From where source merits are comming? Who is my source?
How many merits i get every month as a merit source? Is that number always the same?
Is it normal to get 10 source merit every 30 days?
Seems like you have asked random questions, knowing nothing at all however read the following (if it's interesting then go to the main topic and read the full)... If you want to be a merit source:
1. Be a somewhat established member.
2. Collect TEN posts written in the last couple of months by other people that have not received nearly enough merit for how good they are, and post quotes for them all in a new Meta thread. The point of this is to demonstrate your ability to give out merit usefully.
3. We will take a look at your history and maybe make you a source.
I am especially eager to have merit sources in sub-communities such as the local sections.
I hope you find your answers. |
|
|
|
Whatever the case may be, I don't see enough evidence that he used alt accounts to abuse a bounty. I thought I did, but now I'm not comfortable with that "evidence" or with leaving him a neg. If any concrete proof comes along, I will definitely consider it and act accordingly.
Thanks The Pharmacist. I never thought to have an alt, never wanted to make big money (which compromise basic human morals) using the forum, never wanted to break any rule(consciously). I gave my best to respect the rules, to respect the community, to keep things in order to help the community. I fell for Bitcoin long ago. Then when I found the community, I felt the urge to do something for the community to help the concept of decentralized currency economy. I wanted to have a good impression of my image, I wanted to create a good brand for my name. I guess it's a very common motivation. This is for the readers:I promoted some business in the past (before joining the forum like I said all the time and that's truth) which are not acceptable for some groups (here in this forum, they have different opinions and views) but those who know the industry, know (knew me while I was involved) me, know the business model, know how to sell online products (like anything), know how to learn skills - they always expressed their gratitude, we respected each others, many of them still ask for guidelines from me even though they know I left the industry. I was involved with advertising (precisely online marketing) industry. I promoted several affiliate products (like Ledger products, different hosting services, eBooks, digital educational materials, physical products along with all those online businesses which marked as ponzi business here for some groups) and that requires skills. Try to sell a pen online (not just list it on ebay or AliExpress, think how ebay got their name, think how AliExpress got their name - create an eCommerce brand) and see for yourself what it takes. These days production is easy but creating marketplace, finding customers to sell your products is the hardest part. I realize, offering the escrow of 20BTC was very ambitious and that was a mistake I made. Anyway, I do not have any regret for what I did in the past, I always knew/know my intentions which were/are not to harm anyone and that matters for me. If you can not align with me then it's not my problem, perhaps it's not your problem too. It's the different life experience, different social status, different motivations between you and me. I am proud of what I achieved, I am proud of myself. Lately, I have decided to change my mind. If I quit then no one will ever know who was mdayonliner, who was me. Perhaps people will conclude me as a ponzi promoter or someone who wanted to scam big money (perhaps this 20BTC escrow deal) and when failed, he left. I don't want to put this bad label next to me. From now on, I will continue with mdayonliner and will keep doing that I was doing all those days. I missed my days on bitcointalk. |
|
|
|
And how do you explain that you posted the same Twitter link as nguyenthanhhieu did AFTER he'd already posted it? Had he done this previously?
I don't think I understood your question correctly. nguyenthanhhieu is not me so saying "you (me, mdayonliner which I understand I guess) posted the same Twitter link as nguyenthanhhieu did AFTER he'd (who?) already posted it? Had he(who?) done this previously?" is making me confuse. Can you rephrase it please? However I guess I figured the confusion: If I am not wrong then we are talking about this two posts... https://archive.fo/6wSFj#selection-3065.0-3065.84 post #1011 https://archive.fo/rQ5eg#selection-5981.0-5981.84 post #2199 And the twitter feed is: https://twitter.com/cDesignsUK/status/1003628228907446278It seems I (mdayonliner) made the last post (#2199). According to the twitter date-time I made this tweet/retweet at 6:23 AM - 4 Jun 2018 nguyenthanhhieu posted it on June 09, 2018, 05:11:05 AM
This is the post which I edited/updated with the draft reports (every time I made a twitter posts and/or facebook posts for the weeks. The original date of the post was May 30, 2018, last edited September 02, 2018). Once I completed the task for a week I copied the report part from the post and submitted the report for the week. Check all the report links posted from for all the weeks ( week#1, #2, etc). What I assume is: for week #2 (post#2199) I was staking my Twitter and Fecebook posts on the draft post#3. Before I completed my task for the whole week nguyenthanhhieu copied from my draft post and made post#1011 on June 09, 2018 which was obviously before my reporting post for that 2nd week June 10, 2018. Now, I see I edited the post on June 17, 2018. I can not recall why I did that but most probably I edited any spelling mistake on the bottom part of the note I left for the bounty manager.
Can anyone find any more info that would link the accounts in question to mdayonliner?
Not exactly it's "any more" (How it's any more where there were no link at all. Anyone can post my twitter feed from their bitcoinTalk account and in this case they already did for whatever the reason)
...is talking about a hypothetical scenario.
That's correct. As to the part I bolded above: if you were to find evidence of something like that happening, I would expect someone to bring it forward and challenge me on it, and I'd expect a neg as a result. But since I don't participate in bounties (just the Chipmixer campaign), don't use social media, it would be very hard for someone to frame me like that.
It was a hypothetical scenario which obviously was not meant to you but seems like it happened/happening to me. phantiennghia: A user made 4 posts where one post has bounty submission using my twitter handle nguyenthanhhieu: A user made 5 posts where one post has bounty submission using my twitter handle. quangtrung1991: Seems like a typical bounty hunter who posted my twitter username where s/he was suppose to post the Facebook URL. What I assume is he wanted to copy my reporting format, forget to change the URL. Notice the number of followers section: mdayonliner post has 2136 which is close to the current followers 1736 and the other account post has 3023 followers. The post from quangtrung1991 account seems a mistake from the user where the other two users (phantiennghia and nguyenthanhhieu) post seems planed? or what could be the possible reason. Why would I (mdayonliner) will make two posts on June09 and June12 from two brand new accounts created on April 03 and May 22 when I was doing very well with my mdayonliner account. FIY hilari tagged me on July 09. Another point worth to note is: The fight between me and xtraelv was started on May 19 precisely on May 09. I have no accusation against anyone by the way coz I have really decided to give up from this account. My be I will start over, may be I already did, may be I will never look back to BitcoinTalk life.
This is where the issue is. You accuse me of lying but you have not identified a single lie. I have offered to change any mistakes in the information.
If I start listing the lies then I am sure there will be a long list however I am not sure if I am willing to do that but if that is very necessary then I will do that. All the evidence I have presented I have backed up with a source so people can check it themselves and draw their own conclusions. The job of a journalist is to provide information not to justify. From the beginning you picked a side, your motive was to destroy me. So you pulled the information and always left your judgement to manipulate the readers. The readers found some of the information from you which were truth and based on that they trusted your manipulated judgement as well. This is how you started everything at the beginning... Time to shut down this blackmailing spam clown. The archive and original post can be read here: http://archive.is/CiVJK#selection-1431.0-1431.47The changed contents of the same post are available here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.msg37869385#msg37869385Point is, you have edited and updated your posts so many times (after I left the responses of the original posts) that your motives at the very beginning and the motive the user get now (after reading the current contents) are totally opposite. I guess it's important to know the source of an issue in between two person when they involve in arguments. Your editing and updating of old posts including bringing up those online businesses I was involved in the past - made a very good impression to the community to easily pick a side or why not anyone else (except marlboroza) were talking about (never really bothered to talk about) the last video where I declared publicly that I gave up promoting those businesses?
When I was doing my investigation the user xtraelv had only 133 merits where 33 was earned. Out of that 33 merits, 13 were from Lafu (6 transactions )  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg36439011#msg36439011 (2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg36860882#msg36860882 (2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg32362928#msg32362928 (2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg31817321#msg31817321 (2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg31104253#msg31104253 (2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg30798924#msg30798924 (3) There were 19 merits that sent to Lafu from xtraelv (3 transactions)  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg36746425#msg36746425 (10) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg33965514#msg33965514 (2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.msg31744134#msg31744134 (7) All seemed (seems) sent for some customer service for Cryptopia topic. Source: http://loycevsbasement.privatedns.org/Merit/history/897509.htmlBut for an exchange to take place there would have had to have been some sort of agreement. There was none. I never discussed merits with Lafu until after you made the allegation.
How would I or anyone know? Everyone (including me) have no doubt about the xtraelv now that s/he are capable of earning merits and his/her judgement about sending merits are good enough but that time, people had no idea that the old xtraelv were capable of receiving merits and had a good judgement of sending merits specially after looking at the screenshots above.
There is nothing questionable in my feedback. Both feedback is true, previous one and new one.
Questionable because you never wanted to answer the questions I left on the investigation topic. I didn't wake up later, I am always here. By waking up I meant about the red trust you left for me. You could left one shortly after hilary tagged me or may be after the PM respond I left for you. What took you too long to tag me? What conversations OMG. You sent me message to check something and I said I can't find anything and you should report it to admin. That can't be called conversation. What other conversation you have in mind? I can't find them in my PM.
Can you please point me several conversations between? I had no idea that conversation means only the PMs (which is one or two I guess). Would you ignore the public conversations? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4773983.0 |
|
|
|
I would not bother to make another post to say the old stuffs again and again but seems like here xtraelv bought another new dimension to spice up the entire mdayonliner reputation again. You are doing very good job xtraelv since you were caught on exchanging merit with your friend (which later I figured was not intentional). You are mixing truths (I was involved with online marketing stuffs before joining the forum) 1, semi truths 1aa, mistakes where I had no hand and regretted in public numerous times 1a, innocent mistakes when a system was too new to understand 1b, finding mistakes in regular things 1c and lies very wisely. I wonder how do you find everything all together? I hope you don't plan for them to frame me. So it looks like mdayonliner abused that Ambassador airdrop/bounty with alt accounts? Does that sound about right? (I may just forget about this forum completely or may consider creating another account /This time anonymous like most of you all have/)
I would advise you to be a lot less ambitious in your dealings on bitcointalk if you go that route. I never thought you offered to do that escrow deal so you could run away with the money, but you most likely would have had the temptation to, and given that you didn't have a reputation as an escrow, it was an ill-advised offer. My impression was always that you were trying to build a reputation here too quickly, and that got you in trouble. So what about the apparent alt accounts you had participating in the bounty I mentioned above? This post is for The Pharmacist: Remember once you said you admire/respect me out of the few users on this forum? This was a moment of feeling that I will never forget. I was not even aware about my place that much on the forum before this compliment. After that - I looked for comments and looked for users who always admire me and my work. I easily discovered a circle. When I found the circle I felt responsible. When I felt responsible then I started to think about my best skill to offer the community and I found that helping the community is the one I can do the most. I focused more on helping the community answering the stuffs they are looking for which I know. I never even thought of having ALTs, abusing ALTs comes later. My all focus was to build up a name for me, a positive impression using mdayonliner account so that I find more people who admire me. Who does not want to earn a name for themselves? I was doing well until the escrow offering ambitious move and that was a mistake which I did not think of that time. The red from hilary was not even stopping me to perform my duty to the community, I was still doing my job. But every time when I found a bad finger pointing on me because of the red trust I felt bad. I even found in my local topic some people are telling me bad things and some other people are defending me, I found members are even thinking that I may sell merit if I become a merit source. All because of the red trust. Having a red trust is a huge burden for a user like me who are not known to a large number of users. I was tired of taking insults from the users who do not know me. I don't mind having a red trust for offering a large sum (a mistake which I realized the weight later) but I do mind when people say... I am: - A scammer - Promoted ponzi on the forum - A shady character - A merit abuser - Don't deal with this guy (me) he is not trustworthy - Can sell merit if I become a merit source etc etc. All because of the red trust I have where the red trust was given because I offered a large sum as a escrow but you will clearly see the interpretation of the members are not limited to the original reason. On top of it, marlboroza's questionable( ?) red paint. The ponzi promoting topic was created long ago by xtraelv but why marlboroza was silent all those days and woke up far later even the hilary's tag? Why marlboroza wanted to know in PM that when I withdrew the escrow application (before or after the red tag from hilary)? When I responded then why did not marlboroza asked me anything else about it for long time. He was active and we had conversations with several other stuffs in between. Anyway, back to the ALT and abusing bounty accusation, the new direction from xtraelv, the reason I had to break my rule and had to post another post from this account. https://twitter.com/cDesignsUK and https://twitter.com/FollowMasudul are my twitter no doubt about it. I have participated few bounties in my entire bitcoinTalk life times but only CREDITS Ambassador Campaign is the one which I started from the beginning and stayed till the end. This was the reason... I was an investor in CS ICO. Good to see this campaign.
I got paid as well for the bounty: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x838f6d0ec680728b5e99267cefc14d73299ff0c88ce7a693a727ee647f3f74c7Accounts bought into attention are so far... phantiennghianguyenthanhhieuquangtrung1991and all used the twitter account: https://twitter.com/cDesignsUK phantiennghia: A user made 4 posts where one post has bounty submission using my twitter handle nguyenthanhhieu: A user made 5 posts where one post has bounty submission using my twitter handle. quangtrung1991: Seems like a typical bounty hunter who posted my twitter username where s/he was suppose to post the Facebook URL. What I assume is he wanted to copy my reporting format, forget to change the URL. Notice the number of followers section: mdayonliner post has 2136 which is close to the current followers 1736 and the other account post has 3023 followers. The post from quangtrung1991 account seems a mistake from the user where the other two users (phantiennghia and nguyenthanhhieu) post seems planed? or what could be the possible reason. Why would I (mdayonliner) will make two posts on June09 and June12 from two brand new accounts created on April 03 and May 22 when I was doing very well with my mdayonliner account. FIY hilari tagged me on July 09. Another point worth to note is: The fight between me and xtraelv was started on May 19 precisely on May 09. I have no accusation against anyone by the way coz I have really decided to give up from this account. My be I will start over, may be I already did, may be I will never look back to BitcoinTalk life. But before I go, I would like to give you a final thought @The Pharmacist and others about this new acquisition: If I create few bitcoinTalk accounts and then start finding your tweets of a bounty campaigns you are and post them using those alts to frame you (perhaps) will that make you (the real The Pharmacist) a bounty abuser? I tried my best to prove/defend my image on the forum even with this surprising new one (alt account and abusing bounty). On my defending and even all those past days I have never lied (consciously) which I only know. Certain things I can never change even if I try thousand times. I was never a perfect one and I don't expect to be one coz it's never possible for a human. It was a pleasure hanging out on this forum with all the goods and bads. May be someday I will come back proving everyone wrong that offering the 20 BTC escrow was a legit one. I had no intention to walkaway with the money even the amount is a very very huge one. Good luck everyone, good luck BitcoinTalk.
11a1b1cYou've been caught shitposting numerous times. (73 replies deleted by moderators and 9 topics removed according to bpip.org) 1c1aa1c
Archive |
|
|
|
From what I can tell, the amount you wanted to escrow is worth many average annual incomes in your country...
Not sure which country you are talking about coz I live in one country but my native country is another one. Point is - how or why a country is/was relevant? 1I don't think you had bad intentions... I did not have bad intentions. I did not even know what was 2/3 multisig address as all that time before you mention it. I admit I acted very stupid. I am not sure, why have you opened this thread? Are you trying to force people's to trust you ? Is there any specific reason to trust you?
Thinking I am not a scammer or all the bed stuffs about me does not mean that I am asking people to trust me. Obviously you are good poster but it doesn't mean you are trustworthy. How posting (good or bad) could be relevant to trust 1? Correct me if I am wrong. Also you have tagged by Lutpin for merit beg. Although it's neutral but if some one think that, a merit begger are not able to escrow 20 btc than he will not wrong (imo). This is basic things. I am really having hard time to understand the point you are trying to make. How the merit begging issue and the escrow is relevant. Seems like everything you are trying to say is - whatever I do you want me to establish as a bad one. Do we have any previous issue 1? About the merit begging issue by Lutpin... Read... Hi mate, I am writing you about the neutral tag you made.  I Understand your point of view. I may did the same thing until I had a clear explanation before removing it. Seems like very early days mistake (February 02, 2018: Merit introduced on 25th means after only 8 days), I did not have any idea what I was doing here. I may have few more shit posts like this until I realized the value of the forum and started studying the forum and engaging with the community. I have deleted the red marked part however for your reference here I have kept an archive.is copy. I am trying to be brutally honest, if you find any more this kind of stuffs then fee free to PM me if possible, I will remove it. Looking at my post history page, it's really hard for me to find these kind of posts (if I made any) to remove them. I hope you understand and remove the neutral tag if possible. Regards, Make some points: I admitted that it was begging in bitcointalk dairy, it was done not even 8 days gone past the merit system introduced (people even sent 50 merits to each others that time because they were unsure about the whole system and stuffs), I intentionally kept the evidences, because I felt that removing evidence is not a good thing. But seems like people are using it against me... Don't worry, I'll change it now, it seems it bothers you.
Yes it does, and it also means that you try very hard to show your importance on the forum. Your trusts are too cheap for me. There is no way to know what you would have done with that money had you been sent it...
But leaving the feedback means you knew the outcome or technically you guessed the outcome and acted without even bothering the correction I made. I withdraw the offer immediately, I sent you PM about it but you never responded. Hi hilariousandco, Just withdraw the application I did not have all those negative things in mind. And about the investigation topic. I and marlboroza had conversations few times. I have explains the facts to him/her clearly. The OP created that topic against me because he was mad at me. He accused me for things which I never done in the forum lifetime. I will appreciate if you take your time and read the contents of that investigation topic and this topic as well where the OP was mad at me for tagging him for merit abusing. The entire things from OP was biased by his madness. I guess you are seeing me on the forum all the time. I never took any step which legitimately harm my reputation. I always respect value of the forum and also I never did any harm to anyone consciously. It's against my strong moral. I hope my activities in the forum backs up my claim. After your investigation if you are satisfied then would you please remove the rad tag. Feel free to ask any question if you have. Thanks for considering. Worth to mention the PM, sent to marlboroza when s/he asked me about the situation. ~
Update:
I withdraw my interest.
Did you withdraw your interest before or after you got tagged? After seeing hilariousandco's response, I composed this this message, then updated the thread where I showed my interest then while I was adding the update section (on the bottom) - I noticed the red trust for the first time. So I believe the tag happened at the same time while I was busy writing and withdrawing my interest and updating the threads. Side note: My email notification for that topic is on. I was online too. So, when I saw the email notification I immediately visited the topic to see the update and then I saw hilariousandco's response. And then without wasting any time I started composing my reply coz I had this feeling that hilariousandco was not happy about it. Thanks mate for asking me. I appreciate it. Considering the fact that you are from Bangladesh and have been recently trying to get some of the pinned threads translated into Bengali. So you are trying to get more people involved in it? Bitcoin and transacting in bitcoins is illegal as per the government there and I am sure you already know about it. Did you know about it?
Bitcoin was illegal to many other countries. I do not think any government STILL like us to use Bitcoin. One of the reason for you and others to be anonymous is that you don't want to get caught for using Bitcoin. Look mate - I understand your are trying to point something else but truth is whatever I want to do is to help my local community. People like you are too skeptical to anything. Please stop calling my wife whenever you get chance. No offence fella, but I don't trust you.
I am not offended mate. I do understand your views.
1 Don't bother to answer the questions coz after this post (I may just forget about this forum completely or may consider creating another account /This time anonymous like most of you all have/) I will login to this forum only to communicate with the loan thread I have (There are few people who took loan from me and still on their process to give them back although I am not sure how much I will get back). I love Bitcoin and wanted to be part of the forum to promote bitcoin (I still can do my job by the way, this forum should not be the only option for me). I never had any bad intentions and will never have one coz deep down I know myself although this proves nothing for you except criticism from some of you. Thanks to the well wishers I made here also the haters. Good luck everyone. |
|
|
|
1. Loan amount: 0.3 BTC
2. Reason for the loan: hold me over until payday
3. Repayment amount: 0.35 BTC
4. Repayment date (GMT timezone): November 1
5. Collateral: Domain, e d i c e . c o m
6. Bitcoin address: 3P7MqyfWAReyS1NBJDchWCEH1wbA879DAZ
Domain is valuated at $4,100 and was purchased for over that on Godaddy auctions. If you have a Godaddy account, I can push the domain to you within minutes from account to account. Just need a loan until the 1st for when I get paid if possible. Needed more than 0.3BTC but at the moment I will take what I can get to pay my bills without liquidating anything.
DeniedSorry, I am packing up my lending business. Lost too much money here. |
|
|
|
Since I received red trust from hilariousandco (I don't care about marlboroza's one coz it basically repeated hilari's psychology) forum members started to think that I am a scammer or someone who done bad thing/s (money involved) on the forum or anywhere else. OTOH, red trust for the other things seems to indicate a general tendency to easily sell out for a few bucks.Wich is definitely not a quality I'd like to see in a merit source. Lutpin already removed the Red Tag on mydayonliner, trust isn't the only thing that should be relied on, In fact OP has already done a good job here, although he failed on sime attempt to offer beeing an escrow.
And I think it has nothing to do with his application as Merit Source.
Again, a merit-source should be somewhat trustworthy. I can easily imagine a situation where a rogue merit source could undermine the whole recent changes to the ranking system, where 1 merit is all that stands between us and the Spambiecalypse. There are numerous occasions where people called me scammer, they did not trust me because I have negative in my profile. Having negative trust on my profile does not mean that I scammed anyone or even tried to scam anyone on this forum or anywhere else. Even, I never asked a penny from anyone in this site.
If having negative trust on a profile means that someone is a scammer (cheated or stole money or done shady activities in anywhere) then the entire trust system is a misleading system because in my whole life I never committed such action. Hope it make sense. You guys make me regret joining this community and using my real identity. I received negative because I offered an escrow service which hilariousandco thought I may run away (note the keyword may run away) with the money. Does that mean I committed a crime to get punished mentally? Some of you may say that it's a forum and don't take it in heart, I will suggest you to wear my shoes then to advise me not to get hurt. I should not use my real identity which I regret now. You guys tagged me as a scammer where the real mdayonliner, the forum user mdayonliner, the real masudul never even took a penny from anyone. |
|
|
|
Looks shady after seeing their FAQ stating a typo. How to top up my balance?
You can up your balance on "ADD FOUNDS" window. Another part that made the site scammy is the chatbox, you'll notice that most of the users have Bitcointalk profiles(mdayonliner,BADecker, etc) to trick new users. Good thing that you've asked here because this thread can serve as a reference for the others so they won't get scammed in the future. Edit : That smaq user who gave you the code is the owner of the site. 100% Actually the only two profiles that i've recognized on the site were the ones you mentioned. to trick new users. By picking 2 negatively trusted users? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=149737https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1432468That wouldn't really comfort me to bet all that much if that were to be all/my only reference of said site. I think there's probably more to it then them two just being randomly picked by the presumed "owner" of the site...?
Edit: Nevermind. I now see a lot more profiles popping up as well. It does look pretty random. Having negative trust on my profile does not mean that I scammed anyone or even tried to scam anyone on this forum or anywhere else. Even, I never asked a penny from anyone in this site. If having negative trust on a profile means that someone is a scammer (cheated or stole money or done shady activities in anywhere) then the entire trust system is a misleading system because in my whole life I never committed such action. Hope it make sense. You guys make me regret joining this community and using my real identity. I can confirm that whoever the owner of that site - they are trying to use my username with the other guy. Before reading this topic I have no idea about this site. In-fact it made me curious why did someone even tried to use my name. Am I that much known face in BitcoinTalk? LOL By the way, I was encountered a site which had same behavior (I guess) and here is the topic I created. I can confirm that this kind of approach means they are scam. So, if the deposit amount has changed in your case then the person is developing the site for sure (admin) and trying to trick people with different initial amounts to see which one works best. Everything else on the website you are seeing (other users) are just auto bots IMO.
It's not just me someone else also had the same experience. |
|
|
|
This is an interesting thread. Specially seeing yahoo on the list which now exists rather as a brand than organization, so not too inspiring. Other than that, you have made your point.
It's not only yahoo but also other giant like amazon on the top of the list. I am not sure who is bigger - yahoo or amazon but I have always thought that amazon is bigger than yahoo. I may need to do some google search. |
|
|
|
I am as guilty as anyone else and a large % of my merits get handed out here,
I guess more or less we all are guilty for this. The situation with shit threads is only going to get worse. They are adapting and just posting worthless shit in here now, its a shame as meta will go downhill very quickly if we do not try to counteract it. Lately I am avoiding meta for some reasons and this is one of it. It went worse after the 1 merit requirement introduced for Jr. Member. anyone else have any thoughts or suggestions around this? May be it's time for us to find good posts on the Bitcoin Discussion board. Encourage the posters to post there (good posts of-course) |
|
|
|
The topic is self-moderated to prevent spamming. Thanks for taking it easy.
This topic is for those who lost money in coins. I found this picture on LinkedIn and thought to post it here so that investors know that there are risk involved in any kind of investments. The media will try to give you this idea that investing in crypto is the riskiest investment but the truth is in any industry you can have bear market. Patience is the key!  Thoughts? |
|
|
|
Good to see that the case was taken cared by Hilari. Anyone with a healthy philosophy will see wrong when it comes to fake feedback. A single detailed honest review is worth more than a hundreds of fake reviews (there are other "legal" ways of dealing with such cases, [e.g. File a formal complaint] instead of seeking revenge).
Indeed. Anyway, I am locking the topic since the purpose was served (Not sure If I wanted them to get red tag, I was expecting them to have a warning like a neutral tag may be). |
|
|
|
I'd much rather not getting into details due to legal liability but I can guarantee I'm not their competition I am just a very angry and financially hurt ex teenant trying to save other of having to go through what I went
Again you are asking to trust you. My point is how and why I would? May be you can share your story with some evidences, may be you can leave your own honest review instead of paying others for fake review. When you pay for a review - you are encouraging fake. Plain and simply in my dairy. People paying for good reviews is so commonplace that I can't see why doing the opposite, and that too for a non-BTC related business would be worthy of a neg
Good or bad - it does not matter. I think a review should be honest, from a person's own experience. When it comes to pay money for that then it WILL be misleading and most of the times it will hurt others (an innocent one in this case). |
|
|
|
I understand that forum does not even moderate scams but think about a service like this... Someone is asking for negative reviews for his competition (may be). Obviously false reviews and paying in Bitcoin. Think about people who heard a little about bitcoin and will learn that those reviews were possible because the payment was in bitcoin (I understand that payment form could be anything else)... They will have this negative idea that bitcoin basically encourage shady activities etc etc. Whatever we all are doing here... we have a common goal which is to spread bitcoin in a good way. We should protract the name of bitcoin. Anyway here is a topic... I need 5, 1 star reviews for this business you must be from the US, the place rents offices and warehouses so say things about how overpriced their spaces are how rude the landlords are etc, only need 5 so only the 1st 5 reviews will get paid, post a screenshot of the review along with your btc address make it at least a 20 words review. Won't get into details but I guarantee these people deserve that and more. Pelican Bays 5171 SR 7, Davie, FL 33314 https://maps.google.com/?cid=3749123768436412277Also need 10 on yelp you can just copy paste your review of google maps I will pay 0.001 for this one. Pelican Bays https://yelp.to/qTKq/07RQJXhDOQPlease read some of the replies too on that topic. My question is... should we encourage them? |
|
|
|
If the person is really selling that "leaked database" which is fixed in 2016 or a bit later from the forum administration , should not be tagged but banned permanently. The damage that will happen to the forum because of such happening is colossal to say the least if in there there are people who have not changed their password or abandoned their accounts.
Seems like the topic was deleted. He really was selling the DB. I had an archive... have a look here: http://archive.is/OigVF#selection-3037.0-3037.20I am not sure about current the status of the person. I do believe this kind of activities == ban the user. |
|
|
|
I need 5, 1 star reviews for this business you must be from the US, the place rents offices and warehouses so say things about how overpriced their spaces are how rude the landlords are etc, only need 5 so only the 1st 5 reviews will get paid, post a screenshot of the review along with your btc address make it at least a 20 words review. Won't get into details but I guarantee these people deserve that and more. Pelican Bays 5171 SR 7, Davie, FL 33314 https://maps.google.com/?cid=3749123768436412277Also need 10 on yelp you can just copy paste your review of google maps I will pay 0.001 for this one. Pelican Bays https://yelp.to/qTKq/07RQJXhDOQNot a good tactics. Never! I don't know the real story but it seems like you are intentionally trying to harm someone. This kind of attitude should not be encouraged. Play a fair game if it really needed to play. |
|
|
|
|
pinkman12345 PMed me and said he will repay but slowly. I asked for possible dates. I do not mind giving him time (it's not something new for me, I never even asked anyone to pay me the late fees if they do not pay extra willingly) but I really hope he pays both of us. If s/he really does then I would request DTs to remove his tags for this case.
TucoRamirez PMed me the email you sent him and ask if we should wait... @TucoRamirez I do not mind to wait (please pinkman12345 let me/us know reasonable dates as I stated on the PM.) rest is your call.
|
|
|
|
it's not clear to me what kind of input you're asking for. Are you looking for approval for something that you did? Are you proposing a new type of format of an ICO post? Are you asking for a rule to be revised?
Maybe you should make it more clear as to what you're requesting; that way, it will become easier to get a response to this subject matter.
You gave me a lot of dimensions which I never thought of especially the ICO post thing  Thanks for the eye opener. It's too late here, I will update the OP with a clear direction. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
