|
Before deciding what to do i would figure out how to get it all converted into BTC without harming the market and without risking not getting my BTC...
|
|
|
|
|
But miners aren't creating bitcoins; Satoshi was the only person ever creating bitcoins, when he started the blockchain; miners are simply finding the bitcoins that have always existed in the protocol...
|
|
|
|
Over $13 between MtGox and Bitstamp!  ARBing doesn't work very well if you there isn't a full loop... |
|
|
|
I'm all up for cracking down on paedos but this has gone way too far. I predict WW3 if they try to take down SR.
The thing is they didn't go after the child rapists, they attacked the people offering evidence against the criminals. |
|
|
|
|
I think the concern applies mostly to wallets that are passed on, when you might trust the original creator but not the individual that gave you the wallet (or anyone else in the chain of ownership).
|
|
|
|
|
Terrorist from the Middle East didn't like the freedoms people in the West had, but neither did the governments of the West; and it turns out the governments were way more efficient at fighting against those freedoms...
|
|
|
|
If the NSA created Bitcoin, why did the CIA need Gavin to brief them on what it was?
It would raise suspicion if they didn't... One Time Pads are proven to be uncrackable. It's not the One-Time Pads (OTPs) themselves which are unbreakable. Instead, certain ciphers cannot be broken if the key is truly random. However, this does not mean that a One-Time Pad (OTP) is truly a one-time pad as a truly-random pad will have a likelihood of being truly-randomly generated again reversely proportional to its' length. What this means is if the length of the pad is 1 binary digit (bit), then the next pad has a 50% chance of being the same; if the length of the pad is 2 binary digits (bits), then the next pad has a 25% chance of being the same; and so on. The name One-Time Pad (OTP) is misleading. From this moment on, I shall call such devices Truly-Random Pads (TRPs) as true randomness is their significance. However, true randomness does not exist. You see, all particles in existence are at a certain position. From that position, the laws of physics dictate their motion. Therefore, all events in space are preset at this moment. In order to determine and/or alter the future of an isolated system, one would have to reside outside of it. I have observed this in 1997 or 1998 when analyzing something beyond your wildest imagination – it is one of my PANDORA-grade projects; PANDORA designating that it should never be made as it converges towards a collapse of the space-time system we're in, with extinction event being a mild term for the outcome. Don't forget that one of the things in the box was Hope... |
|
|
|
|
We can't afford not having people on our side doing the mining; if honest miners don't hold the line, we risk getting screwed by dishonest ones.
|
|
|
|
|
Did Tormail store your emails in plaintext? That would be really stupid...
|
|
|
|
|
Many games companies refuse to buy the in-game money back from clients and many even try to prevent players from exchanging game money (and other items) for fiat with each other precisely because they wanna avoid the legal repercussions of being seen as acting like casinos.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps it would be a good idea to clone this thread on the newb area?
|
|
|
|
I'm not 100% sure, but i think most of the "censored" bits on that letter can be recovered relatively easily... |
|
|
|
Alright, i tried again, and this time i paid more attention to what was going on on the whole screen and noticed that when i submitted the form and getting the error, a little banner from NoScript (which i thought i had disabled) popped up for a couple of seconds. After checking the stuff inside the settings of that extension i noticed " Application Boundaries Enforcer" was still enabled. After disabling it, the site worked as intended. |
|
|
|
Hm, i'm not sure if this is the site that complained about Tor before, but i got a Tor related message, and this time i remembered to write it down: Warning: file_get_contents( http://exitlist.torproject.org/exit-addresses) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden in /home/redcoins/domains/redcoins.co/public_html/verifym.php on line 101 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/redcoins/domains/redcoins.co/public_html/verifym.php:101) in /home/redcoins/domains/redcoins.co/public_html/verifym.php on line 6 I hope that helps. (Unfortunatly i got distracted and forgot to pay attention to what the site before this one was, sorry.) Btw, would it be hard to add some sort of counter or progress bar showing where you are on the list of sites; to show how many so far and give an idea how long until the end is reached? |
|
|
|
|
Btw, can't you code somthing that will write on a log on the server whenever a certain site doesn't load for someone, and then send you an email or some other type of alert when some site gives too many failures in a day or somthing of the sort? Making the test happen on people's browsers when they are actually trying to load the page anyway means there would be no additional load put on their servers.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mean cheating on the CAPTCHAs, i was thinking more along the lines of a cookie signed by someone all the sites trust, that says this user proved to be a human at time X, and then when about to present a CAPTCHA sites would check if the cookie is valid and recent enough, then consider the CAPTCHA done if the cookie pass the test.
But yeah, people can't even agree on a CAPTCHA provider; not much chance this shared CAPTCHA idea would be adopted, specially by competing sites...
|
|
|
|
|
Alright, i've finished the loop (well, at least the ones that worked; i had a couple empty pages and one claimed i was a Tor exit node even though i ain't and have not been in ages).
It would be nice if i could fill just a single CAPTCHA and have that be enough proof i'm human for all those sites at once...but i guess no one will be making such a system since there probably won't be enough demand to justify the effort...
|
|
|
|
|
I would like a couple hundred dollars for free as well...
|
|
|
|
|
What is the difference between replacing any communication from the people with communication from the government, and shutting down?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
