Oh, so we just skip over the whole "does this tech actually exist" and go straight to insinuating that some people knowing other people definitely means they're conspiring? Does that mean the Pfizer vaccine is safe or is Pfizer founder's niece linked to someone in Wuhan too?

BCI tech is in its infancy even with electrodes physically implanted in one's head. AFAIK the whole nano particle shtick would require a helmet just to read brain activity. OTOH we already have drugs that affect "mood and behavior" so why not just put those in everyone's beer and don't bother with the complicated virus-vax conspiracy.

None of this proves that remote mind control exists, can be covertly delivered via injection to billions of people, and that this actually happened.

I wouldn't think for a second that you really believe that gibberish you're posting, so I'm quite intrigued how far you're going to take this.

That looks great. Who is in your league, or is that a secret?

For the loser - I think public humiliation is a fantastic prize. Maybe some mockery but no taunting, that's against NFL rules.

That's not a "translation", that's speculation, loosely (if at all) related to the quote.

Here is another James Giordano quote for you, since you seem to be very fond of him:


Seems like you got your 12+ here, good job. Using your own standard of evidence "someone mentioned it in a lecture so if we pick the right cherries we can claim that this thing exists and we're living it", that's definitive proof right here that you work for the Chinese government in furthering their bioweapon attack (which of course is also definitely real based on the same standard of evidence).

Or maybe you're full of shit like all conspiratards, albeit more capable to overwhelm your audience with big words and irrelevant links and quotes.

I think JG's heart is in the right place but... yeah, using more neutrals and less conjecture would be far more useful to the DT and the forum as a whole.

I think it may have been suggested in discussions about possible perks for a hypothetical post-Legendary rank.


One can already promote scams in the signature, via avatar, or even via the unclickable personal text... no big difference IMO if we make it clickable but I would prefer it to be limited to higher/highest rank.

This forum is certainly not good place for people with mental health issues and it is quite possible that by giving a platform to delusional individuals we're making the problem worse. I can't really see any upside to this for anyone, but if it's necessary for some unknown-to-me reason to allow this nonsense to continue, maybe those threads should be locked after a few responses. That way the troubled person still has an outlet, but there is less collateral garbage. It should be quite clear by now which topics will never result in any kind of intelligent discussion.

Well, it worked out far better for you than I was hoping it would . I still need to find some points to beat you and I just don't see any particularly exciting possibilities on my side. I'd be lucky to meet the ESPN estimate.

Yes, that one. He often suggests killing some random politicians/celebrities and their families, which seems like an immensely idiotic thing to tolerate and a misguided application of "free speech". Even if no one cares about the actual fact of promoting violence, you'd think there would be at least some concern that if something happens to one of those people it might land this forum (and perhaps individuals like mods or admins) in hot water.

Let us know how that goes. I've reported some of BADecker's far more shitty posts without success so I'm not wasting my time on this. He seems to have solid immunity (no pun intended) here.

LOL, and I thought I'm special:

I would if it existed. It does not. You're the one making the claim, you should prove it.


Bitchute video is not a Supreme Court ruling.

This isn't even the worst example. There is that Bootlicker or whatever the name is who openly promotes terrorism - mass killings of certain groups of people (and their families) that he dislikes.

This should (at the very least) fall under low value rule since it's not about "politics" or "society" anymore, it's just about someone's mental issues. But I'm not holding my breath.

I find myself rooting for Jaguars today. They don't really need to win but 20+ points and 300+ yards would be nice.

Except Robinson. Don't give him any more balls please.

Edit: it's quite funny how Bengals were careful to leave less time for a rookie QB than 49ers against Rodgers.

Anyway, congrats to morvillz7z, you hedged your roster very well.

Post a link to the document on https://www.supremecourt.gov/

SC doesn't hide its documents inside bitchute videos.

Proof?


There is no evidence whatsoever, circumstantial or not. You haven't shown any proof that this mind control stuff exists, or that it can be delivered with the vaccine, let alone that this was is actually happened. Someone hypothesized something and someone funded some research. You could equally successfully argue that the vaccine contains a fusion reactor or a wormhole.

And let's face it, without the mind control nonsense, all you've shown is that COVID-19 is quite dangerous, which... no shit, Sherlock. Get vaccinated.

You forgot to add the link to the actual "ruling".

Get up to date with the talking points, you're supposed to say "injected poison which may be a depopulation agent, a mind
control/pacification agent in the form of injectable “smart dust”, or both in one".

LOL even better. Makes sense, it's some airdropped nonsense that cost the scammer nothing, and they already scammed ~$40 so it's pure profit.

Keep in mind though, this type of gas scam would still work with any ERC20 token (and probably most other smart contracts), not just with locked craptokens.

In hindsight, it was quite amazing that we had only a few flatearthers despite many users here buying into other batshit conspiracy theories. Even BADecker didn't bite on it, albeit for his own insane reasons. Sadly "spartacus" didn't make a case for flat earth or lizard overlords, this could have been epic.

That would be the conclusion, yes


Choosing from your bench or the free agents? There is no one available that's much better than what you already have. Maybe get some temporary backup in case Higgins is out.

Edit: Higgins is in fact not playing tomorrow. So you probably want to move him to IR. And if you want Tyler Boyd - let me know, I can hand him over. At least I hope I can, not sure how this works.