cans off the board and it'd still be alright. The S5 has 100uF tantalum per 2 chips in a node, and I have 200uF ceramic per one chip node right now, but the U3 init (expecting parallel chips, no balance needed) was way too abrupt and the first chip was very much outpacing the top chip until power was so out of whack that they both shut off - in well under one second. So, for now I have two working two-board setups, one a standard parallel on a USB adapter and one string on the S5 controller. Novak's in command today, and will probably be figuring out what the heck all the code's doing so we can try and get some Compac- and Amita-specific drivers going in cgminer. I'll probably be spending the day odd-jobbing and trying to cut down the noise in my Compac regulator. Hopefully I can work out some simple changes and a fresh PCB layout we can prototype in-house and not have to waste more time and money on prototype PCBs that don't really work. I won't be able to run out full Amita prototypes until we know what node-level capacitances we'll require, which looking at the init power profiles, will definitely require some working driver to test.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 8356
'The right to privacy matters'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 25, 2015, 02:57:24 PM |
|
to update this gear is now 16-17gh which was hoped for by sidehack and look at the charts it is right there!
|
|
|
|
ZenFr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 25, 2015, 03:03:58 PM |
|
The forum is back : very good :-).
And the news about THE project.
|
|
|
|
valkir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 25, 2015, 07:03:52 PM |
|
to update this gear is now 16-17gh which was hoped for by sidehack and look at the charts it is right there! Great stuff. These 3 days give sidehack some time to focus on the project without any question on the forum ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
██ Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to :
1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
|
|
|
|