it's unknown why bitcoin mienrs don't want segwit but litecoin miner liek segwit? they both would lose in fee right? why litecoin miners have decided to activate anyway, there is not blockstream for litecoin, this whole story doesn't make sense for me
because Coblee sold them the angle that it will significantly increase the value of the coins they have/will mine which will more then make up for any perceived fee loss (btw we are talking here not segwit but what comes after like LN etc). like most economic models if you work for what benefits the whole it generally also works out to be whats best for you. but thats lost on so many facets of the bitcoin community. |
|
|
|
c-cex also claims the amber dev is working with them to sort the problem?
they actually told you he's helping or u asking ? Yuriy said the dev of ambercoin was working with them to fix the problem and they'll relist it when its fixed. |
|
|
|
you mean the stolen coin ETH version, or the rolled back hacked ETH version  |
|
|
|
|
c-cex also claims the amber dev is working with them to sort the problem?
|
|
|
|
cex replied to me saying the ambercoins blockchain is broken, which i've just replied to telling them it most certainly isn't. one thing ambercoins blockchain and networks working fine, staking fine, moving fine, least that's something we got, despite the market freefall  |
|
|
|
yes centralisation is the salvation of a decentralised network  Segwit doesn't centralize anything. It solves transaction malleability, enhances block size to 1.7 MB, makes the building of hardware wallets such as Trezor easier, enables smart contracts for bitcoin plus half a dozen more benefits. But by all means keep shouting "centralisation", if it makes you feel better. r u high what part of my post, or the OP's post in which mine was a direct response to even mentions Seqwit |
|
|
|
|
one positive the c-cex delisting message is gone, so i assume its not getting delisted.
i've no problem with the network and have sent the coins around 4 different wallets and 2 exchanges (cryptopia, c-cex).
|
|
|
|
0.25 btc is plausible the way btc is heading  |
|
|
|
really gotta love all the buy high advice in this thread most choosing things that have already risen significantly of late. OP; DYOR buy low sell high (could be a few gems outside the top 50 even outside the top 100). |
|
|
|
Roger Ver wont even buy BTUCoin.com, shows how much he believes in this coin/plans.
He understands domains very well owning bitcoin.com so not owning BTUcoins.com is a red flag he doesn't believe in it, jmo.
he bought btcun limited.com instead  |
|
|
|
"Every battle is won or lost before it's ever fought." Sun Tzu i've thought for the longest time that bitcoin is a dead man walking. because of the personality types that have or attempt to control it. only thing is nothing suitable has stood upto the task of replacing it. basically the same types take over (or start) the leading alts as well money and power  |
|
|
|
Do you really think that the people who bought BTC cheap and held it all these years through the highs and lows were just "lucky"?
from experience most who held (from lows to highs) did so because they forgot about btc or ignored it for years LOL |
|
|
|
Anyone know what caused the 114BTC buy surge of FTC in the last 24 hours on Bittrex?
someone just likes repeating history and trying to mimic this exact time last year (look at the chart) |
|
|
|
From my perspective at least, this is not a bet, it's a business transaction. My motivations are 90% profit and 10% because I do not foresee BU as it exists today succeeding with the lack of code review and still unsolved EC divergence. Nothing prevents a miner from switching to the Core chain and orphaning the entire BU chain if it becomes profitable to do so.
As for big vs small, I supported 2MB last year when there was no working implementation of LN. Today SegWit + LN appears to be ready to go. I believe that the BU miners are not looking at the bigger picture. On chain fees can continue to rise even while a large number of transactions move to LN. There is no issue paying a $10 fee to open a reusable channel, while the same fee for a single transaction is extreme. SW already offers 2MB, the only difference seems to be where the signatures are stored.
Let me ask you a question just to satisfy my own curiosity and discover the reason for your recent "business transaction" proposition to Ver. You are "loaded". I assume you live in a beautiful home with all the modern appointments. Surely you must have fine automobiles at your disposal and take worldwide vacations with the same frequency that other people change their underwear. In essence, you want for nothing. Your stake in the "business transaction" you're proposing is worth upwards of $60 million. With that kind of money, why would you not simply cash out, retire, and enjoy everything the world has to offer? Instead, you leverage your millions to prove a point? I don't get it. i'm guessing you don't know many high wealth individuals, because i am yet to meet one that has as you put it, 'cashed out', 'retired'. tis not how they think and in essence the driving force to their high wealth. (just noticed epiphy above explained it well also) |
|
|
|
litecoin is bitcoin without the premine |
|
|
|
thinking you did your ftc update a day early  |
|
|
|
It is a clusterfuck. I bought ETH. LTC and XMR are other options.
ETH forking history is kinda worse though  At least the attacker fork failed. hard to know which one was the attacker fork  |
|
|
|
could turn out bitcoins simply been the testnet for litecoin all along |
|
|
|
It is a clusterfuck. I bought ETH. LTC and XMR are other options.
ETH forking history is kinda worse though |
|
|
|
|
need;
option 5) move to litecoin
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
BTC going into - - - 
