Correction - half a jet, i.e. the half that's not made of foreign components. But that's ok, you'll still have Soviet-era trains when the Siemens-made ones stop running.

Yes, Captain Obvious, aggressors will die. That's the whole point.

If something like that happens you should probably slap yourself as a parent instead of slapping the child who is already scared shitless and will have to work two summers to pay for fixing the car.

The US doesn't use the imperial gallon.

Has the richest country figured out yet how to make anything from those resources or are you still flying in evil EU Airbuses and driving 1960s FIATs?

"The West" will have some short-term pain for sure. Putinland however will be fucked for a long time and every day of war digs the hole deeper.

Yep, like this idiot here regurgitating Russian state media lies:


It doesn't matter what you call it. Putin's snowflake dictionary has no meaning outside of his propaganda machine. He started a war that he's increasingly unlikely to win and you'll be lucky if he doesn't completely destroy Russia's economy in the process.

No, the Ukrainians are not stupid to believe that any kind of surrender to Putin would be better than fighting. This isn't about "the Ukrainian army" anymore. To defeat Ukraine it would take a genocide that'd make Stalin blush. Putin would have to kill and deport millions of Ukrainians. Can he do it before his economy collapses? While making new missiles (and airplanes, and pilots, etc) faster than he loses them?

Again, shelling civilians is hardly a defining or desirable attribute of a military victory. The question now is whether Putin has enough missiles to level Ukraine and kill every Ukrainian.


Of course. Putinists wouldn't know democracy if it hit them in the ass (with a Javelin).


That's exactly the military strategy I'm talking about. The ground must be frozen in Ukraine because it's frozen in Murmansk.... oops.

And yet this amazingly powerful hypersonic military force is stuck in the mud and getting smoked with rotten capitalist Javelins. How many missiles does Russia make per day? I bet it's less than they launch.


Just like they "minimized" Grozny to a pile of rubble. As I said, that's the only "winning" strategy they have when the population doesn't want to be "liberated".

Things must be really bad for Kremlin if you made it to the English boards.

Putin's army is able to "fight" only unarmed civilian population. When met with any kind of strategy and/or weaponry, it turns into cannon fodder. The only advantage it has is quantity but that's slowly changing.

Yeah don't interfere with the sting operation.

I don't know what happened between you two, but I don't see "all [yogg's] negative feedback from others". There isn't anything particularly negative in his trust ratings except a few idiots. If you have a trade issue, create a flag, provide evidence, and ask to support the flag, instead of abusing the trust system with sockpuppet inclusions/exclusions.

Edit: grammar.

You can question anything you want but if you decide to post your delusions publicly you should expect to be ridiculed for it. Unless you're in Russia, in which case being delusional is vital for survival.


When you start your fallacy-ridden essay with "why did NATO continue to exist after the fall of the Soviet Union", no amount of excuses can obfuscate that. Justification for NATO's existence is in full display right now. Putin didn't attack e.g. Lithuania to close the Suwalki gap because of NATO. If NATO didn't exist or hadn't expanded, he'd have started picking off smaller Eastern European countries 10-15 years ago.

The rest of your conspiracy and whataboutism shit is lifted straight from RT, so spare us the sob stories about your Moldovan family. There are idiots in every nation.

Has it ever occurred to you (or any other putinists here) that some - well, most, with rare exceptions being totalitarian shitholes like Belarus - countries/nations/people do not want to join the new Russian/Soviet empire. And would fight against it regardless of what the US or NATO does or doesn't do.

Rhetorical question, don't bother.

Edit: spelling.

RT doesn't want you to know this, but...

I reported my own post and deleted it. It turned to "Good".


There are other places on this site where updates are not real-time so I don't find it "strange" at all.

Also the report page says: "When a post is deleted, reports for it will sometimes stay in unhandled status for some time before moving to handled status."


I don't know what you're still babbling about. You made a claim (sorry, "remembered") that seemed to be incorrect so I checked. Mods can't see deleted posts anyway, nor should they take action on deleted posts, so whatever.

No, I don't think that's a good thing and you shouldn't cherry pick information from whichever side you like so that it fits your narrative:


I don't particularly care since your whole civilian-to-military ratio is meaningless. Just pointing out your hypocrisy re "independent information".


Their numbers are likely accurate but also likely late. The full picture is not known in real time and the UN report itself says that the real number is probably much higher.


This was a direct response to your expectation that everyone should be evacuated at once. You must know something no one else does if you think that's possible.


I never said or implied that. Your inability to provide proof is what raises doubts about "nazis" killing civilians in Mariupol (if we're still talking about that; kinda hard to follow your maneuvers). Plenty of proof exists of Russian forces attacking civilian targets. "Can do" and "do" is not the same.

I think you may have outdone yourself with the number if straw people in one post, good job.

Ouch... turns out China is supplying "military" hardware to Ukraine.

I've noticed that very little if anything gets deleted e.g. in soccer discussion threads, even lame shit like "this team won this team is very good because player X played well and very good coach and <insert rephrased copy pasta from another post about another team two pages ago>" and yes, it's coming in bursts of posts across a few threads once or twice a week to fulfill their Gambling board quotas. I have mostly stopped reporting those, waste of time. Maybe I just don't understand soccer - this could be the expected level of intelligence for those discussions.

If the post is deleted by the author it's automatically marked as "Good" after a minute or two.




Should have used your other account here.