The problem is that posts can be edited and content changed at any time, so you would have to reindex the content on a regular basis in order to maintain the most recent version. I do not know if this is even possible and it would probably require a lot of processing power and a lot of bandwidth. That is why third-party tools, like Ninjastic.space, are good for archiving posts, but they cannot fully replace forum search since their database is out of date.

EpochTalk will probably handle this issue differently, so perhaps we just have to wait for a new version of the forum software (if that ever happens).

That's exactly why Oceat said physical bitcoins have value as collectibles. The coin from your example is so rare that its market value is therefore significantly higher than the nominal value.

This still does not explain the use of the same profiles from other social networks, such as twitter and facebook...
But since you asked for it, I will continue my investigation:

Case 3:

Last year, in the Ethernity.CLOUD Bounty campaign, you made a POA post with the wrong account, which links you to another alt account of yours (this is the eighth one already, if I am not mistaken):

8. Tybi

Proof:


https://ninjastic.space/search?content=Tybi&topic_id=5354912

And you did it once again in the Cat Fish bounty campaign:


https://ninjastic.space/search?content=Tybi&topic_id=5357709

Account Tybi is self admitted alt account of another group of already tagged bounty cheaters.

Trust summary for Tybi


Should we continue?

If what you say is true, then perhaps you can explain this:

Case 1:

(archived)

That same telegram username @onyka73 was used by other accounts even before you: https://ninjastic.space/search?content=%40onyka73

1. cryptofarid10
2. Motin9
3. MOOMTUCH

All of these accounts are already tagged as bounty cheaters or worse.

For example:

---

Case 2:

(archived)

That Facebook profile was used by at least 5 other accounts on the forum, including the aforementioned Motin9:
https://ninjastic.space/search?content=angela.ummi.5

1. Motin9
2. MOHIN93
3. AU4
4. U4A
5. Urmi3

Account AU4 is linked to another group of alt accounts and already tagged for bounty cheating by CryptopreneurBrainboss.

Should we continue?

Honesty? Well, I guess we do not see that very often from bounty cheaters. But I doubt that will help you much now. What you should have done was inform the bounty manager of your decision to change the campaign, and to avoid having stakes in both campaigns at the same time.

What I really want to know is why did you wait almost three months to ask for forgiveness? Based on your activity over the past few months, it is reasonable to ask if this is your only account here or just an alt?


This statement makes sense only if you can confirm that this is your first mistake and that you are looking forward to being a positive contributor to this community in the future. Was this the first (and only) mistake you have made in this forum?

I really do not see any use for a physical representation of digital currency other than as a collector's item. It also seems like the coin would be of questionable value to anyone using it. They would still have to be connected to the blockchain in some way to verify its value. Not to mention that physical representations of bitcoins are much more susceptible to theft.

Do you really believe that investing in gold has never produced a loss? You should check the gold price charts throughout history.


https://www.investing.com/currencies/xau-usd

I think it is safe to say that buying gold as a place to store wealth would not be a sound long-term investment unless you can wait decades.

Ultimately, it is not just about how new the site is, but also about how much faith we have in the company behind it. For example, would anyone leave their personal information with 1xbit and the like? Certainly not . People need to know the site is secure and reputable, and that there is a serious business behind it.

~


I think most licensed casinos do not allow gambling to teenagers anyway, so...

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)


7. MarryGun

Proof:



https://ninjastic.space/search?content=0xa9bBb77504a474288C9554c8ceC526ae618D7c6c

Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:



Miscellaneous:

The account is connected to many accounts already reported and tagged for bounty cheating by enrolling multiple alts.

Yes, there is some truth to what you say here, merit is not a measuring stick for quality of posts, but it is a good indicator and will give you an idea as to whether the post you are reading is likely to be of good quality. I have observed, however, that there is no standard or clear guidelines that governs posts that generate merit. You will have to judge for yourself whether the post you are reading is worthwhile or not. For example, we have posts that have received a lot of merits but in reality, they are not so good and some that are truly crappy. It is important to be aware of that when reading posts. Don't take everything on face value. So, I don't judge posts based solely on merit, I consider the content quality as well as engagement.


No, I do not think something like this will ever be implemented on a bitcointalk forum. For starters, this would mean favoring posts from an elite group of members (high-ranking members usually get more merits than newcomers). Secondly, such a system could be easily manipulated in threads that typically do not attract a lot of merits. Thirdly, such a system would require an "us" versus "them" mindset, which is contrary to what bitcointalk stands for.

It is true that anyone can make their own NFTs, but that is not the point. Like everything else, some NFTs serve a purpose, some do not. Some are art, some are not. Some may be valuable to collectors, but others will not.
I don't think it's good to generalize things like that. Take the Internet and the World Wide Web for example, anyone today can create their own website, but that does not mean all websites are useless and worthless. And to expand on this analogy, back in the 90s, no one could have predicted the rapid development of the Internet over the next 20 or 30 years.

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)


6. Kijing
7. Sharebit
8. volbit

Proof:




https://ninjastic.space/search?content=0x4da32430d481807De715396ca1eab28C32dc126d

Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

Ban evasion and cheating bounty campaign with alt accounts.

There are several possible scenarios for the future of NFTs. The first is that users will gradually lose interest on the NFTs, eventually shifting to the other, more popular trend in the future. The second scenario would be that these NFTs become prime assets in the virtual world economy. They can become a way of providing investment opportunities in the virtual world, as well as a means of entertainment and social interaction. On the other hand, the third scenario is that traditional gaming community will turn their focus to NFTs and decide to use NFTs in order to participate in the virtual world economy. All previous attempts, without exception, have met with negative reactions from the gaming community.

WTF are you talking about?  Your telegram username has been used by at least five or six other accounts on this forum. Some even in threads in which you never posted. How do you explain that?
The account is connected to many accounts already reported for bounty cheating by enrolling multiple alts. I do not know why I haven't tagged you before, but I guess it's never too late.

I do agree with that.
I enjoy playing at Roobet because it has proven to be a trustworthy and fair casino. The introduction of the KYC was an unpleasant inconvenience that had to be overcome before I could use the platform again. Although many hate it, especially in the crypto community. Fortunately, the Level 1 KYC only required basic identification with a name and an address.

Bitcoin is a type of digital currency, whose value is not regulated by any central bank or any government. It also has limited supply, with only around 19 million bitcoins currently in existence. Thus, with such limited supply, it has to be priced, to some degree, differently than traditional currencies.

This means that a bitcoin's price will fluctuate with time, depending on how well it remains in demand. More demand equals higher bitcoin's price. It can, therefore, also fight inflation, because if the demand increases as inflation increases, the price will also increase in proportion. It is important to note, however, that it doesn't have to become the predominant currency to fight inflation.

Thanks for your kind words, but I am confused. How did I suddenly become a scam promoter? Are you also accusing Roobet casino of scamming?


You fell into the "trap" because you tried to trick the gambling site, and it backfired on you. But hey! That's just my personal opinion based on what I've read. You may not like it, but I have the right to speak my mind, as does everyone else here, so deal with it.

Try contacting notblox1. He offers testnet coins to developers and people who need them, for free.


Also, there are some faucets you can try. However, I don’t know if these are still working.

Before opening a topic like this, I suggest you first read the sticky topics at the top of the Lending board. You can start with: [EDU] The Rule of "No Collateral, No Loan" - IGNORE AT YOUR OWN RISK!

Over the last decade, Bitcoin has catapulted into the spotlight as most popular, global cryptocurrency with billions of dollars of value. And, its mass adoption have worried many government regulators that it could destabilize national currencies or even replace the US dollar eventually. Even though some governments, such as China, have banned the trading of Bitcoins, others have been intrigued by this unprecedented innovation and are exploring ways to regulate it. However, although Bitcoin has tremendous growth potential, its volatility and relatively low mainstream adoption make it unsuitable to serve as a world reserve currency. This trend question of whether a digital currency can replace the USD remains open, but according to prominent economists, this is not likely.