Butthurt about the trust he left? No sir. I'm -32: -5 / +0 I could give a care less about the feedback quickseller gave.
Simply he sells accounts. He has a conflict of interest here. He also "helps" the community by advertising himself and negative repping those who go against him. He has marked multiple signature campaign managers which can only help his case for becoming a manager himself. He also sells accounts so him negative repping accounts creates a desire for these accounts for people to get accounts without red. He also insists upon others to use escrow and tried to force him escrow post to be stickied in which ironically oh look he also offers escrow! What a coincidence!
The dude also is a year old account here. There are people who have been here 4 years more deserving of him by far of the prestigious honor of being on default trust. He sure as heck don't deserve it.
What i dont get is why anyone would listen to anything you say since you are nothing than a trash scammer, you actually admited it already, are you enjoying wasting your time in this forum making pointless accusations? Are you feeling better? I suggest you to find another hobby you lowlife scammer. No one gives a shit about anything you say. |
|
|
|
|
Well this proves that quickseller accusations and trust ratings are pretty much legit all the times, i will save this thread to link it whenever someone says quickseller is abusing the trust system, at the end the scammers will always show their real face, like here.
Thanks for letting us know that you are indeed a trash scammer.
|
|
|
|
The point I'm trying to make is that Quickseller isn't mature or someone who can handle himself in a neutral position with default trust. He has side interests that interfere with his ability and also motivation to leave trust.
Logical and plenty of evidence to support that assessment. Wonder why it is not a concern for Tomatocage? Most likely, tomatocage has only seen the tip of the iceberg. For people who haven't been on the receiving end of a smear-attack by quickseller, it might look at first like he's merely pointing out scammers and potential scammers and the people complaining about him are merely sore about his finding them. However, once you have to start vouching for his actions, it's another story altogether. Presumably, something like this is why he didn't last long on badbear's list. Tomatocage is only just now having to deal with all the QS drama and lies and trickery and cetera. Here's another possibility though, QS is obviously power-hungry and it's pretty sure that he didn't like getting removed from default trust. TC giving him another chance but warning him to hold himself together, etc may actually affect his behavior. Ie, if he stops doing so much abuse, perhaps he'll stay on TC's list and that will be that. That wouldn't be an altogether bad outcome. While it's certainly dissapointing that someone can claw their way to the top through lies and scandals and smear campaigns, if, once they get their, they straighten out their act, I guess that's better than not straightening out. Can you point out any trust abuse that quickseller has done? I mean i know you are butthurt because he left you a trust, wich is neutral so you shouldnt be that butthurt but yeah i would to see some of those cases where quickseller is "abusing" the trust system. |
|
|
|
Hmm its true, i see master confirmed it so it would be logical for tbz to delete his neg trust. Anyways i dont think begging on pm once should be considered to require a red trust, i guess if he did it repeatedly then yes but only once? I mean he didnt scam anyone.
But a scam accusation against ume is a weird thing aswell, he didnt scam no one but i get your point.
Actually my last accusation against him was giving himself positive trust from his alt account.But even then he got no negative trust. Yeah Begging shouldn't mean a negative trust, but if its on me for not doing anything, then it should be on him as he is the main culprit behind it. But again we have everyone jumping over ndhnc and not caring about things like these. ~TheButterZone on my trust list... now you are +10 to me Twipple. Keep fighting the good fight. Seems like there is a nice little group running roughshod over a lot of people here. KWH - Asshole and untrustworthy who supports Dogie VAT fraud.. Quickseller - Asshole and untrustworthy anonymous escrow who supports Dogie VAT fraud. Funny how the same people seem to circle up and pick on people. Why are the Mods not looking into this sort of thing? Although i dont agree with TBZ rating after seeing the evidence KWH trust is neutral so i dont know why you complain about it, and its totally a respectable rating since you did buy the account. Quickseller trust rating aswell is for something different than what is being disccused here so those ones are fine. Its also curious that anyone who defends people that has been red trusted they are often red trusted aswell, if not 100% of the times |
|
|
|
Everything is possible here in the forum, who knows? Maybe he forgot to 'own' that address and posted it or maybe forgot to have signed the TX with those 2 addresses. A control of the IP by the staff will help, but I don't think they will moderate the 'scam accusations'.
The real question is; if you create an account solely to extort people for money, would you (of 4 posts) make 3 scam related posts, and one conveniently placed post with your addy?
Not a chance; this is framing 101BTW staff not moderating trust and scams is what gives scammers here what they need to create this kind of confusion. It's a bloody shame. cheers ''one conveniently placed post with your addy'' Well it wasnt really incredibly placed so people could see it, he did that after the first 2 posts tho. Why do you think he will not post his address by error? People is not perfect. Ndnhc hasnt connected since this so that tells a lot honestly. And no shitty excuses like school exams or that shit, he obviously has time to at least connect once |
|
|
|
Disappointed by you tomatocage. Really am.
I've used your escrow service at least 10 times in the last year and this is what you do. Its a shame.
Unfortunately I am now in need of a new neutral escrow to use for my future trades here.
Also, just FYI, me being a blatant scammer is probably one of the least effective examples of what a scammer is Quickseller. A loan was agreed upon for 2 BTC, I rec'd 4 BTC, 2 BTC from two different addresses. Now yes, a heartfelt person would return the said 2 BTC extra but 1) there was no proof it came from the same guy and 2) no full agreement on 4 BTC. I took it as a gift for my help to the community. At the time I had been doing escrows for people and if you look back I had handled escrows as large as 50 BTC. If I was such a scammer why scam for 2 BTC instead of 50 when I had the chance?
I repaid the agreed upon 2.01 BTC. Contractually I did not scam. Contractually I followed all repayment requirements.
Since that 2013 fiasco, in the years 2014 and 2015 I have traded well over $50,000 worth of BTC on Localbitcoins and here. Just check my LBC, last year and this year I've traded well over $25,000 alone. I make good margins and continue to do so. I have 100% feedback on my 3 LBC accounts and have traded over 250 times with over 100 different people. Two of my accounts are Pro Traders and known very well on the forums there for being a trustworthy trader. Had someone sell me $1000 BTC outside of escrow there about a month ago. Wheres the scam report Quickseller? Marketing time: Feel free to message me if you have PPMC codes or want to sell BTC for bank deposits / moneygram / Western Union as those are what I am currently looking for. Always looking for long term sellers and always open to using escrow.
You can hate me all you want, I sure come across as an asshole no doubt there, but a scammer? Nah Im not. An asshole yes, a scammer no. I aint a scammer but keep on insisting im the poster boy of a scammer. How funny and yet I always insist on accepting escrow. It makes me laugh honestly.
Im sure tomatocage wont be able to sleep at night because of this post. Do you realize that badbear himself gave you negative trust for being a loan scammer? What does it matter that you are insisting in using escrow in this account when you scammed in your other? Your word means nothing, you say you traded x amounts of money and all bla bla but at the end of the day you will still have the red trust, keep whining scammer. |
|
|
|
I think there is a good chance that ndnhc was framed. There are several candidates:
1. Quickseller: He has been after ndnhc due to dadice. Considering his ability it will be easy for him to set up.
2. Twipple: Has the motive to make Quickseller look bad.
3. Any other like Twipple with a similar grudge against Quickseller.
4. Someone who hates ndnhc and wants him gone. As a campaign manager who denies and kicks participants he may have some enemies.
What concerns me is that Quickseller is easy to fool and yet the first responses are mostly bashing ndnhc with no one analyzing the accusation. In the last page he makes another accusation which turns out to be incorrect.
Seeing the feedback on ndnhc, Vod has literally copy pasted his. I wonder if he even took the time to read through the allegation.
5. Someone who wants to take over his campaign.  /joking of course... I hope ndnhc comes in soon since at this point it seems he is the only person who can move this thread forward. Why the joking? Out of everyone in this thread you are the closest to what has happened imho. My theory who is the one person missing who is loving this scenario? marcotheminer and he would have known jocas alts because joca was in his campaign add to the mix not liking ndnhc and constantly trying to troll his signature thread. Failing that he resorted to plan b which we get to witness. He added dadice on skype recently around the same time who has made public marco trying to talk him into letting him take over from ndnhc. He is also sly. I could create a new account plant marcos address everywhere and claim responsibility would that be good for you? It was good enough before. I feel ashamed of this place with the control a few have over the many. "Plant marco address everywhere" see thats the problem here, question2 didnt plant ndnhc address everywhere, in fact only in 1 giveaway post wich is incredibly hard for anyone to notice, if he really wanted to frame ndnhc he would have posted the address everywhere ad you said or at least a few more times |
|
|
|
That is not the network's twitter or website... And the network has a youtube channel, look the video I posted. What are the payout rates for a channel with 13M+ views and 13K subs statistic? (Approximately)
70% for you and 30% for the Network Cant give you a exact answer right now, i'll reply once I get the stats. of course it is... or was. they deleted that site it seems. http://zekteck.com/I call scam. It doesnt even matter if they are not a scam, the only one who is going to make money is the OP who is recruiting people for that network and he will get paid for it. You( the youtuber) on the other hand will get nothing unless you upload good videos with good views but that would happen with any other network so why would you pick an unknown network when there are way better safe networks? |
|
|
|
Yea with accusation against ndnhc this just seems really bad for dadice, at this point who knows what role has ndnhc really on that site. Furthermore i told them in their thread that they now have an obligation to show funds not because of investments but because of the neg trust. I mean if you were they and you had that amount of neg trust and the only way to get rid of it would be to show the funds, why woulndt you do it?
If i was participating in their sig campaign i would quit asap.
nah, they're still getting BTC from the signature.. why would they quit Well if i was wearing their signature i would be worried that in the future i might not get paid. They could run with all the money and never come back soon enough, its not like they would be the first ones to do so, there have been a good amount of casinos that scammed unfortunately. For people saying, but why would they invest in sig campaigns and giveaways, well its simple and obvious, the more customers the more money they can steal if they plan to scam afterall. |
|
|
|
The OP is KingOfSports. If he isn't a clear scammer then IDK who is.
You. You clearly are. You enable scams to take place and are proud of it. Why don't you leave me some negative trust about it? Better yet, log back in to your mod account and delete this comment. I will hound you for the rest of your career here, make no mistake about it. I think i missed a lot here. I have heard that QS give wrong feed to people and all(he don't) But what's this with him being a mod ? I can't find him with mod status  Dont listen to them, they have all sort of crazy theories about quickseller, they are saying that he is badbear so i guess thats why he talks about him logging to mod account. All the people that whine about vod or quickseller are just scammers that got busted and now they are crying, you can notice that they actually never try to refute the accusations against them but rather attack the guy who accused them. |
|
|
|
Ndnhc is a university student from Europe. This time around every year is the time for the final state exams and such. He is probably having a couple left and reading for them thus not visiting the forum. He is probably unemployed too and managing that infamous sig campaign for the cash. By the way this thread is more epic than game of thrones i will give you that good job everyone lol. Wait for the exams to end and he will be here all summer long anyways to ask him about that  Yeah i guess, in spain students finished already tho but it depends on the country. It is still pretty weird that he has been offline after a few hours of this post. I dont believe he will be able to say or provide any evidence that would help him tho. All the possible excuses have been mentioned already. Maybe a staff member could check his ip, see if he used the same for both accounts wich i doubt, he could also take a look at his passwords, if they are the same then its gg. Since the account question2 didnt really post too much there is no way to see if there are similarities in their posts or where they post. But, as mentioned already qs2 did post 2/4 of his posts on dadice threads. |
|
|
|
I can save you the trouble for the next 60days. I'm going to plan more investments as I have other ideas and things I would like to deal with, like starting HashNest.
But if you think that in 60days I continue to pay off any and all my loans (of which I make no pact with you or bitcointalk) then I leave you out to chose your own path. If in the future you remove my negative feedback I will remove mine.
For the record I still 100% think you are going over your bounds by abusing the trust system here!
Just to reiterate in case you miss it, I am NOT asking Bitcointalk for any loans I may or may not be taking out!
If at any point I default on a loan feel free to label me a scam and give me negative feedback. BUT until such a time as I am late on payments I do not deserve your negativity! Innocent until proven guilty!
Lastly I thank TC for his reasonableness!
Yes you do, you deserve the negative trust like everybody else. Have you seen the lending section? Any newbie that asks for a loan without collateral gets red trust, is how it is. Seems like vod removed your neg feebdack once and you decided to troll and you still think you are right?? You are either dellusional or stupid. Also in the trust ratings it clearly specifies that you can leave a neg feedback if you believe that user will scam, so it doesnt have to wait for you to actually scam. |
|
|
|
From the looks of it, you was probably banned for insubstantial posts. I looked through the last 2 pages of posts that you made and they was not 1 that I seen that was over 2 lines. Most of your posts consists of 5 or 6 words. I would say this is the most obvious reason that you were banned. Bitcointalk is making a crackdown on spam quality posts. In the future try to put a little effort into it.
Errm i dont think so, the message would be : you have been banned for insubstantial posts. The thing is that the message you get when you are banned seems to lack information, thats the huge problem. There are threads like this one every day because the message is just not clear. Even insubstantial + sig is not clear at all, for someone that doesnt know english very well that doesnt explain shit. Something like: banned for insubstantial posts, off topic or useless posts wearing a signature campaign would be a better message |
|
|
|
|
In order to get your account back you will have to provide a signed message from an old address used on your other account and send it via pm to theymos, he will restore your account back. It probably was hacked since the last hack that happened in the forum a lot of problems have happened. Did you change your pass after the forum incident?
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm its true, i see master confirmed it so it would be logical for tbz to delete his neg trust. Anyways i dont think begging on pm once should be considered to require a red trust, i guess if he did it repeatedly then yes but only once? I mean he didnt scam anyone.
But a scam accusation against ume is a weird thing aswell, he didnt scam no one but i get your point.
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if I believe this can be true? It can't be.
ndnhc seems like the last person who'd be a scammer, 0.1 BTC is nothing, it's a measly amount.
Why would he bother risking his rep on here for such a pathetic amount?
He hasn't been around for a while, have you guys chased him away, lol?
I hate all the arguments & accusations that I've been reading lately, it's quite depressing tbh.
So far everyone that defends him is participating in the dadice signature campaign so ... the arguments and accusations are not depressing, they are true. The argument of : why would he bother risking his reputation is not a good one. He used another account not his main account therefore he probably thought he wasnt in danger so he wasnt really risking anything. Dont ask yourself why would he do it for only 0.1 and such things, scammers can scam you even for 0.01 if they can. |
|
|
|
From time to time you will encounter several merchants that will offer you deals. You can always pick the option you want, you can risk it and maybe win a good amount of money or lose everything.  I will implement another option later on, leave a negative trust rating. This is great. Do you have a full list of all the people who will be in the game? And you will be implementing weapons such as the banhammer, right?  I can't wait for this, hehe. So far i have: Vod, Theymos, Dooglus, Stunna, Sir Bitcoin as bosses. But there will be more, probably tomatocage aswell, quickseller is in the game already, he is the official merchant. Maybe redsnow or dogie, known and famous scammers like tradefortress will probably be there aswell. |
|
|
|
From time to time you will encounter several merchants that will offer you deals. You can always pick the option you want, you can risk it and maybe win a good amount of money or lose everything. I will implement another option later on, leave a negative trust rating. |
|
|
|
This sounds like an amazing idea. Can't wait to try it out and battle the mighty Thermos!  It will be an epic battle, specially against the final true boss, mr Satoshi himself.   Thats Sir Bitcoin, not satoshi, one of the first few bosses. |
|
|
|
Interesting. When we can expect game release? You can expect a super alpha release really soon (3-4 days most likely) Just so you guys can try the game and tell me if you like the controls. If the jump is working correctly if you can dash correctly etc etc. Im still looking for more ideas, more bosses, so far i have: Vod, Theymos, Dooglus, Stunna, Sir Bitcoin. all of them are bosses of the game. Any more ideas? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
