~
So you came to conclusion that Hhampuz repaid loan and earns 0.5btc+ per month. I am still missing embezzling part. If owner is unknown, again, to whom will Hhampuz return money? If I borrow someone money and I disappear, how will someone reach me if no one can find me and I don't contact anyone? ( assuming that hhampuz didn't return money) |
|
|
|
I have only 25 sMerits available for 30 days  Can I ask how many source do you have in your board?
I'm the only one:) Before we had another merit source with 100 sMerits available but he is banned now. You are not the only one. I am pretty sure there is another merit source in our local board with 10 source merits each month. There is no possible way to merit all posts and I don't think skipping posts to wait for better one is good solution. |
|
|
|
I still don't understand this system. Example:  As I can see flag is not created but warning is visible to guests but not to forum users. ( On the other hand, if "+ number" is higher than "- number" there is no warning) Account is tagged by bustabit's owner for "violating the terms of bustabit's open source license", obviously not forgiven, but no one can create flag type 2/3 except owner of site. Is this how system should work? |
|
|
|
And yea, on a sidenote - you are Croatian, you read Reguls's posts and should really not be calling him a "c/p person".
Yeah, taking things out of context, ranting around and calling admin names usually work  You should stick to "regulus was net positive in Croatian local board and was posting only there since incident with copy/pasted posts..." maybe he was busy for last 5 months building house
I'd bet on him driving to the Moon. ...in his thermos rocket. |
|
|
|
You are running very interesting social experiment here  So basically, color has changed from red to orange and DT feedback is still visible. And some users are happy that their visible red "-ve" feedback remained visible to whoever clicks on their trust page, and, it shows the same number when they post, but different color and number order has been changed. For example: Nice to see finally a positive change which is more transparent fair and most important limits the possibilities of abuse from Lauda and a few other people by saying that only victims are allowed to create flags which makes it now impossible for them to instantly create 4-8 negative trust feedbacks based on nothing
Good work Theymos
I just don't get it. And these flags are for people who are not logged in, everyone else can click on each users profile and read why someone has..." -ge"... Exectly everyone needs to read and see's instantly Laudas and the other BS explanation/claim So what has changed? Color? is this is scamming or some kind of BS instead of instantly juding when seeing the negative trust score. Big diffrence. Ok, so what has changed except color, for example, in your case? editFor him: Nothing. Thule will remain where he is.
And for other users who are tagged and now they have negative orange number? I don't think this change things too much, at least not from my point of view. |
|
|
|
You are running very interesting social experiment here So basically, color has changed from red to orange and DT feedback is still visible. And some users are happy that their visible red "-ve" feedback remained visible to whoever clicks on their trust page, and, it shows the same number when they post, but different color and number order has been changed. For example: Nice to see finally a positive change which is more transparent fair and most important limits the possibilities of abuse from Lauda and a few other people by saying that only victims are allowed to create flags which makes it now impossible for them to instantly create 4-8 negative trust feedbacks based on nothing
Good work Theymos
I just don't get it. And these flags are for people who are not logged in, everyone else can click on each users profile and read why someone has..." -ge"... Exectly everyone needs to read and see's instantly Laudas and the other BS explanation/claim So what has changed? Color? |
|
|
|
You are running very interesting social experiment here So basically, color has been changed from red to orange and DT feedback is still visible. And some users are happy that their visible red "-ve" feedback remained visible to whoever click on their trust page, and, number under profile is still the same. And, order of numbers has been changed. For example: Nice to see finally a positive change which is more transparent fair and most important limits the possibilities of abuse from Lauda and a few other people by saying that only victims are allowed to create flags which makes it now impossible for them to instantly create 4-8 negative trust feedbacks based on nothing
Good work Theymos
I just don't get it. And these flags are for people who are not logged in, everyone else can click on each users profile and read why someone has..." -ge"... |
|
|
|
What a lie. Goraset isn't DT2 and he didn't join the election.
I "run" on default trust settings and account goraset was DT. I know that because when I logged in yesterday I noticed "visible" tag on my account. Any particular reason to include to trust network someone who steals other peoples work for their own personal gain and then leaves retaliatory feedback to person who wrote article? |
|
|
|
|
@cryptofrka maybe theymos knows something we don't so he doesn't want to reply because of that or maybe he is deeply sad because someone who become merit source with larger number of smerits turned out to be "c/p-person or maybe he was busy for last 5 months building house and he will maybe reply soon. I am also interested why some accounts are unbanned and regulus is not.
|
|
|
|
Vodstvo foruma, vodi forum u propast.
Polako se bliži i kraj moje priče na ovom forumu, odustajem.
Graditi godinama nešto, na ovako klimavim temeljima jednostavno ne vrijedi.
Sutra može bilo tko od nas isto ovako završiti.
Bez upozorenja, objašnjenja, prava na drugo mišljenje. SRAMOTA za Bitcoin zajednicu!
A tebi Branko, svu sreću želim i hvala ti na svemu što si nam svojim prisustvom pružio!
Moraš koristiti svoje riječi i ako nekog citiraš navesti source i staviti sve pod navodnike. Samo me zanima kad će/i ako će početi kažnjavati ljude zbog starog "spama" i sličnih stvari, recimo, gledam svoj profil, inače sam došao ovdje isključivo zbog fauceta, imao nekakvu stranicu gdje sam radio tu listu sa ovim ref linkovima pa sam zapravo jako često pisao manje više iste stvari po temama u micro earnings, tipa "easy and simple faucet, can you raise rewards" i slično(da dignu nagrade, naravno)....sad, netko bi to možda mogao vidjeti kao copy/paste ili nekakvo spinanje riječi, a lako je moguće da sam negdje zaboravio staviti te navodnike u svojim "ranim" danima na ovom forumu, doduše, primjetio sam da sam zapravo nedavno zaboravio staviti nešto pod navodnike...uh. |
|
|
|
Can we all agree on a number for deleted post counts that's undeniably from spam?
You got it all wrong, that is number of deleted constructive posts Why is everyone so angry? I thought this is what you wanted rather than posting in random places all over the forum about spam we can do it in one place now
Ok, lets do it your way then: Bitcointalk username: SteveStake From campaign: Stake signature campaign - manager Accusation: Trolling spammer Evidence 1: Report a Signature Campaign Spammer!Evidence 2: This is for all campaigns not only 1! Let's stay on topic and keep this thread for improving Bitcointalk as a whole! Evidence 3: Evidence 4: Why is everyone so angry?
|
|
|
|
hey that's not a fair quote lol
That is not a fair thread. |
|
|
|
Together as a community we can make a change! It's time to take Bitcointalk back!
LOL I stopped reading here. How much will stake pay us to do your job?  Biggest joke here is that you are paying people to advertise stake and they are spamming threads of other casinos and shilling for them Not sure if you are trolling...I decided to be polite so I won't post anything there. |
|
|
|
Sjećam se da sam viđao Stake.com potpise kod članova našeg foruma pa samo malo upozorenje istim da je danas u Meti pokrenuta tema o problemima u vezi Spama kojeg učensici Stake kampanje proizvode na foruma.
Naravno, nedavno sam počeo opet posjećivati gambling dio foruma i nije baš lijepo vidjeti hrpu ljudi koji čim se pojavi neka tema pišu jedno te isto jedan ispod drugog, tipa dođe prvi i napiše "good design" onda drugi ispod njega "yes, design is good", pa onda treći dođe sa "design is good" i nadoda " but site is little slow", pa četvrti se sad nadovezuje na ovo "little slow" i piše "yes, it is slow" pa peti ne zna što će pisati pa uzme od ovog "it is slow but I like design"  i onda kad netko sve to čita izgleda ko da je hrpa retardiranih ljudi na forumu. A još k tome koliko plaćaju, 3$ za 10 postova ni ne čudi me što ljudi tipkaju gluposti, čisto omalovažavanje ljudi koji ih reklamiraju. Ne tako davno problem je bio sa Yobit kampanjom koja je ubrzo ugašena a članovi te kampanje su dobili signature banove.
Nije nitko dobio signature ban. Admin je svima promjenio signature u nekakav text tipa " report me for spam" i zapravo banao yobit-ov signature. Aj, nekako on topic, s obzirom da je novost sa foruma  |
|
|
|
Ja isto mislim da se vrijedi boriti. Možda je stvarno greška jer ako se ne varam, za RegulusHr-a je točno pisao razlog, a ovdje je sve nešto čudno - N/A in topic #0 mi stvarno izgleda kao greška.
RegulusHR-u je isto tako pisalo. U vezi ovog: Ako je istina što je netko napisao da admini/moderatori imaju bota koji "češlja" sve teme na forumu i automatski daje ban ako otkrije neki copy&paste post, to je presmiješno.
Nekakva skripta je, međutim nisu admini/moderatori. Koliko sam upućen admini i/ili moderatori provjeravaju postove prije brisanja/bananja. Što se tiče airdropova i tih "joined airdrop" ima ovo pravilo https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=434310.0 i ovo https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2284371.0, sad sve što je bilo prije tog pravila se u principu ne gleda. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
