I am little scared for the people who told that they took huge loans to purchase BTC  In at the very most a month or so (probably much sooner) they should be able to at least fully pay the loan+interests back. |
|
|
|
|
The only reason the price went down is because you all chickened out! Grow some fucking balls so the rest of us can be rich in peace!
|
|
|
|
|
Does that "DDoS" on Gox yesterday, and the associated dive in the price, fit on your model in any way?
|
|
|
|
Guys but someone will have to give me a chance so that I can build my reputation I can't wiat for a long time to build the reputation. If i will wait then LTC difficulty will skyrocket and I will be left in nowhere.
And Paypal is not the only payment processor in the whole world. there are a lot other ways to convert currencies and withdraw.
Did you really think there were people out there lending out money to complete strangers over the internet? There are, but usually they don't keep doing that for long, and tend to be quite rare... |
|
|
|
|
And depending on the model of printer used, i guess it might be possible to perform a sort of audio variation of TEMPEST style attacks... ¬.¬
|
|
|
|
|
The article seems to be back online...
|
|
|
|
the only other massive peer-to-peer decentralised comms system.. email email isn't decentralized - it's relying on DNS, which is centralized. ... You can't send an email to an address in the format username@255.255.255.255 ? |
|
|
|
|
It would be nice if that blockchain online wallet service changed their name to not confuse newbies. That is a third-party service, not a part of Bitcoin proper...
|
|
|
|
|
I mean so the folded parts aren't touching each other kinda like () instead of ||
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tested it both with different lights, different printers, different types of paper, lit at different angles, trying to curve it so the layers of paper separate a bit etc?
|
|
|
|
If life-like tests are run on testnet, would there really still be a risk of unintentional hard-forking?
uh. Testnet didn't prevent the hardforking we created in Bitcoin 0.8 even though we believe that the relevant cases were tested already. (there were already super large blocks there). But did it had a similar ratio or outdated clients and miners as the live net? |
|
|
|
|
They got high altitude stealth drones, and the people in charge in those places are already crazy. Forget flags, just start sniping at key people from the edge of space and wait till the people in charge gets paranoid enough to either start the war themselves or be removed from the position due to being too crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess it is better if the common user isn't walled from the threat of scams so they learn to remain watchful instead of being left in a state of innocence ready to be picked by any scammer that manages to fly under the radar...
|
|
|
|
Pirates gonna Pirate.
I may be a newbie but my thinking exactly. The number of similar Idea/investments call it what you will that i have seen on these forums is amazing. They all seem to end badly before too long. Well badly for the investors. The people running them sail happily off into the sunset with fiat currency im sure. BitCoin has a future if it can find a way to control this sort of thing. But currently its very poor advertising for Bitcoin seeing these sort of posts all through the forums. If thieves wanna steal it, it must be worth somthing... |
|
|
|
they sure would try it, if they could!
I dunno about GPU, but CPU mining on a webpage is certainly possible... |
|
|
|
|
You got a typo in the thread title...
|
|
|
|
There two things couldn't possibly have anything to do with each other; and I doubt (as in, completely disbelieve) Satoshi has anything to do with any government entity. If it did, it wouldn't have any of the properties it has now; Bitcoin would've been inflationary, with an always increasing supply, and sending Bitcoins would not only be expensive, but it would take only slightly less time than anything else. Oh, and it would be backed by the heart-warming smiles of politicians and advertised to death on every public news network as "the most revolutionary, 100% legit alternative to the dollar, which has never been used to traffic drugs and if you use Bitcoin, you will be fighting terrorism." And besides, the last thing anyone wants to do is ween you off the dollar. You might start thinking crazy things, like, "Why is my money so worthless?"
TOR was created by "them", and it still gets bad press and misconceptions by the general public... |
|
|
|
|
If you wanna show your model is good, post predictions before what is predicted happens.
|
|
|
|
nota: paguei dia 19 de fevereiro com promessa de pagamento pra 3 dias depois, quando o tiago estaria sacando o *investimendo* do rain. muito antes do ocorrido ele teve a oportunidade de pagar.
Quando o ThiagoCMC fez um empréstimo, ele já planejava não lhe pagar. O patife te enganou desde o começo. Se o ThiagoCMC poderia obter aquela quantia três dias depois, por que não esperar e usar a quantia diretamente para comprar a máquina Avalon? Por que fazer um empréstimo sabendo que a quantia necessária seria obtida três dias depois? O que o ThiagoCMC sabia era que ele não lhe pagaria três dias depois nem três semanas depois. Ele agiu de ma-fé ao fazer o empréstimo. Perceba a admissão do patife confirmando a intenção do ato fraudulento: Se eu soubesse que o endereço de entrega ainda era o meu, eu simplesmente teria ignorado o Rodrigo e todo esse teatro. E ele iria implorar ainda mais pelos 60 Bitcoins (como fez no Skype), depois de recusá-los na cara dura... E eu teria ficado quietinho na minha, não teria entrado "na onda" dele... Mas, nada é por acaso... Aqui o ThiagoCMC admite que não lhe pagaria se soubesse que o endereço de entrega da máquina Avalon não seria alterado. Assim, fica estabelecido através de várias evidências que a tentativa de fraude foi intencional. Então você não questiona a afirmação que o rudrigorc2 recusou o dinheiro antes? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
