You say it has less fees than uniswap? How does it have less when uniswap also offers Arbitrum to use? And can you explain the passive income thing. That's the only thing that sounds semi-interesting in here but i remain skeptical on that as someone gets to pay that income. So either fees are close to zero and you get no significant dividends or fees are high, which you said it won't be. So how does that work?

I must be doing something wrong, i tried to register and right after i give name and address it asks for the bonus code. When i try to give it it says "no _user_id supplied" and gets jammed. I cant exit by clicking the x on the top right. It's not sending me any confirmation email so i am not registered yet and it seems i can't do anything at all.

Why tesla though? Chart doesn't look that promising so i am not seeing anything from the point of technical analysis that would.

Google on the other hand seems to recover strongly and i has a change for a very bullish year coming but that montly candle seems too strong at this point. I would wait for retrace before entering.

For fundamental side of TSLA, for any bigger investors this is a truly high risk bet, as when CEO is unhinged and pretty much destroys his PR in his free time, that naturally affects to company PR. I would avoid that. And looking at the charts, investors avoid it as well as while it's not in a free fall it needs ton of confidence to start the recovery.

Exactly. Your changes are better when the token or coin is new and no one is yet talking about it. I'll look at fundamentals and tokenomics, but most overlooked thing is, is it going to be memeable? Is it something that moves masses and maybe it has a logo that might as well be a tattoo as it's so cool. That has always been a winning combination for me.

If it's outside of real world markets, like not real estate etc. further from it the better. Rebellious people of the web and young people are not so interested in traditional markets. Leave that to suits, this is crypto. Traditional is boring. Buy a token that basically has no marketcap and a funny name. Or picture of diamond eyed wasted duck and flp it with $10k-$100k and we are talking. That keeps people talking.

Plus side is of it is that it annoys the hell out of old traditional investors that someone is making millions with things that they are never going to grasp. At some point they try to copy the idea but fail as unoriginal hacks.

Well to some of us big wins isn't the only reason for gambling. Point is to spend time and winning can make it more fun past time.
I know that might sound unreasonable but big wins aren't always a good thing. It might sound like the goal of the whole casino but those big wins are what get people with addictive personalities addicted. Brain is funny that way it remembers big wins better more clearly then hundreds tiny losses. This is where we lose track and wonder how we end up losing.

For example, i am not playing my winnings. My budget is tiny but it keeps my gambling habit fun and i can continue to gamble weekly without getting broke, i am using only half of the money i used to buy tobacco each week. Now that i quit smoking, i count gambling as better addiction. When i decided this i understood that addiction isn't always a bad thing. I for example am not denying my addiction, but i am easily addicted to anything fun. Gaming, social media, tik tok videos, walking in a forest. But i keep unhealthy addictions in check with set of personal rules i don't break.

So i don't need to quit gambling. Not quitting after winning big might not make sense to people who are trying to get rich with it. But it's comparable to my gaming habits.

I hear you, i do combo bets all the time and i even tried to reduce the amount since it failed always towards the end of the list. If you are anxiously waiting and watching live, the dissapointment is even more crushing.

Now i am thinking that if i am not at all sure about the outcome, i just leave those bets out and keep it in 3-5 combo bets. That's not going to bring me millions but maybe after a while it adds up. I save the bets not taken and put those to slots machines. So maybe i'll get lucky there

Obviously not. Their whole name is a synonym of everything that failed in last bubble. Even nocoiners know the name FTX. They might not know what really happened but since everyone is blaming FTX the whole brand is tainted to the point of no recovery. I think that people reviving this smell the money as FTX has infra in place to make money so people believing in this might get themselves some big play money and important titles easier then by starting a new exchange, which they would do if they were serious.

I don't get this argument. Some Nfts are still doing fine, i would say better then most memem coins. Obviously there are ton of rug pulls and projects that are not taking off as market is overly saturated by garbage, but there are few good ones still.

They aren't as liquid as meme tokens but if you buy nfts i don't think instant liquidation is something you are looking for. But i have personally flipped some garbage nfts as well with pretty good profit. I have also aped in into some rug pulls. but that comes with the territory.

That doesn't make much sense, it's not "easier" if you don't know markets are going down. Bull market could com in the middle of your shorting so "easier" is not the word in here any more then if you claim it's easy to predict market direction. Obviously you can say it would be easy to make million dollars if you bought in crypto in 2012 but you would be wrong. It's easy only in hindsight.

I understand their argument but those aren't really "gamblers" in traditional sense. If they are occasionally throwing a buck in a slot machine or what ever, they are just normal people having fun and they can't believe their luck if they win. It's their right to quit while up and hats of to them keeping it fun. But i don't get that how big they need to win in order to completely leave? Because i haven't won life changing amounts but i have won big. If i would left right after i won first time, it would have been 20 bucks or something. Is that really worth leaving?. I wonder what they see as a limit for quitting.

I really don't understand why people have taken these rumors seriously. Even Forbes india publihed an article where they stated that GTA6 is reportedly including cryptocurrency rewards.

But no one from rockstar has said anything even close to crypto being implemented in any form. Even mobile developers are struggling with the concept of pay tp play as it's just not sustainable nor it makes any sense.
I would see that in the future some people get paid to do chores in games, but those are paid by other players. Similar to people selling accounts that are grinded to high levels.

You might not ever get users no matter the tactic, and most likely if you are paying with that promotion campaign with your own tokens, those are just going to be a sell pressure now or later. Those people will not be your customers, they are advertising because you pay them, and in twitter it's most likely that their followers are just other spamming bounty hunter accounts.

People spamming in telegram is a sure way for me not to buy that something because that type of advertisement is borderline harassing.

What comes to your token, i could see myself buying it if it was trading in L2 like arbitrum or polygon. I am not fan of the eth fees.

This is weird claim. How would they know about it and how would that be against terms of service?

I see no reason to use AI either but people have been using scripts for crash-type games since forever. And at least one casino has their own window to write that script. It doesn't help because there are no algorithms that could beat casino's edge. But people still keep trying. I guess fot that same reason they would try AI as well. Casinos would know that it doesn't help so they wouldn't or couldn't ban it.

But we are talking about poker, that's not just about pure luck. Otherwise same people wouldn't keep ending up to finals, it would be totally random bunch of people every time. With live poker, if you don't have a clue who is being played out from the table it's probably you. You can sense a lot on what people bet and on which kind of hands, who is losing their cool and then there are just pure mathetmatical probablilities you could count if you have a good head for it. With AI you don't have to count.

Well, yes but since technically it's about about probability, there's a chance that casino doesn't win your money even in long run. It's just high probability, and with enough people playing, it's more likely casinos end up making profit. But i agree with your bankroll control methods. Setting limits to my playing is essential for keeping it fun. As it might have fun to gamble for the rush and fear. But those have too high stake real world consequences for me.

Much of that sounds like just heavy speculation. I would welcome this but there are a big crowd out there that passionately hate crypto and nfts. And since it most likely would be a small part of the game, they might need to drop it. Just the outcry and boycott doesn't suit well with a company that's trying to make money. And on top of that laws on cryptos are still just forming and company could face some serious trouble for basically same reasons other crypto firms do.

Then there's the confirmation bias, if we start to think that we are losing unnaturally lot, we start to notice every loss and our brains is wired so that it's telling me that we are doing something wrong or the game is rigged. Somehow we tend to forget that if there's a chance to won a lot, there must be a chance to lose as much and more. Somehow we don't think the game is rigged if we win a lot.

If you play long enough entually there will be a day when huge amount of your bets are going to be a losing bets in a row. It's just as certain that there will be a day you will win big. That's just probability statistics.

Why internet publications of all things? If you are talking about traditional news and story sites, those are going to be in trouble soon. AI content is growing rapidly and that area will get flooded as AI:s can produce exponentially more quality content with deepfake propaganda so fast that it will be impossible to fact check faster then new content comes out.

After a while there needs to be a way to filter news to some sort of fact check but before that happens, so many publications have gone broke.

Things like Reddit and onlyfans will probably thrive as people need connection to other people if you consider those as publications.

In theory governments could not regulate DeFi, but the problem is that nothing is really decentralized. Most DeFi organizations have a central figures, commercial browsers need permission to have wallets as attachments, and as long as we are ultimately valuating things in fiat money, or dealing with fiat money at all.

And if we want to keep current form of civilization that has taxes, we need to have transparency on wealth and AML laws. This is where FATF comes in and basically renders any cryptocurrency unusable that you can't prove where you got it from.

Things have become way more complex and while it's still possible to launder money i am not going to give any examples how to do that as i don't think it's ethical. But DeFi is not the key element in that.

I see something like this a very possible scenario. Many countries have very strong consumer protection laws and i always felt like concepts like self custody and permissionless transfers is something that wouldn't fit automatically in on those.

Basically centralized provider of services that is handling your money should be ultimately responsible for it and repayments. But these laws were done before permissionless immutable payments were a thing so they are operated on uncharted waters and everything is very much still on grey area. This however is going to be temporary. This is why i assume if bitcoin or other becomes a legal tender, things get very much complicated for these companies.