|
1
|
Other / Meta / Re: Is Samourai wallet now banned from Bitcointalk?
|
on: April 25, 2024, 05:49:16 PM
|
If Samourai in particular (the entity, not its protocol/code) pops up again via a Tor hidden service or something, that would be banned. There's no need to ban links to already-seized sites. Other trustless CoinJoin services are still allowed. This case seems largely to rely on an idiosyncratic issue with Samourai, namely that there were allegedly instances of Samourai devs very directly marketing to people committing crimes. Theymos probably opened a Pandora's box when he banned mixers I feel that this sort of thing justifies my decision, which was based in part on seeing a pattern of increasing "squeezing" of privacy services. This Samourai action is in-line with my predicted trend, which I think will only get worse. Since I am not surprised by this sort of action, it does not make me want to expand the mixer definition.
There's a giant institution with guns out there which wants to destroy every centralized, destroyable component they can find related to privacy. Every centralized privacy service is at risk of being nuked from orbit at any moment, and you want to be nowhere near the strike zone. I think that the legal argument against Samourai is fairly weak, but the law is only ink on a piece of paper: it has no magical powers to protect you. I wouldn't be surprised if the Samourai devs win their case in the end, but their lives are still going to be ruined for at least the next few years, and they'll probably be bankrupted. The fact is that the powers-that-be desperately want these things destroyed, and they're eventually going to find ways of destroying them, if there's any way to do so. I'm certainly not saying that privacy is a lost cause, but this environment requires a much higher standard of robustness and decentralization. This isn't as free a world as it was when Bitcoin was first created. |
|
|
|
|
2
|
Other / Meta / Downtime
|
on: April 23, 2024, 07:52:17 PM
|
|
Sorry about those few minutes of errors. I was trying to update something which I thought wouldn't cause any issues, but it did cause major issues, which I wasn't entirely prepared for.
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Happy 4th Bitcoin Halving
|
on: April 20, 2024, 01:34:57 AM
|
|
Happy halving! Once again, Satoshi's hand reaches out from the past and chops another bit off of the subsidy.
IIRC, in last halvings there was lull in the price for some time after the halving before the effect of the reduced supply really started to be felt. I wonder if that'll happen this time.
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Other / Meta / Re: Mixers to be banned
|
on: April 13, 2024, 06:58:29 PM
|
Previously, I was under the impression that Jambler was merely a software or platform provider, like Wordpress or AWS. But after reviewing it more closely, it meets the definition of a mixer as written. My mind was especially changed when I saw this diagram from their website:  The diagram clearly shows that Jambler is the actual mixer. They issue the "letters of guarantee", they send the BTC directly to the final customer, etc. The partners are just lightweight proxies in front of the true mixer, which is Jambler. Jambler "has a feature advertised for taking property, improving its privacy somehow, and then returning roughly the same type of property", and it meets the other two criteria, so it's a mixer. (Maybe you could make the case that Jambler's actual customers are its partners instead of the final end-users, but even in that case Jambler is acting as a mixer for its partners. Jambler is the one doing the mixing. So it's still a mixer in either case.) Since I had previously ruled that Jambler did not meet the definition of a mixer, and I've now changed my mind, there will be a short grace period: Jambler will be wordfiltered (and otherwise treated as a mixer) starting on April 22. As with other banned mixers, please do not interpret this as a moral judgement. I'm not saying that Jambler is or is not bad. |
|
|
|
|
5
|
Other / Meta / Re: Identifying the linked-to post in a topic (SMF patch)
|
on: April 08, 2024, 08:41:36 PM
|
I like the idea. All proposed styles seem OK to me, though some alternative styling ideas which come to mind are: - Change the color of the entire post <tr>, using a different color than the usual alternating blue and grey (but not too different). - Add a little red(?) asterisk or something in the lower-right corner of the post icon (ie. td.td_headerandpost table tbody tr td a img). When you open the HTML source of this page for example, there are a bunch of "shadow" posts under the OP. These are invisible posts that have the same HTML structure as real posts, but they don't have anything inside them. There is usually a random amount of these displayed, anywhere from one to three. So what is the deal with that, and where do they come from?
Those are decoy posts meant to confuse adblockers. This is also why a lot of the CSS classes randomize on each pageload. Now that there are no ads, I could remove both of these things. Would doing so break anyone's parsers? |
|
|
|
|
6
|
Other / Meta / Re: Security bounties
|
on: April 08, 2024, 08:07:00 PM
|
1) Is it required to have a persistent custom HTTP header in all requests, e.g. "X-Bug-Bounty: {bitcointalk username}"?
No. 2) Is it acceptable to use newly created / generic sock puppet accounts for testing?
Yes. 3) Is the "The Glider" forum badge assigned in all cases where a vulnerability is disclosed and patched, or only when a payment bug bounty is provided? (I am curious if this badge will be given out for low to medium risk findings that are not eligible for a payment bounty, but could still be useful)
Probably only for the listed security bounties. 4) If my genuine IP or testing accounts are banned for suspicious use whilst performing bug bounty testing, will my normal BitcoinTalk account remain unaffected?
IPs are only banned for making too many requests, not for suspicious behavior. So just don't make more than one request per second.
A lot of people try to run "website security scanners", and then report the "bugs" that these software packages find. Please don't do that. These scanners only ever report little configuration things which some people consider less than ideal, like allowing certain TLS ciphers, or sending/not-sending certain HTTP headers, and stuff like that. It's not useful. |
|
|
|
|
7
|
Other / Meta / Re: Adjustments to Merit calculation
|
on: April 02, 2024, 12:01:53 AM
|
April fools! I feel like more people were legitimately fooled by this one than normal.  In hindsight, I made the new titles too difficult to get. But it's shocking that so many veteran members were finally revealed as Certified Shitposters.  (They were Cyrus, fillippone, LoyceV, xhomerx10, goldkingcoiner, and DdmrDdmr.) Thanks to PowerGlove for suggesting the idea! |
|
|
|
|
8
|
Other / Meta / Re: DT update log
|
on: April 01, 2024, 07:07:26 PM
|
This month 140 users were eligible. Old: OgNasty
qwk
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
TookDk
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
gbianchi
EFS
dbshck
stompix
hilariousandco
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
JayJuanGee
achow101
DaveF
teeGUMES
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
Real-Duke
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TwitchySeal
BitcoinGirl.Club
holydarkness
Lafu
finaleshot2016
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
duesoldi
Vispilio
Baofeng
krogothmanhattan
wolwoo
RaltcoinsB
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
KTChampions
Trofo
Coin-1
icopress
GreatArkansas
dragonvslinux
JeromeTash
Bitcoin_Arena
joniboini
MinoRaiola
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
coinlocket$
witcher_sense
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
anonymousminer
Lakai01
stoos
morvillz7z
Husna QA
fillippone
cryptofrka
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
Harkorede
The0ldl_lser
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
jokers10
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
FatFork
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Poker Player
paid2
New: theymos
HostFat
qwk
Vod
vapourminer
PsychoticBoy
Foxpup
philipma1957
babo
Cyrus
ibminer
joker_josue
Mitchell
albon
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
gbianchi
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
cryptodevil
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
nutildah
minerjones
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
SFR10
TwitchySeal
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
Jet Cash
condoras
Lafu
polymerbit
tweetious
Yatsan
buwaytress
crwth
comit
bobita
Vispilio
Baofeng
imhoneer
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
roycilik
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
Coin-1
icopress
sheenshane
3meek
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
MinoRaiola
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
tvplus006
mole0815
witcher_sense
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
anonymousminer
morvillz7z
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
abhiseshakana
madnessteat
Harkorede
Little Mouse
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
seek3r
FatFork
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner
Lillominato89
Poker Player
MrCryptHodl
paid2 |
|
|
|
|
9
|
Other / Meta / [April fools] Adjustments to Merit calculation
|
on: April 01, 2024, 12:03:28 AM
|
|
Edit: April fools!
In recent years, it seems that a lot of people have been making low-value posts just to get paid. To address this, I've added a merit "cost" to posting: from this point forward, for every 15 characters you post, you will lose one Merit point. This should eliminate any incentive to make low-value posts.
Any halfway-decent poster should be able to earn much more merit than they lose due to the penalty. But I recognize that some good posts are occasionally overlooked. So to counterbalance the penalty, I also added a system whereby you will earn a bit of merit just by reading posts. If you want to write a lot, you'd better do some reading as well!
For both the penalty and the bonus, this applies only to your merit score, and does not affect sendable merit (sMerit).
Let me know what you think of these adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Economy / Games and rounds / Re: [VOTING PHASE OPEN] Bitcointalk Pie Baking Contest (2nd Edition)
|
on: March 19, 2024, 10:16:13 PM
|
|
Bitcointalk Account: theymos
My vote goes to: Mame89, acroman08, Despairo, Bd officer
Mame89's was the best IMO due to the large amount of variety and detail. Acroman08's is also good-looking and thematic. Despairo's dragonfruit pie is vibrant and interesting; I wonder how it'd taste. A lot of people used pomegranate "drawings" to good effect, and I think that Bd officer's was the best of these.
Thanks for running the contest, RickDeckard!
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Other / Meta / Re: Is something wrong with the forum’s native search function?
|
on: March 09, 2024, 10:10:09 PM
|
But I think that the search function still doesn't work as it should
That's unrelated to the issue DdmrDdmr brought up. Search has a number of quirks, and I'm not going to fix them all right now. In this case, your search didn't work as expected because words appearing in a large percentage of posts are not indexed within posts at all. Currently, there are 181 unindexed words, and "bitcoin" is one of them. So if you search for "bitcoin", it will not even look for posts containing "bitcoin" in their bodies, though it will search topic subjects, and it will highlight "bitcoin" in any posts found via subject-search. As another example, if you search for "bitcoin candy", it will search for messages with [both bitcoin AND candy in their subject] OR [candy in their body], even though it will highlight both "bitcoin" and "candy" in message-bodies in the results. (Furthermore, this will exceed the result limit, so you will actually only get an arbitrary subset of the possible results.) Next time I reindex posts, probably it would be a good idea to not have any nouns in the list of unindexed words. |
|
|
|
|
13
|
Other / Meta / Re: DT update log
|
on: March 01, 2024, 08:38:41 PM
|
This month 134 users were eligible. Old: theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
qwk
Vod
vapourminer
fronti
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
TookDk
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
gbianchi
EFS
stompix
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
cryptodevil
NeuroticFish
DaveF
examplens
minerjones
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
Real-Duke
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
LeGaulois
SFR10
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
holydarkness
Lafu
tweetious
Yatsan
buwaytress
Ale88
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
Baofeng
be.open
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
Coin-1
icopress
dragonvslinux
JeromeTash
3meek
MinoRaiola
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
Heisenberg_Hunter
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
anonymousminer
Lakai01
stoos
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
cryptofrka
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
The0ldl_lser
YOSHIE
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
FatFork
NotATether
decodx
Lillominato89
Poker Player
MrCryptHodl
New: OgNasty
qwk
Vod
vapourminer
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
TookDk
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
gbianchi
EFS
dbshck
stompix
hilariousandco
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
JayJuanGee
achow101
DaveF
teeGUMES
examplens
nutildah
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
LFC_Bitcoin
o_solo_miner
Real-Duke
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TwitchySeal
BitcoinGirl.Club
holydarkness
Lafu
finaleshot2016
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
duesoldi
Vispilio
Baofeng
krogothmanhattan
wolwoo
RaltcoinsB
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
KTChampions
Trofo
Coin-1
icopress
GreatArkansas
dragonvslinux
JeromeTash
Bitcoin_Arena
joniboini
MinoRaiola
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
tvplus006
coinlocket$
witcher_sense
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
anonymousminer
Lakai01
stoos
morvillz7z
Husna QA
fillippone
cryptofrka
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
Harkorede
The0ldl_lser
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
jokers10
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
FatFork
NotATether
Stalker22
bullrun2024bro
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
Poker Player
paid2 |
|
|
|
|
14
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi - Sirius emails 2009-2011
|
on: February 24, 2024, 01:33:36 AM
|
Skimming through those makes me so nostalgic... Next time somebody complains about the version of SMF on bitcointalk.org, I have a great excuse! Hopefully the 1.1.x line is mature and updates are infrequent. We
shouldn't upgrade to 2.0. I made a ton of customisations that wouldn't
be compatible, and I kind of prefer the look of 1.1 over 2.0 anyway. |
|
|
|
|
15
|
Other / Meta / Re: My account was changed email
|
on: February 06, 2024, 08:21:44 PM
|
I thought people would quickly figure out on their own from the new email address what happened, but maybe it's not as clear as I thought. Maybe later I'll put a big red notice about it on the Account Settings page if you've been affected, especially if more people keep coming to Meta and asking about it. So what happens if an existing email address suppose " testmail123@gmail.com" gets disable or ban for some unknown reason? The address won't exist then. Google recently made a new policy where inactive gmail are deleted. You weren't receiving email before because your email got banned/disabled, and now you'll still not be receiving email. Nothing is lost. The forum account isn't banned or anything. Another possible issue is if email can't be received temporary, because of maintenance or outage.
If it's temporarily down, then it won't give a bounce message of "No such mailbox" (or similar), so the email won't be affected. Gmail for example responds via SMTP, "550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1 https://support.google.com/mail/?p=NoSuchUser". We're detecting several variations on that "no such user" SMTP response. Longer-term, I would also like to do something about emails where the domain times-out or returns a "temporary" error in like 3 of the last 12 months or something like that. If you register with an email like asdfwerwe@werwetwerwer.com, then somebody could register werwetwerwer.com and steal the account that way. But this issue isn't on my short-term to-do list at all. |
|
|
|
|
16
|
Other / Meta / Re: My account was changed email
|
on: February 06, 2024, 11:44:11 AM
|
|
This is something we recently started doing. If email sent to your email address bounces with an error message like, "This email address doesn't exist", then your email may eventually be changed to u...@bounces.invalid. (It's not possible for users to change their email address to something ending in .invalid, so this can only be an administrative change.) Because your old email didn't exist, somebody could've registered your non-existent email address and used that to steal your account.
I didn't particularly intend for the trust warning to appear for these automatic changes, but it's a niche situation and a bit difficult to fix, so I probably won't fix this unless several other people complain. It only lasts 30 days, after all.
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Other / Meta / Re: DT update log
|
on: February 01, 2024, 07:33:02 PM
|
This month 140 users were eligible. Old: theymos
gmaxwell
CanaryInTheMine
Vod
vapourminer
fronti
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
ibminer
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
EFS
arulbero
Avirunes
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
DaveF
examplens
minerjones
irfan_pak10
bitbollo
pooya87
o_solo_miner
sandy-is-fine
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TwitchySeal
phishead
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
ekiller
holydarkness
Lafu
polymerbit
tweetious
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
duesoldi
bobita
Vispilio
Baofeng
krogothmanhattan
wolwoo
roycilik
El duderino_
KTChampions
icopress
GreatArkansas
sheenshane
3meek
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
joniboini
MinoRaiola
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
morvillz7z
Bthd
fillippone
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
1miau
Harkorede
The0ldl_lser
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Lachrymose
seek3r
FatFork
NotATether
CryptoYar
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
MrCryptHodl
paid2
n0nce
New: theymos
HostFat
gmaxwell
qwk
Vod
vapourminer
fronti
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
TookDk
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
gbianchi
EFS
stompix
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
Lesbian Cow
willi9974
cryptodevil
NeuroticFish
DaveF
examplens
minerjones
irfan_pak10
yahoo62278
bitbollo
zazarb
pooya87
Real-Duke
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
LeGaulois
SFR10
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
holydarkness
Lafu
tweetious
Yatsan
buwaytress
Ale88
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
Baofeng
be.open
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
RaltcoinsB
Igebotz
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
Coin-1
icopress
dragonvslinux
JeromeTash
3meek
MinoRaiola
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
tvplus006
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
Heisenberg_Hunter
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
anonymousminer
Lakai01
stoos
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
cryptofrka
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
The0ldl_lser
YOSHIE
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Rikafip
FatFork
NotATether
decodx
Lillominato89
Poker Player
MrCryptHodl |
|
|
|
|
18
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: Farewell
|
on: January 17, 2024, 05:26:08 PM
|
|
Thank you for spending so much time with us; your absence will be a major loss to this community.
Even though I didn't know you well, you've been around so long and contributed so much that I feel a real sense of loss, and I'm sure you've created these sorts of connections with a lot of people, far more than will reply in this topic. You'll be in my thoughts. I hope that as much as possible and for as long as possible, you are happy and healthy.
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Other / Meta / Re: Mixers to be banned
|
on: January 04, 2024, 05:14:50 PM
|
In any case, it's completely hypocritical : look at this topic which is THE source of all this shit and it isn't even wordfiltered.  The clearnet site was seized, so there's no need to wordfilter it. What about this oneShould it be locked or I can keep going on it? As you can notice, I removed any URL, I only mention the names and it has been say we can still discuss mixers. Otherwise, in a random discussion, we can talk about a mixer but not allowed to say the name? That's fine. And you can say the names of mixers in posts, unless their name is a URL. |
|
|
|
|
20
|
Other / Meta / Re: DT update log
|
on: January 01, 2024, 04:54:40 PM
|
This month 142 users were eligible. Old: HostFat
gmaxwell
OgNasty
qwk
Vod
vapourminer
fronti
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
Welsh
ibminer
d5000
Mitchell
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
dbshck
stompix
hilariousandco
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
achow101
DaveF
examplens
nutildah
minerjones
yahoo62278
zazarb
pooya87
o_solo_miner
sandy-is-fine
Real-Duke
klarki
The Sceptical Chymist
LeGaulois
SFR10
TwitchySeal
TryNinja
ekiller
Jet Cash
holydarkness
tweetious
Yatsan
HCP
buwaytress
crwth
comit
Ale88
duesoldi
Kryptowerk
Vispilio
Baofeng
imhoneer
krogothmanhattan
JollyGood
roycilik
CryptopreneurBrainboss
hugeblack
El duderino_
KTChampions
Trofo
icopress
o_e_l_e_o
JeromeTash
3meek
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
joniboini
MinoRaiola
Agrawas
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
TheBeardedBaby
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
DdmrDdmr
Lakai01
morvillz7z
Husna QA
Bthd
fillippone
cryptofrka
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
The0ldl_lser
jokers10
efialtis
geophphreigh
Rikafip
NotATether
Stalker22
decodx
BlackHatCoiner
Poker Player
New: theymos
gmaxwell
CanaryInTheMine
Vod
vapourminer
fronti
mprep
Foxpup
philipma1957
Cyrus
ibminer
Mitchell
albon
wwzsocki
Timelord2067
jeremypwr
EFS
arulbero
Avirunes
buckrogers
Buchi-88
willi9974
JayJuanGee
NeuroticFish
DaveF
examplens
minerjones
irfan_pak10
bitbollo
pooya87
o_solo_miner
sandy-is-fine
Real-Duke
klarki
LoyceV
The Sceptical Chymist
SFR10
TwitchySeal
phishead
TryNinja
BitcoinGirl.Club
ekiller
holydarkness
Lafu
polymerbit
tweetious
buwaytress
crwth
Ale88
duesoldi
bobita
Vispilio
Baofeng
krogothmanhattan
wolwoo
roycilik
El duderino_
KTChampions
icopress
GreatArkansas
sheenshane
3meek
logfiles
Bitcoin_Arena
joniboini
MinoRaiola
GazetaBitcoin
Maus0728
coinlocket$
mole0815
witcher_sense
bitmover
DdmrDdmr
shahzadafzal
morvillz7z
Bthd
fillippone
madnessteat
The Cryptovator
lovesmayfamilis
DireWolfM14
1miau
Harkorede
The0ldl_lser
Little Mouse
YOSHIE
efialtis
geophphreigh
zasad@
Lachrymose
seek3r
FatFork
NotATether
CryptoYar
BlackHatCoiner
Charles-Tim
Lillominato89
MrCryptHodl
paid2
n0nce |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
