The grownups in the room don't even need to be involved, as we demolish crap anti-American, contrived theories about 911.

I have to hand it to you. You've just proved that the BBC, XINHUA, CARE, AIPAC, RT, Al Jazeerra, and Fox News, and about ten thousand Chinese agents in universities need to register as a foreign agents. Including a couple Chinese agents who wrote Badecker's prize find report "Fire did not down World Trade Center Building 7".

Not to mention John Podesta, Diane Feldstein's chauffeur, Hillary's bosom buddy Huma Aberdin, Valarie Jerret, and Debbie Wasserman's IT dickhead.

A good summary, may I make a minor correction?

...is that the situation Joe Bidenis a shit show.

I do? News to me...

But I'm sure you understand that when you make an assertion, you don't have a valid excuse "the proof of it is classified, but trust me."

We don't ... trust ... you or anyone...

Well, that's certainly an interesting take on the matter. So maybe Biden's just a "placeholder", and he was used to get that nasty primary process out of the way, with it's silly presence of elections by the people, so the fat old men in the back room could go ahead and slide in whoever their patsy is?

I just don't know. The Clintons sure do seem to be the gift that just keeps on giving...

No, you really have not shown that he was guilty. I understand that you think you have, but you have not. You'd have to do quite a bit of research, and prepare a properly argued brief, to get half way where you think you already are. You'd have to cover the common arguments by defense in said brief. And defeat those arguments.

There are many technical details in such a matter, and there are numerous standards to be met before a DA would take a case and bring it to court. He'd have to be pretty certain that he was going to win, right?

Sure, I've heard of energy weapons. I've also heard of "guns." Saying "guns" is not the same as saying Glock 26, 22 round extended magazine, fitted with Trijicon Reflex Sights.

So it's fair to say I have no idea what exactly you are talking about, right?

The reason I have not refuted anything is there has not been anything from you to refute. A picture, a vague mention of "energy weapon," etc.

Or because that's the deal they offered him? I think that's much more likely. They would like to proceed with a "crime" that they had total control over from when they first dreamed it up and set up the trap, to when they recorded it, and then later prosecuted it.

There could have been serious deficiencies in the other things, that would have made the outcome uncertain if they were brought to trial. You have suggested ONE possibility.

Ultimately, you just have to deal with your own conscious in the matter of believing it's Good and Right that someone pleads guilty of something they were innocent of.

But after all, given that it was a rigged, setup scam of entrapment, why wouldn't you defend it?

But the Right has had two of those damn Clintonistas to deal with, what with the Bimbo Explosion, and the four or five dozen murders swirling around Killery, and all the other problems they've caused.

So the Right SHOULD HAVE double the complaining rights about the Clintons as the Left has about The Trump.

Be fair.

Just my opinion, but for "plea bargaining" to have any shred of justice, it would be necessary for the crime that the defendant plead guilty to , to have been one he actually did and was guilty of.

Made up crimes and process technicalities occurring during the course of an investigation cannot possibly qualify.

So to answer Twitchy's earlier comments, had Flynn pled guilty to an actual crime that he'd actually committed, that would be different than if he pled guilty to lying in an interview for which those who interviewed him said he was being truthful, and for which their managers had schemed to entrap him, and which for those specific actions have been fired from the FBI.

Of course even in this case, for the "charge of lying to the FBI", for that to have been fair, we'd need to see that the victim (Yes, Flynn) was advised of his Miranda rights and told he had the right to an attorney present.

Say how is that space-age magic thermite doing? Found any buildings with it cast into all the concrete lately? I guess building could just go POOF anytime right? What about concrete roads? I'd hate for a road I was on to suddenly vanish.

So this is made up?

While you may think that’s only because of the ongoing coverage of the coronavirus pandemic, think again: In that same time period, CNN, MSNBC and NBC have hosted Biden for a total of three interviews (including an hour-long town hall on CNN), and no host asked even a single question about these new charges.

Compare that to how those same networks raced to promote misconduct charges against then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018. ...in the twelve days following the first reports of Ford’s claim, the ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news shows churned out 305 minutes of coverage. Only a scant amount of that airtime — less than five minutes — mentioned that none of the witnesses named by Ford would confirm her story.

Besides the broadcast networks, CNN and MSNBC dished out uncounted hours of coverage, all based on the premise that Ford was telling the truth and that Kavanaugh was a guilty liar.

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2020/03/31/blackout-tv-news-silent-new-biden-sex-abuse-allegations

Children more sensible than 911 truthers.

Well, ... maybe ...

But I'm not into goat yoga...

I merit the creation of a phrase here.

All Hail The Reptilians (including their Leader Barbara Streisand)!

What you did here was reply with a very general and vague reference to the "Star Wars programs."

And zero facts. Got anything more?




Yes, I'm only refuting arguments using grade 8 science. Including your mistaken belief that dust in the air is evidence of some super weapon. Next you'll be referencing some "expert, Phd, Scientist, Engineer" right?

Be my guest. Because then your "expert, Phd, Scientist, Engineer" will be defeated by science at a child's level.

False. There's been a well known trend in exposing the most minute indiscretions of Republicans, and ignoring the largest and most corrupt actions of Democrats.

The current set of examples of this can start with Bill and Hillary Clinton's presidency.

To bring it up to date, it's been recently noted that the main media had ZERO stories on the Biden/Reade issue, and that's easily comparable with (you pick it...Trump, Kavanagh, whoever) and how many stories there?

I'm probably good with assuming that joule vs watt is somewhere around the 8th grade level that I've restricted myself to using on this forum.