Having Paytiz "disabled" at the bestchange.com site is not the point. The point is that they are under investigation in UK, but instead of saving some money to have a good lawyer, they playing with posting "green" comments there and at TrustPilot and trying to do their business "as usual".
Yes. The problem, however, is that you need money to hire a fancy lawyer - a lot of money! So, "business as usual". |
|
|
|
At the same time, this confirms that 0.00000001 is not very convenient for practical use in everyday life, and also that either Fiat or another cryptocurrency will exist firmly. Fiat will be strongly protected, inflation is inevitable in the near future. But even further 0.00000001 is not very convenient to use. Today, in the usual sense, prices vary from 0.01 - 1000000.
Why would one satoshi be impractical or unconvenient in everyday life? Or, say, 1 mBTC? Satoshi is good for asset but it is difficult for presenting price (on sites) as far as it is common to see numbers 0.01-100000 (usd/eur/etc) now
There are a lot of different fiat currencies currently on the market, and their base values are quite different. You seem to not be aware of this. According to current exchange rates, for example, one South Korean Won (KRW) is equal to just a little over 2 satoshi. With that in mind, why do you think presenting prices in satoshi is more difficult than in other currencies? will you accept "affordable asset" ? As far as crypto performs as currency the meaning "affordable digital currency" (to buy) appeared too  What you said doesn't make sense. You may wish to reword your comment to make it more understandable. |
|
|
|
~ They claim to be partners with bestchange, but I didn't find their service listed on the bestchange's exchanger page. I think I also agree that this service is a scam. https://www.bestchange.com/list.htmlI am not sure, but I think they were BestChange partners at some point before. Their current status on the bestchange.com site is "disabled" and with a big red warning:  https://www.bestchange.com/paytiz-exchanger.html |
|
|
|
The famous utility apps, CCleaner is now being used by cyber criminals to spread malware that steal peoples credential, including crypto assets.
~
This is not related to the CCleaner software, and, as hugeblack said, your title is misleading. What you describe is applicable to any cracked software. To be more precise, the problem lies not in the software but in how you try to get it (illegally, by the way). Given the fact that using cracked software is theft in itself, there is some poetic justice in the fact that cracked software may contain malware that can steal your crypto. And the irony is that you are trying to crack a security tool designed to protect your system.  |
|
|
|
~
What do you think? Is it necessary or possible to control a decentralized cryptocurrency or not.
The very fact that something is decentralized means that you cannot fully control it and there is no central authority that has the power to limit or control it. Based on the concept, no censorship, and how Bitcoin was created it was the true and only decentralized cryptocurrency in the market but we also need to understand that after private organizations and institutions are the major investors in the bitcoin market its decentralization level has also changed.
I do not believe that is how the decentralized aspect of Bitcoin network works. Changes in the system are only possible through the collective decision by the majority of Bitcoin nodes, not by Bitcoin whales. Therefore, it is possible to control decentralized crypto at some point and no crypto can be decentralized forever.
No, that is incorrect. The system can be decentralized forever. |
|
|
|
This undeniably confirms that SATOSCARD = CriptoDebit.com. The idiot posted from the wrong account but forgot that everything is archived in real time. First posted as SATOSCARD:  https://ninjastic.space/post/60293257and then, deleted and posted the same message as CryptoDebit.com in hopes that no one would notice. Hhahahahahah you are pathetic, What are you doing on BitcoinTalk asking money to rent out your profile picture? Why not enjoying live with your fleet of solar-powered jets.
Btw, our service will be restored today. Love
Oh sorry... looks like you forgot to use different profile this time  Clear proof SATOSCARD = CriptoDebit.com = the same scammer person. I can't believe you are so dumb, and I am (not) sorry for ruining your stupid plan. PS Idiot thinks that deleting post makes any difference, but he doesn't know that everything is archived in Bitcointalk Archive saved: https://ninjastic.space/post/60293257EDIT: Now he made a post with the same content from his other account: Hhahahahahah you are pathetic, What are you doing on BitcoinTalk asking money to rent out your profile picture? Why not enjoying live with your fleet of solar-powered jets.
Btw, our service will be restored today. Love
Now everything is clear. After his scam with CryptoDebit.com failed, he tried the same scheme on Satoscard.com and lied that both sites were related. |
|
|
|
lol
Yes, LOL! I wonder what else you lied about and how many more alt accounts you have here? Let us not forget: ~
However, we are not the same company nor the people behind CD [ * ], we have however bought some intellectual property from them in the U.K.
~
archive: https://ninjastic.space/post/60281579So maybe you could elaborate on this a bit more? * CD = CriptoDebit.com |
|
|
|
~
Hhahahahahah you are pathetic, What are you doing on BitcoinTalk asking money to rent out your profile picture? Why not enjoying live with your fleet of solar-powered jets.
Btw, our service will be restored today. Love
Hahahahahaha! You are an idiot posting from the wrong account? You forgot that everything is archived in real time. You posted this as SATOCARD just minutes ago: https://ninjastic.space/post/60293257BOOM !!! LIAR AND SCAMMER EXPOSED!Edit: I just realized that dkbit98 was faster. |
|
|
|
Was anyone able to fix it? The forum works fine on the rest of the browsers.
I said the solution in my previous post, disable fingerprint blocking in Brave ad blocker settings - Advanced Control - Allow fingerprinting, and your fonts will turn back to normal like it was before. This is only temporary fix until Brave developers fix this bug, but bitcointalk forum is not tracking or fingerprinting anything anyway, so you don't have to worry about that. That actually makes sense. In my understanding, browser fingerprinting also involves detecting user fonts installed on the system (if two users have identical fonts available to the browser, they are more likely to be the same user), so Brave browser probably masks this option as part of their shielding technology. This is probably the reason why Verdana isn't available as a default font on the bitcointalk.org website, causing the display to look different than on other browsers. |
|
|
|
30k is most scared price range many hope it goes lower but instutions data shows very small possibility tht btc ever can go much lower .
So you think, based on your "instutions data", that the 30k level is some kind of floor below which bitcoin cannot go? How can you be so sure? From what we know, that floor could be three stories below the current price. By the way, can you show us that instutions data? Or is it just your intuition? |
|
|
|
I don't see a new topic about Nations League 2021/2022 in this section apart from Sportsbet prediction pool discussion thread. Should we continue here after updating the OP or create a new one? Games already started since June 1st and there is some interesting results there
I see that people have already started talking about the new season here in this thread. However, I think it would be better to create a new thread for the UEFA Nations League 2022/2023 season since the OP has been inactive for a long time and will most likely not return to update this thread's title and intro post. Who here has experience in creating such threads? |
|
|
|
I urge, BitcoinTalk moderators to pay close attention to this. Thank you.
What exactly are you expecting moderators to do in situations like these? It seems like you have misunderstood what this platform is for and why it even exists in the first place. This is a platform for discussion and exchange of opinions, and the main duty of the moderator is to moderate such discussions and make sure that a user follows the forum rules. If you want to stop scam projects from being promoted, it would be better to urge bounty hunters not to apply for such campaigns. Obviously, this will never happen since the vast majority of bounty hunters do not give a damn about anything at all before joining a campaign. |
|
|
|
However, you can always return to the parking lot and get your car. You can never retrieve your coins if you misplace your seed or don't write it down.
I agree. That was an interesting and somewhat amusing story, but I am not sure how it relates to a bitcoiner forgetting or losing his wallet's password or seed phrase. It is one thing to get used to doing things in a certain way, and some people need time to adjust to the new situation, but it is quite another to behave irresponsibly toward your own property. Sure, I have lost passwords and wallets, but that was because of my stupidity, not because I used to do things a certain way. |
|
|
|
have some new collateral i can offer to a possible lender so contact me to know more so we can discuss this further
And I am Queen Elizabeth II... so, contact me so we can discuss this further. In any case, I strongly believe that you are trying to scam someone here. Am I right or am I right? |
|
|
|
What is an unpopular opinion you hold about bitcoin and cryptocurrency that you will love to share with newbies?
My unpopular opinion is the mining aspect of Bitcoin. I understand that it is necessary for the PoW algorithm, but I really think it is energy inefficient and wasteful. It is not something I would necessarily share with newbies but I do really think we should move beyond the miners. |
|
|
|
|
OP, I do not think that is enough evidence to accuse the two accounts of being alts to each other. It could just be a coincidence.
Although, according to ninjastic.space, I see that both of these accounts have taken long breaks from this forum before, so it is possible they have more active accounts. But of course, that is just my subjective opinion.
|
|
|
|
Background:
One fellow contacted me on Discord that I won some bitcoins at their exchange, I did a background check and discovered that it's a scam exchange. So I'm looking to start exposing some of these scam sites. If you find new scam exchanges, I'm willing to pay $10 for 20 scam exchanges you find. Please note that they must be new ones.
If this is something you can do, contact me on Telegram @Cyberczar
There are already many scam websites exposed in the Scam Accusations section, so if you would like to compile a list, I suggest you begin there. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0Considering your offer, my only objection is that I don't see why this has to be done in Telegram. There are many complaints about spam and other issues on this platform. You can simply ask members to share their findings here. |
|
|
|
|
Let me begin by clarifying that I am not taking any side here. Just a neutral observer.
This is a brief description of a situation, if I understood correctly. The casino alleges the user is multi-accounting, which violates their Terms of Service. The casino then asks the user to provide additional documents for ID verification. The user complies and submits the required documents, but the casino remains firm on its original stance of multi-accounting. Did I get this right or did I miss something?
There are a few things that do not make sense to me. If the casino has irrefutable evidence that a particular user has violated the ToS, why are they requesting additional ID verification? Is it possible that ID verification could challenge the evidence they already have?
|
|
|
|
It will be nice if you could list the AV you find to be worthwhile through your research because security should be the number one priority of every cryptocurrency investor or holder.
I don't want to single anyone out in a negative context, and I think everyone should try out how some software behaves in his environment - and they all have a trial period of 15 or 30 days, which is enough for everyone to decide if something is good for them or not. Here I am primarily thinking of testing premium software, not those that are free. My recommendation would be Norton 360 + Premium Malwarebytes, both complement each other great and you don't feel their impact on a computer that has 8 GB of RAM. I understand what you're trying to point out but I ask the question because not everybody that has the knowledge or time to understand the best AV to use. I have once used Norton on my old laptop computer and I can tell it is a good AV but sometimes it is hard for my old computer to withstand the capacity of the AV. However, I have never tried out the AV again ever since then and what I use now is Kaspersky. I have never used Malwarebytes but someone once told me that using it alone with updated window defender is enough if don't visit an untrust site. My recommendation for a commercial anti-virus is Nod32. I have used it on my business computers for years and have never had any problems. Malwarebytes Anti-Malware is also commercial software, and in my experience it's able to detect threats that standard antivirus programs miss. |
|
|
|
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)7. Inastran8. edyjamalProof:Reporting:I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with neutral feedback. Related Addresses:Twitter Link: https://twitter.com/Konstan_Dag
Ban evasion. Cheating bounty campaigns with alt accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
