I think it's a matter of appearances, not whether Bitcoin is money or not. So they have a legal facade despite doing dubious things. There are casinos that have KYC limits in their ToS to which they turn a blind eye, especially while you are still losing, or that have a list of countries from which you cannot play but if you access the casino from those countries without VPN they also turn a blind eye, especially while you are losing.

A Curacao license is not a very prestigious thing either.

It sounds fishy to me That he offers $200 and says to contact him on his Telegram without ever showing up here again, at least for the time being. He may or may not be sincere, I'm just saying we have to be cautious with these things as scams of this type abound. In any case and as has been mentioned, a HW wallet is the best option.

Well, it's not bad what you are doing but it would have been much better if you had done it when the price went down to $17K, not now when it is not so far from the highs. If the historical pattern repeats itself the price is not going to break above the previous ATH of $69K until the end of the year or next year, and you are going to see several ups and downs until then, so if that happens I hope you don't get desperate and sell. In any case, better to accelerate purchases now than when the price is much higher.

If I have not varied my DCA.

The figure is certainly shocking. Much more than I could have imagined. But in an increasingly digital world where money is increasingly digital it makes sense. We have seen on the forum that criminals are getting more and more sophisticated at scamming cryptocurrencies and committing crimes to get them (such as hacks or kidnappings). It also makes sense that they try to hack large institutions like this, as the loot is very juicy.

It is worth thinking about what would happen if they succeeded.

I see this as relative because part of the narrative comes from the propaganda of the (mainstream) left-wing media that sells people the victim mentality.

It is true that the purchasing power for some basic goods, such as buying a house, has been reduced for the majority of the population. But today's population generally enjoys many more goods and services than 40 years ago. Starting with the cell phone we all carry in our pockets, continuing with cheap clothes and ending with cheap travel. Forty years ago travel was a luxury that only the rich could afford and today working people have gone to the other side of the globe on a trip.

Besides that today there are more opportunities to earn money, even in the form of extra income, comfortably from home, and you have an example here in the forum with the signature campaigns.

So it is relative. For me only one part of the story is true.

I agree with some things but not with others. In general it doesn't make much sense to save in the fiat system we find ourselves in. It is better to invest, which can be considered a form of savings where you put money to work for you.


In this I agree, and the fact is that the voracity of politicians seems to have no limits. Even in US states where there is no VAT, the fees for owning a house are enormous.


Okay, that's why I usually recommend people when starting out in personal finance to focus on controlling expenses, paying consumer debts and saving an emergency fund. But the second step is always to increase your income.


I do not agree with this. It is commonly accepted that you have to save between 3 and 6 months of expenses. After that, you can invest.

Well, not in my case because despite having sold and spent Bitcoin, my economic situation has continued to improve, and if it is true that if I had not sold any of the Bitcoin that has passed through my hands, I would now have a little more wealth, it would not be a very significant difference compared to the current one. Those who regret it are usually those who knew and had Bitcoin very early on, where the returns were more spectacular. In any case, if you see that you have made a mistake and you regret it, it is better to move forward and not make it again than to focus on the past.

The only way I would consider paying rent with Bitcoin would be if I had already reached a stage in my accumulation that would allow me to live off it without working for the rest of my life, which at current prices would be like having 40 Bitcoins. Only then would I prefer to spend significant amounts of Bitcoin on a regular basis. I don't see much point in spending Bitcoin and keeping the fiat currency. Least of all in Argentina, which has one of the worst currencies on the planet.

Really sorry to read that buddy. I've enjoyed a lot reading you all this time. I wish you the best within the circumstances. Peace.

That's right, it seems the OP hasn't figured out that the one who launched it is an old acquaintance of the forum. It was not created by Elon Musk, no matter how much they are using his image in cartoon form to promote the shitcoin.



I believe it will be worthless before those 2 years.

Hey lightlord, I was hesitating because I don't like to be the bad guy but you're back at it again. Good thing I didn't remove your tag or change it to neutral, otherwise I would have to put it back to red again:

I have to qualify this. I'm not saying it's a matter of time, but it could happen over time and especially if more restrictions are imposed. Let's imagine that casino campaigns are banned, for example. What would happen? I think that we could see a clear transfer of members and traffic to the other forum.

As usual with you, you didn't even bother to read what I explained afterwards. I'll explain it to you in another way.

A month ago, the highest paying campaigns on this forum: $250 per week.

A month ago, the highest paying campaigns on this altscointalk: $0.

Now: the only campaign that pays the most in this forum: $150.

On altscoinstalk: $45.

A year from now: we'll see.

The purpose of this thread is to warn of what may happen if more restrictions on signatures are imposed, not simply to rejoice in looking at a still photo of what this forum looks like today.

But the OP is talking about large price fluctuations and for him to say that at the gates of a bull market, when he says he has been buying Bitcoin for 10 years is to be laughed at. Of course big price fluctuations will come, the only thing is that he has to wait. That they will not be as spectacular as in the first cycles? We already know that. The thing is that he had overestimated the effect that the approval of spot EFTs could have on the price, which was already largely discounted (the effect occurred before they were approved).

It is that what you should have put to be accurate is "up to xxx a day" and not give those figures as taking for granted that it is easy when you have already been dismantled by saying that the real figures are much lower. In any case the top ones might reach those figures but in some specific case like watching ads not even that. You don't get paid those figures either in Bitcoin or fiat for watching ads.

I wonder the same thing too, and I think if the screenshot is from the OP's account it will most likely be from his local currency.

It is obviously better to do the cashout, what happens is that doing so does not prevent you from ending up betting it and losing everything. There are not rare cases of people who make a cashout to deposit it all again after a while, bet it and lose it all.

Yes, but I understand they made it easier now, right? Or is that link at the top of the page, of all the forum pages, actually, that says:


has been there since 2020? I ask because I don't know but I would be surprised, because also the possibility of teleporting was there since then but it was not exclusive to Bitcointalk, also to other forums.

They were displayed in banner form. Go to https://www.altcoinstalks.com/ and see the banners there. That's like they used to be here.

I don't remember exactly, I think it was like a year or two ago but theymos decided to stop because the forum has so many bitcoins that it doesn't need the money coming in from advertising. Why are you so curious about ads?

Yes, Pinocchio, it's funny because your nose has grown back. I didn't leave you a neutral tag after getting into DT, because I've been a Default Trust member for more than two years. You probably mean it was after entering DT1, but I guess you haven't figured out that correlation does not imply causation. If now you see a lightning strike and after a while I leave you a red feedback, you will surely deduce that I left you a feedback because of the lightning, right?

By the way, I have deleted the previous feedback and added a new one about what I actually think today.

I am not surprised either. Surely they have taken the idea of freebitco.in, which is not exactly created FUNToken but joined giving advantages in their casino and has been profitable for them but not for investors. I guess we will see something like that: