Actually, Bitcoin's essential danger is the public authority so this can be the explanation Blockchain control through the bigger part has been known for quite a while, Initially comes to whether all the administrations inside the world would have the option to partake to actualize such thing. In the event that we take a see where Mining in bigger part and the use of Bitcoin is more similar to Ukraine, Venezuela, Encourage the Bitcoin yet too inadequate to even think about squaring addresses of accomplices.

Amen, brother.  We have a true believer.  Can I hear another?   

Recht hast du.

Da ich aktuell leider nicht viel Zeit zur Verfügung habe, ansonsten hätte ich eine aussagefähige Analyse gepostet und das Bruttoinlandsprodukt anhand der aktuellen wirtschaftlichen Leistung gespiegelt, ein Benchmark vorhandener Mining Hashrates und einer zukünftigen Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Steigerung der Difficulty hochgerechnet ggfs. hinterfragt und das Whitpaper von BTC zum 10x durchgelesen, ... aber meine grafischen Fähigkeiten können das ebenso gut ausdrücken.

See there and smile 

Hi my dear ancestors,

  something global could happen very soon it will all depend on you.

Bitcoin is a dynamic force with a capacity far beyond what you can yet imagine ☞

  Don't forget BSV is Bitcoin.

  G42-Sol0818.்8-921|6818908732155


Time is running!

Tesla Model 3 is listed on top at coinmarketcap  


https://coinmarketcap.com/

No regulation can force a miner to control what other miners do.

You are saying that a supposed regulation, which doesn't exist, that would force miners to orphan blocks which contain transactions not mined by them. You are basically saying that a regulation would force miners to make a 51% attack on the network, which they can't do because they do not have the hash power.

Based on that supposed regulation which doesn't exist, a mining centralization of 4 miners which also doesn't exist, you are saying that bitcoin is not censorship resistant...

You two are just spreading misinformation, or talking about things you don't fully understand.


Even if the majority of the 4 biggest mining pools decided to blacklist an address they would need to have 51% of hashpower (but they wouldn't, because small miners would move their hashrate to another pool).
 2 other big pools could mine 2 subsequent blocks with that "blacklisted" addresses transaction.

Then the 4 mining pools would be 2 blocks behind, in the shortest chain. They would have to outpace the longest chain, creating a parallel blockchain, competing with the rest of the network. This would literally be an attempt to do a 51% attack, but miners would be slowing move their hashpower to the longest chain, as they wouldn't like to lose money in the shortest chain...

That odds of that to happen are very low. Basically for nothing, as no regulation could do anything against those miners as they didn't mine the block containing the blacklisted address. (also, that regulation doesn't even exist)

That's the problem with all those raspberry pi nodes. They don't affect the network in any way, besides making it just slower. Blockchains in general should not be designed to run on a desktop pc and certainly not on a raspberry pi. Full nodes (mining) should only run by people or companies who can afford the big infrastructure. Doesn't matter if mining pool or mining facility. That's why the 1MB block size limit of BTC is the worst thing you can do. 1MB blocks just that some people can run them on their small device and think their now a "rebel" or something similar. I don't want small nodes who only damage the network. I want big miner who mine terabyte blocks.

Wer Anfang 2018 gekauft hat musste immerhin bis Ende 2020 warten um ohne Verlust zu verkaufen. Das kann natürlich jederzeit wieder passieren.

By opening this thread why this error shows up!!!!

** Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Check their trust page to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution. **

I decided to dig into this subject a little more.

I looked into an Antonopoulos video exactly about this subject here

Begins at 34minutes.

He explains that to consistently block transaction from an address there should have been a group of miners with 51% hash power. Those miners would need to refuse to add transactions from those addresses AND to orphan blocks that include transactions from that addresses. This would be litteraly a 51% attack, coordinate globally.

So, practically impossible.

To summary:


I think you should watch it.

I'm glad to know that Craig Wright is fighting to get back what's his, look how beneficial this is as it brings the trolls heads out of their asses a little more often  #crigissatoshi and sa pisses you off deeply 🤣

Viele Use Cases, die Ethereum bietet, kann man auch mit dem Bitcoin-Protokoll durchführen. Tokens (auch non-fungible), Optionen, DEX ... Nur braucht man oft Zusatzprotokolle und Extraclients wie Omni, da der Core-Client diese Funktionen nicht out of the box unterstützt. Aber sie nutzen unter der Haube auch nur reines Bitcoin Script. Um den Umgang mit Smart Contracts unter Bitcoin zu vereinfachen wird ja z.B. an Simplicity gearbeitet. Mit Omnibolt gibt es jedenfalls auch (experimentell) Tokens mit Lightning-Unterstützung. Also wer ist hier das Yahoo?

Ich warte immer noch auf einen wirklich überzeugenden Einsatz der turingmächtigen ETH-Skriptsprache. Was z.B. unter dem Schlagwort DeFi "verkauft" wird ist größtenteils enttäuschend.

Kurs fellt zwar wieder etwas, aber auf sehr hohem Niveau (die 38,7 K waren wohl etwas zu schnell erreicht worden, 36-37 ist aber auch vollkommen OK ... )

  Simply.... They are building tomorrow's world now