You should try posting in the "Services" section. There are some folks over there that could help you.

I've been waiting for the bull confirmation for a long time.

It tells me that they actually like bitcoin, but when they want to tell the public they are using it they would rather say blockchain technology.

Not the first time Szabo has been speculated as Satoshi. Nothing original here NYT. Also I don't believe Szabo is Satoshi.

I'm expecting another uptick to the $250 mark this weekend.

This is my video.
Not sure why having the change address would give you a 26 error (rejected by network rules).
I hope you didn't send too much as a mining fee.
I did explain between the 8:30 - 9 minute mark that if you don't include a change address the remainder will go to mining fees.

2 different languages for 2 different purposes.
I like php since I'm comfortable with it for backend web dev.
Java is good for app development.
Not to be confused with javascript which is good for website interactivity.

Or BTC (blockchain transfer credits)

What is the minimum size transaction accepted by the network right now? 5,430 satoshi or something?

Let's say when wallstreet starts trading using bitcoin they name 5,430 satoshi a blockchain packet or a blockchain share?
I'm saying could it be possible that wallstreet might do this so they can use and transact in bitcoin without having to say the word bitcoin? There's a reason you see these articles where they only mention blockchain technology and not bitcoin, and I'm assuming that's due to the negative association that comes with the word bitcoin.

I feel there's confusion. I'm not saying they will create their own chain. That wouldn't work because noone would mine it or run a node. My OP intended to ask the question if the unit of value, currently known as bitcoin will be rebranded as blockchain shares or packets since they don't like the association to bitcoin. Its still the same thing just being rebranded

As I understand they are going to use THE blockchain which will require bitcoins to transact. I'm thinking tge units currenly known as btc will be renamed blockchain shares or packets

Lately I've been noticing that people love the blockchain but not bitcoin. Nasdaq wants to use the bitcoin blockchain but not bitcoin... will the term bitcoin get left behind? Will the new term for unspent outputs on the blockchain be renamed to bllockchain shares or blockchain packets? If so domain speculators should get. Buyblockchains.com or similar

Sounds a lot like fishbitfish, but with cars instead. 

Wish I got in back in 2011, but hindsight is 20/20 I probably wouldn't have bought much. I remember first hearing about bitcoin in 2012 and I completely dismissed it as being equivalent to WOW gold. I literally thought that it was some centralized website selling digits for money. I remember thinking, why would anyone pay for that crap? I didn't even look into it to discover that it was actually a revolutionary new technology.

Even as a permabull I'm kinda doubting the Stockholm launch. I don't know why, but I am. It's great for the validity of bitcoin, and it helps move bitcoin out of the fringe anarchic nerd circle, but for some reason I'm not expecting much volume from KNCs Bitcoin Tracker.  Lets hope I'm proven wrong.

It's not about dice. There are so many use cases with bitcoin and micro transcations that's gets cut off by this idea. If I want to send $2 or $3 to pay back a friend for a cup of coffee, that is considered spam? Musicians like myself who want to sell a mp3 for 50 cents using a paywall is now spam. We are dealing with a free market and if you try to make it all bout the miners bottom line instead of the users, you will not have users. Usability is partly what gives bitcoin it's value, take that away and you take away the value.

I have a feeling that the SEC has already put their stamp of approval on COIN behind closed doors. What are they waiting for is the question. They approved a singapore corporation to open an exchange in NY (itbit). I believe they are waiting for Lawksy's office to role out the bit license before announcing that COIN is approved.

May 2015, the month that bitcoin went institutional with GBTC going live and Nasdaq Stockholm. Will we be able to look back in X amount of years and see it as a significant date in either adoption or price? I'm thinking maybe.

As for short term right now not really any walls visible, but I think we are going to drop a little further for a day or two. Trend wise, I'm confident the 18 month bear trend is at a close.

Sounds like a VISA/MASTERCARD/WESTERN UNION mentality, the user should not be the one burdened by the block size limit. Increase the blocksize, DO NOT INCREASE USER FEES. I should not have to pay more if I want to be sure my transaction gets confirmed. If it's going to cost me 0.01 to send a transaction, myself as well as the free market will migrate to another coin for transactions.

Except COIN would be way more liquid as a true ETF instead of the trust that Barry hacked together to squeeze into the markets. Once both are available through major markets I'm pretty certain that most people would choose to trade COIN over GBTC. Time will tell!