This may seem like a legal gimmick but on this point I agree with the company. I don't know exactly what the legislation will be like in the USA either, but it seems to me that the most appropriate thing for the Sheriff to do would be to put the money in court along with a report of what happened, and then let the judge decide whether to return the funds directly to the woman or have to gather more evidence before deciding to do so.

Those examples you give are too exaggerated to the point of being unrealistic. For me, the amount of regulations should be reduced to the minimum possible, as well as taxes, but for example for the nuclear or the petrochemical industry, of course there must be regulations. Besides, today we are not exactly lacking in regulations. There are thousands and thousands of pages regulating ad nauseam for even if you want to open a fucking souvenir store. Besides, if the creator of the submarine violated the regulations, he committed a crime to begin with.

On the one hand, if the OP is correct, you will receive the cheater's weekly payment, as the rules say in the OP of the signature campaign.

On the other hand, to be on the safe side, you better pass them through at least three detectors, as you can see in the following thread:

AI Spam Report Reference Thread

I am for the integration of AI in the forum, just as it is already happening in real life, but not just copy-paste. Also, I can see that he has one negative tag and another neutral but of negative spirit, so I think the future on this forum looks bleak for him, unless he changes his behavior right now.

The other day I read the first article, which I quite enjoyed, and I had pending to read the second one, which I just did. Apart from being very well written and touching on several points, I enjoyed the account that the libertarian ideology that was at the birth of bitcoin and even in its prehistory. Today there is not so much libertarian ideology, something that can be seen in this forum, and probably has to do with what is mentioned in the article that the early adopters did it for ideological reasons while today the main motivation to get bitcoin is usually pecuniary.


I see that the second one was published about two weeks after the first one, and now it is almost two weeks since the publication of the second one, I would still publish with that time interval. Twice a month. They are quite elaborate and dense articles and I think it justifies a lower frequency of publication than the usual of once a week.

The news raises many doubts in my mind.


Where do you get that from? I didn't see it in the news. Alleged scammers told her that to avoid a fraud she had to withdraw $15,000 and deposit them in a Bitcoin ATM. But those ATMs deposit it in an address generated by the ATM, as far as I know, they do not allow you to send it to another address, which would be the one of the scammers, and I do not see anything in the news that speaks of sending those bitcoins to another address.

IMO as well. I hold both actually, although the amount of gold I have is much less. But it doesn't make sense to buy gold to not hold it because the buying and selling fees eat you up. It is not an asset to speculate in the short term, nor in the medium term I would say. Bitcoin has more advantages, the main one being digital and being able to transport and transfer large amounts very easily, which is impractical with gold.

So the best thing to do is to hold both.

This has generally been the case and will most likely happen again in those two quarters, although we cannot exclude that due to some specific events that negatively affect Bitcoin this may not be the case. But Bitcoin is affected as part of the financial markets by what happens in the markets in general and what happens in bullish times is that more money is put into Bitcoin in the same way that more money is put into Nasdaq 100 stocks than into the S&P 500 ones. However, even if the downturns are more spectacular, it is more profitable in the long term.

I don't know why you include fiat currency, because the only way it will "outperform" the rest of the investments is if there is a downturn in the markets, which would leave the investments in negative, that is, worse than fiat despite inflation.
 

You answer yourself. You pose the problem in an objective way, as if it happened to all of us, to finally recognize that you are to blame. It is true that society encourages spending, but ultimately you are responsible for it, because it does not happen to me and many others.


It looks like that what he does.


This is essential. If the OP wants to start spending less, the first thing he has to do is to make a budget, and try to get in the right mindset.

That had given me to think at first, that the account was sold, as it had two previous positive feedbacks for financial issues, and scamming someone for an amount of $63 doesn't seem very consistent with someone who seemed to show integrity in these matters in the past.

But if he didn't change passwords, I see it as much less likely.

I agree that today it is more of an asset than a currency but the volatility problem, at least in theory, will be reduced as time goes by and the price and market cap continue to grow. As of today, no. To be able to buy bread, you want a stable currency.

Then, for it to become a real currency there is the problem of scalability. The blockchain cannot support billions doing Bitcoin transactions every day, and LN has its limitations as well. Then we also have Gresham's law, according to which, if several currencies coexist, people tend to spend the bad one and keep the good one. For me there is no doubt that Bitcoin will continue to coexist with fiat currencies/CBDCs/shitcoins, so I think this is also why people will use it mainly as a store of value and not as a currency.

In the past, when I had less experience, I used the free accelerator sites, which, as has been said, are usually useless. If I had to accelerate a transaction, I would simply bump the fee, as I usually have RBF enabled, and ultimately if I didn't have it enabled I would use viabtc, from what I have read on the forum.

Regarding the red tag, I don't understand it either, when I saw this thread, I thought that anubizz had opened a thread to talk about these sites, but it is a simple comment in another thread.


That's my opinion as well.

I don't want to discourage you, but my experience is that those who try to find for themselves and even more so for such simple things usually have a better future in this forum than those who wait for it to be served to them on a platter. Try to use the forum to learn and share experiences and knowledge and that's it. You'll learn as you go along.

In my case, what I would do is to remove as many barriers as possible to let the private sector create economic growth, and this boils down to administrative simplification, reduction of public spending and lower taxes.


I agree with this if you are referring to doing it through bids so that private companies compete and the best offer is the one that will be in charge of doing it.

I suppose the news that has been cited had something to do with it, but we had been in a bear market and sideways for quite some time in a cycle that has been quite disappointing in terms of returns. At some point we had to start going up again, counting that there is less than a year to go before halving. But it has been nice this rapid rise reminiscent of good times past.


This is not only pessimistic but also short-sighted. Bitcoin is still in demand and in very limited supply. Declining supply in the long term. It is better to buy now if you are going to HODL for 10 years, a couple at least, but it seems to me that you are not thinking about that.

Well, it's always nice to get merits but it was in my case, and I think in most people's case, it was more motivating at the beginning, when I was in the lower ranks. Now that I'm at the highest rank that can be reached, it's always nice to see that you've been given merits but the feeling is more monotonous, more routine.

By the way, what you should start doing is to send merits yourself, I see you haven't sent any.

This is happening mainly because the fees paid by entrepreneurs and the self-employed have been considerably reduced. Twenty years ago it was impractical to accept card payments for $2 payments. Besides, nowadays it is more convenient because we carry the card in our cell phone.


What I believe is that the use of cash will continue to reduce in the coming years, and maybe they will try to accelerate its disappearance with CBDCs, but for me the option to pay in cash should always remain, otherwise we are heading towards total control with fiat currencies.

What I want to say is that I have long since left the issue with Royse777 on my part and wasting time on it, and if you want I will explain privately why, because here it would be off topic, but basically it has to do with I think that indeed a client of his told him that I had contacted him to badmouth him and tell him not to work with him. But I did not contact any of his clients. So, I understand his position better.

So, when you arbitrarily make a selection of threads and you you say that I opened 5 out of 20 about Royse777 with others that you relate to him saying that they are his "cohorts", you are making a subjective interpretation, it is your subjective opinion.

Because the truth is that I let it go some time ago. Tell me if this what I wrote yesterday looks like a vendetta or if I really want to argue with him:

Of course. That's why I created it here. And if it has been here for more than half a year in view of all the moderators and a lot of users who do not take a minute to report threads especially in this section, I have a good reason to think that belongs here.


Fine.


That qualification you make when you join Royse777 "and/or his cohorts" is a subjective opinion at best. And no, I haven't been spending much time on the subject for a while. FYI, the last one I opened at Royse777's request:


FYI as well, he was the one starting the argument this time.

This is my answer:

Where do you think a thread asking for a ban should be?

This is not a thread about naim027's reputation, it is a thread asking for the ban of someone who ban evaded with several alts when he was banned, of which there is no doubt, as he confessed it himself.

That was the initial intention of the thread. I have now moved on to asking for explanations as to why the rules are not being followed in such a blatant case, the silence for an answer being embarrassing.