you can't shut down something that is decentralized and make it disappear as long as people find it useful and continue using it. which is true about bitcoin. it is like saying torrent network will disappear but peer to peer connections will remain! you can't shut down torrent network since it consists of peers connecting to each other and sharing file. bitcoin is a much stronger implementation of a decentralized peer to peer network.
what will disappear is two things: 1. the altcoins without usage that keep being created even if they have the biggest market cap among altcoins 2. the government and bank issue tokens that are more centralized than anything else.
LibertyReserve ? Highly decentralized it was shut down ... Liberty Reserve was centralized. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_gold_currencyStop listening to mis-information from CSW (Note that hv_ is a BSV proponent.) Less centralized than a dedicated protocol dev team that alters Bitcoin and need a lot PoSM What has CSW to do here ? Need any dumb arguments to win what ? |
|
|
|
Did he really MADE the Change himself or was it to show it WAS changed ?
He really made the change himself. He even admitted it. As was described already to Tweedle Dum in my Scam Accusation thread against BSV & CSW: Sure - now anyone MUST beleive you since you are long known as independant instance /s You see - it does not lead to any good. There is no way of proof here or there inside the internet. Trolls that try to tell such - will stay in their own realm for ever.  What especially potent brand of dumbfuck juice are you chugging that you not see the link to Reddit I posted where CSW admits he changed his blog??  Nice - now you show reason & context. Getting better (why u need ad hominenm?). Does that proof anything ? |
|
|
|
hm - to less troll overlay down there ?  |
|
|
|
Did he really MADE the Change himself or was it to show it WAS changed ?
He really made the change himself. He even admitted it. As was described already to Tweedle Dum in my Scam Accusation thread against BSV & CSW: Sure - now anyone MUST beleive you since you are long known as independant instance /s You see - it does not lead to any good. There is no way of proof here or there inside the internet. Trolls that try to tell such - will stay in their own realm for ever. > Better beleive nothing and just watch |
|
|
|
Well the guide would have been useful to future wannebe Faketoshi's if they can actually do the stuff that are suggested. <Like signing those early addresses>  In any way, who really wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto? The real Satoshi will get a ton of media attention and it will be a absolute freak show with all the crazy people hunting for the 1 000 000 coins. Satoshi will also spend a lot of time in court and he/she or they will be sued by everyone that wants to get their hands on those coins. <Remember Bitcoin is a combination of several different ideas that was out there before Bitcoin was developed. reads like a deja vu |
|
|
|
Any decent proof you can provide WHO really altered ? Was that you ? Who btw wants to discred ppl without proof ? You ?  Wrong. CSW posted the edited version of this on his own twitter feed: Dr Craig S Wright (@ProfFaustus) - then seemingly subsequently deleted his entire twitter feed presumable to cover up evidence. This is not the only example of this. You seemingly have a real problem with trying to twist hard facts and the truth. Did he really MADE the Change himself or was it to show it WAS changed ? Was he closing his Twitter or was it closed by Twitter ? Still - you wanna be blind or wanna create bias |
|
|
|
you can't shut down something that is decentralized and make it disappear as long as people find it useful and continue using it. which is true about bitcoin. it is like saying torrent network will disappear but peer to peer connections will remain! you can't shut down torrent network since it consists of peers connecting to each other and sharing file. bitcoin is a much stronger implementation of a decentralized peer to peer network.
what will disappear is two things: 1. the altcoins without usage that keep being created even if they have the biggest market cap among altcoins 2. the government and bank issue tokens that are more centralized than anything else.
LibertyReserve ? Highly decentralized it was shut down ... |
|
|
|
|
Most of them will disappear - for good
The DNA (incl PoW) of it will live forever, tho
|
|
|
|
The bsv users swear that they follow bsv because of its values not because of Craig so they would probably lie to themselves and just continue on with their shitcoin.
BSV supporters have proven to be mentally challenged, so it doesn't surprise me if they believe their own bs. I do however feel somewhat sorry for them because they put their everything into that scam coin without realizing that they're pretty much going to lose everything eventually. In some cases I don't think the intentions of these supporters are bad, they just don't have the ability to seperate fake from real due to their weaker mental state. CSW knows how to get them to support him. It will be so funny when they have TB blocks but still only 50ish kb worth of data in each block. Same we could say of the Segshit + LN supporters, but that's hard to see in such a Forum where most sane ppl left the space - not much here to discuss / educate by arguments. Good we have a clean bitcoin and CSW works like a filter to Keep dumb guys out of it - make things really stable and ready for global scaling. Did you ever check out the facts ? |
|
|
|
Any decent proof you can provide WHO really altered ? Was that you ? Who btw wants to discred ppl without proof ? You ? |
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1139915209739579392BREAKING in Kleiman v. Wright case. Motion to Compel GRANTED yesterday in strongly worded order. The tl;dr is below. Excerpts follow. Court rejects "but encryption is hard" argument wright made. Basically, "give me a break" -- you need to comply with court orders. Wright says he hasn't complied with court order but it's not possible. https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1139918678252773384Let me translate. Wright is close to getting sanctioned and losing. Court doesn't think much of his arguments. Case not over but it is not a good development for him.Welcome to Law!!! Have a nice life!!! What jurisdiction ya mean? Nah... Edit. Read and get the reason here https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.33.0.pdfIt is only about starting fishing AFTER , based on 1) condolences from CSW 2) what Ira got from (core) social media Not even getting down to correct jurisdiction, Australia So expect only proof that CSW is Satoshi And put ur money where u see truth is behind against what u might wish to believe U might see such actions / "protections" from some ppl who KNOW it before you...  It s a strong hint, but there is no deductive proof possible like in maths that 2*21 = 42 Still enough room for trolls to dispute and .... troll |
|
|
|
I guess the only thing I want to reply to is point 2 about centralization. Yes, megagigaterapetablocks will likely result in fewer fully-validating, non-mining entities. It will also likely result in fewer full-stack mining entities. So what?
People keep talking about decentralization as if it is an end in itself. Why? AFAIC, as long as there are no structural barriers to entry by new participants, the network is as decentralized as it need be. If there is no discernible marginal benefit from adding one more participant to the network, then by definition further decentralization is of no benefit.
And quite frankly, all public blockchains -- to the extent that said blockchain is economically significant -- will centralize thusly - at least with respect to mining. How many parties make up 51% of BTC hashpower? Four. Already.
Not to mention the fact that non-mining nodes provide zero benefit to the network anyhow. If you have sufficient economic interest to be a first-class tx creator, then fine. Pony up for a validating client. But don't delude yourself that your participation brings any benefit to anyone but yourself.
By having megagigaterapetablocks you are giving full control of blockchain audit to the "operators". I guess the only way some people would understand why centralization is bad is when forces collude to censor certain transactions, such as donating to Wikileaks or anything else that wouldn't comply with what they consider a morally correct transaction. All public blockchains -- to the extent that said blockchain is economically significant -- will centralize thusly - at least with respect to mining. How many parties make up 51% of BTC hashpower? Four. Already. A blockchain is not public if it cannot be audited, and that is the dead end of BSV if it ever go to be used at scale. Just because you can see the transactions on some website, it doesn't mean anything in terms of how valid the data being shown is and thus it's private. Anyone who cares to invest the requisite time, talent, and treasure is free to audit the blockchain. In SV as it is in BTC. Auditing means running a full node, Okaaayy.... validating the entire blockchain and confirming that everything checks in within the rest of the network, something you can't do on centralized, running-at-scale-on-chain approaches
Ok, so what's your point? like SV
Oh I see - you're deluded. Carry on. My point is that you are bagholding an altcoin (BSV) from the look of your posts, and you are not understand the game theory at play when it comes to what makes Bitcoin valuable on the first place. A Bitcoin which is ran on datacenters on both the auditing and mining part is basically fiat. At that point if there were no alternatives, you could just keep using fiat (which is already digital) and use gold as store of value. A bitcoin where core devs and PoSM tells u what to change in the protocol and MUST sell u new 'features' not needed for Bitcoin is fiat . More than a stable protocol where all new features are on the app layer. Sigh |
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1139915209739579392BREAKING in Kleiman v. Wright case. Motion to Compel GRANTED yesterday in strongly worded order. The tl;dr is below. Excerpts follow. Court rejects "but encryption is hard" argument wright made. Basically, "give me a break" -- you need to comply with court orders. Wright says he hasn't complied with court order but it's not possible. https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1139918678252773384Let me translate. Wright is close to getting sanctioned and losing. Court doesn't think much of his arguments. Case not over but it is not a good development for him.Welcome to Law!!! Have a nice life!!! What jurisdiction ya mean? Nah... Edit. Read and get the reason here https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.33.0.pdfIt is only about starting fishing AFTER , based on 1) condolences from CSW 2) what Ira got from (core) social media Not even getting down to correct jurisdiction, Australia So expect only proof that CSW is Satoshi And put ur money where u see truth is behind against what u might wish to believe U might see such actions / "protections" from some ppl who KNOW it before you... |
|
|
|
All of those who were tricked by Ayre and CSW shenanigans should sell while they can.
The court in the Kleiman v. Wright case about to prove he is Satoshi "To lose he has to be Satoshi". Anyway this is the BSV Blockchain thread with large blocks, cheap transactions, growing number of apps, phenomenal tech.... There are plenty of threads about the Wright sideshow. Large blocks are real, BitCoin can scale, welcome to reality. Empty blocks, pump and dump, false claims... He can't prove any transfer of Bitcoins prior to 2013, can't name any trustee for the "blind trust" but "To lose he has to be Satoshi". You're a funny guy. Code is not law, when will you idiots understand? Not code rules the world fear does https://news.bitcoin.com/theymos-bitcoins-satoshi-destroyed/So Szabo not SN? |
|
|
|
Welcome back Mezzo dann kann die Party ja losgehen Binance hat den Service für US-User heute eingestellt. Localbitcoins musste letztens In-Person Cash Trades einstellen, was das Ende einer Ära bedeutet. Da der BTC-Preis bei neuen Regulierungen weiter steigt, scheint es zumindest gefühlt kaum jemanden zu stören.
Machen sie einfach Binance.us die Halunken https://twitter.com/BinanceAmerica/status/1139427935159349248Binance.US will provide secure and reliable cryptocurrency trading to users in the United States. Challenge die SEC - na dann mal los |
|
|
|
You just build / posted a bunch of shit / soft proofs - most are fabricated by trolls - but you are just to slow too dig you through  Have fun for a while Why would anyone with hard brain in real world beleive this pile of proofs. Wait - trolls ? I ve no time for playgrounds bye |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
