Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:01:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 80 »
521  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RISKCOIN - Scrypt - Bittrex - More to come... on: March 15, 2015, 08:25:19 PM
Nope. This was never intended to be a longterm project I think  Cheesy

Has there been any release after the official launch? Like wallet updates, services etc?


I think you might be right, and as usual people are questioning placebo's integrity as well (I've received numerous PMs) because of how complacent he seemed to be in the OP's actions..
522  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: March 15, 2015, 08:21:05 PM
Wel we got what the complainers wanted is it.....
They no longer sell to consumers , because they are simply to stupid to adminstrate a bitcoin miner.
If you are are investor you could have hired someone who has the skills instead of complaining and trying to sue them.





As yiou can see 3.6 TH , and 7.3 TH for 2 KNC miners.......

there is notting wrong with KNC miners , they work fine the only thing you need is skills to drive them , as I said its a formula 1 car
and thats why the dont sell them to cunsumers.
because consumers are sheelpe that buy stuff from borrowed money that breaks before you get your ROI , its the kind of people to stupid to handle industrial equipment.
end result solar miner will not be availble for you anymore. Smiley



 

You are an absolute moron, the issue isn't that people can or cannot run them, but KNC's legal obligation to deliver miners when promised..
523  Economy / Securities / Re: HAVELOCK tried to BRIBE ME! on: March 15, 2015, 07:03:16 PM
Is there any actual proof that AirWolf is not insane?

Look at Airwolf's feedback, some simple ways to prove he is legitimate but apparently refuses to do so... That makes me wonder given how easy it is to sign the address to prove ownership...
524  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: 7dayponzi.com - "Ponzi Done Right" - Round 2 - Now Paying 130% on: March 15, 2015, 05:59:00 PM
We do not use their time stamp.

What time stamp are you using then?

We run a full bitcoin node and use it as the authoritative clock/transaction order

Actually blockchain.info has a very limited api and has gone down many times.  We want our system based on the actual bitcoin blockchain, not a third party.
What is missing in the blockchain.info APIs? Your could create a lot of more trust, if you use a system (e.g. blockchain.info), we can easily follow. Even the clock there is always correct. I played ponzis for a longer time and till now i never saw any time lag. Sometimes the confirm takes longer, but the timestamp was always correct.

Why use a 3rd party api of the blockchain, when you can use the real blockchain?  Take an address and compare the times and transaction orders between blockchain.info and blockr.io.   They don't match 100%.  We make sure our countdown timer is synched with our blockchain time.  The true transaction order/time are directly taken from our node and displayed on our site.




The challenges for the game comes from the fact that the OP is trying to execute a game where order of transactions and timing are critical to the perceived fairness of the game.. Yet not using a common reference (blockchain.info, chain.com, etc.) means users have no external reference to base the game's performance on.. Further the OP even links to blockchain.info TXes so it's reasonable for users to reference it for transaction ordering and timing..

In short the blockchain has no assurance of timing for broadcast or explicit transaction broadcast order but you are running a game that relies on that, and providing users no reference point outside of a self fulfilling statement the server itself is the authority, but your upstream network topology, connected nodes, etc. all have a material influence on how that order works since you are trying to establish it yourself.

Bottom line, if you want to build trust and avoid most of the ambiguity that is inevitable with the current game utilize a blockchain reference (blockchain.info, blockr, chain, etc.) as the authority...
525  Economy / Speculation / Re: I'm All In - Sold My House! on: March 15, 2015, 05:36:13 PM
Bad decision of selling house .

People saves the memories of there father/mom how can you sell it dude for money you can sell your money and save your father's house damn .
Yes, it is, but what if he is right, Bitcoin rise up to 100,00$ and he becomes a millionaire? All people here will praise his success and say I'm regret not following him. Nothing succeeds like success.

He had been here last month but didn't talk anything form last June, may he is OK.

100,000
I'm with you for wishful thinking but lets get real alright? 10,000 maybe. 100,000 per coin? Get real dude.

It's all relative, many of us that were playing with piles of BTC when they were worth a few cents didn't think they would break $1,000 one day...
526  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RISKCOIN - Scrypt - Bittrex - More to come... on: March 15, 2015, 05:34:03 PM
Grin What about placebo taking over this coin, and becoming its Dev?  Grin

Wasn't he doing much more for this coin than the so-called "Riskcoin Dev" since the very beginning? Wink


It's a conflict of interest if placebo is trying to be a proper escrow provider but you are right that the dev should hand it over (with some ICO funds in escrow to be safe since it's obvious dev has spent almost nothing) to someone that can properly support the coin.. It needs to happen now before the coin is delisted and completely dies...
527  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Deep In The Mines Cryptocurreny Mining Hardware on: March 15, 2015, 03:04:11 AM
I dont think you will be able to sell S5 for 625$ here.

This is the bitcoin forum. We know the price and are able to do the math.

Which you the best for your company but dont expect a lot of sell here.

Cheer

Valkir

Well even worse is the A2 for 2 grand.  They cannot say they have been selling at that price.

We sold a A2 about a week ago for $2,250 on another market place



That would be ebay, sure you will occasionally find a seller that will fork over a premium but watch for a chargeback as a buyer paying that kind of a premium may have more nefarious plans.. I sell on ebay often so I am not trying to down it, just saying to need to be careful...
528  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Ponzi247.com | 100% Automated | 130% Return | Every Saturday Night on: March 14, 2015, 11:25:17 PM
uh no website or anything? srsly? lol...

There is a website and all but apparently the game is frozen.. Tried to force a payout from a previous deposit but nothing is updating...
529  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Sfards: SF3301 Tapeout Complete [Updated 10/3/15] on: March 14, 2015, 02:15:50 AM
Looking forward to seeing what is available and offering a review myself.. From the 5 chip Gridseeds, to the Gridseed blades and beyond I have been with dual mode/Scrypt ASICS from the beginning and can't wait to see how this one comes together..
530  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Sfards: SF3301 Tapeout Complete [Updated 10/3/15] on: March 14, 2015, 02:14:31 AM
Even the first Gridseed it had dual mining but nobody mined dual mode.
To many heat related problems that nobody care to solve.
I mined ONLY LTC with these miners until I sold them all
Hope this miner will have less problems and good pricing


You are right, I had a bunch myself but the dual mode was a poor implementation.. Hopefully they got it right this time around..

531  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] 14x 2TH Antminer S4 (Umisoo Hosted, Mining & Ready for Immediate Sale) on: March 13, 2015, 03:10:31 PM
I am interested in a few depending on shipping costs to the USA. Can you find out the cost per miner shipped?

I TALK WITH THEM BUT THEY SAY THAT SHIPPING COST IS TOO HIGH.



so it will not worth to shipp it.

I'll be honest and tell you the reply from the hosting provider implies there may be some funny business going on.... You might want to keep a real close eye on things and hope you do in fact get actual miners one day, if you purchased actual miners I assume they stated the shipping costs post contract up front?
532  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BitCrane T-110S for $614! on: March 12, 2015, 06:06:13 PM
Are you serious, 1Th at about 1W for over $600 is a good deal? You are well over double the going rate for that type of hash and effeciency
533  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [BitAffNet] How we're the #1 Bitcoin Mining Pool In The World (proof inside) on: March 12, 2015, 05:14:16 PM
@ s0br: Stop being a chicken sh*t & answer the questions like you keep saying you will, or stay the proven scammer you are.

No payouts again eh? No surprises there then..... Roll Eyes

Let me guess, s0br the scammer/liar/thief has run out of BTC again & can't decide on weather to fake another wallet theft or wait until the next diff jump so he can take his percentage off all your earnings again.......

Submit a ticket if you have payout problems.

Why? So s0br can ignore that as well? The ticket system is a cr*p system started by ghash (another scam outfit) so they could hide their corruption of miners, look what happened to them.

Wake up.

How much time you invest pushing your agenda blows my mind, in any case the pool's hashrate is ticking up so enough people must be satisfied with the results..
534  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RISKCOIN - Scrypt - Bittrex - More to come... on: March 12, 2015, 01:43:23 AM
dev what are you doing
I'm just back from holiday. What is going on here? Bittrex 2600sats  Huh Why are people selling so cheap  Huh

Are you serious? Do you have no concept of how to handle a coin, it's only worth something if it has value to the community and you are doing nothing to build confidence in yourself or your coin.. It blows my mind how out of touch with the community you are..
535  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: March 11, 2015, 12:36:40 AM
I can understand the frustration of the Neppy folks but the Titan folks might have got thier miners a month or two late (HELLO that happens in this industry)

I lost a good chunk of $$ on the SP30 when they shipped a month or two late as well and I'm not trying to sue.

Plus you got more MHZ than the spec 256 , and you got bonus Titans in March.

WTF are you douches crying about !  its not KNC's fault the Scrypt coin market tanked , that's part of investing .. win some lose most.

You Titan guys are so annoying especially Searing.  

At least KNC shipped .  Go look at the HASRA thread , Fib Thread, MAT thread, Alpha and more that i care to name.  

If anything you should be washing KNC's balls if you are a Titan owner since you have one of only two Scrypt ASIC that shipped in late 2014  

I can't imagine how this thread would look if they pulled an Alpha on you guys lol.

A month or two late? Try a quarter or two late, point being that market aside they blew commitments and unlike Spondoolies they mined with customer equipment instead of satisfying customer commitments that were made, and now have been delivering used equipment to customers to satisfy deliveries..

Your point about them being better than some companies is a joke, if that was the measuring stick for any company or individual breaking the law the world would be a sad place.. I can you standing over the dead corpse of your significant other using your logic, "well I'm not that bad, I only killed one"
536  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RISKCOIN - Scrypt - Bittrex - More to come... on: March 09, 2015, 04:00:58 PM
Dumped all I got, 11k.

Shitcoin, shitdev.

Matter of time till it hits 1 sat and will be removed from bittrex again

Normally i should not be negative on the coin that i did the escrow on, but you have a valid point. He put in a Buy wall on C-CEX, move it away, put it back in, then again moving away.

I will update my escrow rules, that i'll put the buy wall and being responsible of putting the buy wall and that DEV needs to prove himself and will only receive the whole ICO amount 2 WEEKS after launch, and the buywall will stay on the exchange for 4 WEEKS.

I was lucky, or maybe not, as i sold my coins to buy-in on another ICO so i didn't lose anything on RISK but i have lost on that other ICO.

placebo should not worried about the dev decision on buy wall at your escrow service. You have did a good job in escrow service, restricting dev on buy wall is beyond your service.

Actually, like you mentioned before, a good coin price must come with an active dev... But not in RISK~~  Cool

Still i have modified my rules to protect the ICO investors better. As it is not good for my name too. Of course i'm not responsible for the coin behavior or what DEV is up to with his BTC, but adding some more rules to protect investors is not a bad idea. Not saying that Risk DEV did something wrong but i have follow the thread and notice a few complains about the buy wall moving all over the place, and this is something that i have added as a escrow rule. We are all here for making money, and not for miningrigrental, coin owners and exchanges make the biggest money and the real investors running a lose or even loss everything.

It's a good idea to make that move because you are right in that it won't take long before you are looked at as an enabler...

Unless there is a rebound I am out about 5 BTC, the dev could come back and turn things around but seeing him quiet while the value is tanking and the thread has gone negative is a bad sign.
537  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Dutyfree.io - Buy cheap cigarettes with Bitcoin on: March 09, 2015, 02:57:09 AM
Any chance on Marlboro Menthol Lights 100s?
538  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [BitAffNet] How we're the #1 Bitcoin Mining Pool In The World (proof inside) on: March 09, 2015, 01:45:20 AM
@ s0br: Stop being a chicken sh*t & answer the questions like you keep saying you will, or stay the proven scammer you are.

Count me in on this too - it's about time s0br posted some explanations like he said he would.

Why so quiet s0br?  Answer the damn questions already. Man up FFS.

He doesn't spend any time in the forums but I talk to him every day on freenode and he is readily accessible.. I can't speak for the past since I have only been with him a couple of months, nor do I understand the history and pure hatred some have toward him... However I can say without a doubt he is a solid pool operator and is a stand up guy, addressing any issues I've had personally...
539  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RISKCOIN - Scrypt - Bittrex - More to come... on: March 09, 2015, 01:17:32 AM
The paper wallet was created last week and i inform everybody to watch out for Risky trading to come. (Bittrex).

What i'm working on this described in the roadmap that can be find in OPs. I own that people are getting afraid even when i'm not online for 2 days. Come on. Two days... Also when there is nothing to report then i just login and check if something interesting happened on the thread and reply on it, t notihng interesting was posted then i needed didn't post anything.

Thanks for reinforcing the point you don't really know what you are doing, I hope you are taking to heart the comments being made by many of the active people in the thread.. In short you are doing a mediocre, to poor job of managing RISK.

Sadly the above post tells us you really don't understand how to manage a coin, further you are blind to the basics of effective communication and continue to dig yourself a hole.. The measure of effective communication is different in every industry, please recognize that thus far you haven't grasped what it takes..
540  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Ponzi247.com | 100% Automated | 130% Return | Every Saturday Night on: March 08, 2015, 02:19:19 AM
Ready for Week #4 ?

So I gave it a shot anyway, and a player that deposits almost a minute early gets paid and I in turn do not.. If your goal is to build confidence and trust in your game it's a really shaky way to do it...

You seem to think that building confidence is about saying 'fuck you' to those who deposited 1 minute early as if the game is called 'who can deposit at 12:00:00 spot on or otherwise gtfo' which is totally not the case. If that would be the actual point of this game, I would have designed it in a totally different way. Instead, I'm doing my best to keep it true to its original name and purpose: it's a weekly ponzi, nothing more, nothing less. If it's a different type of game that you would like, I am open to feedback and suggestions as I said from my very first post.

Actually I wasn't going to suggest a fuck you, rather a refund for early deposits (minus the TX fee), since the alternative is to put more honest players at a disadvantage, which is what you are doing now.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 80 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!