Yes, nearly everyone has some sort of reaction, like sore arm.


One might think that after months of bitching about the vaccines you'd know at least something about them but apparently you prefer to remain an idiot.

It's a shame they decided to kick at the end there. They should have let Mac go for it on the 4th.

Yeah I know I said I couldn't care less but I did laugh a little when Belichick got doinked by his strategy.

Edit: congratz morvillz7z, not that there was any doubt but it's officially official now, Evans did not save me.

That's what you get when you peruse random blogs instead of the original source, which has this disclaimer, among other warnings regarding the data:

Yeah that's the real FUCK of the week, what did I do to deserve this LOL

Looks like I'm gonna need those 5 TDs from Evans  

So when you have a broken leg or appendicitis you get a random "man/woman/whatever" to fix you up instead of a real doctor?

This must be the stupidest thing I've read on the intertubes today. Well, at least in the last hour. I hope you're just trolling.

What's the point? Anyone who knows about "Spartacus letter" probably knows where to find it, and also the fact check article that you mention actually has a link to the letter. What you really want is SEO for "covid conspiracy" or "vaccine mind control" or whatever it is you're trying to do with this letter.

As long as Brady throws at least 5 of his eleventy touchdowns to Mike Evans, I couldn't care less.

Did you know that Biden can drink single-handedly:



#strongestpresidenteversince2017

I really dislike retaliatory exclusions. This makes it about the ego and hurt feelings and not about what's best for the trust network and for DT.

Having said that, there are simple solutions to that:

• Include users that you think JG excluded unfairly, if you actually trust those users.
• Exclude JG if you think JG's actions are not fit for your trust network.

Right, we're injected with a bunch of loop antennas

How about you two stop dicking around and show us the design of the nano antenna that definitely exists in the vaccine and can extract usable amounts of power from the 5G waves at 100m+ from the transmitter inside a building and inside someone's skull (assuming the subject is not wearing at tinfoil hat).

Antenna size is directly correlated to wavelength. Minimum antenna size for 5G signal is ~3mm. AFAIK there are some tricks to reduce that slightly, perhaps to 2mm. That's still 4-5 orders of magnitude beyond what is considered nanotechnology. Not gonna fit through the needle either.


Yeah... it is technologically infeasible. The fact that you talk a lot about remote mind control via nanoparticles but provide links to much more limited experiments with electrodes should be a hint that you're not exactly honest with that statement.

Then there is another huge leap between technological feasibility and the ability to do it covertly at scale.

Oh, so we just skip over the whole "does this tech actually exist" and go straight to insinuating that some people knowing other people definitely means they're conspiring? Does that mean the Pfizer vaccine is safe or is Pfizer founder's niece linked to someone in Wuhan too?

BCI tech is in its infancy even with electrodes physically implanted in one's head. AFAIK the whole nano particle shtick would require a helmet just to read brain activity. OTOH we already have drugs that affect "mood and behavior" so why not just put those in everyone's beer and don't bother with the complicated virus-vax conspiracy.

None of this proves that remote mind control exists, can be covertly delivered via injection to billions of people, and that this actually happened.

I wouldn't think for a second that you really believe that gibberish you're posting, so I'm quite intrigued how far you're going to take this.

That looks great. Who is in your league, or is that a secret?

For the loser - I think public humiliation is a fantastic prize. Maybe some mockery but no taunting, that's against NFL rules.

That's not a "translation", that's speculation, loosely (if at all) related to the quote.

Here is another James Giordano quote for you, since you seem to be very fond of him:


Seems like you got your 12+ here, good job. Using your own standard of evidence "someone mentioned it in a lecture so if we pick the right cherries we can claim that this thing exists and we're living it", that's definitive proof right here that you work for the Chinese government in furthering their bioweapon attack (which of course is also definitely real based on the same standard of evidence).

Or maybe you're full of shit like all conspiratards, albeit more capable to overwhelm your audience with big words and irrelevant links and quotes.

I think JG's heart is in the right place but... yeah, using more neutrals and less conjecture would be far more useful to the DT and the forum as a whole.

I think it may have been suggested in discussions about possible perks for a hypothetical post-Legendary rank.


One can already promote scams in the signature, via avatar, or even via the unclickable personal text... no big difference IMO if we make it clickable but I would prefer it to be limited to higher/highest rank.

This forum is certainly not good place for people with mental health issues and it is quite possible that by giving a platform to delusional individuals we're making the problem worse. I can't really see any upside to this for anyone, but if it's necessary for some unknown-to-me reason to allow this nonsense to continue, maybe those threads should be locked after a few responses. That way the troubled person still has an outlet, but there is less collateral garbage. It should be quite clear by now which topics will never result in any kind of intelligent discussion.

Well, it worked out far better for you than I was hoping it would . I still need to find some points to beat you and I just don't see any particularly exciting possibilities on my side. I'd be lucky to meet the ESPN estimate.

Yes, that one. He often suggests killing some random politicians/celebrities and their families, which seems like an immensely idiotic thing to tolerate and a misguided application of "free speech". Even if no one cares about the actual fact of promoting violence, you'd think there would be at least some concern that if something happens to one of those people it might land this forum (and perhaps individuals like mods or admins) in hot water.

Let us know how that goes. I've reported some of BADecker's far more shitty posts without success so I'm not wasting my time on this. He seems to have solid immunity (no pun intended) here.