I sometimes wonder in what kind of world some people would like to live. Most communities are very clear about the historical value of their monuments and proud of them. Remember when someone threaten Iran to destroy all of their historical heritage? The response was more unanimous than anything before that. They are proud of who they are and very aware of the value their heritage has. People should have this sort of sensibility and not deface statues and random monuments....
Including paid Anti-American operatives? Maxists? Haters? White anarchist know-it-all punks who don't work, but slouch along in Momma's basement?
|
|
|
.... I suppose you could see forming a legal argument as "threading a needle" as that is quite often the case. I'm laughing at the executive order because Trump is just mad he got fact checked on Twitter. ... I get the impression that you really laughed at it, and that precluded actually reading it. Because the substantive legal arguments that will form the basis of enforcement actions ARE THE CONTENT.
|
|
|
....
They'll likely have a new fabrication every week going forward.
The game will be a new unsubstantiated charge before the last one has even settled.
Some will solemnly repeat every one of these lies.
For me the problem is that democrats tried too much to discredit Trump and it backfired a lot of time. If you are flooding the media and other organs of communications with false claim, don't expect people to trust you when you are telling the truth Lol "The boy who cried wolf" right? Nonetheless, they will have a new outlandish lie every week, through the election cycle. Because that's who they are, and what they do.
|
|
|
The entire comment thread looks fake, and the article is pure lofty, unspecific speech. Generally, a 3rd party has an effect calculated to move an advantage to one of the two large percentage parties, one of which will win. @spendulus it’s quiet possible that those are paid comments as one can easily buy those comments online for few dollars, and further politicians have their own private social media team which buys these, but then again it’s difficult to prove this as we don’t have the required proof. .... There's really no need to "Prove it." Often in this forum you see people trying to "prove things" with ridiculous stretches of logic and truth. The comment thread looks and feels fake. That's enough to say.
|
|
|
Reddit taking out The Donald will result in legal action. There's no way their actions are not a blatant pre-election political action. Whether the legal action is from the government or private citizens doesn't really matter, does it? Nobody's stopping us. Problem solved.
What kind of legal action? What law has been broken? There's been an executive order already issued on this matter. Everyone knows that Reddit's excuse of violent talk on the Trump forum is bullshit. Trump's forums were shut down as a blatant anti-Conservative, pro-Democrat action. We all know that, including the lying liars that act puzzled and bewildered that anyone could ever suggest such a thing. Sure, Reddit can be the test case. After 300M in legal fees, let's see how they are doing. Nobody's stopping Bill Barr. Problem solved. LOL. This is what right wing fantasies have come to now? Reddit getting sued by the federal government for removing a Trump shitposting group? First of all, Trump issued the executive order because he was mad his tweets were being fact checked. He doesn't give a fuck about other people. Second of all, you still didn't name a law that has been broken, or how Reddit's actions open themselves up to a lawsuit even after Trump's executive order. Here's a good starting point to build your case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Acthttps://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-preventing-online-censorship/You just want increased government regulation over free speech and business, which is the antithesis of what Republicans are supposed to be about. Have fun watching nothing happen. No, I chose not to thread your needle. Just like I didn't buy the argument that "Antifa is a movement, not an organization. It's untouchable!" That argument did not go too well, did it? You see, a lot of people see through these ruses quite clearly. That claiming violent posts was only an excuse to cancel the Trump subreddits. I'm willing to wait and let you see how this is going to play out. I don't need to convince you. I am curious, though, if you have actually read the executive order you linked to, and what in it you object to and think is unfair or toothless. You clearly are standing AGAINST an executive order of the POTUS. You are laughing at it. I am only a spectator, viewing things, and wondering why in the world someone would have such an attitude. Of course, I certainly understand that Trump's millions of advocates who used the Reddit group were shitposting. Because, orange man bad. Right?
|
|
|
The President needs to also protect other monuments Everyone needs to help on that.
|
|
|
Very good question.
What will happen if Trump LOOSES?
Is that like if he gets loose?
Sort of like a mad bull rampaging through town?
Though the china shop? The candy store?
You're just upset that Trump has done more for God than any other president since Reagan. The posts Indicate the question is what happens if trump LOSES. But that's not the question. It is what happens if he LOOSES. If you were smart, you wouldn't want him let loose.
|
|
|
The entire comment thread looks fake, and the article is pure lofty, unspecific speech. Generally, a 3rd party has an effect calculated to move an advantage to one of the two large percentage parties, one of which will win.
|
|
|
.... Apophos, one of numerous extremely dangerous rocks. https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/sentry/details.html#?des=99942https://cneos.jpl.nasa.govGeneral theory of impact speed calculation. http://www2.mae.ufl.edu/~uhk/ASTEROID.pdfBut these rocks establish over millions of years, a resonance with the orbit of a planet. For example, one may precisely loop then sun seven times, while the Earth loops six times. This happens over and over. From observations, we calculate the rock's elliptical path. Three observations is the minimum, and the more there are, the more precise the calculation becomes. First it is established that its path in the ecliptic crosses that of Earth (2D). Then it is only a matter of whether it passes in front of the Earth, or behind the Earth, or strikes the Earth. Very interesting. Thanks for sharing this information. Found myself browsing about asteroids for quite some time on that CNEOS link I am sure that SpaceX rocket tech would be useful for future studies of asteroids. What is primary is not tech, and not Spacex, tech, but MOTIVATION. Currently motivation exists in several companies which propose mining asteroids. This leads to their procuring rockets and systems to explore the space rocks. There may also be some government R&D, but primarily, look at private industry. If you want to see where, possibly, methods to avoid catastrophic asteroid strikes will be found.
|
|
|
Indeed. I remember the name, seems she started out and for a while was a fashion model, maybe French. Odd the twists and turns and humps life doled out. PS: I looked her up on wikipedia. Her past is pretty dark...
|
|
|
I assume you are well intentioned in posting these links, but I happen to be quite knowledgable about aerosols in the air. It's really a small step from there to understanding covid-19 particles. So I can skip your links and ask again the two basic questions, which you DIDN'T understand. So what's the point of continuing the masks? Why practice social distancing? We've "flattened the curve," now it's time to deal with and coexist with the original and mutated forms of the COVID, now that our hospitals are not jammed with sick people. Then it will go away, just like all virii do.
|
|
|
.... You will see he didn't actually even reply, he just spouted out some more bullshit in the hopes you wouldn't notice he has no retort.
The radical left does best to pick a fight with the right when the lies are on their side, and the facts are totally on the side of the conservatives. Then they doggedly pursue and repeat and elaborate the lies. This generates a Controversy, with much attention. That is what they want.
|
|
|
...
We're going to have to sit around and wait for new info, that's all we can do.
@squatz1 once again the opposition is manipulating US citizens into believing that Trump has connections with Russia, and this is absolute nonsense because they’re trying to divert the attention of people from the fact that Trump has successfully pulled back troops from Afghanistan. Further I’m expecting more such hoax statements to surface in the election year against Trump, as the Democrats are suddenly fearing for their victory, because an improved US economy will guarantee Trump an easy victory in the upcoming elections. ... They'll likely have a new fabrication every week going forward. The game will be a new unsubstantiated charge before the last one has even settled. Some will solemnly repeat every one of these lies.
|
|
|
.... ..........meanwhile Patriotic Florida Sheriff To Deputize Gun Owners If Cops Can't Handle ProtestersSheriff Darryl Daniels ~ US Patriot who protects ALL citizens without fear or prejudice!Clay County Sheriff Darryl Daniels announced in a Tuesday video that he will "make special deputies out of every lawful gun owner" in the county if he has to..... Any sheriff in the USA can do this. Antifa LOSERS BEWARE!
|
|
|
Reddit taking out The Donald will result in legal action. There's no way their actions are not a blatant pre-election political action. Whether the legal action is from the government or private citizens doesn't really matter, does it? Nobody's stopping us. Problem solved.
What kind of legal action? What law has been broken? There's been an executive order already issued on this matter. Everyone knows that Reddit's excuse of violent talk on the Trump forum is bullshit. Trump's forums were shut down as a blatant anti-Conservative, pro-Democrat action. We all know that, including the lying liars that act puzzled and bewildered that anyone could ever suggest such a thing. Sure, Reddit can be the test case. After 300M in legal fees, let's see how they are doing. Nobody's stopping Bill Barr. Problem solved.
|
|
|
If anything we are more responsible for ending slavery than any other nation
You seriously need a history lesson on that one. Indeed, he should be required to attend re-education in which the new, revised and certainly correct history is presented. Half his food rations also, until he shows remorse and true dedication to the new corrected history. That excess food ration, send it to me for safekeeping.
|
|
|
This isn't about them being "forced" to publish things they don't like. Oh poor corporations! This is about them not obeying existing laws, preventing content from being published outside of their TOS, in illegally monopolistic ways, and in ways that serve as illegal in kind campaign contributions. They aren't just restricting content, they are trying to define what reality is.
OK. So then sue them, or better yet, create your own social media platform. Nobody's stopping you. Problem solved. Reddit taking out The Donald will result in legal action. There's no way their actions are not a blatant pre-election political action. Whether the legal action is from the government or private citizens doesn't really matter, does it? Nobody's stopping us. Problem solved.
|
|
|
You can attempt to "try again" all you want by once again attempting to frame the issue in a way so you can "win". But you're willfully ignoring the bigger philosophical issues and the impact of all of this on society. The fact that you won't even engage on that front tells me you're happy with corporations via activist groups telling you what to believe and what's right and wrong.
Amazon is refusing to publish books or at least I've heard of one recently. Social media "censoring" content. If you can't see the direction all of this is going then you've got your head buried in the sand.
Nice dance moves. Amazon has the right to not publish whatever the fuck they want. I don't think you actually understand what "freedom of speech" means. .... Seeing as how social media wasn't even around the last time there were major book burnings (Nazi Germany), I have to wonder what the fuck are you actually talking about. "Secretly happy with the book burning?" What book burning? Where? You're equating videos hosted by YouTube being taken off YouTube with someone's books being forcibly confiscated and then burned. This is a bit retarded of a comparison.
Stefan Molyneux does have books but you're a fucking idiot if you actually think I want them burned.
What's the equal for an ebook to a physical book burning of physical books? It consists of removing the ebook from availability, which has three primary ways. A) Not providing the ebook's source in google or other search algorithms. B) Not providing the ebook when the end user has the correct location. C) Removing the DNS of the correct location. The equivalent would be somebody deleting the content of your computer or mobile device and the action being sanctioned by the government. I'm all for net neutrality, but I'm against social media companies being forced to service customers they feel are bad for business. Start your own social media service. Literally anyone can do so. Problem solved. That just plain isn't correct. Also it's a misdirection. I listed three ways that are perhaps the modern equal of book burning. You are going off about social media companies. Not that I agree with you on that, either.
|
|
|
corona outbreak is the virus that is sending people to hospitals sick ..
Well, we all stayed home for two months and "flattened the curve", and now that's over and the hospitals didn't get overwhelmed. And now it's time for the rest of us to get a mild or moderate or severe case of that flu and we know the hospitals will not be overwhelmed. Right? So what's the point of continuing the masks and distancing?
|
|
|
... The allegations started months before the June phone call. Maybe over a year? It's hard to keep track. They were covering it on Fox daily in the weeks before the phone call though, which was also the first time Biden had emerged as a front runner in the polls, both likely factors in why Trump asked Ukraine to investigate.
Source for this? How could quid pro quo allegations against Trump occur prior to the phone call being made? This entire fiasco started because of the whistle blower complaint. People have made up timelines to keep all this straight. https://www.justsecurity.org/66271/timeline-trump-giuliani-bidens-and-ukrainegate/....
I think the truth would be that he was greatly exaggerating in that video where he was bragging on stage. ....
Now that's a steaming hot pile of fabricated innocence!
|
|
|
|