I don't see Man City as usual too many opportunities are lost I don't know if it was due to bad luck or the Chelsea defender who was too strong Now Man City only has 15 minutes to equalize the score if nothing changes maybe Chelsea takes the trophy. Chelsea is inspired like I've never seen them before. I'm surprised, but what's more surprising is that City looks surprised, lol. Now with De Bruyne out, it's not likely to get any better for City.
|
|
|
De Bruyne just came out, big blow for City. He took a hit to his eye, it looked pretty bad, and he was obviously in pain. I hope he's all right. I was sure City would run away with it, and had a bet on them for the game. In fact I had a betbulder multi for City to win, both to score, and over 8.5 corners. There've been two corners so far. At least the game has been more entertaining than it would have been if my predictions were accurate.
|
|
|
So many wanting this to be a close match, but I think City runs away with it. Chelsea has been strong, but I don't think they can repeat their EPL upset. City is such a polished team with unbelievable skill at each position. I can't believe I'm saying this, but I since I have City to win here it goes: Go City!
Is the starting 11 out already? Here's the line up according to google.
|
|
|
a) 9 b) 1:45 a) 11 b) 2:07
|
|
|
Short answer: No one.
I hate to be callus about this, but if bounty hunters refuse to take the time to research the projects they support, this kind of thing will never stop. As long as there are gullible people wiling to shill for projects that turn out to be scams 99.9% of the time, there will be scammers to take advantage of them.
The altcoin section and specifically the bounty section is full of scammers. Most of the time bounties are paid in the altcoin which the project is promoting, so even if the bounty hunters get paid there's no guarantee the altcoin will ever have any value. The project could be just priming the altcoin for an exit scam anyway, so unless the bounty hunter is able to cash out early, his time has been wasted. That's assuming the there's a market (and/or exchange listing) for the altcoin in the first place. Never trust the project promotors' claims of the value of their altcoins, without a market there's no way to confirm, and more often than not, it's a lie to lure in the gullible and the greedy.
|
|
|
I am using a very very old versions of Electrum. On my cold storage I am running Electrum 2.x and my watching online Electrum is 3.0.x. They still work. Rather not go thru the hassle of having to upgrade to a newer Electrum because then I need to upgrade the dependanices and those I also need to verify to make sure they are not tampered with so I rather just leave everything as is. I'm old school.
However wondering if Taproot will be backwards compatible and will I be able to perform any transactions. All my cold storage is on wallet addresses starting with "1" and none are Segwit or Pay-by-script (start with "3"). I rarely do any transactions so this is why I keep this set up.
As others have already said, taproot isn't going to be an issue for you. However, running obsolete software on an outdated system might become an issue. There are only five dependencies needed to install Electrum, and you can get away with three if you only want to run it from the source code. They've all been tested to function with the OS, but I suppose there's no way to ensure there's nothing malicious in the code without auditing it. Even validating the packages authenticity doesn't doesn't guarantee that it hasn't been compromised by a malicious developer. I get it, there's no such thing as being too paranoid, until you are. Here's the list of dependencies needed from Electrum's downloads page: python3-pyqt5 libsecp256k1-0 python3-cryptography python3-setuptools python3-pip I understand why you're reluctant to update your system, and since you don't make a lot of transactions you'll likely find yourself in this situation again and again. It might be better for you to use a hardware wallet, which effectively gives you the security you're looking for.
|
|
|
Now why is it that they are more strictly refusing entry to recently vaccinated people than to completely unvaccinated people?
CYA. Their doing the safe thing, and I don't blame them. The vaccine is new, and all of it's ramifications are unknown. It's highly unlikely that a person who was recently vaccinated for any disease could cause harm to others. However, when someone is recovering from surgery they're more susceptible to infections. It makes sense to take precautions. They would probably do the same if you're uncle had recently been vaccinated for measles.
|
|
|
What a heartbreaking loss for the Devils, but it was a great game. Both teams played quite well, brilliant passing, and great defense. Both goals were excellently played, no gimmes there. Solskjaer's hands were tied with substitutions, his depth sucks, and his best team for the situation was already on the pitch. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. At least I get to say that Arsenal lost to the eventual champs. Congrats to Villa Real, well deserved championship. I hate that it had to end on penalties, I don't know why they don't just play two games for the final.
|
|
|
Or, we all sign up and when they don't pay us we can all put a flag on all their accounts. I know theymos thinks he is doing the correct thing in not moderating scams or nuking large parts of the forum that are a breeding ground for scammers, but sooner or later IMO having all this stuff festering here is going to hurt crypto.
-Dave
In my humble opinion, this forum doesn't have a lot of effect on the world of crypto anymore. Crypto is bigger. And it's still full of scams. Nothing going on here will hurt crypto nearly as much as a pump-and-dump celebrity influencer. I'm not trying to speak for theymos, but I'm not sure he thinks he's "doing the correct thing," but rather allowing the community to choose what's right or wrong. Having a hands-off approach doesn't mean he's impartial. Quite recently he stepped in to take remedial action against scams. But these are different situations, and can't really be compared.
|
|
|
I was going to suggest bit torrent, but you can probably sync bitcoind and electrumx five time over before transferring ~60GB that way.
If one of you has a MS Teams account or a Dropbox Pro account, they allow you transfers up to 100GB. There's also transferxl.com, and transfernow.net which allow up to 5GB transfers for the basic accounts, but you'll have to pay to get more. None of that is going to be fast, and if one of you has metered data usage that would make it impractical. I think synchronizing the db yourself is probably the most practical solution.
Or, just play around with testnet.
|
|
|
It took my system some time to sync, but I'm sure it wasn't a week. Like I said before, I think it was a max of three days and IIRC the block height was around 660k at the time, so not that long ago. I'm using an internal sata ssd, and I doubt my internet connection throttled the process in any way. The first time I set up ElectrumX I had just built the system for it, sync'd bitcoind, then realized I hadn't turned on txindex. I had to sync the bitcoin blockchain again, then sync ElectrumX. It seemed like I was waiting for a month.
|
|
|
1xbit is at it again. They showed up today with a new account and started a signature campaign, and of course, they have many applicants already. Then they started a bounty for reviews, in a self-moderated thread, lol. I'm not a fan of tagging accounts for wearing a signature, but I am hoping this will cause some to think about whether they want to support this outfit. Here's a list of the 1xbit accounts, read the Accounts: Here's the thread 1xbit started to "fix" their reputation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266815.msg54938685#msg54938685
|
|
|
He is same guy!!! He texted me and some other partner with these usernames and said the same thing to both of us. He uses it as lie that there is an impostor, but who would really want to impersonate this user?
Now he goes to others thread and accuse us of stupid things like he is really being the most honest person here, despite the fact that is constantly scamming with his "impersonation"
I will admit that I suspect there is some truth to what you are saying, but that's all I have is a suspicion. Most DT member won't do anything about it unless you can provide evidence. As has been demonstrated already in this thread, a newbie showing up and making accusations isn't going convince anyone.
|
|
|
I'm not much of a gambler, so I don't have a lot of accounts on gambling sites. The first thing I noticed about 1xBit.com's site is that they don't ask for any personal information when registering a new account, they don't even require an email address. I like that, actually, but it does make me a bit suspicious. More on that later.
The site it's self seems easy enough to navigate, has a lot of popular sports to bet on, and plenty of casino games to play. To me, the site is kind of busy with all the bells and whistles that can be fit onto a single web page. It's somewhat distracting, but maybe that's the goal.
Would I use 1xbit? The answer is no. The existence of a site that works isn't enough, I would need to trust the site and the operators. In this particular case, I don't. There have been too many scam accusations against 1xbit to ignore. The fact they allow users to register without so much as an email address sparks my skeptical suspicions. They can use this feature to lure in clients who are concerned about their anonymity, then block large withdrawals using AML as their excuse. This is a common tactic employed by unscrupulous on-line casinos to bilk their customers, and freeze their funds. There's is a significant amount of evidence that 1xbit.com and affiliated casinos have used this tactic to steal customer's money.
Conclusion: I don't recommend 1xbit.com.
bc1q4xyljwpku4qkgwehh7hs7p3rgas5wjlg38ed6j
|
|
|
If you buy bitcoin on an exchange, it doesn't move from their wallet. The exchange just creates an internal database entry to grant you ownership of the bitcoin. So, you are correct that there is no "on-chain" transaction in that scenario, there is only the exchange's db entry. Not until you withdraw the coins will there be an on-chain transaction.
The exchange itself had to obtain the coins through an on-chain transaction; either the exchange bought the coins, another customer deposited the coins into his account (on-chain transaction to the exchange's wallet,) or the exchange mined the coins. There is no difference about the coins themselves, they just exist in a wallet that's controlled by the exchange.
|
|
|
make clean first. ^This. Last night I was trying to compile Pasta.alla.Ragu and realized that my working directory was fucked. I was unable to find pot.lid.asy in the default location, I could only find lid.nopot, which would not suffice. I had noticed in the past that you can get by with pot.nolid, although it's less efficient. Sometimes it can be found in /home/kitchen/stove/top, but it was missing from that location as well. I decided to try executing sudo find /home/kitchen -n pot. The results were troubling: /home/kitchen/sink/bottom/fishy_smell/pot.stink So now the real work began: sudo roll-up -sleeves mv /home/kitchen/sink/dirty.dishes /home/kitchen/dishwasher/rinsed.dishes cd /home/kitchen/dishwasher make clean cd /home/kitchen/sink make clean sudo ls -la /home/kitchen/sink/drain-trap sudo touch /home/kitchen/sink/drain-trap/yuck 2> /dev/nullIt's a wonder I ever get out of bed! So yeah, make clean first.
|
|
|
What about Copa Libertadores and Copa Sudamericana ? It's the UCL and Europa League of South America so it's really nice to watch them and get into the mood if you stay woke at nights for MLS. Also play-offs for NBA and NHL are here too. So we have from where to chose but this week we have the Europa League final so let me ask you , who do you support ? United or Villareal ? There are some excellent teams in Brazil, but I don't get a lot of coverage of South American soccer in the US. I'm sure there are subscription services available, but I already have more than I have time for. Concacaf has a few entertaining competitions going. The Concacaf Champions League has been fun the last few years since MLS teams have been preforming better.
|
|
|
Perhaps I was not clear. The goal is to get the coins from point A to Point B without a trace. Do I have to spell it out any more clearly?? Lol.
If your friend's goal is privacy (from an ex or something along those lines,) she can merely send the funds to an exchange that allows HD addresses, like Coinbase. Then she can reset her Ledger with a new seed (optional) and send the funds back. They'll be nearly impossible to trace without a warrant. If she needs more privacy than that, then a mixer might be a good choice. See this post by theymos that has some excellent advice: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5146241.0
|
|
|
I'm bummed that Arsenal didn't get that 7th spot, so close. They did what they had to, but the Leicester didn't help them out. Over all it was an exciting finish to the season with all the European league implications. I didn't watch the Chelsea game live, so I was surprised when checking the scores. I expected them to try harder for the third spot.
One more big game for City and Chelsea, and that's all until August. At least I have Major League Soccer to keep me occupied until then.
|
|
|
I just set up a Coinbase PRO account; I already had a regular Coinbase account. When I set it up, I saw that the bank account info I had set up in regular Coinbase synced over into the PRO account. I am trying to set up a limit order to buy Litecoin, but the system is telling me "Insufficient funds" as if it's not linking to my bank account. I never have this issue on regular Coinbase.
I know the funds are there. How can I resolve this??
Coinbase pro doesn't have an "instant-buy" feature like Coinbase does. There's a big "Deposit" button on the main console on the right. You have to deposit money from your bank account, then you can trade that for LTC.
|
|
|
|