Adding to this thread. ~
Nice try @i_am_viral but we are not buying it. By the way, I am kind of glad you finally got yourself banned from the forum. However, I would have hoped you would have come back with a more respectable post after you were kicked out. Well, once a troll always a troll, I suppose.
|
|
|
~
There's nothing to discuss, but someone might want me to clarify some points from the OP. So, there's no need to lock anything. Hahaha, that sounds like you are just an attention-seeking whore! What are you even doing here? Are you aware that this is an online discussion forum about Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies?
|
|
|
You have to ask yourself: how widely knows is it that 1xBit is a scam casino? The people on this forum know about it relatively well, but you still have people who get scammed out of their money by using their services. Just yesterday I read about a case of a user who has been a member on Bitcointalk since 2020 and he got scammed as well. I don't think Mycelium carried out extensive research here. Since many people probably rely on sites like Trustpilot, you will be surprised when you see that 1xBit has almost 2.500 reviews, and 56% of those rate the casino as excellent, 17% as great, etc. 19% rate it as bad, but with an overall rating of 4.0, it looks like a good platform, unless you carry out more research. I believe that 1xBit very easily buys those positive reviews on Trustpilot. IIRC, 1xbit_official even admitted once that they encourage and reward leaving a review, which is why all positive comments on Trustpilot have an "Invited" note next to them. For example, 1xBit has almost twice as many reviews on TrustPilot compared to Stake.com, and the traffic to their website is ten times less than that of Stake according to Similarweb.com.
|
|
|
~ Like I said. There's nothing to discuss here anymore.
Good. You have your opinion, the rest of us have ours, and the future will decide which one is right. Obviously, nothing we say can make you change your mind, and you have already said that your opinion is the only one that counts. Since we have nothing more to discuss, do you mind locking this topic now?
|
|
|
So all that been said, I must say that there is more fun in this modern gambling than before, especially for those who watch the games live
In my opinion, I do not believe that technology has brought more fun to gambling. The fun factor has always been there, technology has only made gambling more accessible. But the basics of gambling are still the same.
|
|
|
So I am locked with UST on the crypto exchange forever - when placing a sell order for 1 USDT order, they don't execute it, and they don't allow to withdraw it to exchange it with other users
So you lied that you had 100 UST that you offered for exchange or as collateral for a loan? If you can't even withdraw those tokens then you can't exchange them with other members, right? You really look like a fucking fool now and this only confirms what others have already suspected, that your real intention was to deceive and to scam naive victims.
|
|
|
So does it mean that their work on the Epochtalk software has been postponed and/or the Epochtalk project is canceled?
I thought that the Epochtalk project is delayed and might be live one day but now it seems we will stick to the SMF forums which is also not bad in my opinion.
I think the truth is that no one really knows anymore. So much time has passed and the people who worked on Epochtalk probably moved their focus to new projects a long time ago. Is there anyone from the original development team still working on Epochtalk or is everything solely in the domain of the open source community?
|
|
|
It is already evident that Bitcoin is going to be mainstream in the next decade, which will increase the demand of the global digital currency. But, most people do not like getting their hands dirty with any new idea, and it is good that you try to educate others, because they are likely to be more receptive to the idea once they have been properly educated. The main drawback about Bitcoin adoption is lack of awareness.
So if you do not know what Bitcoin is, or how Bitcoin works, so how can you ever understand the advantages of Bitcoin? We should all follow your example and try to help people understand the true potential of Bitcoin and work on spreading the word about Bitcoin as widely as possible.
|
|
|
Thanks for the good tip on how to exchange your UST, but I REGRET to inform everyone that I am unable to exchange my UST because the exchange requires a withdrawal fee of 1 UST and a minimum withdrawal amount of 100 UST. Please don't write here on this topic, if someday the exchange removes the withdrawal fee, I will inform you - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5406561.0Wait, you are unable to exchange your UST because the exchange requires a withdrawal fee of 1 UST? That just does not make sense. Do you even know how exchanges work? In order to exchange your UST, you need to deposit it on the exchange, so you do not have to worry about the withdrawal fee and minimum withdrawal amount.
|
|
|
@Stalker22, that link of Roobet isn't from Roobet but links to another thread in the Service Discussion.
Yeah. Apparently, this shit sometimes happens when you have multiple tabs open simultaneously. Fixed. Thanks!
|
|
|
I understand market I'm in, 20 BTC is limit per mix not whole balance of the mixer
A little reminder: You are one more retard liar asshole. So when you sign you can't take those 20 BTC ?? WTF is this bullshit you are writing. You may sign and then easily take those 20 BTC same way. ~ This sounded like you don't want to sign so you don't compromise your cold storage, and it sounded like 20 BTC is your entire balance. But, apparently, you don't even have that much.
|
|
|
3 letter words are often fairly easy to find in addresses and would make them harder to believably replicate for users paying attention to what they're doing.
That brings me to what I observed with my wallet app early last year or so. It was a Blockchain wallet app I was using then and I needed to receive Bitcoin from a seller. In order to differentiate that transaction I needed to send a fresh address from the same wallet app I had been using. Surprisingly I discovered that the new address was a legacy address turned vanity with the first three letters of my name to it. I didn't do anything to generate that vanity address and it kind of astonished but excited me. However, till date I haven't made use of that address as I couldn't get around how that happened. Is there anything I should be worried of with that? There is no such thing as a vanity address generator on Blockchain wallet app that I know of. Most likely, it was just a coincidence. The chances are slim, but still possible.
|
|
|
Roobet.com campaign has opened one position for Full Member. [OPEN] Roobet.com Signature Campaign | The Honest Online Casino | Full Members+~ We have 1x Full Member position open, apply now!
Shaker.finance campaign was closed unexpectedly after only one week. ~ Since there are many suspect about a scam warning against shaker.finance, I’ve decided to close this campaign.
You can remove your signature now, thanks.
|
|
|
This one caught my attention, this is something I didn't even think about, I didn't imagine it was possible for an attacker to impersonate my Vanity address, am guessing the way this is possible is by the attacker using my vanity address initials to set up his own vanity address, the end result being that the beginning of the vanity address of the attacker will be same as mine, but the alphanumerics that follow wont be the same, but it wont occur to users sending funds to the address to check the rest of the Alphanumerics since the beginning of the address already has my initials which bears my identity.
That is basically true. But the same goes for any other address. Anyone can create an address that is identical to someone else's in the first few characters. Even so, I still think that such addresses are cool, for example for accepting donations or using in online profiles. Is there not a way to make it completely impossible to create another vanity address that bears the same initials with one that's already created before?, like it is when you get an error like "this username has been taken" when trying to create a username that matches with another username in a forum .
No. That is definitely not possible.
|
|
|
don't see the point for further explanations. I didn't like the community of bitcointalk at all, I have stomach to lead the campaign myself but not sure it's good idea. There will be topic with rare updates I guess and that's it. Sign campaign costs much, gets not that much traffic and it doesn't feel like advertising investment we really need now that's why I've written campaign manager to stop one
What do you mean by "you didn't like the community"? This is the largest crypto community online, and your business offers services related to crypto. It does not matter whether you like the community or not, what matters is your attitude. As I said before, you are clearly not up to the challenge. Since you haven't actually run the signature campaign in the real sense yet, you cannot really say whether it brings traffic or not. One week of a campaign cannot be taken as a reference. Besides, if that were true, none of the companies would advertise here, yet we have campaigns that have run successfully for years. Those -3 negative comments won't help project as well but anyway if you want to swap negative trust comments I'm in
That is not how the trust system works here.
|
|
|
I do not really believe that they have banned it because of criminals. People have started paying a lot of attention to Bitcoin but because of our financial system, some countries are afraid that if they do not stop that trend, it would affect their economy. They think that their banks will go bankrupt, so, they have banned Bitcoin. It is a very sensitive issue because they say that they are doing that for the sake of their people. They say that they are trying to protect their people from the frauds and the evils in the cryptocurrency world. But the way I look at it, there is more to it than meets the eye.
|
|
|
This Symbol ⏠⏝⏠ is very annoying ⏠.⏠ , (o⏝o) (oxo) Title. Did you edit it? Oh, that was actually very nice. @Sarah Azhari you are a very talented artist. By the way, I also see a symbol stretched across two lines. Chrome browser, Windows 10 I hope that this will not give ideas to other ANN thread creators...
|
|
|
We already sorted out this thing I don't think there is need to discuss it further
In my opinion, you can have the best intentions and your business can be completely legitimate and honest, but the way you treat other members who have expressed their doubts, some of which are valid, is completely unacceptable from a business perspective. The first thing you should do is hire a community manager and let someone else handle that part of the work, since you don't seem to have the stomach for it. You may have a good, genuine service, but if you're marketing it poorly, or telling your potential customers a bunch of half-truths, they will get the wrong impression. The second thing you should do is find out what the people who are venting about your business are trying to tell you. Are they expressing concerns that could be addressed? Are they asking for more information on the subject that you haven't provided? Then take those concerns seriously and address them. It's one thing to shut them down and say that you don't care what they have to say; it's quite another to listen carefully to their suggestions and address their concerns.
|
|
|
This myth must be sitting deep in the subconscious of every bitcoiner and makes worry about the safety of their cryptocurrency. Thanks to your calculations and detailed explanation, I hope Y3shot (and others who are interested in this) will stop worrying about the same seed phrases.
Yes. Many beginners ask this question, especially when they are just starting out. I have to admit, I also thought about it at some point. Only when you see numbers presented in such a plastic way, as o_e_l_e_o just did, can give you a true sense of what the magnitude of these numbers is.
|
|
|
|