Selected members so far:
Light
howzar
seandaniel
Wendigo
Rulishix
coinnewbit
All of you soon will receice the servey on PM.
I can confirm I have received and responded to the survey accordingly. Will update with proof of payment. |
|
|
|
This isn't a problem. To put things into perspective read below. Statistically speaking, unless the protocol changes to accommodate more decimal places, only 2.1e14 addresses could contain at least one Satoshi, and that's only if everyone only had one Satoshi. If anyone has more (and pretty much everyone who has any has more than one Satoshi), then there are fewer occupied wallets.
Within the set of 2256 private keys, they only map to 2160 unique wallet addresses. So the question is how does 2160 compare to 2.1e14? One in a million? One in a trillion?
The answer is one in 6.9595 decillion. Since "decillion" isn't a commonly used word, I'll save you the bother of having to look it up: it's a one with 33 zeroes after it.
To put that 6.9595 decillion figure into perspective: The Earth has a diameter of 12,742 kilometers, giving it a surface area just shy of 50 million square kilometers. A square kilometer is 1 million square meters, and a square meter is one million square millimeters, meaning the surface area of the Earth, in millimeters, is just shy of 50 quintillion mm2.
So here's the game we'll play. I've got 140 trillion earth-sized spheres. On one of them, I have randomly selected a single square millimeter as the prize winning spot. Find it, and you'll get to spin the prize wheel to see how much you've won. The prize wheel currently has about 22 million spaces. 21 million of them contain less than a dollar. But you only get to spin the wheel if you can find the secret spot on the secret sphere.
Wanna play? |
|
|
|
Let us know if you have any questions/suggestions, as we would love to incorporate some member feedback!  Would you be able to incorporate the option of open parlays (similar to 5Dimes)? |
|
|
|
|
I would advise Electrum - I moved over from Qt especially after having to redownload the whole blockchain again. It's pretty lightweight and offers nearly the same functionality as Qt except that it may be slightly less secure in terms of transactions as it relies on external nodes rather than your own copy of the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
Hello Hank and thanks for contacting us. We have noted our prices above,if you like any help,feel free to leave me ur skype via private message. We don't do "No quiere no pay" because the court taxes and our taxes cannot be "gambled". If you like to start a case,you should read more about ur rights and what you can do or just talk with us. Our price is non-negotiable and they are the cheapest on the market from Professionals. No one can offer you 100% win at any case,not even the Devil itself  If you like to start case agaisnt the scammers,contact us. How is anyone going to take you seriously when as a trained 'lawyer' you can't even get you're grammar and spelling correct. Just saying - anyone with real problems in need of real advice would be far more likely to use an actual lawyer they can meet in real life and who can speak English. |
|
|
|
exactly my sentiments. what the hell is he planning to do with his account?
In all probability one of two things: 1. Use it as an alt for signature payouts 2. Use it to scam people Depends on how nefarious you believe him to be. |
|
|
|
|
I'll tell you what - use a trusted and known escrow (something tells me you won't) and maybe people might be trusting enough to deal with you. Sending money to an unknown stranger over the internet with no trust and who is using a disposable account is just begging to get robbed.
|
|
|
|
martingaling can work, you wait for like 18-20 reds and then start betting, and again it's pure luck whatever you do.
The whole premise of probability in mathematics is that the past event doesn't have any implication on the result of the future event. If it were true - it would be possible to use a specific set of patterns to choose the most apt point in time to place a bet giving you +EV. So basically, martingale doesn't exactly work regardless of when. |
|
|
|
I paid those users, and you were not even one who participated in the service.
He didn't.
He just removed all my posts that said otherwise.
The power of self moderated threads.
For further proof , I gave him my address as : 17kzPBwE8cRGUkgimViRGfYwGNHahQ3FFZ and you can see that there are no transactions of me receiving anywhere between 0.0115 - 0.017 BTC.
Well then - since both statements are contradictory one of you guys are lying. @Gambler: Are you able to provide concrete proof you paid back all users? |
|
|
|
I PARTICIPATED IN HIS SERVICE AND WAS SCAMMED !
According to him he paid you back. Did he really? |
|
|
|
I exchanged several emails and support tickets with two guys from Bitcoin trader, John Carley and Michel Brandenburg. They sign their blog posts are well and I was told that several payment processors they use are registered to John Carley. I suppose these payment processors require ID verification. Regardin BTC-arbs, no info there.
Just out of reference, the IDs required by payment processors are easily faked or at least edited to have the necessary information. Rarely do they have the time or staffing to actual physically verify anything - so these people by all means may not be 'John Carley' and 'Michel Brandenburg'. |
|
|
|
Eliminate the bankers. 99% of the world's problems will be solved with that.
Isn't that a bit of an overexaggeration? I mean greedy shits who prey on people are rather frustrating but I do think we are not living in a world yet where they are the biggest priority. There are far more fundamental flaws in humanity than just being a 'banker'. |
|
|
|
I don't care what people were claiming, I never did claim such silly things. From the technical point of view, the bottom is at $265. I don't know which direction and how far it will go right now, but I do know it won't go below 265 ever again.
I'd be interested in the technical approach you take to derive such a figure. Would you mind sharing? Personally, IMO anything can happen - the whole thing is entirely based upon group perception. |
|
|
|
Hm... wouldn't they still have logs from before he was using a VPN/Tor? Or does theymos not keep any logs at all after a certain period of time? What I don't get is that if he wanted to scam he could have easily waited for a few more escrow orders to come in to get more and then run off - with the worst case scenario only having to return the forums coins if theymos had leverage over him via his details. |
|
|
|
Stop with this no lower than X bullshit. When prices were in the 800 range, people were claiming that it would never go below 600 again. Nobody really knows.
Concur - any speculation is just pure speculation, as I've stated many times trying to theorise human nature is impossible. Sure you can base value of S/D curves but what drives those curves is still human thought/fear/hope which can't actually be measured/quantified nor used to predict these fluctuations in S/D. |
|
|
|
Hasn't made much of a difference members are still paid around 0.0003 or so per post, it just to be as low as 0.0002 per post for everyone even hero members.
Put it this way the restriction lead to a lowered price for those which newer accounts while inflating the price for those with older accounts. This only works on the premise that newer accounts are far more prone to spamming, while older accounts are less willing to spam and risk getting banned. |
|
|
|
Unless he feared the forum owners would reveal his identity?
Do they actually have all his dox or some partial information about his identity? Man, after 3 months he still hasn't said a word or even logged in. Talk about a hiatus. |
|
|
|
No idea. But the got in to an email account of mine as well. Not the one related to Localbitcoins.
Have you checked for any keyloggers/viruses on your system yet? You might also want to look into turning on 2FA for at least your email, especially if you're planning on a business where security is rather important. |
|
|
|
|
I see no reason why we need a new symbol that a group of idiots can trademark and then try to sell to everyone else at (for them) hopefully a nice sum. It's basically self-perpetuated highway robbery. BTC is just fine as it is 'industry group' be damned.
|
|
|
|
I am pretty sure that's impossible.
My understanding is the public key is calculated from the private key in a unique fashion.
Correct, Bitcoin's current implementation means that it is impossible for you to have more than a single public key from each of your private keys. Mathematically, I believe you might be able to - but this has been addressed by the way Bitcoin has been coded. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
