Well man, I've repeated it throughout the thread but I'll repeat it one more time: that if new restrictions on signature campaigns were to be introduced, what has happened now is a warning of what could happen: that traffic would go elsewhere. It's something that has been talked about many times on Meta, there's even a current thread on the subject, but this is the first time we've seen a restriction and its consequences.


I agree.

Another blind member who sees still photos instead of processes. In October 2017, which is when ATT was created, that difference sure was a lot worse. And you could have said that with much more reason. 7 years later it's still alive and kicking. As well as having a bunch of quality posters teleported from Bitcointalk there.

I've seen that you have already been teleported. The only thing I would advise you to do is to try to get a customized deal, as hugeblack said.


And as you said, you can combine the two forums. With how much you write you can do a good job in both.

Good luck with it.

That's what I said about what happened to the price after the approval of the spot Bitcoin ETFs in the USA, that some big whales must have been happy fleecing a lot of little fish. I prefer to invest for the long term but in any case if you plan to make short trades, better to do the opposite of everyone else; when the price goes so low that it looks like it will go to 0, you'd better buy, and when it is rising non-stop, beating ATH after ATH and there are predictions of how fast it will reach $1M, you'd better sell.

In the end it happens like with charts that try to predict the price of Bitcoin going forward, they have a certain logic, a certain regularity, but if you look at the fine print they don't work. To think that macroeconomics, which is quite probabilistic and volatile, is going to be determined by a simple arithmetic progression is quite naive. And even more naive is to think that it has been right in the past without doing simple checks like this one.

Yes, I also said the same thing in another thread about it. I wouldn't have had the price go down like it has so far after the ETFs were approved but then thinking about it later it has to have been a case of these for sure. A lot of minnows sure bought after hearing about it from the news and are now panic selling.

I'm sorry to say that I think you're asking the wrong question. The relevant one today is whether the banking system, especially central banks and public authorities, are going to be able to get their hands on Bitcoin. Not to wipe it out but to control it with ever stricter regulations involving KYC and transaction censorship.

Sorry to put it this way, but this is just another of the many examples I see on the forum where I see little testosterone. I guess it goes with the world in general, where testosterone levels decline over time.

It's clear to me, he defaulted on a loan, and you kept the collateral. Now you can do whatever you want, like ignore him if you want.

I guess you red tagged him, is that right?

I saw this thread yesterday and, again, it seems that this section gives more play to doom and gloom news, especially if it is about USA and EU. I had to rescue the thread from almost the second page.


When the 2008 crisis broke out, which started in the real estate sector, although it affected the rest of the sectors, China was not greatly affected, as it continued to grow at close to double-digit rates during those years. They have not yet seen a crisis in the sector and it will come sooner or later. In the UK and Spain it was very noticeable. First the real estate sector collapses and then the rest of the sectors are affected. Let's see how this one goes.

What a load of bullshit, and the bad thing is that it's not crazy what the OP is saying, it's just commonly held beliefs. OP, read what happened with the Edict of Diocletian, which people throughout history have tended to forget and repeat.


Pure and hard Communism, that is, the political theory that the more it fails and the more millions of deaths it produces, the more popular it becomes. Leaving the means of production in state hands and taking them away from private initiative has had the same result, identical, in all the countries where it has been carried out: extreme poverty, famines, exodus, political-psychopathic repression and millions of dead.

Good. I also think he's been temp banned or something. He logs in but doesn't post.

I am still wearing that signature because of what you, icopress and WhyFhy said. But if he is a nobody that is not connected to Wasabi (apart from being a mere volunteer occasionally), how would you explain this?


Click on "Discussion Thread", see where it goes, and who created that thread.

I just hope no one is such a moron as to even for a moment cross their mind to buy anything that sells the OP. After selling a system to get rich betting against casinos, he now sells a course to make you immortal. You have to be a fool. Not an elixir or a treatment, a course.

Don't make a fool of yourself anymore, LosingSorrow.

At the moment you have already taken two red tags and if you keep insisting we will have to create a newbie warning flag so that the most naive people do not fall into your trap. We are clear at first sight, we have seen it a thousand times, offers of these systems that if they are so good you wonder why the OP, in this case you, is not on his way to the Bahamas in his yacht and is wasting his time in the forum trying to find dupes for his offer.

After seeing what has happened here, I have just communicated to the manager icopress that I will not continue in the Wasabi campaign because it goes against my moral principles. I will simply wait until the end of the week tomorrow and I will remove my signature.

I am not going to hold anything against those who will remain in the campaign or those who still have dealings with him but I simply can't continue.

I think the same, since you can be saying that now, and then come to power, contradict yourself and launch the CBDC, as happens with certain promises of politicians.

In any case, and without liking the character too much, I prefer one who says at least a priori that he is not going to launch CBDCs than another who is already working on implementing them. I don't remember any renowned politician in Europe having such a clear message against them, and I would like to see one.

Dimon has a way of making a fool of himself, it's normal for him to go wandering around with the things he says about Bitcoin if he doesn't know the basics. You don't have to have great technical knowledge to know that and that the only way there would be to do it is to make a fork to which the majority of the community would change, as adaseb says. I didn't pay much attention to what he says already, but after seeing this, less so.

Well, one more step in the EU Big Brother. In a way it is to be expected. Besides the rules not only target crypto but cash transactions, which is not surprising either:


And I believe that they have not imposed lower limits on this because Germany, which is the country that has the greatest weight in economic matters, is a country where a lot of cash is still used.


It is not clear to me but public administrations are not usually characterized by their speed. I suppose that if this is approved, at least at the beginning things will work in a slow way.

Well, but for Bitcoin to overtake the silver market globally (instead of just in the US), there is still some way to go.

https://companiesmarketcap.com/assets-by-market-cap/




Considering that the market cap will have to increase by more than 50% I believe that if things go as planned (similar to previous cycles) this could happen in about a year's time.

Bitcointalk is not a company and a forum without traffic is not a forum, it is a relic or a ruin, like the Roman ruins that people visit, not a forum. If hypothetically tomorrow there will be no more traffic on the forum, it will surely continue to survive because it will not need money, but it will not be a forum, it will be a ruin.