To invest in properties is always a great idea. A safe investment that doesn't lose price within time, the fiat's opposite.
And better than this would be to find someone selling properties for Bitcoins. It would be much easier to finish the deal, with maybe some discount, as BTC increases its price on long term and the seller could take this in consideration... However, I don't know if it would cause trouble with the government.

Once you have your property you are safe from government's mistakes regarding fiat (as your money isn't in fiat anymore) and in a hypothetical scenario, even regarding Crypto-Currency...

If $11.000 has really became the new support level it's a good achievement. It gives more strength to Bitcoin resist the hard moments and gives more confidence to investors start investing heavily again. If this trend continues, we have the chance to see nice prizes that can make us remember the last wealthy months of 2017. Who knows, maybe it's the last call to $14.000-$16.000... I hope so.

If you don't know or aren't sure about what this site is, why are you promoting it on your Signature spot already? 

I also think fiat won't become obsolete, but less important. Crypto-Currency will rule the financial system and I don't have doubts about it, the question is if it will be done in a centralized or decentralized way. Crypto-Currency isn't something 100% done and closed, there are many different configurations that can be done with this, resulting in different consequences, but the principle for all the next innovations and technologies on the financial sector are coming from Crypto-Currency.

If fiat crashes, those who are behind this system will find a new way to camouflage fiat system via Crypto-Currency, it will look new, but it will be the same old system...


Even in third world countries many people have already access to internet, in some years everyone will have the chance to access internet, if they wish. I think this is not a limitation. But there will be always some people wanting to deal with physical money, if not for necessity, it can be for whim.

And if the official physical money doesn't exist anymore someday, people will create their own.
In some cities it's a reality, they have their own physical money, useful only on the local stores.

It's true, why would people invest in a Crypto-Currency's ICO that is centralized by a country's government? And I think not only on this forum, but in general.

And that one of the goals is: "to solve the anonymity problem that has plagued bitcoin and precluded its mainstream adoption".

They would have more success by adopting Bitcoin and using USD simultaneously. I believe a local Crypto-Currency like that won't have much impact, between this and virtual Dollar transactions there isn't difference and Dollar is stronger, better.

I'm not sure if they are really banning ICO advertisements there, as I see, there are still many kinds of advertisements on their platform about Crypto-Currency in general. Maybe they refrained about heavily censoring these advertisements fearing the consequences, what could boost another social media platform and decrease their influence on the internet, as people would find new ways to promote ICOs, letting Facebook aside.

Strange that there is FaucetFly on the link, but the faucet pays through FaucetHub.

But indeed it's really hard to make it sustainable, reward has already dropped to 4 satoshis. 

At least it continues fast and easy to claim. 

Confidence has only validity if the gambler is really skilled. Empty confidence, based in pure lucky will only lead to the bankruptcy. But I agree it is one of the gambling's effects when the gambler is constantly winning during a session or during few days. It's a very dangerous effect, and as was said, that can lead to bankruptcy if the gambler is blind by his confidence that end being greed.

Yes and that already exists, it's called fiat system, totally centralized and totally the opposite of Bitcoin. You can't have all the advantages of a decentralized system and all the advantages of a centralized one at same time... If you want central bank approval, you are just wanting to use the fiat's system and it will be worthless to use Crypto-Currency, it will be the same than using "eletronic cash", fiat anyway.

And I doubt these Crypto-Currencies would still be so profitable for everyone as now if they were heavily regulated.

Always good to see clean faucets easy to claim like this. Got 18 satoshis and I think this reward is fine because it was really fast to get the prize.

With some dozens of faucets like this we could make a decent progress from "fauceting" activity again, like in the old good times.
Now the challenge is to make it sustainable, good luck!

Each person uses Bitcoin as it better fits their needs. There are people using it like a currency, doesn't matter the volatility and transactions costs. Others use it as investment only. I think these statements about Bitcoin can't be this or that is a bit contradictory, because the main concern of many governments about Bitcoin is the "anonymous currency" question, being used by criminals...

So even those who don't like Bitcoin say it's a currency.

Could you say the ROI in percentage you have gotten so far (in BTCs) with this contract?

When Bitcoin is legal on the country it's because rules were defined about it by the authorities. But in most countries Bitcoin isn't legal or illegal, it's not recognized as means of payment, as you said, but people can still use it without problems, some people call it grey area, and it remains this way until regulations are defined towards the currency. In my opinion that is the best status Bitcoin can have (grey area).

Since the moment regulations are created and it becomes legalized, it doesn't mean only that people will have legitimacy to use the currency and that it will be easier and safer, but that they will have to follow a series of new rules and will have to pay new taxes, in many cases it just increases the bureaucracy and the abusive tributes, so it really depends how the legalization is done to say if it will improve Bitcoin's performance or not.

Of course it can. When individuals have more money on their hands to spend, they help to keep the economy in circulation. It's a prosperity looping circle that is built by the individual choices of each one. It means more profit for shops that consequently will make its owners spend more in another shops and hire more services.


Just let people enjoy their money, don't cut investor's profit, don't regulate it in a way the individual will have less money to spend.
Let the individual improves the country's economy by himself.


Adoption is surely needed, legality could help, but it will depend how this legality will be done by the local authorities of each country.

The contradiction has just one reason: Referral system. These "financial advisors" are probably trying to make some extra satoshis by referring Crypto newbies to invest in cloud minings. I have seen similar situations happening with some acquainted, people considerably well instructed being lured to invest in cloud mining believing that is the "hot" way to make profit with BTC.

One of the issues with Bitcoin nowadays is that people are being told about it by the wrong people...

Yes, that is the media's billionaires hypocrisy. If it's something they have control and/or influence over it's good, but if it's something out of their control, it's really bad and harmful, stay away... But I think these days people are smelling that these statements are dishonest easier than some years ago, when the words coming from these big personalities were "rule" towards the masses.

Indeed, clean faucet as it promises.

Claiming 0.08 DOGE (about $0,00049424) per claim, without time limits.

The faucet's model is very nice and would be nice to see it with another configurations, like higher reward and higher countdown time.

Good luck with your faucet.

Many governments and their banks act like this. They don't give any example to be followed, they don't give any incentive to their citizens, they aren't transparent, but the real danger here is Bitcoin and AltCoins. They are already feeling threatened by Bitcoin and the changes it can promote... That is why they spread these notes.

Microsoft causes deaths because terrorists and drug dealers use the operational system on their computers to execute their shady activities.

Someone please tell him to close his business before more people die!

What you say makes sense for me and it's a hard decision to make. We must give up the "anoymity" and confort to have high prices and high adoption, but if we want to keep flying under the radar, with must give up the high prices and adoption. Well, it's a natural process and it's out of our control, but if I could choose I'm reaching to the conclusion it would be better to stay with lower prices and consequently less attention from the media and governments...