If you are off Altcoins boards then everything is definitely about Bitcoin.


You have unrealized profit at the moment because you haven't sold anything yet, right? In two weeks you may not have x12, but only x6, and in a month maybe only x3. Long-term investing in alts can backfire, because most of them are pump&dump schemes.


If you claim that you are not satisfied with the possible profits in this coming bull run, I wonder how you will be satisfied in the one that will come only there in 2029/30, and after each halving the growth of the max price is less and less. However, if that is your plan, stick to it - everyone has the right to invest in what they want and in what way they want.

You are one of those people who want to believe that something is true, regardless of the fact that from 2016 until today, CW Faketoshi has failed in all discussions and trials where he presented hundreds of pieces of evidence that were proven 100% false by experts before these same courts.

It's funny that you consider this trial to be some kind of final solution to the problem of "is CW Satoshi or not?" if the chance for that is less than 1%, although some will say that it doesn't exist at all. Regardless of the court's decision, CW will continue to claim that he is Satoshi, and people like you who, despite all the evidence that he is not, will continue to give him some incentive to continue to prove it.

Considering that you have stated several times that you only invested in altcoins, the only thing you can hope for is that the Bitcoin bull run will have an impact on altcoins. If you look at the top 20 coins, none of them have grown more than Bitcoin in the last 7 days, but if you are greedy and want x100 profit, then you have no choice but to gamble with projects that have no purpose or sense.

I expect that the Bitcoin price will reach a new ATH in the next two years, and whether it will be x2 or x5 compared to the last ATH is nothing but something we can only speculate about. Your problem is that through all this time on the forum and all the answers you've received, you haven't really learned much - I suggest you start reading your post history from the beginning.

Are you forgetting again that you have already asked similar questions? In case you haven't already received answers that satisfy you, wouldn't it be best to find a tax advisor who would then advise you when it comes to taxes?

Paying tax in UK after bull run?

I have already written before, but it is worth repeating, considering that some members think that such things are not a priority for the admin, maybe it is something completely different. Some members were not really thrilled with the idea of their report statistics being published publicly, and how to publish something that should be partially censored?

I personally have nothing against it, and it would be interesting to see who are those who still find some time to make the forum a better place for everyone else.

How about continuing the discussion in the thread you already started? If someone didn't leave a password to be found, then we can assume that they didn't want someone to get access to what they locked.

Furthermore, if you don't have the slightest idea of what the password might look like, the chances of someone brute forcing a password that consists of random letters, numbers and special characters and is longer than 10 characters are almost zero.

I found something on this link, with some more answers to the questions on the left. I agree that there is definitely a better (non-KYC option) for virtual cards, but for those who want a card with which they can get directly to cash, there are only two ways, either mandatory KYC or buying an anonymous card that costs a lot of money.

Exactly, so we have an old CEX like .stamp that became famous for its crazy checks (some members described their experiences), to those that encourage people to elegantly bypass the rules and even help them to do so. At the end of the day, it all boils down to making as much money as possible while spending as little time as possible on things like KYC.

For a few hundred $ you can buy the account of a well-known CEX together with the card, and it is even sold quite legally on this forum. They will not mind that the account is opened in country X, and the money is spent in country Y.

In that case, we think similarly, and only if as many people as possible realized how much they are actually using us for their personal goals, maybe something would change. Mass protests by farmers across the EU may be just the beginning of some big changes.

---

I also have elections this year, three times, but the most interesting ones for the parliament are not too uncertain, given that the ruling party has absolute power over everything, whether it is the media or the agency that will eventually enter votes from paper into digital system, not to mention a few hundred thousand more voters than people who have the right to vote at all...

---

I watched a relatively recent documentary on N about how some chicken farmers in the US are now starting to grow mushrooms because they literally got sick of doing the business of raising poultry. And what about the breeding of cattle and literally lakes of excrement and urine that are then spread over the fields with the help of pumps, and all this practically at people's doorsteps.

Journalists are always looking for something to make their article as "sensational" as possible, but to compare what happened in Venezuela with what the US government is trying to do now is quite pointless in my opinion. The US authorities would not allow themselves to engage in such business at all, because that would mean giving Bitcoin legitimacy to the extent that the headlines "US government "produces" Bitcoin" would appear.

We all know that the US authorities sell all the seized BTC at auctions and that they do not want to have any possession of the same - although some may say that they have a hidden agenda in this whole BTC mining business. Because if they put their paws on all those mining farms in the US and introduce censorship of transactions, they would make a real mess, at least for a while.

I have to admit that your idea is very strange to me, because you think that the forum should integrate an AI chat bot with which users would then communicate in order to get answers to questions that can be easily found using the forum search option? I don't see anything positive here, except that we are going in the direction when forum members will communicate with AI bots instead of discussing with other members - because that is obviously a much easier approach in today's world.

However, considering how people think, I wouldn't be surprised if your wish comes true one day in the future - which means you just need to stay on the forum long enough.

The OP is another one of those who convinced themselves that they did something without which even Bitcoin would not exist - so if they already claim that they participated in the creation of this forum, why don't they follow the rules of that same forum?

@Keawe, do you know about rule 32 that you broke in this topic?

My mistake - when I selected your post for a quote, I manually copied the link of that profile and left out the last number 8, thus getting the link of a completely different user. Anyway, good job, I hope you catch as many of them as possible.

The user @donald24 (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=donald24) has been banned today, and the link you posted leads to the user @Renaldas123. Anyway, gambling boards are an ideal place for all those AI spammers, although some of them get what they deserve.

If by some chance I didn't know that everything that is being asked about cryptocurrency miners comes from the US government, I would think that it was about a country where mining was illegal or maybe in a gray zone and that now that government has decided to legalize everything. This is how it turns out that the US authorities did not know anything about what they now want to know, and that they themselves have no mechanisms to find out.

Whether this is just a show for the public or whether some of the anti-Bitcoin politicians managed to lobby for the initiation of such actions remains a question to which we may one day get an answer - but all this reminds me of what happened in China before they decided to ban mining.

---

Tell me what does Israel even have that is not "made in the USA" or is it sponsored with their money? As things stand, it turns out that Israel, without US military assistance, could not defeat an enemy that does not have tanks, military planes, or any modern weapons systems.

However, I don't think that the US government is so desperate that it would try to increase its budget in such a way that it would try to take something more from crypto miners - well, their annual military budget is greater than the value of all BTC in circulation.

Companies are greedy, or at least most of them, and you shouldn't doubt that. The fact is that many manufacturers of food, drinks and other products have reduced the weight of the products in their packages, and in addition have raised their prices without communicating this to their customers. That speaks volumes about how much they respect those they actually live off of. However, I must admit that I found one exception, because I read a notice on one package that said something like "the quantity of this product has decreased by xx% since 202x".

Politicians are always looking for excuses for their incompetence, so even in this case it is not strange that they try to blame the poor standard of their citizens on companies that just want to make as much profit as possible. Maybe they should have thought of that when they almost completely stopped the world economy due to a virus that had a death rate of about 1% or even less, and that among people over 60 years old.


I would not agree that we should look forward to something that will only harm the general population in the long term, because the debts created by today's politicians will be paid by the children of our grandchildren, and that is not the inheritance we should leave them. Bitcoin will succeed even without crazy financial measures, and with all that, I'm always more for the fact that as few ordinary people as possible own as many coins as possible compared to rich individuals and companies.

There are already several topics about this, and you surely remember this one -> Shrinkflation

The OP has been a member of the forum since November 2023, and since then he has written only 3 posts, and if he has not understood some things by now, it will not help him even if you once again present him with the links that others have already posted in their posts.

To me, this seems like just another in a series of alt accounts trying to catch merits. In addition, it seems that the most common occupation in Nigeria is graphic designer (those who follow the forum a little better will understand the context in which I am speaking)

Would anyone who has ever read posts from Satoshi on this forum or private correspondence with any of the developers really think that CW is the real Satoshi even if he signed a message from any BTC address believed to belong to Satoshi? At some point, we have to accept that it may happen that someone will come into possession of the private keys of those addresses, which means that even a signed message cannot mean that someone is the original owner.

According to everything we know about Satoshi and CW, they are two completely different people in every sense. CW is nowhere near intelligent enough to play the role of Satoshi, and he shows that every day with his forged evidence - would someone who invented Bitcoin be so incompetent that he couldn't forge a single document in a way that leaves even the slightest doubt of authenticity?

@NotATether, when I saw this first device on the list, I remembered that I saw that one of the forum members offered it for sale a few months ago, and I was curious and checked what exactly it was about. It seems that this Flipper is a very interesting and powerful device with which you can do all kinds of "naughty" things.

It seems that in addition to the usual threats from the internet, we will also have to pay attention to all these "solid" threats, especially if we use our devices outside the home environment.

If you think that CEXs obey the law down to the smallest detail, then you are living in a big delusion, because they not only close their eyes and turn their heads to the other side whenever possible, but also help users to become legal in their system in an illegal way. The CEX you mention is one of those that owes its success precisely to its work on the edge of the law, or better said in the gray zone, which is why they are banned from working in many countries.