The announcement only affects its custodial lightning nodes, although you can still use other or own self-custody nodes to proceed a lightning transaction. This also mean that their main wallet and other features are not affected by that changes.

Yes, nothing, you just distrust it.

It's still has the same effect, distrusting a user means you distrust him/er regardless how many times you put the same username with a tilde.

Wag mo na itry if you're planning mag direct from mixer to your coins account, pwede pa if mixer to your non-custodial wallet then coins account. The same sa gambling funds.

Ika nga "prevention is better than cure" so be wary trying risky things lalo na gamit ang mga centralized platforms.

Twitter giveaways should always be taken with a grain of salt even its an official account especially if it needs deposit for a giveaway lmao. This kind of issue is not new and already exists since 2 years ago or so. People should really learn these things already.

I never heard this permissions on other users using Stake before, maybe a new feature, but surely looks like sensors have different ways to sense any activity you do in browsers. Yeah, sensors are a helpful use in gaming and VR but in gambling? It will probably raise an red flag issue.

If i knew bitcoin that time with enough money to spare i will probably do the same. But unfortunately, i'm still a student only online gaming and friends are my only hobbies so there's no way i will get introduced on such technology unless someone do it, but nah.

I'll still give a 40 mins a longer wait, since im not always in rush ^{(well, most of the time)}. Usually i give my transaction 2-3 hours of waiting since i only do 5-10 sat/vb when making a transaction.

This. He could have avoided all the trouble if it was announced to the casino team, but didn't.
Now about the bug, it is true that OP abused and took advantage the bug which is against the TOS of every services in the internet and subject for ban/being restricted.

You might have a point, but that's not what always happened. Sometimes you don't need to BUY bitcoin in order to have it, you can work and earn by the company/service paying bitcoin, its like what signature campaigns do

It's the same of having an advocacy of spreading bitcoin knowledge, you write a book on it and accept bitcoin as payment in order to be have it.

Its very highly unlikely bitcoin will proceed to PoS. ETH was criticized and even a bit considered as securities by US SEC because of this move.

Newbies should really be careful choosing exchanges to use to, a simple deposit will be fucked later if you chose a scam one without a proper research or maybe even a simple research will really help.

I registered a random email, with a random 6 digit verification code and it works, means the site is an obvious fucked up. Also, the site uses a common scam exchange. How unfortunate someone got scammed again.

That's okay you, don't need to bother and think like paranoid what will happened next few decades, just live the life today at pano mabuhay at present.

Well, about the news, lahat ata ng induatry needs na ng internet, both government, banks and private system kaya daming maaapektuhan at  baldado lahat ng transactions yan.

Yeah, the same mindset why most people regret later after bitcoin reach another milestone.
Bitcoin price doesn't look to go down now and it's a good time to take risks.

It doesn't matter either its an alt or not, the main purpose of the thread is the specific stake account that was closed due to the reason mentioned by stake, only if these are true.

Usually this is triggered when a user withdraws a large sum of balance in just one go.

Also, it's a good move of OP to bring this to legal court since we are talking a 6 digit money here.

In the name of "learning blockchain and transition of web3" talaga eh no, may maisingit lang, tapus yung fake bitcoin known as BSv blockchain ang ipu-pursue nila aralin. Sa may mga alam ng student possible mag react sa ganyan baka maya-maya sabihing or ipakilala nlang ang BSv ang original bitcoin lmao, eh di, mas dadami mangmang dito satin, either it came from huge universities.

Why not? The profits it gets benefits the company and everything to its future investment plans. Also, it's a company owned by multiple people who have shares and doesn't have 1 person to do the decision making. I know how bullish to bitcoin Saylor is, but a company/incorporated such as microstrategy doesn't work like that.

Just a little explanation to them will give them insights what this forum is, especially if they target crypto users on their platform. Either it's a wallet service, mixer, exchange or a casino. Now if they target more on social media users, people who uses search engines, other crypto site's users then making google ads, facebook ads and other crypto-related ad network should be fine. But if they want to maximize their marketing budget and target then having a signature campaign on this forum is recommended.

---

Oh, so there's a campaign manager who accepts such offer, good one.

I remember some thread like this asking before, but sadly there is no campaign manager as of the moment accept such as referral program as per my knowledge ^{(i hope there is)}. Maybe because they are so confident of their network where their previous participants always recommends them to those company's representative/owner that are asking.

Isn:t most casino or new casino is partnered with third party game provider now a days? I always see that in scam accusations of users playing casino then banned because game providers detected unusual behaviours of the users. They usually reply and tell that generic message that you are banned but wouldn't tell you specific reasons.

If they sell on bull run i don't mind i guess there wont be any significant change but if they sell in bear market that would be the worst case scenario cause it will have huge effect on the market probably we will experience a very long bear season.