A correction. You didn't show me anything. You posted some pict with no link, no explanation, nothing. So now you get exactly what you deserve...

What black marker?

And I thought I was the only one that noticed Twitch repeating the same things.

Well, if it couldn't have been an explosion, and if you are to believed about "all kinds of evidence", of which you list none, that it didn't come from an airplane, then that only leaves one option.

A GIANT RABBIT. Likely blue or purple in color.

Unless someone has a couple million $ and a couple years to spend in federal court, there will be no court trial with a jury. Ever.

Why, you are most welcome. I'm glad you are now referencing some pages. I don't know what the pages reference are to? Care to explain? Of course, you never explained what the hole in the wall pic was from, I got google images to do that.

So yes, I could (should). be 5000 pieces of obscure, hidden, arcane, information behind you and have no interest to go exploring that rat hole. Please clearly explain a pictorial item, and link to its source, otherwise it has no meaning.

But by the way, your hole in the wall? There is a conclusive proof that it did not come from an explosive detonation, and that is the spherical radius of destruction does not continue into the floor. There is no crater, and thus it was't from an explosion.

RGB doesn't need to get better to prevent the Courtnado. She doesn't even need to show or or participate in Court activity, she only needs to not die.

But it's near impossible that Trump does not get one OR TWO more justices in place before Ivanka is voted in.

An ideological hard line liberal coming off the court does not move it to "the right", but to the center.

I already posted a link showing such a thing is exactly one of the prohibited items; thus a valid cause for reversal of a guilty plea in a plea bargain.

You ignored it and kept trudging down the same path.

If you seriously want to discuss the Flynn case, you really need to understand the legal concepts involved, and keep up to date with the case.

Either you are delusional or you are 2 years in the past. WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING is that Flynn is using valid, standard legal technques to overthrow a guilty plea. What part of that do you not understand?

You are completely deluded. Let me explain.

I am only describing the reality of a case, in which D is seeking to have a guilty plea overturned, and in which he has multiple methods in law to do so. It is what it is.

You would opinionate on why he's guilty, without even caring about the nature of the problem. Of course we know you believe "Orange Man Bad" and "Friends of Orange Man Bad".  The reversal of the plea will be handled in court.

Does he have a good chance that his strategy will work?

I'm just an observer of this, not an influencer.

You believe you influence opinion by posting on the internet. In doing your little job there you've been fronting a great deal of mis information, mis direction and outright lying.

Have fun at it, but don't you think you might need to go back to self moderated threads?

Your excerpt of the court transcript is simply part of the standard sentencing question and answer. The question posed was when and in what circumstances a guilty plea can be reversed and why. This is an event AFTER the trial.

How about you?Have you considered Flynn's pleading guilty after the FBI agents threatened to charge is son if he did not? That is the very definition of a plea not made voluntarily, isn't it?

Does that sound like it's okay in your internal system of judgement? It doesn't bother Twitch, that's certain.

The article says...

De hecho, recientemente fue detectada una flotilla de ovnis en aparente dirección hacia la Tierra. Las imágenes fueron captadas por una cámara de la Estación Espacial Internacional que tiene como función orbitar el planeta. 

No creo que verdad.

You know, this is the third time that you've responded with a drone-like repetition of the same exact words and phrasing, which is an attempt to direct a discussion toward predetermined ends. I suggest you think that over and consider that it may be a tactic that works with some people some times, but it's basically ridiculous. Alternately, stick to self-moderated threads?

I'm not seeing the slightest relation of your mis-framing, mis-stating and goal shifting of my argument whatsoever. To help you out I'm going to repeat it for you.

Has it occurred to you there might be some reasons why all the decent candidates, both men and women, are sticking their noses up at getting involved with your operations?

But that does not matter because the pre-selected Democratic VP will be the one that becomes the vested interests puppet after Biden is shoved aside, resigns or dies. There really shouldn't even be the need for a pretense about this.

Actually nothing is obvious, that's the basic reason humans use language to communicate.

Like I said, you picked not the immediate wall the plane hit, but some interior wall. If you don't know the exact location and numerous other factors, you don't know anything about that wall's relevance or lack of to your claims.

And what's a tail wing?

Long, long way from fronting the likes of John Kennedy, Bill Clinton or Obama.

Has it occurred to you there might be some reasons why all the decent candidates, both men and women, are sticking their noses up at getting involved with your operations?


But that does not matter because the pre-selected Democratic VP will be the one that becomes the vested interests puppet after Biden is shoved aside, resigns or dies. There really shouldn't even be the need for a pretense about this.

What is the time and date the picture was taken, and where was it taken?

You should get these kinds of questions if you don't post a link, just a picture...

But through google images I locate your pic as a recently released FBI picture of "an inner wall" of the Pentagon after the 911 hijacked plane struck it.  It's in a group of pictures along with lots of crumbled up airplane parts. I didn't see any detail on where that hole was exactly, related to the angle of and direction of impact of the aircraft.

So yeah, what about this pic. Some inner wall of the pentagon. I'm not seeing anything at all there that you can hang a conspiracy theory on. I'm not seeing enough data to address your (poorly framed) question about whether the picture "is consistent with..." A better way to ask might be "is there anything here that directly shows an explosion." The answer to that is no, there are none of the fractured or shattered appearances that would indicate pressure waves faster than the speed of sound in the materials, such as would be the case with a 50,000 fps gas shockwave.  Oops, sorry, that's not at the 8th grade level.

I am seeing something else, which is "don't bother trying to damage the Pentagon by ramming planes into it."

Now, you ask about a pic of a hole in a wall, next to hundreds of crumpled airplane parts, whether that pic is consistent with an airplane crash. Do you think some guys snuck into the Pentagon in the middle of the night with a disassembled Boeing jet, sneakily assembled it, then planted explosives, then in the morning blew it all up?

That seems rather complicated to me and would require some guys working a night shift. They don't like to work night shifts and want more more for them.

This is a perfect case to just throw out of court, or declare a mistrial, in the interests of justice alone. I've bolded the issues in Flynn's guilty plea that separate it from a guilty plea bargain made in good faith.

 If made in a timely manner, courts generally will allow plea withdrawals after sentencing for the following conditions (this is not an exhaustive list):

Defendant was denied effective assistance of legal counsel, as guaranteed by law.
The plea was not entered by the defendant or anyone authorized to act on their behalf.
Plea was not made voluntarily, or was entered without knowledge of the charge or sentence.
Defendant did not receive the concessions agreed to in the plea deal.
Defendant entered a guilty plea under the judge-approved condition that it could be withdrawn if the court rejected the agreed-upon conditions of the plea.
Defendant entered a guilty as the result of promises or threats made off-the-record (assuming they can be proven).
It's simply not enough to claim dissatisfaction with the outcome of the sentencing hearing, assuming it didn't result in a miscarriage of justice. But even without the defendant's request, a judge is required to set aside a guilty plea when there is strong evidence (perhaps latent DNA test results) of the defendant's innocence.

https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/withdrawing-a-guilty-plea-after-sentencing.html

There is a real problem here that the prosecution with held evidence favorable to Flynn. They are not allowed to do that.

The Brady Rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), requires prosecutors to disclose materially exculpatory evidence in the government's possession to the defense. A "Brady material" or evidence the prosecutor is required to disclose under this rule includes any evidence favorable to the accused--evidence that goes towards negating a defendant's guilt, that would reduce a defendant's potential sentence, or evidence going to the credibility of a witness.

..... in cases subsequent to Brady, the Supreme Court has eliminated the requirement for a defendant to have requested a favorable information, stating that the Prosecution has a constitutional duty to disclose, that is triggered by the potential impact of favorable but undisclosed evidence

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule

Twich has attempted to argue that the prosecution revealing their evidence wasn't necessary because the case didn't go to trial, but it most certainly did go to trial. In fact, he'd like to argue simultaneously that Flynn was "a convicted felon" and the case "didn't go to trial."

Sure it is, 100% truth. When someone repeats about same time the same mantra, this:

Flynn is CEO of FLYNN INTEL GROUP INC. (FIG), they filed under the LDA in Sept 2016 and FARA in March 2017.
On election day 2016 his op-ed Our ally Turkey is in crisis and needs our support
From Sept-Nov 2016 FIG received ~$500k from Iovo, a company based in the Netherlands.

Do you believe these three statements to be true?  This isn't a trick question.

Such a course of action violates Rule 1 of Internet forums. Be interesting. Translated, don't think that the lying cunts of FBI agents who "interviewed Flynn" are a role model for your own behavior.

You said,

It doesn't even matter what the context or conspiracy, the question is, is it consistent with a plane crash or an explosive...

What is the "it", exactly?

What is consistent?