Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 08:25:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 ... 367 »
701  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [Warning] Yobit pump and dump announcement. on: April 16, 2020, 10:19:56 PM
Will yobit ever change their scamming behavior?
Well...

Dates    2,061 days old
Created on 2014-08-25
Expires on 2024-08-25
Updated on 2018-07-25


http://whois.domaintools.com/yobit.net

As you can see, they are untouchable therefore they can do whatever they want. I always like to say: "why would they stop it if it brings them profit?" Best thing you can do is to spread word about shady practices and keep newcomers out of fraud schemes.

So, what is supposed to happen:

1) they announced 10 "coin" pump
2) people will buy 10 "coins"
3) all 10 "coins" will be pumped" by "community"
4) they will pump 1 coin
5) people will see one coin is going "up" more than other "coins"
6) people will start buying that coin
7) yobit will dump 10 "coins"
8  profit
702  Other / Meta / Re: Advertising on trust page on: April 16, 2020, 08:25:53 PM
New "trust advertising" in form of positive trust by account AtlasHEART:



Reference link: https://discord.gg/mA8JhA

Can someone remove this crap from my trust page?
703  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Bitcoin: "Lakše je prevariti ljude nego ih uvjeriti da su prevareni"(Mark Twain) on: April 16, 2020, 08:09:09 PM
Imam jedan mali savjet za tebe: ako ti pisanai sadržaji stvaraju previše frustracija i ne možeš ih podnijeti nemoj ih čitati.
Imam ja jedan mali savjet za tebe: ako ti se ne sviđa bitcoin, odjebeš s ovog foruma i nikad se više ne vratiš? Ljudi ti već par godina pokušavaju objasniti sve o bitcoinu a ti u svakom postu tupiš da je ovo piramida i ne možeš promjeniti mišljenje, OK, razumijem, smatraš da je bitcoin piramida al ajde odi negdje drugdje pa kenjaj o tome. Ovaj forum je ipak za bitcoinere, ne za neke fudstere koji nemaju ništa pametno za radit u životu pa spamaju doslovno cijeli internet sa nebulozama.

Pazi, to je jedan jako dobar savjet sa kojim će se vjerovatno složiti 2 milijuna korisnika ovdje.
A ako se hoćeš zabavljati otvori si svoj thread pa to radi tamo. Ovaj je za konkretnu temu, a ne za zabavu.
Nema tu ništa konkretno, ti si jedini pametan a svi ostali su glupi i ne kuže. To nešto kaže o TEBI, ne o NAMA. Evo ti za kraj jedna slikica koju ćeš još jako jako dugo gledat:

704  Local / Off-topic (Hrvatski) / Re: Molio bih pomoc, info - Leadopogo.com on: April 16, 2020, 07:53:03 PM
Naša tvrtka
A koja bi to tvrtka bila zadužena sa ovu prevaru?
Jebo me pas ako sam ja shvatio što si ti ovdje napisao. Tvoja tvrtka je uzela software kojeg OP spominje da pronađe kontakte na internacionalnom tržištu? Kontakte za što? Osim toga, što će jednom takvom programu mining BTC-a? I što uopće znači "mining je opcija, kao što je i btc tržište opcionalno"?
Ma pusti ga, piše gluposti, kao i svaki drugi prevarant.
Ono što pokušava reći je da su oni zaduženi za ponzi/piramidu na našem djelu tržišta.
Kratko i jasno  Grin
705  Other / Meta / Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie on: April 16, 2020, 06:18:26 PM
What consequences? Any nutjob can create a pointless thread about anything, like you do incessantly about posts that aren't deleted to your liking. Are those threads supposed to be your retribution against users speaking too freely?

The only thing that may have consequences for hacker1001101001 is his continuing lies.
"free speech" works only when TECSHARE is doing it. Lets not forget when he reported my post because he didn't like what I said and then he complained that moderators are censuring his right to speak freely  Cheesy

Regarding this appeal of ban appeal and what bugs me here, was hacker's "spam business" known at the time he got signature ban, or it was irrelevant?
706  Other / Meta / Re: What's the punishment if someone PMs you bad words on: April 16, 2020, 05:53:22 PM
I am not sure, but I think if someone send you "fuck you" without any reason it might be something for moderators.

Can you provide more context? Was there any conversation prior to "bad words"?
707  Economy / Reputation / Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account on: April 16, 2020, 05:15:49 PM
~
I don't see connection either. Lauda?

Mr hacker, may I remind you that I didn't really looked into all this closer and you are digging yourself a bigger whole over and over again. You claim that you have not been engaged in this business for years while proofs are telling different story:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221633#msg54221633
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221706#msg54221706

Elaborate recent ICO bumps coming from accounts closely connected to you.

It looks a lot like you are the one digging the hole.
Elaborate this statement. After those 2 discoveries hacker said something, you obviously missed it:
Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me
He said all this fake review business something which looks like bumping happened long time ago (years ago), look:
IF you want to blame me as a scammer by looking at some nave activities of mine in the past which I left 2 years ago
So, my question still stands.
708  Other / Meta / Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie on: April 16, 2020, 03:58:43 PM
coordinated
critical
clowns
retribution
abuse
system
punish
disagree
them.

clowns
punish
criticizing
clown

retribution
speaking [...] freely
critical
I have already told you, if you want to discuss anything with me, post something new. You are repeating yourself like a parrot. You must post something without using your usual keywords, otherwise only thing I see are keywords.

I missed that one  Embarrassed

That's alright, hacker doesn't remember it, so I guess that means it never happened.

I just don't remember when I did this shit!
Seems hacker remembers everything now:

Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me.
709  Other / Meta / Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie on: April 16, 2020, 01:35:23 PM
~
I missed that one  Embarrassed
710  Other / Meta / Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie on: April 16, 2020, 12:51:52 PM
~
What 60 days ban?

Oh, I just realized that hacker was banned somewhere in May, 2019. and transactions to some fake buzz review accounts came in June 2019. while some accounts continued to spam until November 2019. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221633#msg54221633 , https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221706#msg54221706 etc). Somewhere in that period Theymos introduced new bump system, which likely kicked many fraud services out of business. Hacker claim he stop doing this business, well, that could be truth, yet again, hacker is proven lying cunt so I wouldn't take anything he says seriously.
711  Other / Meta / Re: Ban Appeal RegulusHr and discussion on topic "good for the forum as a whole". on: April 16, 2020, 11:43:53 AM
Good case finding. If I remember correctly I was arguing against this here, and this user is definitely much more contributing than the one linked in the topic.
I was curious why RegulusHR was permabaned without getting second chance like many other users here, I suspected there is something larger going on but no one really told us anything. Now, we have this spam account who got second chance and I find all this very confusing.

There were 2 c/p posts found in RegulusHR's history as far as I remember, and as for hacker, there was one c/p post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5143331.msg51058321#msg51058321 (this is c/p from one of accounts I mentioned in this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54171090#msg54171090) and, of course, there is more c/p posts in hacker's post history(archived):

Quote
This makes bitcoin a dark currency and a currency which only bad and evil minded people uses. Bitcoin is like a big opportunity for many people in the world if used in correct way. Buying drugs with bitcoin is not a good option. Some of the sites on deep web like silk road are shutdown due to this bad use of bitcoin and people should also not try to do so.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1184641.msg23532786#msg23532786
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1184641.msg23532255#msg23532255
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2316855.msg23533421#msg23533421

This makes score 2:2 Huh

edited links
712  Other / Meta / Re: Ban Appeal RegulusHr and discussion on topic "good for the forum as a whole". on: April 16, 2020, 11:12:31 AM
Looks like double standards https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5240612.0
713  Other / Meta / Re: Appeal of Ban Appeal: “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie on: April 16, 2020, 11:10:33 AM
This war between groups that want to control DT
Exposing ICO bump service or how some people call it, spam service, is not "war between groups that want to control DT"! You will never say that all these users are in war https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4720640.0 you are selectively choosing where to post and what to post.

Account TECSHARE should go to that topic and start shilling for other spambies, especially the ones payed to post fake reviews for ICO's, like he is shilling for this fraudulent service for last 4 months.

coordinated
critical
clowns
retribution
abuse
system
punish
disagree
them.

For more details check:

PUBLIC WARNING:

Account TECSHARE is shilling hard for fraudulent payed positive ICO reviews and interfering with investigation of such fraudulent service

 >>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.0;all <<<

"ICO bump service" is highly deceptive and malicious service which highly misleads potential investors and leads to money loss

It is beyond my knowledge how this plagiarist, fraudulent bump account and spam service got the second chance.

Use "Report to moderator" and report the posts that break the rules. I doubt there was only one plagiarized post.

A wall of text is unlikely to convince moderators to just ban him again for a previously reported issue.
That is correct. I just remembered something  Smiley
714  Economy / Reputation / Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account on: April 16, 2020, 10:46:00 AM
~
I don't see connection either. Lauda?

Mr hacker, may I remind you that I didn't really looked into all this closer and you are digging yourself a bigger hole over and over again. You claim that you have not been engaged in this business for years while proofs are telling different story:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221633#msg54221633
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221706#msg54221706

Elaborate recent ICO bumps coming from accounts closely connected to you.
715  Economy / Reputation / Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump? on: April 15, 2020, 01:54:58 PM
What do you mean it is not your reddit account and you have nothing to do with ICO bumping service?

I was not involved in any type of paid posting promotion rather was just filling my signature campaigns post requirements.
As I said, that was the only level of contents I could produce on the forum back then to reach my atlcoin signature bountys post requirements weekly
OK, I agree it looks like bumping but I had no incentive from that posts more than increasing my weekly post counts back then.
Ok, yes they were targeted reviews but as I said I use to follow many ICOs back then on telegram

Again funny for you, I already agreed I was involved in posting for ICOs and following them even on telegram, which I left when I got to know it is forbidden on the forum.
I agreed being paid, please read the above info.
I agreed about my involvement in the service and me not been engaged in it from long time, as soon as I was aware of the rules around it and I even discouraged such practices thereafter.
They are not alts connections as you try to frame it here, they are just simple one side ETH transactions, and it doesn't prove I own those accounts or have anything solid to do with them.
none of the account listed out by marlboroza are my alts. I already posted about me being in that business some time back, same indicates and defines those ETH transactions. The accounts are not connected to me or I am not much aware about the info of the owners of those addresses.
Yes there are transactions between me and those accounts. Marking it red and violate doesn't indicate anything other than me being in business with them around 600 days ago. I worked with this type of services back then, which I have accepted many times in this exact thread.
I have done business with them and I am not obligate to explain each and every transaction from my wallet ( most of them I don't even remember ) also, that doesn't prove anything more than me paying or receiving funds from them and you repeating the same question again and again like a dump.
Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me. I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even unethical for me to comment about others accounts and there address transactions with one of my address regarding such type of service

Let me see if I got all this right :

"I was not involved in any kind of paid promotion"
"I agree it looks like bump but I was filling my signature post count"
"Ok, they were targeted reviews"
"I agreed being payed"
"I don't have anything with those accounts, those are one side transactions"
"I have no idea who are owners of those accounts"
"Yes, those are transactions between me and those accounts, I did some business with them"
"Yes, I was involved in bumping business and many users worked AROUND me"

 Huh Huh Huh
 
Ok, hacker, you claim you are not in this business for years. Not only that "600 days ago" become "300 days ago", can you explain bumps which happened in November 2019., a month prior to creation of this topic?
716  Economy / Reputation / Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account on: April 14, 2020, 08:05:49 PM
Can we get a summary list of all accounts involved? Will make it easier to make something like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238497.msg54219192#msg54219192.
I might do it on weekend, but if anyone has time and will, please do.

Why the fuck would he respond to you, no matter what happened? You baboons aren't interested in doing anything but dishing out retribution for those that dare criticize you or your clown gang buddies. So much fraud going on here, but day after day after day you are here crying about this guy as if he just stole The Declaration of Independence. There is a good reason I call you all clowns, because you are a joke.
Hello, shill. There are at least 40 accounts mentioned here. Instead doing your usual text spin:

Quote
retribution
criticize
clown gang
buddies
clowns

please read.

On side note, here is another good topic for you to do "retribution for calling out clown car buddies" thingy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112217.0. There are so many users you don't like there, so  why don't you do the same crap there instead of doing it here?

You can even discuss with bump service about their own contradictions:

Users: [...] Have been abusing Bitcointalk Trust system by giving negative trust reviews, not because of scam, but because they simply do not agree with that I have been doing.

Giving fake reviews is a scam.
You two will perfectly fit together Cheesy
717  Economy / Reputation / Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account on: April 14, 2020, 07:00:06 PM
player1001101001

I bet he just forgot to mention it. I think it's genuinely possible to forget some of the sockpuppets when you have so many.
I know!

To me it is just an impersonator
718  Economy / Reputation / Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account on: April 14, 2020, 06:17:14 PM
In addition to my previous post, first account I mentioned used this telegram (check spreadsheet):

Vickywaghmare

Now, this is funny (both posts are archived):

#Proof of Authentication
Campaign: Signature
Your Bitcointalk Account Link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2288171
Your @telegram username: @Vickywaghmare

Anish02 is another bump account, as You can see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2288171;sa=showPosts (http://archive.is/AWF76)

#JOIN

Signature and Avatar campaign

Bitcointalk url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1216263;sa=statPanel

Telegram url: https://t.me/Vickywaghmare


Lol! player1001101001! Of course, it is another ICO bump account (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1216263;sa=showPosts;start=140 http://archive.is/wti0Y)

ICO BUMP UNITED:

Absolutely true, developers are going as per the roadmap and very soon everyone can see the brighter side of the project. So have some patience because developers will keep their development continuous.
This is the only way we can do for now. We have to wait for the team developer to complete this platform and make this one a good and a worthy project here in crypto space. And hopefully, it will be successful and have a good function in earning profits.
The team is consistently putting efforts in the project and sooner they will complete the development of the platform. So until that we will keep our support continues towards the project.
When it comes to developing, the team behind the project has been consistent since from the beginning. As per the time passes the support of the community is getting bigger and stronger.

Lolz:


(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4855053.msg49336697#msg49336697 , http://archive.is/tqgQk)


Why the fuck are all these ICO bump accounts connected to hacker?
719  Economy / Reputation / Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account on: April 14, 2020, 06:06:40 PM
From hacker's address to this address 0x3c31c531d6772723c749dbfff6a547bc02726763



https://etherscan.io/tx/0xd19a39f9f00c3e93cd64bedc590708fafa89383a9412dd9d15afbab673b03466

I couldn't find who is behind this address, yet again, someone from this address received some tokens from GMAT (https://etherscan.io/address/0x3c31c531d6772723c749dbfff6a547bc02726763#tokentxns):



I checked GMAT's bounty campaign topic and there is spreadsheet! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bq0ZPWIMEksvfa6ZuCWkBkjFReqZLx-D5ts_eJIk4Fg/edit#gid=1284949262 (http://archive.is/3J6Au , http://web.archive.org/web/20200414171941/https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bq0ZPWIMEksvfa6ZuCWkBkjFReqZLx-D5ts_eJIk4Fg/edit)





Amount of token match. Account behind that address appears to be beveryu778.

You will never guess what I have found  Cheesy

Tadaam! It is just another payed bump account:



Also check dates, seems this account bumped various ICO's not so long time ago, or, should I say, not so long time ago prior to creation of this topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=406354;sa=showPosts, archived http://archive.is/JijLv).

------------------------------------

Account under that spambie account (#3 on spreadsheet and account is registered to signature bounty just 11 minutes after account beveryu778, check spreadsheet picture above), Theizestooke is giving me headache. Address from that spreadsheet is 0xF5Ee2C70Dee2BB05c375297c080D768A460d8BE0. Account received exactly the same amount ETH at the same time from hacker https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc7962f6fd30377517929beec878d57db5c1dba6651bf26a796dcfcd7449c069b , to visualize it:



Amount of tokens in that address match with numbers from spreadsheet. Theizestooke is another bump account, as You can see from post history (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1200481;sa=showPosts):



There is archived version of this account's post history dated 1 year ago http://archive.is/Gp2Mw so someone else must have investigated this account as well.

Misc: this is only account which included hacker to their trust network at one point:



http://loyce.club/trust/2019-01-25_Fri_22.33h/1021758.html

--------------------------------------

Third address from picture above (the one with 3 transactions), 0x5b041663dc1bdfdacb00d36d851b6baa5dc93bd7 (transaction), well, You can find that account in the same spreadsheet under #13, it is account swordking:



(received bounty tokens https://etherscan.io/address/0x5b041663dc1bdfdacb00d36d851b6baa5dc93bd7#tokentxns)

Swordking is another bump account, as You can see (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=150734;sa=showPosts , http://archive.is/JijLv), also check dates:



There must be perfectly valid explanation for all this bump.
720  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Rebitcoin scam on: April 14, 2020, 01:31:02 PM
Another thread and use brand new account, need to be tagged too.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5239831.0
Yeah, I created flag for second account as well.
Should be tagged for two reasons. one is plagiarized whitepaper and second is creating alt account
Hmm...makes me wonder, if there wasn't any plagiarism, would you consider it as a scam?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 ... 367 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!