...resonance...unique 'constellation' of aluminum particles in their brain tissues complements of the vaccinations which are all but mandatory at birth and have been for decades... geometric configuration of this constellation ...databasing, wave forming, and targeting technologies....reading of DNA is practical via EMF based hardware....powering active denial systems.... these weapons create an absolutely intolerable pain to anyone in the general area. The populations below them will be 'collateral damage'.
I'm not interested in any of the wild speculation such as noted above. You and others have alleged the gigahertz technology as deployed on cell towers can form death rays. The backup generator to the cell tower can be for dozens or even hundreds of devices. It is not a way to figure the power of the death ray. Gee, that's funny 'cuz you seem interested enough to edit through my writings and (I'm sure by accident) mess up the attribution so people cannot trace back very easily. In fact there is nothing especially new or novel about almost any of the things I said. It's the mosaic which is not so often offered. I would like to know the frequencies and power of such a death ray. Either people alleging such things exist know these basic facts or they do not.
As soon as the systems are reverse engineered and/or the various research is declassified or leaked by a whistleblower, we'll have better answers. It's hard to reverse engineer things which have not been released or activated yet. In the mean time, everything about 5G shrieks means, motive, and opportunity vis-a-vis a part of a population control grid. With the 'smart-foo' that it is loudly proclaimed to enable there is ambiguity about what the owners expect to achieve. Since the same people who own the 5G apparatus own the regulatory agencies (and most of the rest of the governments besides) we simply have giant holes in the understanding of what they are setting up. We'll pretty much have to wait until they are put into action in order to learn more. In the mean time, we can and should continue research one the who's and how's of how things got to where they are. And with the so-called 'covid-19' event it looks more and more like we are actually into what the Christians (the real ones) call the 'beast system.' Again, no double talk please. I asked about as simple a question as could be asked. I would like to know the frequencies and power of such a death ray. It's understandable that you would use this subject to introduce six or eight other subjects of interest to you, but you've either got the potential for death rays in 5g or you don't. In the absence of any answer to my simple question, it's pretty clear that you don't. So, no death rays. Darn. I always thought ray guns were cool! |
|
|
|
the nasal swap/lower tract swab to test which virus is tech thats been developed since 1960's
the blood sample antibody test is stil hit and miss because people only started getting it in december, recovering in february. so they need many blood samples of post-february to then use as comparison to identify antibodies specific to immunisation of covid19
as for the initial identify the virus test. they have years of samples of previous viruses so its easy to compare a new strain
The PCR test developed by the University of Washington School of Medicine (UW Medicine) targets just 100 nucleotides that are specific to SARS-CoV-2, Dr. Alex Greninger, an assistant professor in the Department of Laboratory Medicine and an assistant director of the Clinical Virology Laboratory at UW Medicine, told The Seattle Times.
These 100 nucleotides include two genes in the SARS-CoV-2 genome. A sample is considered positive if the test finds both genes, inconclusive if just one gene is found, and negative if neither gene is detected.
...
PCR tests work by detecting specific genetic material within the virus. Depending on the type of PCR on hand, health care workers might swab the back of the throat; take a saliva sample; collect a liquid sample from the lower respiratory tract; or secure a stool sample.
....Once a sample arrives at the lab, researchers extract its nucleic acid, which holds the virus' genome. Then, researchers can amplify certain regions of the genome by using a technique known as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. This, in effect, gives researchers a large sample that they can then compare to the new coronavirus, known as SARS-CoV-2.....
Tests from UW Medicine that are either inconclusive or positive are sent to Washington's Public Health Laboratories and the CDC for further testing, The Seattle Times reported.
In contrast, serological tests look for specific antibodies that the body has produced to fight the virus. "If they detect those antibodies, [the test] gives a positive result," ' https://www.livescience.com/how-coronavirus-tests-work.html |
|
|
|
We're in agreement with one important exception. YOU are the only one saying "Explosives, explosives, explosives, blah, blah, blah."
Any transfer of energy may be assumed somewhat inefficient. For example, suppose that two falling beams hit each other, just right, and one receives a energy transfer enough to create the 11 m/s vector force. The impact likely created considerable heat, and perhaps the 2nd beam moved in some direction also. Therefore, perhaps the total energy transferred was 250 joules, and the part of interest to us is 192 joules. Amazing how something so statistically improbable happened so many times that day isn't it? I'm good with your alleging "statistically improbable" as long as you show the statistics that show it's statistically improbable, but in the absence of that, forget it. You don't get to use big words and assert they are Truey. You are not the arbitrator of what happened on that day. You are just one guy arguing that explosives were required without any evidence and without producing serious arguments for that premise. It's pretty laughable to say something like "it's obvious that it's statistically improbable." What is the chance that of 30 people in a room 2 have the same birthday? If you are gambling, heads you win tails I win, start gambling with 1$ and double it every bet, you'll win it all after a while, right? Huge fortunes and entire cities, such as Las Vegas, exist because of peoples' poor comprehension of statistical principles. |
|
|
|
|
...resonance...unique 'constellation' of aluminum particles in their brain tissues complements of the vaccinations which are all but mandatory at birth and have been for decades... geometric configuration of this constellation ...databasing, wave forming, and targeting technologies....reading of DNA is practical via EMF based hardware....powering active denial systems.... these weapons create an absolutely intolerable pain to anyone in the general area. The populations below them will be 'collateral damage'.
[/quote]
I'm not interested in any of the wild speculation such as noted above. You and others have alleged the gigahertz technology as deployed on cell towers can form death rays. The backup generator to the cell tower can be for dozens or even hundreds of devices. It is not a way to figure the power of the death ray.
I would like to know the frequencies and power of such a death ray. Either people alleging such things exist know these basic facts or they do not.
|
|
|
|
...
they do know how to do it based on the actual RNA and it is specific to covid19
....
I can think of a couple ways that could be accomplished but typically it would be a several year long project. scanning DNA/RNA doesnt take several years per sample they just need to look for certain indicators to narrow it down. its like finding the difference between a orange and a human which is super easy and fast. so is finding the difference between an orange and a tangerine Not the scanning. But the chemical differentiation would require distinguishing a specific marker somehow. I will have to look up the details. Worked in a related area in college. But not at all up to date. if this was the first time of ever using a tech to distinguish things then yea it would take years of research. but once you done it a few times over many decades such as the first discovery of corona family of viruses in the 1960's and identifying other strains over the decades..it becomes easier and easier at the moment detecting which strain of corona someone has is fast. the part about scaling up the antibody test(different test/different thing to detect) for people to see if they are immune after recovery. that takes time. and recently using UK as an example one 'super lab' has failed to meet certain quality control standards (10% false positive) so for now they are just giving patients a few of the detect the virus tests every couple days after symptoms stop and released from hospital when they show no trace of the virus. but as i said working out if immune after is still cagey. and unknown how long that immunity lasts. because those tests are slower to produce accurately Well, it is the 21st century. |
|
|
|
The director of the World Health Organization (WHO) has warned that the early termination of restricted movement measures could cause a "fatal return" of coronavirus, as it is learned that some countries have already begun abolishing it.
At a virtual press conference in Geneva, UN agency headquarters Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said....
I would advise not listening and taking advice from this guy. There are several more variables involved which are being measured and studied, one important one is the pre existing fraction of people who somehow had the virus. For example, look at the difference between contagion NY/California. There is a huge difference. When we know why, then we know enough to talk about when and where to intelligently restrict movement. |
|
|
|
Huh? A high energy cosmic ray particle - one particle - can have the energy of a 5.3 ounce baseball thrown by a profession pitcher. You are not going to get anywhere close to that with your couple hundred milliwatts.
And that one particle isn't anywhere close to what it would take to kill a human. It would just bust up a number of brain cells and cause you to see a flash in the vision field. Who said anything about a single particle? I also didn't say anything about a couple hundred miliwatts. I am not responsible for what you or anyone else says, only what I say. The point was the energy levels are not the only variable. The frequency is part of what determines how lethal a source of EM is. Oh, my error, that was tcvcof. But people who are so knowledgable about lethal aspects of 5G to be discussing it on Internet forums certainly should be able to cite frequencies and power ranges for the effects they discuss. |
|
|
|
You keep telling me the energy required to move the mass. I keep telling you that more than that amount of energy needs to be released in order to move that mass, because your calculation only accounts for the kinetic energy transferred to it, not the total energy required under the conditions to deliver that sum of energy to the mass. It is not complicated. You are calculating the bare minimum amount of explosives assuming 100% efficiency. Maybe you can argue with me some more about the question if glass is weaker than steel.
We're in agreement with one important exception. YOU are the only one saying "Explosives, explosives, explosives, blah, blah, blah." Any transfer of energy may be assumed somewhat inefficient. For example, suppose that two falling beams hit each other, just right, and one receives a energy transfer enough to create the 11 m/s vector force. The impact likely created considerable heat, and perhaps the 2nd beam moved in some direction also. Therefore, perhaps the total energy transferred was 250 joules, and the part of interest to us is 192 joules. |
|
|
|
...
they do know how to do it based on the actual RNA and it is specific to covid19
....
I can think of a couple ways that could be accomplished but typically it would be a several year long project. scanning DNA/RNA doesnt take several years per sample they just need to look for certain indicators to narrow it down. its like finding the difference between a orange and a human which is super easy and fast. so is finding the difference between an orange and a tangerine Not the scanning. But the chemical differentiation would require distinguishing a specific marker somehow. I will have to look up the details. Worked in a related area in college. But not at all up to date. |
|
|
|
There are so many CV controls and cures coming out of the woodwork - in this case, the licorice "woodwork" - ....
Yep, that "cure" has made a number of people very, very sic.
The WHO threat. Are they going to unleash more biological warfare on the world? Are they upset that we are seeing through their charade?
At least we are finding out WHO is behind this fake pandemic... by self implication.
....
The article you quote has zero to do with covid-19. Zero. |
|
|
|
And the required strength for a death ray?
(Hint: There MAY BE A reason why we don't have any handy Ray-Guns?) What if it was ionizing radiation? That is not much energy compared to what you are describing as a mechanism for pure energy transfer to heat a target now is it? It sure will cause death tho won't it? The frequency at which the energy applied is important. Huh? A high energy cosmic ray particle - one particle - can have the energy of a 5.3 ounce baseball thrown by a profession pitcher. You are not going to get anywhere close to that with your couple hundred milliwatts. And that one particle isn't anywhere close to what it would take to kill a human. It would just bust up a number of brain cells and cause you to see a flash in the vision field. |
|
|
|
...You might as well calculate the total energy of the Earth's spin and throw that in there the way you are engaging in your premise.
Yes, it does matter, because that means a tiny fraction of that force will be applied to the object.
It matters? No, it results in about a one meter offset in the landing position from straight vertical. And the force is quite trivial. See, there you go again. Saying something based on your brain's wild guess without actually knowing anything. So, you are wrong again. Wrong by relying on a gut "feeling" about the level of a physical force. You are telling me about "feelings" about the level of force as you arbitrarily pull numbers like "one meter offset" out of your ass. This isn't a wild guess. It is a fact. Even if enough air pressure was available, it could NEVER be efficient enough to blow out a 22 ton mass by collapse pressure alone because it would simply blow out the windows and then the force would no longer be applied to the panels. This is exactly why a high explosive pressure wave would be required, because anything else wouldn't be fast enough to overcome the loss of pressure via the path of least resistance from windows and other gaps being blown out. Like I said before, your calculations depend on 100% of your calculated force being applied to the mass. In reality much more force would be required, because most of that energy would be lost via the path of least resistance. [/quote] No, I calculated the offset being one meter. Which you'd know if you'd checked, but you didn't. You have not calculated anything. Everything you said, is you relying on your gut instincts. That's going to get you wrong answers every single time on a matter like this. And it's clear you still don't understand the calculations. NONE of them "depend on 100% of the calculated force...." So why don't we go back and see where and how you misunderstood that? Was it when I showed the force required to move a KG 500 feet and you tried to shoe horn that into a spherical gas expansion at 50,000 feet per second (which is your HIGH EXPLOSIVE) but you didn't know the way to compute the fraction of total force that would project on a side object? There, you wanted to see the "Total force", right? It's easy enough, but all that does is give you the number such as 1.5 or 2.5kg of TNT which applies a force of 2-3 ounces of TNT on the piece that goes off 500 feet. But that's totally irrelevant, isn't it? That does not lead you to a proof that high explosive was used or needed. It gets that argument nowhere. Meanwhile, what you absolutely know is the joules required to move each KG 500 feet. Period. End of subject. |
|
|
|
|
...You might as well calculate the total energy of the Earth's spin and throw that in there the way you are engaging in your premise.
Yes, it does matter, because that means a tiny fraction of that force will be applied to the object.
[/quote]
It matters? No, it results in about a one meter offset in the landing position from straight vertical. And the force is quite trivial.
See, there you go again. Saying something based on your brain's wild guess without actually knowing anything.
So, you are wrong again. Wrong by relying on a gut "feeling" about the level of a physical force.
|
|
|
|
Recently, I have seen more and more information on the Internet that the deployment of 5G networks can harm humanity.
I started to study information about 5G and somehow I came across a video where a Soviet scientist told me about the possibilities of using death frequencies using 5G technology.
Has anyone heard of death frequencies? What are the frequencies and how do they affect the body?
This is real. It can be done by essentially hitting DNA with a resonant frequency until it unzips, and your cellular structure just turns to jelly. I was reading about this technology well before 5G was even a thing. Frequencies and required signal strengths please. No worries. The transmitters only use a couple hundred milliwatts I think: https://towerdirect.net/product/180-kw-diesel-generator/And the required strength for a death ray? (Hint: There MAY BE A reason why we don't have any handy Ray-Guns?) |
|
|
|
This comes a shocking news Bernie Sanders who is a senator from Vermont has openly declared his presidential dreams cancel
This would strengthen Democrats Joe biden ambition for the Presidential race.
What's your take on Bernie Sanders decision. I feel he stood a chance.
I predicted exactly this outcome, but no Bernie-heads believed me. |
|
|
|
I'm still upset that my right to make nuclear reactors was taken away  ... It was? Darn, I need to read up on the rights and laws and stuff more often! |
|
|
|
That might make sense if everything was perfectly sealed, but it was not. That kind of air pressure would blow out windows, then the force would escape, not blow 22 ton panels 600feet. You are really stretching now desperate to come up with anything that even sounds close to a potential to find a reason why several 22 ton masses of steel traveled hundreds of feet laterally from their resting positions.
Nope, you don't understand my intent. I only show the force in the air in a volume size of a single floor of WTC if a sudden collapse halves the volume. Then I explore how that compares to your MASSIVE BEAM. Now you have asserted " That kind of air pressure would blow out windows, then the force would escape, not blow 22 ton panels 600feet. " You are welcome to show the math and the numbers to support that. I suspect you are wrong, but you might be right. I KNOW that 20 square feet on the interior face of any beam will be subjected to the force I described during the collapse as described. Because I got a MASSIVE FORCE. Your MASSIVE BEAM is 1/400 of that force. It is what it is. Your breathtaking, awesome, massive forces that REQUIRE HIGH EXPLOSIVES just aren't and don't. So next, why don't we take a 200 foot section of beam tilting under gravity only from the base point, and at 45 degrees the 50 top feet breaking off, and ask another simple, 1st semester physics problem. How far does it go sideways before hitting the ground? Now why would we do that? Because that's actually the way, and the only way, to examine problems of this sort. Your intent has no bearing on the validity of your assertions. So you are implying that such a pressure wave would blow a 22 ton panel hundreds of feet but wouldn't blow out windows? This isn't rocket science, it is a simple comparison of materials. Glass is weaker than steel, air pressure takes the path of least resistance, thus once the windows are blown, the vast majority of that pressure simply would go around the panels and would have no where near the force required to eject them hundreds of feet laterally. Your tipping theory might make sense if the panels were not blown several different directions. For your model to make sense the panels would all have to peel off effortlessly like a banana peel on all sides, that makes zero sense. Those are your ideas, not mine. I'm just saying that we can figure the forces on that beam fragment. Not the same as advocating that as what happened. I get the impression that you still don't really understand my approach to this problem. It is simply to show, via a variety of proofs at the level of beginning physics, that there are many ways these things could have happened, and thus to refute the argument that "high explosives were REQUIRED"... which is a totally ridiculous assertion when the total energy in kinetic and potential of one of the WTT falling is a significant fraction of the Hiroshima atomic bomb. Deal with it, it is what it is. Regarding... Glass is weaker than steel, air pressure takes the path of least resistance, thus once the windows are blown, the vast majority of that pressure simply would go around the panels and would have no where near the force required to eject them hundreds of feet laterally. Be my guest, show your work, prove that is true. You don't get to assume it's true because you feel that way. As for "The vast majority of that pressure" ? That does not matter, the force of the air is 400x greater, isn't it? So yet again we see how truly puny and insignificant the 22 ton MASSIVE BEAM is... |
|
|
|
...
How about add to that list - devious evil GROUP - operating SECRET CHEM TRAIL AIRPLANES - carrying out EVIL PLAN and then... - metallic particles sprayed high in the atmosphere could end up in lung tissue - metallic particles injected into the muscle tissue could end up in the brain - metallic particles interspersed within human tissue could make the tissue more reactive to high frequency electromagnetic radiation Does that sound about right? I've got a simple, straightforward objection to your CHEM TRAIL SECRET PLANES. Namely, I have been around civilian and military airports and repair/production facilities all my life. If they existed, I would have seen them. And I've seen some pretty strange stuff. It doesn't get any simpler than that. Oh, I see. Since you haven't seen anything it doesn't exist. Can I borrow the pass which lets you into every secure site in the country? I'm thinking to take some pictures of NORAD, Area 51, etc, etc. No, you can't. And there's no reason to stretch or exaggerate. I haven't been in every site. Do you think these FANTASY CHEMTRAIL PLANES are all crowded in the NORAD Mountain? In Area 51? Aren't there a whole LOT OF THEM? Because, big time GEO ENGINEERING? |
|
|
|
...
Wait, so we've gone from "Chemtrails are/are not real" to linkages between that and 5g, autism, and vaccines? This is getting close to the Perfect Country Western song. Just out of curiosity, what concept do you have such a problem with: - metallic particles sprayed high in the atmosphere could end up in lung tissue - metallic particles injected into the muscle tissue could end up in the brain - metallic particles interspersed within human tissue could make the tissue more reactive to high frequency electromagnetic radiation How about add to that list - devious evil GROUP - operating SECRET CHEM TRAIL AIRPLANES - carrying out EVIL PLAN and then... - metallic particles sprayed high in the atmosphere could end up in lung tissue - metallic particles injected into the muscle tissue could end up in the brain - metallic particles interspersed within human tissue could make the tissue more reactive to high frequency electromagnetic radiation Does that sound about right? I've got a simple, straightforward objection to your CHEM TRAIL SECRET PLANES. Namely, I have been around civilian and military airports and repair/production facilities all my life. If they existed, I would have seen them. And I've seen some pretty strange stuff. It doesn't get any simpler than that. |
|
|
|
...
they do know how to do it based on the actual RNA and it is specific to covid19
....
I can think of a couple ways that could be accomplished but typically it would be a several year long project. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
