True instant withdrawal with a considerable reduced fee.
Some gambling site do advertise this features in their site but truth is, they don't actually implement it.
How can you say your withdrawal is instant yet it takes almost the whole day to send. Only to take a quarter of the payment as transaction fee. It is day robbery.

Lol   This cracked me up.

This new guy claiming Satoshi seems more convincing than Craig S Wright though. At least he tried to speak in a challenging way, with the attitude that might even makes people to end up believing him.

The problem is, with all these Satoshi Nakamoto springing up everyday, when the real Satoshi finally decides to show himself, nobody might believe him. That's if he hasn't been ignored already.

Some government feels it will make the people to become unproductive and less innovative.
In as much as I'm against governments banning gambling in countries, sometimes we human tends to fall back and seek money in ways were we have to do less work.
Imagine if the citizens of a whole country are gamblers, what a country it will be.
What government should do though instead of banning is to regulate it in a less strict way without extorting.

I doubt it, not when we still have the government.
Even math can't help much here.
State governments live on tax, without tax a country won't be up to standard and guess what, the people will complain.
The only thing agreeable here is a transparent system for tax payment. This is where blockchain can come to play, if there is true transparency, every tax issued won't be as highly charged as it is now.

He might not have any related legal issues  but as soon as the real Satoshi emerges, watch  out how state governments will want to pin something bad on him to take him down.
Probably more reason why the guy refuse to show himself.

Every country?! I don't know where you base but you do know that some countries presidential elections are very much manipulated? Right? if you want to really bet on politics, it's best you do it for the country that has high transparency during election.
And don't just conclude that betting in politics in less risky cause politics this days is messed up. Systems are been manipulated nowadays just for personal gain.

 I personally won't even put my money on it.

Simply, numerous altcoins popping the market everyday, have made Bitcoin remains the dominance.
None, of them are being different but just been a repetition of themselves.
Without Bitcoin, non of these coins would have exist and to make matter worst, the influence of most developers is not helping either.

You should be asking if the hacker or scammer has the consciousness of returning it back.
Most scammers and hackers are mind harden and when the succeed in hacking an exchange there is mostly no return.
Those stolen coins are most investors life savings and they will do anything to have it back.

Don't let your fear get over you. Binance has been the best so far.
They might really not go bankrupt as you think.
These challenges they are passing through will only make them stronger.
If you are still insisting on an alternative, Bitmax and Okex can still be go for just that Bitmax don't operate for those in US. Please do your own research before trading with either of them.

This is one of the top realistic price I have seen so far.
$100k in the next Five years is simply worth it and its very achievable.
But on the other hand the too much involvement with the higher authority is what we should be skeptical about. ETFs regulations is a good thing but what about the negative impact it might bring.

So far, Bitcoin has showed what it can do even without the influence of a higher authority and nothing will stop it if it continues to be.
So therefore, it strength is guaranteed but having a stable price may not be a sure one...
Moreover, whatever issue the USA is having with China will not affect Bitcoin. Bitcoin is not specified or owned by either of the two countries.

His case is way different from greediness.
It's more like being impatient, if he had waited enough for some years, he would have leap the gain.
This same impatient is what drove some people to trading too.
We should learn to drop the notion of purposely tripling the btc we have through either gambling or trading.
It use tyo work before but not anymore.

I knew the emerge of this IEO of a thing will be another dimension of scamming investors the more.
Whether they keep changing the name from ICO to IEO or anything related, it still same thing.
Don't be surprised the fraudulent activities in IEO will be much in coming months compares to that ICO, cause many believe it will be safer as tokens are being held by exchanges. Alas, it made it worst.

Trading is not for every one.
In as much as you might have heard these words many times, they are true!
Exchanges are not running a charity business, it's all about the profit. Which contributes to why buying price is higher than selling price.
In trading sometimes you gain big, sometimes you lose big; more like gambling.
To get less frustrated, it's best you store your Bitcoin in a secure wallet and wait for the better days to come.

That's one crazy and annoying thing about ponzi scheme.
Not only do they scam people, this is another second best of what they know how to do best.
It's a bad thing, Bitcoin has become their demonstration ground.
Come to think of it, this should be what Ryam Azab Youssef should be advocating about; how to destroy their Bitcoin and not that of Satoshi.

I don't see any connection between the two.
The two government are dealing in fiat currency, it could have been possible if it were on cryptocurrency.
Or else though individuals whom are doing business with cryptocurrency decides to take it up in themselves.
Besides, the issue going on with these two government is nothing but power exhibition.

Some of them are true to their words while some are not.
I think your paramount concern should shift from the bonus you will gain to the credibility (if users are actually being paid).
Moreover, most of these site use the bonus as a way to attract new players. More like marketing strategy.

If they intended using, the blockchain technology will be their best choice.
Hopefully, it will bring about transparency in the gambling sectors.
It will possibly reduce script manipulation and promote provably of casino developers and their sites. These issues has mostly been the shortcomings of some gambling sites

If you mean gambling with fiat online, then it's a no for me. I have never tried it.
The protocol is too much and its way too risky, I can't afford risking my credit card.
But for offline, I have done it several times. It's simple easier handling out the money in hand without no trace. Now it's even more easier to gambling with cryptocurrency.

It's not all about gaining money from it.
I know gaining is what most of Bitcoin/all cryptocurrencies investor looks out for when investing in it, but at the end, it's still not about the money.
The risk and gain there should be if world authorities don't make it 'dense' for Bitcoin investors/onwers in the future. At the same time if it will be 'spendable' in the future.