...
I decide no to risk wrath of God on that girlfriend. Later on I find 2 girls already God might hates for homosexuality and tried with them. This way I am ok. ....
You have some certainly very interesting ideas. I have to agree, that finding 2 girls who God already hates for their homosexuality and trying it with them is better than causing God to hate more people. He's pretty busy already, you know. But are the girls whom God already hates hotter than those he doesn't hate? I don't think I'd want to get involved with any who were ugly as sin. |
|
|
|
the fat cats picked biden long ago. warren is just an insurance policy to keep bernie from getting too many votes.
If coins4commies and I agree on something, you know it's gotta be right. |
|
|
|
...
We have as close to a universal consensus among scientists as is realistically possible, given that there will always be some who are paid off by the climate-hoax lobby, mega-rich oil firms etc. Climate change is real and ongoing and caused by human activity. There is a mountain of evidence as linked to previously.
No you do not. What goes on is that scientists are surveyed, asked a question such as "Does man have an effect on the climate?" and the answers are pretty much "yes." Then those exact questions are misrepresented in the propaganda machines in several ways. Would you like the details or are they obvious? Remember how the entire continent of Australia used to not be on fire? Always consider what someone's motivation could be. If you work for a cigarette company, or if you're a doctor conducting a study that is funded by a cigarette company, the likelihood is you'll find cigarettes are safe. If you're independent and have no covert interests, you'll find they are dangerous. Same with climate change. Same with everything.  https://time.com/5753584/bushfires-australia-catastrophic-fire-alert/I just came back from Australia, and there was very little news or discussion about "big fire problems" there. This is quite curious, because there sure is a lot of talk about it here. Or propaganda. How would you explain that? |
|
|
|
Booker is out and Bernie is surging (at exactly the right time). Warren lost too much support when she flipped flopped on M4A.
Quite a swing from just a few months ago when Warren was on Top and Bernie had just had a heart attack. FiveThirtyEights lastest forcastOur latest forecast for how many pledged delegates each candidate will win after all states have voted...
Utterly worthless, since the fat cats in the Democratic back room will decide all this. |
|
|
|
I will say that Trump didn't have anything to do with Hong Kong protests which was brought on by the decision of Carrie Lim introducing a bill which would have extradited certain criminal people to China if enacted and this is what lead to the protests and it's common knowledge that the people of Hong Kong has always been against Chinese interference in their affairs.
Agreed. The Hong Kong/mainland dynamic came to a head with those events without any US meddling. |
|
|
|
This may be true that some parts of the world are cooling like Winter or snowing in some parts of the Middle East, heavy rains in Dubai, etc Bur If you look on the other side Australia is burning. This is climate change and it seems its an imbalance of nature. Climate change is real, whether it is cooling or warming, people are suffering and lives are lost.
It seems an imbalance of nature? Nature is imbalanced. Ever been caught in a hurricane? Seen a roof torn off your neighbor's house by a tornado? Maybe you need to revise what you think nature is? |
|
|
|
This is such a sad thread. There is so much data and explanation available from reputable sources demonstrating how where and why the world is warming. Its middle school level science. How can BS be posted and so many users go along with it? I thought at least we were at the point where science deniers posted links to fake evidence and pseudoscientific explanations of their claims but we don't even have that here. We just have a consistent flow of unsubstantiated nonsense.
Just to let you know there are some of us here, like you, who have considered the evidence and find it absolutely overwhelming. ... You likely "considered evidence" that was shaped and formed to make it appear overwhelming. |
|
|
|
....
I didn't go to google, I simply made two clicks to the FAQ of the page I posted in my previous post.....
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/03/global_cooling_the_real_climate_threat.htmlNASA's page on solar influence clearly states that changes in the sun largely determine Earth's atmospheric and surface temperatures. Astrophysicists and climatologists measure these changes in the sun in terms of quantifiable phenomena such as sunspot activity and solar cycles. However, in recent times, NASA has succumbed to pressure from climate doomsday proponents. NASA's original page on the sun's impact on our climate system is now hidden from the public domain. With the advent of dangerous man-made global warming theory, CO2 has taken the limelight, and the sun has been relegated to a mere spectator. This could be warming-obsessed alarmists' biggest mistake ever. http://joannenova.com.au/2019/02/nasa-hides-page-saying-the-sun-was-the-primary-climate-driver-and-clouds-and-particles-are-more-important-than-greenhouse-gases/So, FROM NASA:NASA 2010: What are the primary forcings of the Earth system? The Sun is the primary forcing of Earth’s climate system. Sunlight warms our world. Sunlight drives atmospheric and oceanic circulation patterns. Sunlight powers the process of photosynthesis that plants need to grow. Sunlight causes convection which carries warmth and water vapor up into the sky where clouds form and bring rain. In short, the Sun drives almost every aspect of our world’s climate system and makes possible life as we know it. Earth’s orbit around and orientation toward the Sun change over spans of many thousands of years. In turn, these changing “orbital mechanics” force climate to change because they change where and how much sunlight reaches Earth. (Please see for more details.) Thus, changing Earth’s exposure to sunlight forces climate to change. According to scientists’ models of Earth’s orbit and orientation toward the Sun indicate that our world should be just beginning to enter a new period of cooling — perhaps the next ice age. However, a new force for change has arisen: humans. After the industrial revolution, humans introduced increasing amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, and changed the surface of the landscape to an extent great enough to influence climate on local and global scales. By driving up carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere (by about 30 percent), humans have increased its capacity to trap warmth near the surface. Other important forcings of Earth’s climate system include such “variables” as clouds, airborne particulate matter, and surface brightness. Each of these varying features of Earth’s environment has the capacity to exceed the warming influence of greenhouse gases and cause our world to cool. For example, increased cloudiness would give more shade to the surface while reflecting more sunlight back to space. Increased airborne particles (or “aerosols”) would scatter and reflect more sunlight back to space, thereby cooling the surface. Major volcanic eruptions (such as that of Mt. Pinatubo in 1992) can inject so much aerosol into the atmosphere that, as it spreads around the globe, it reduces sunlight and cause Earth to cool. Likewise, increasing the surface area of highly reflective surface types, such as ice sheets, reflects greater amounts of sunlight back to space and causes Earth to cool. Scientists are using NASA satellites to monitor all of the aforementioned forcings of Earth’s climate system to better understand how they are changing over time, and how any changes in them affect climate. According to the Wayback Machine the text disappeared in early 2011 under Obama’s reign. Some people say Trump hides climate science, but Trump deletes propaganda, while Obama denies the Sun.
The Sun drives the climate on Earth
There are many mechanisms that the Sun can change the temperature of Earth (and not just through solar radiation). As we’ve discussed here many times, not only is there Henrik Svensmark’s theory about the solar magnetic effect on clouds through cosmic radiation, there are also potential effects (backed by observations) that magnetic fluxes, solar particle flow (the solar wind) and changes in the spectrum of of the UV and infra red may affect all kinds of climate markers on Earth. That includes atmospheric pressure, jet streams (Rossby waves), clouds, floods in Europe, rain in Asia, groundwater recharge in China, lightning over Japan, and wind and rain over Chile. The pervasive effect of the Sun even correlates surreally with human fertility, lifespan and jellyfish plagues.
|
|
|
|
You mean NASA's wrong. And every other major organization of Scientists. This isn't about me. I simply directed you to their resource. ....
No you did not. You asserted a page linked to was a responses to an assertion. In fact it was a mid 1990s level of topical scientific opinion. It is about you, because you don't know what you are talking about, but keep insisting that you do. Also the very phrase used to indoctrinate the public was changed from Global Warming to Climate Change. Clearly the latter phrase incorporates both cooling and warming. Why do you want to be a Denier? |
|
|
|
Yawn. 2 clicks shows only how ignorant you are on the subject. You do not even understand the etiology. Who said the subject was ... The amount of solar energy received by the Earth has followed the Sun’s natural 11-year cycle of small ups and downs with no net increase since the 1950s. Over the same period, global temperature has risen markedly. Nobody. Nobody said that was the mechanism by which the Sun affects the climate of Earth. The mechanism appears to be its effect on cloud formation. It's a bit hilarious, you starting with the conclusion and then trying to affirm it with google. That is not science. |
|
|
|
Officials at Glacier National Park (GNP) have begun quietly removing and altering signs and government literature which told visitors that the Park’s glaciers were all expected to disappear by either 2020 or 2030.
They dont need to remove them in Slovenia. Since glaciers are mainly gone. 50 years ago you could ski on them in Spring. ... That is much better than if the entire land of Slovenia was covered with the ice. |
|
|
|
This is such a sad thread. There is so much data and explanation available from reputable sources demonstrating how where and why the world is warming. Its middle school level science. How can BS be posted and so many users go along with it? I thought at least we were at the point where science deniers posted links to fake evidence and pseudoscientific explanations of their claims but we don't even have that here. We just have a consistent flow of unsubstantiated nonsense.
Solar scientists are faking evidence? But we can validate their claims of a cooling sun. The raw data is available. But those scientists who claim it is warming? Will they hand us all their data, so we can validate their claims? |
|
|
|
|
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Quote
Quote from: iluvbitcoins on January 11, 2020, 10:42:28 AM
Quote from: Spendulus on January 11, 2020, 09:28:06 AM
2/3 = 66.67%
But they won't get the 2/3.
Also, it would be correct to say "every ELECTED president" since Ford wasn't elected.
I need to stop posting when I'm hangover.
I strongly suspect that in your worst hangover, you have more smarts than that bunch of Democratic jerks that thought they'd impeach Trump.
|
|
|
|
Its symbolic, at least, but more importantly a message that a president simply cannot do whatever he wants, when he wants.
Yeah! Serves him right for conducting US foreign policy exactly as he is supposed to be doing!
us is a democracy after all well trump was elected to do that. democrats should better follow orders. they won't likely survive 2020 election though. I hearby award Trump one hundred thousand Permits to Ridicule Biden in compensation for the unjust impeachment he has been put through. |
|
|
|
.... So, basically you need 75% support in order to impeach a president. It's pretty obvious they won't get 75% support in the Senate. So what's the point? It's a propaganda tool. I still find it pretty misleading to be labeled as mostly false.  2/3 = 66.67% But they won't get the 2/3. Also, it would be correct to say "every ELECTED president" since Ford wasn't elected. |
|
|
|
My reading on it will be the Senate trial will be timed so as to maximize the advantage to Biden being out campaigning, and maximize the confinement of Sanders into DC for six days a week. So those who were for Sanders get screwed a second time around by their own party! |
|
|
|
...
I scan my own private list of Jewtube channels ....
ahhhh HA! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
