85% seems like a made up number but even so, i think that the number should be higher. Crunchbase lists 9,587 AI startups and with 85% dying there should be 1438 left in 3 years. IMHO there will come even more and number will be way less than that. Most of them run out of money in 3 years as they are basically money grabs. Reason is obvious, people love to fund trendy stuff because they think it might get adopted by apple etc...

Even though that would be only crappy "AI" app making your voice sound like a toddler, people see it somehow on par with chatgpt 4.

Thanks, there seemed to be some confusion, like Like dailypost and many others saying Binance is now illegal and sued by nigerian SEC. BNB might have been slightly affected by the fud but nothing noticeable as everything is so volatile anyway.

But it couldn't be that big of an operation, could it? How long did the scam run and how much they scammed?
I can't even find any trace of the binance nigeria ltd site, existing ever by google. Usually even if the site was a scam there still will be other sites linking to it and influencers talking about it.
All i find is dozens of articles quoting CZ saying it was a scam operation.

Don't' know what biometric bridge is, so if you want to shill it, don't assume people do get everything. It sounds like fingerprint or eye scan instead of private key, and frankly i don't see that revolutional. Just google auth app works better.

But scip was on my radar as a newcomer from end of 2022 and i even had some of it in my wallet. Selling it almost immediately when it started dumping was one of the best panic dumps i have made as it has just kept on dropping. It's near ATL again and while it's cheap, it isn't worth my risk until it's way below $1M marketcap. But good luck with your investment.

That's weirdly my experience as a kid as well. With my first lottery i chose numbers for one game in my dad's lottery. My row won a lot, i recall my dad shouting from joy, but he never told me how much my row won. After that my dad made me fill one row for every lottery but i never won again.

I was so young that i didn't have any bank account or anything. My dad kept the money and gave the biggest bag of candy i ever saw to me. But i was quite annoyed as i didn't know how much he won and never saw a penny unless you count that bag of candy . Sadly he was living a luxurious lifestyle and spend it all before i even had grown up.¨

Is that really threatening? Sounds more like an ultimatum, and she is allowed to do that. I know people that wouldn't watch that kind of behavior at all so divorcing is totally understandable.

I don't know about their monetary arrangement but usually if couple is married, there are joint bank accounts and mutual budget. Any bigger spendings will be planned together as you are living with the same.

Gambling away your family's money is totally unacceptable. I would leave just if i was blatantly lied to. Not to mention gambling away our shared budget.

Suing someone isn't really that damaging. SEC charged Ripple 2 years ago and we are still watching that to unravel.

What happened is that SEC decided that many altcoins were securities, and now they are suing exchanges for allowing buying and selling of securities all along.
Keeping in mind that those weren't securities just while ago.

So now CEXes are unregistered security exchanges. Bittrex just gave up. There are many things that are weird in this but funniest thing is that either side could wint this. We are in uncharted waters and crypto is stlll relatively new. Regulations can still change a lot, even during the court fight. One thing i am certain is that this will get way more complex then it already is.

You are quoting a research i didn't find by google, nor your link was pointing into any actual academic research.
I tried to search Psychology today but their search isn't that great either. So it's really hard to review any research without reading the actual research, or even an article about it.

And using google translate when you want accurate grammar make the page a very vague source.

Huh? Gongratz and thanks for the tip, i didn't have any idea about any giveaways.
I thought i made an account there already but can't find anything from my laptop, hopefully double accounts aren't prohibited in there as i kinda want to make a account that's most likely my only account. But i would feel weird to hang in there just to participate in giveaways so i will look around and see if i can participate talking in there first.

But HOW ai would be used against the casinos? Beating the house would mean it would beat the mathematics behind house edge itself. The edge is designed to make money,
Slots should be obvious that you can't "win" them by counting. And even with backjack, from what i know there are already systems in place to prevent cad counting teams.

If you are talking about sports betting, if majority of people started winning via bots, soon they wouldn't be even worth the risk to play as winnings would be so low.
If you are talking about the poker games, players would be scamming each other, not the house.

Is she would be your friend you wouldn't need a paid investigation to find her freaking instagram.

People who are helping OP for money, understand that you are most likely helping a stalker trying to locate a prey from pic backgrounds, probably a stalker with restraining order.

There's most likely not one decent private detective that would take OP's money. That's why op is trying to pay as a pseudonym.

You can't really judge people on thinking that. The whole crypto rich myth as build on getting rich over night because some people have done it. EVERYONE i know has came into crypto other than devs has become in because they wanted to get rich.

I see those people in low- and microcaps, but they are a minority or they are not as loud as sensible hodlers. Somehow every new lowcap token out there thinks it's reasonable to have over $100M marketcap. And if they are going past that, they will start to talk about being next shiba, or eth killer.

I am not sure what kind of regulatory challenges are you referring to in the past? I haven't seen this level of conflict before if we are not talking about regions where it's legal to use cryptos

Mostly whole cryptocurrecy scene have just complied with regulators. We haven't "won" any cases against regulators, just accepted the facts and complied.

Marketing ICOs/sales are more closely regulated as people now know that you can end up going to jail over them. Taxation regulations are updated to handle cryptos. CEXes, casinos and eveyone dealing with money are complying with aml regulations that many crypto users seem to see as invasive.

To comply with regulators on this issue and future legistlations that are going to happen will be more challenging than anything i've seen before. This doesn't mean we won't find a common ground because most likely we will, but it will look different then we are used to.

They might have paid the bonuses but has anyone tried their "refund" policy? Or is that really more like promotion campaign then a policy?

I would like to see a report from someone with an account with actual credibility in bitcointalk. As you have just buy member accounts to say what you want. At the moment i need every penny i got and i am certain if i tested it, there would be some hoops i wasn't prepared for, like bet size limits etc, and either it would take a month to get my money back or i would end up messing their rules to be eligible because they were too vague

I never saw enough advantage in Avalanche over Ethereum that it would make sense to build a whole new network for it. That just divides the whole crypto community more and makes me think devs just wanted money. What avalanche tries to build could have done on top of eth. Not evertthing needs a new blockchain.

And it isn't security yet. Sec hasn't stated it's not a security. It just wasn't listed, yet.

People can't really predict the world events and that was based on the past like every prediction. When fundamentals on some high cap alts are as bad as now, it's natural that people will focus on coins without a company or funding behind them. I recon that people will soon start to trust alts again as nothing new happens for a while. These court cases will take so much time that be might be over next bull cycle before there's any kind of result available. Which side will end up winning this is anyone's guess.

"10x"? That number is not based on anything. It's true that lower caps have more room to grow, but that only applies if they have any future to begin with. And no one knows if they do.


Depends, i remember when eth was high on the marketcap, people thought it was too high to move as much as lower caps. Turned out that there was so much room to grow and ETH ended up being the most profitable altcoin, even when it started from top. Top was relative to todays marketcap, but we don't know what the cap for highest marketcap will be.

I understand your scepticism, but i don't think that problem will be in adoption but in the fact that there's no suitable ZK tech for it yet that governments would allow in larger scale. We are in the testing phase of few alpha versions that are most likely not going to take off as any of current platforms isn't really regulatory compliant or safe enough.

And while there technically still are people that 2023 Internet user statistics ] don't have an access to internet, [/url]there are people who don't have an access to banking or money either. But in civilized countries those numbers of internet users are way up, And that number is slowly increasing as the meaning and demand for physcal cash is decreasing. And this tech will start from first world contries, that's for sure.

Spot on. Shame doesn't need religion to fuel it but it helps. I think it's frowned upon no matter where you live, especially if you are doing it a lot. Which is weird. In finland it means you are contributing to lots of charities as well when you gamble. So it should be viewed as a public service to put your money in.

I guess people see the generic gambler as irresponsible, even if they don't know anything about their lives. And i am guessing there's a bit of jealousity when gamblers win and because gamblers dare to live more on the edge, while non-gamblers deny that from themselves. So they are easy bunch to hate or pity. I still see haters as a minority as most people know you can gamble while not being an addict or irresponsible.

I am only speculating here, but i am guessing that mandatory kyc will eventually apply to everyone, in every casino dealing with stablecoins or fiat money that is.

As this seems like a temporary solution to eventually fill regulatory demands.
 
Because when you think about it, asking kyc for just for newcomers doesn't really make sense unless it's a step by step system. As confirming IDs and scaling the process for applying to everyone instantly would require insane amount of work and it would take time while customers would need to wait in line for approval. Step by step system seems to make most sense to me.

That's how i am reasoning it anyway and i am not against kycs. I see them as necessary evil, however i wish someone would make a ZK based identification system to prevent id thefts via hacks.

Maybe focus on hunting new cutting edge new tech in crypto and if you are lucky they will reward the active users with their token. That's how every successful airdrops have worked. If they announce airdrop before airdrop, it will get botted out and you most likely won't get anything worth money. In fact you most likely end up spending more then airdrop just by using the product in every way you can think of.

That tactic, of actually caring about the project and getting rewarded for it has given me a lots of money via airdrops.

Why is it absurd that people sell with any price they get for free at the bear market. Everyone knows it can drop a lot from here, so why not sell and get something.

Remember IMX and GODS airdrop? I sold gods in $5 which was near all time low at the time. So was it low and absurd to sell too or was it having a perspective on over priced valuation? As now GODS is $0.12
IMX i sold little under $5 which seemed like a bad price at the time. I just saw it over priced, and now it's $0.62.

It's not always about having some pocket money. People have made a lot of money selling BLUR and it's still quite high in the marketcap considering that it doesn't have an interesting or attractive useful use case that i can see.