Ale krypto dostało w nocy po głowie. Zmasowany atak FUDu i na prawdę solidny spadek bitcoina (z 22 500 do 19 800).

https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1634032009658990593

Totalna panika. Jakie wasze spostrzeżenia? Wracamy do bear marketu, czy tylko strzepnięcie ostatnich wytrzymałych?

Klin wybity górą. Target 0.019


Chyba, że to nie jest początek hossy... Wybicie na bnb/btc spowodowane głównie ogromnym spadkiem bitcoina z 22.5k do 19k. Pogrom połączony z ogromnym fudem z każdej strony.

As far as i'm concerned Visa takes 5% from each transaction. 5$ out of each 100$.

5 sat/vbyte is enough for bitcoin tx to be included in next block which is most often below 1$. Means that if you are about to pay >20$ its better for seller to accept bitcoin for this transaction as long as coinsgate/bitpay or any other gateway is not adding much more fee above bitcoin network fee.

you can always ask for TX address from buyer before preceding each transaction. To confirm if its the right amount you can use a simple api that check price at a date of transfer. you can also set a price in bitcoin just like many crypto/fiat transaction intermediaries work (like bitpay or coingate). when you click "pay with bitcoin" it check current bitcoin price, set a price in bitcoin, add a fee, generate new bitcoin address for deposit and wait.

Altcoin/BTC trading pairs were popular up until 2018. After that market shifted to trading against stablecoins and Altcoin/BTC  or altcoin/ETH trading pairs day by day were losing volume and liquidity more and more and thus the spread became unacceptable and the low volume only makes AT on these pairs practically meaningless, because this chart is only the result of other charts. There is no real volume. Just arbitrage traders and marketmakers. also flash crash is much more likely.

Most of such discussion is paid shilling. There are paid services hiring people with a lot of crypto knowledge to go to various telegram groups to speak about project that pays the most. Be carrefour.

SOL is dead.

1- it did not build userbase big enough to justify marketcap
2- its connected to FTX and SBF so people wont trust it anymore
3- according to what SBF said about "box tokens" in his most famous interview ... it would be faster, cheaper, safer and more profitable to lauch new SOL instead of trying to resurrect the old one.

Z tego, co opisałeś, to prawa nie złamałeś a tylko chcesz w miarę bezbólowo przejśc przez proces księgowania zysków.

Jeśli jednak chcesz pokazać jakieś koszty, to w PICie podajesz koszty z tego roku. Jakbyś chciał coś podać z poprzednich lat to razem z korektą pitu za tamte lata i czynnym żalem. Sposobem realizacji tego, jaki widzę, by też nie były to nieudokumentowane koszty z czapy, które przyspożą tylko dodatkowych kłopotów, to w ciągu roku rozliczeniowego w którym będziesz wychodził z krypto, kupić też mała paczkę a po chwili sprzedać. Masz wtedy przelew z banku na giełdę krypto jako dowdów. Wtedy w picie za ten rok będziesz mial i koszty i przychody.

"Welcome to Fight Club. The first rule of Fight Club is: you do not talk about Fight Club."

Welcome to the scam announcement. The first rule is that every scam announcement looks so shady that even its creator doesn't really believe in it, so "girl/guy" has to say, "We don't cheat" or "We are not scammers."

1. There is a third option. The market will go in one direction, and a margin call will close your long position. Then the market will reverse and close your short position. You will end up with both at a loss, which is a very possible scenario with high leverage.
2. If you open a long and short position, your net position is 0. That means it's like you did not open a position at all. So why pay fees for doing so? You can reduce costs by simply opening long where short would be closed and opening short where long would be closed, which is the classic buy when support or resistance breaks.

kilka nowych miejsc w mojej kampani. Polecam bo to jedna z lepszych. Te nowe miejsca są do osobnej listy tylko na 4-tygodnie specjalne z okazji nowej współpracy.

Manager: Hhampuz
Nazwa kampanii: Roobet.com Signature Campaign
Ile do zarobienia: Full  Members - $40/Week.
Jakie rangi:
2x Full Member
4x Sr. Member
5x Hero/Legendary Member

Dodatkowe informacje: min. 15 postów/tyg i liczą się lokale.

Somehow they managed to trust in an experiment - juggernaut standing on 2 thin matches and wobbling from fall to collapse for the last 50 years called "fiat money" AKA paper backed by nothing. The only thing they needed was "bread and circuses".

"We don't need our gold ... just give us piece of paper, its better because its much easier to use... It doesn't matter it lose 97% of purchasing power per 100 year" - that's their attitude.

The question is not about the trust but about the collapse of current system. Thats the only way to shake majority and open their eyes on how modern monetary system changed them into slaves and called them "middle class" with 200$ in wallet and 30 year mortgage on "starter home".

The problem with this is that they are mostly overvalued and pays like 2% of dividend which is way under inflation. The fact that they performed well in the past does not imply that it will perform well in the future. Generally speaking, investing in good dividend companies is one of the best solutions, however, I warn against too high expectations. The purpose of such investing is to secure capital, not to achieve wealth. With this approach, it will be easier to look at a position that brings mediocre profits for few years.

From where the initial supply comes from? Who was the selling part of transaction on CEX if all tokens are vested? something is not right here. If there was a transaction, there had to be tokens available for purchase. I guess that the team allocated part of the supply to the listing and these tokens were used as the liquidity on the sales side. How many tokens were for sale and how many have already been sold will be one of factors to determine how low the token will fall. but even after they sell all tokens they allocated for this purpose the price can continue to go down.

"the only people who are able to buy and sell the tokens are the ones who have bought it on the CEX." it doesn't matter because people can sell at a loss. The only reason why price go up is because there are more buyers willing to pay more than sellers willing to sell even at lower price.
If the price does not increase and there is a shortage of buyers, the price starts to fall, because there is no one to sell the tokens to at the current price. In the extreme scenario where the number of new buyers is 0, the price is also 0. It doesn't matter who bought and for how much.

1- these days, a 7% APY can barely break even with high inflation eating up all that profit. But you have to pay tax from 7% profit anyway  XD
2- high dividend stocks are not always good. NOBL (most popular ETF with SP500 dividend aristocrats) pay 1.9% in dividend. If some stocks can pay 7%, 10%, most often there is a reason why investors avoid it. It may be irregular payments or the current high dividend is caused, for example, by a temporary increase in the price of raw materials. It will come back down together with company profits. Perhaps the company is located in a country threatened by its neighbors. Meybe there is a corruption and high crime in the country. Maybe the new tax rules that insiders know about will drive margins down in the future. Maybe there is a thriving competition in the area, quite by chance related to the government of the country. We don't know it but mostly there is a reason for too high apy.
3- there are many examples of companies paying dividends and not making profits. these companies go into debt to keep their payments going (to become a dividend aristocrat or stay in this group). If it doesn't work out well, you can invest a future bankrupt.
4- too high dividend in relation to profits may indicate that the company has nothing to invest in. Which may lead to a collapse of profits in the future and an outflow of capital (decrease in the price) and a real loss. (and you will pay tax on each dividend anyway )

So be carrefour. 2% dividend on good stock is better than 7% on future bankrupt but both will give you a real loss when inflation is at 10%. So now the game is to keep the purchasing power of your money for as long as possible, not to "retire early".

Czemu idealny?


Ciekawe spostrzeżenie. Nie myślałem nawet o tym. Faktycznie z punktu widzenia służb, to takie pieniądze z nieba wypłacone z CHIŃSKIEJ giełdy może wyglądać podejrzanie. Na szczęście niewiele jest takich biznesów wymagających prześwietleń finansowych.

You know what?
When cars were about to hit mass adotpion, horse-drawn carriage drivers were protesting. The same was with postmans and telephone/internet innovation. The same was with taxi drivers and uber. Over the years, many professions have ceased to exist or have become marginalized. if ai generator can create 10 000 "art" in a time an artist can make one third ... its not the moment to cover your eyes and say I can't see it. Lets all forget there is such technology to protect artists job.

No matter what we do to defend them, there will always be an honest artist who will work 10 hours a day and sell 1 peace of art ... and his competition who will work 5 minutes a day and sell 2 claiming that it is also a handmade.

in my opinion, the new utility made people just test what it is and how it works, and hence such interest and spam on the network. Sooner or later it will calm down, the volume of this type of transactions will drop by 99% and everything will return to normal, because as you yourself pointed out "just another bullshit"

High fees will also push such transactions to other chains (like BSC).

BNB/BTC. Wolumen tej pary nie jest duży, wszyscy przesiedli sie na handel do stable coinów więc nie wiadomo jak ufać temu wykresowy ale formacja aż rzuca się w oczy a dojrzałość wskazuje na szybkie wybicie.



Klin zniżkujący ma 66% szansy wybicia górą a jego target to szczyt klina, czyli +50%. Risk/reward wygląda też dziś ciekawie bo stoploss na -10% wydaje się wystarczający.

Do obserwacji. Ja osobiście nie zagram tej pozycji, bo kłuci się ona z moim podejściem, że na początku hossy rośnie najmocniej bitcoin a alty przyłączają się w połowie... ale może coś w tym jest, bo BNB wielokrotnie pokazywał, że potrafi być inwestycją lepszą niż oczekiwania.

Above. I'm short term bullish (next 2-3 months). The recovery we already had is nothing compared to amount of pain we have had before. We did not even hit a 0.236 fib lvl yet (long term from top to the bottom). There is a lot to space to go up even if its not the beginning of new bull run and we are about to see a new lower low few months after.