tvbcof
YOU know its about protein and not DNA altering

but you want to fluff you feathers and flap your wings around with "gene therapy" to then misguide people down a rabbit hole of assumptions that its about DNA altering

just stop your quaking around like a legless duck going in circles.
mRNA is protein making not DNA altering

END OF
move on

mRNA does not go to the nucleus to edit genes(dNA)
it goes to the ribsome to create proteins
there is not replication factor and no gene editing occuring.

to be gene therapy it needs to contain enough code to produce another gene
.. mRNA does not do that

if you cannot understand the difference. then please do not be in the kitchen with a bunch of ingredients being told to make a omlette or a pizza. you wont know the difference

...
as to ognasty
magnets-debunked. just stop licking coins before sticking them on your arm. its the moisture not magnets
passports to walk around - debunked. open your door and go for a walk.

superbug mutations. well unvaccinated people cause more strains more often so if anyone is going to cause superbugs. its mass UNvaccinated populations spreading viruses faster
in 2020(pre vaccine) there were 4 note worthy mutated strains(alpha beta gamma delta)
december 2019(alpha)-october2020 delta (4 strains in 10 months)

in from october 2020-now(10months) thanks to vaccines. we are still only observing 1 strain of significance. delta
yep since vaccines there has been no new strain of significance
no Epsilon no Zeta no Eta no Theta
yep we had 4(ABGD) pre vaccine but none post vaccine

mRNA vacines do not enter the nucleus (part our DNA sit in)
mRNA doesnt have the coding to alter the dna

mRNA goes to the ribosome. to make proteins. not new dna sequences
mRNA breaks down in days.
mRNA doesnt have the tRNA or rRNA or any other microRNA types to replicate

the fastest way to evolve a species would have been hitlers model of only wanting blodhair blue eyes to produce offspring and then kill off the ginger, none pal, dark haired population.
but even with tanks on the streets and guns in hand.. even he couldnt speed up a change of human kind to a single direction

the only thing left is the neo-nazi fear of the lineage of 'pureblood' being diluted into mix-race offspring..

as for science intervening into natural evolution
well chemical usage.. if you call sugars chemicals. have been added by the cupfuls into foods that didnt have them 100 years ago.
this has caused people who usually get diabetes at 60 average. to now be 40average. where by their kids become diabetic by teen years.

but with that science has actually helped those that usually died at around 50yo 100 years ago. to now have it where the average age is 85
basically giving 65% extra live expectancy

chimps live for about 40 years..
so millions of years only added 10 years naturally
since added 35 years on top of that in just 100 years

this is not any genetic manipulation. or dna altering. or evolution change.
this is just finding cures/medicine for a disease or ailment that people would have got in their 40's/50's that would have killed them without the cure/medicine.
even things like organ transplant and operations. save lives and keep people alive longer

heres the thing about novel viruses
the dont trigger the 'first defense'

no runny nose. no flemmy cough

so if you have a dry cough and no snot.. you have been infected with something your body does not recognise to first fight off at the passageways to the throat/lungs

so any idiot still thinking its "common" ..
check your nose..  .. then you will k'nose' for sure

as for tvbcofs plug of a link 123dead
its a advert to get people to buy ickes book who then suggests another guys book who 'reproduces' some other stuff
where the reproduced memo says clearly in the first abstract that viruses can depress or express the immune system . (slow down or accelerate)

meaning. its saying nothing special apart from .. expect anything

seems tvbcof cant see a subliminal advert if it slapped him in the face and fell into his browser bookmark
its no surprise. tvbcof, badecker always fall for the nonsense blogs that are actually just advert pages of nonsense products not fit for purpose

..
but atleast he is admitting now that he knows people that have got sick from covid.
maybe his idea about covid will become that its a real virus. (like every other able brained person worked out 18 months ago)

i thought hornet was trying to prove he has same leaky brain as badecker so they can have something in common and get married together.
if not hornet then ariel is desperate to be badeckers basement buddy.
tvbcof just wants to rub up against badecker and be the bestman, but he might swing badeckers way if he rubs up too much.. he is nearly there.

Tash with all 'her' memes seems to be more of a bridesmaid or badeckers 3rd wife
im only saying all this because maybe badecker will settle down if he loses his 'v' and actually stands face to face with a real human and actually has to be accountable to someone

.. or the very least. they can take their conversations of conspiracy into the basement away from this forum

back then privkeys, had no value.
they were not important.
satoshi;s philosophy was if people lost their keys it made the coins left in circulation more scarce

he showed no desire, excitement or effort in hoarding. no mention of wanting/needing to accumulate. he preferred sharing coins for others to use for bug testing

as did others back then. making faucets to give coins away

hoarding/accumulating coin mindsets only begun in 2011

multisiig was not a thing in 2009-2010
there were no 'group' keys

secondly. satoshi was a single person with a single username
he talked and interacted and got help from other people. but they had their own names
like Hal. like Sirius
hal and sirius did not work physically in same room, building, neighbourhood as satoshi. they interacted over the internet
they were independant of each other not thinking of themselves as a 'group'


sats and btc had no value in 2009-2010 there was no reason to share keys. the mindset back then was not save for retirement. the keys had no value and of no importance.

also sharing keys then defeats the whole security model of bitcoin. the idea is to move value by spending value on bitcoin not handing the private keys to people

EG first transaction to hal. was done onchain by spending 10btc. not by giving hal a private key and then him moving them at his leisure

when it comes to the german floods

and the lack of historic floods before ww2

what you then need to do is look at the land development and the canals and dams developed after ww2
yes man made action ..
but not due to carbon in the atmosphere caused by man..
not due to carbon at all causing rain.

but instead mans action of altering the water table and water cycle
and changing the land to not just be open fields to soak away water. but instead sewers, pipes, concreate making water flow and combine

more and more towns and cities are being build in low level ground near rivers..
so more and more people moving to these newer urban area's are going to experience flooding.

..
people buying houses foolishly believe the housing developer has picked a spot that will never flood and be of no issue to any weather..
little do they know years-decades later. nature wants its land back

EG
new orleans is a natural swamp land. ofcourse its going to flood.
just because a developer puts cheap housing on the land doesnt mean its suddenly not a flood risk

yep i sent badecker from his request links to a report. its a 40min read. but months later he again asked for the report.. again i sent him the link..
months later he asked for the report. i sent him the link...

this week he asked for the report yet again. i highlighted i sent it to him like 4 times and he replied "it will take me days to read it can you send a summary and exerts"



he must have forgot i sent him summaries and exerts in previous requests last year and he just ignored them saying the summary exerts were not the full noted reports
(hot potato ignorance game pass me full report. pass me exerts. pass me full report)

in short is isnt just dumb he also lacks remembering he got debunked. lacks even bothering to check if he even has a valid opinion. and just relies on his dementia as an excuse to continue sounding like an idiot

gold has 2 markets..
1. asset (treasury reserve) market of world bank exchange
2. commodity(product manufacture) market of many exchanges

bretton failed because the demand/supply in the (2) market kept cutting into the (1) market. causing an instability

to sell gold from (1) they needed to literally burn bank notes.
to gain gold into (1) they needed to literally print bank notes.

with electronic manufacturing causing huge demand of gold. this caused a bad game of burning and printing dollar. that became uncontrollable.
thus in the end debasing the gold value of a dollar instead of rapid burn and prints.

..
bitcoin has no commodity market
bitcoin is not a commodity. it is a pure value asset. so more easy to control.
it has one purpose.

so fiat currencies could peg their fiat to bitcoin.

the only issue is that it would require exchanges to adopt circuit breaks to not allow bitcoin to move more then 1% in any direction in any one day.

and that would require alot of exchanges being regulated into such thing and also alot of inter-action with each other to arbitrage orders to keep them all in the same 1% each day

..
the actual solution is not to re-invent a bitcoin-backed-fiat to replace a countries legal tender.
but to have an option of accepting more then one tender. fiat and bitcoin. as 2 separate currencies

another aspect is 'spam'

going with the previous post philosophy that 4tx a day is acceptable regular use to warrent a person to want to monitor bitcoin 24/7
again thats 90,000 fullnode potential

now if 1% of users are spammers. re-spending their value every block
thats 900 transactions filled out of 2500.. every block
thus brings down the potential full node utility to only 57200 regular users and 900 spammers (58100 nodes)

also because of this spam. all 58100 are fighting to outbid each other, raising the average fee FOR EVERYONE
causing more people to not want to use bitcoin regularly due to regular fee costs being high

so expect less than 58100 full nodes being happy to be regular null node users

..
continuing this 'free market bid'; scheme of fee's wont work in the long run.
again without editing any bitcoin parameters of transaction count..
a simple fee formulae can be implemented to not penalise all users. but just the spammers
if they want their slot every block only they should be paying premium to get it

there are many ways to implement this.
but cutting down the spammers = more users onchain to be normal regular spenders and happily spending cheaply to want to remain using bitcoin and monitoring bitcoin

again a fee mechanism can increase the full node potential of this demo 58100 to the potential of 90,000 demo potential

its not just about increasing transaction count per block to solve fee issues.
its also having a fee mechanism with a premium for those with far less than 36 confirms(spending more then 4 times a day average)

before i begin on the big picture stuff you hesitate.. lets just handle your influencers PR campaign of offramping users to be a solution to increasing fullnodes(facepalm)

tl:dr;
bitcoin potential of regular onchain users = 90,000 fully synced full node potential
offramping usage to altnets. causes a 90,000 fully synced full node count. to become a random of only 7500 nodes being fully synced per hour(different set of nodes each hour, but only 7500 fully synced at any time)


...
lets begin
off ramping users away from the network. removes congestion. (your narrowminded thought benefit) but removes people wanting/needing to monitor the network due to lack of their personal use of the network.
(do you stay logged into a paypal app if you only make/receive payments 2 times a month.. no)
(do you check your bank balance every hour if you only get paid once a month.. no)
resulting in your fear of less nodes coming to fruition
yes i said it. the less people need to use onchain. the less they will want to monitor onchain

(if you were getting paid on paypal 4 times a day, your more likely to leave the paypal app open all day)

imagine it this way
an average block is 2500tx and a day has 144 blocks(360,000tx a day)
imagine normal daily use is an acceptable 4tx a day for normal people to use bitcoin enough that they want to keep an eye on the blockchain 24/7
thats about 90,000 users a day potential regular users..
or 65,700,000 hours a month of all 90,000 nodes always being fully synced
..
next is the narrowminded idea of offramping regular users away from using transactions by encouraging them to lock funds up and not make a transaction for a month.
those users no longer need to monitor the blockchain 24/7 because they are not using bitcoin.

this also depreciates the full node count because those off ramped users are now using litewallet apps on another network, and funds are locked for a month. so no need to care about bitcoin monitoring

some narrow minded people think that if each 'regular user' is instead playing around with an altnet. and only makes 2tx a month, means more users can lock-in and unlock..
well maths says it can allow upto 5,475,000 users.(dont get too excited)
but thats 5,475,000 people using an altnet that do not need to monitor bitcoin 24/7 and only need to access bitcoin 2 times a month

so no.. no no..  you are not going to have 5million full nodes always active

so lets go back to the start
a fair usage onchain 4tx a day =90,000 users a day = 65,700,000 monitoring hours a month(24/7 active)
vs
the offramp narrowmind of 5mill altnetters for 2hours a month= 10,000,000 hours a month(0.273% active)

you have now proposed the idea of a 6x decrease in blockchain monitoring.

also these 10mill hours.. are not 'synced' hours of seeder nodes.. but majority leacher nodes trying to catch up

meaning the amount of synced/live nodes with uptodate blockheights is alot less
5 million users will only be synced for a couple hours a month

and this final point alone is a flaw in of itself because it calculates down to only being 7500 nodes being synced in any given hour

far far far less then the 90,000 nodes at the start of this post

-note this post is just one aspect. mainly about windfurys 'decentralisation/full node count scaling'-

average joe doesnt buy whole btc anymore.. so the basket term is less applicable
yes i have many whole btc but even i measure things in bits and sats

..
its like 'boxes of apples'
do people actually care about the box.. or the apples inside
the box (basket term) is not the value in of itself.

yes a container ship box might be $30k
but people only want to buy single apples of $3 bags

world traders might only have 10,000 containerships of apples on their trading exchange suite. but its not actually the container thats the value. its the apples inside

scarcity of apples is not about the box amount. its about the number of apples that can be shared. no matter if they are in boxes or separate

gold was scarce when the smallest shareable size was like a necklace or a coin (multiple grams)

but now gold is everywhere. your device you read this post on now has milligrams of gold in it
everyone on this forum has milligrams of gold.
gold is no longer scarce.. its right now right there within 3 feet of your eyes


..
its like this
"due to the limit of boating lanes and cargo ships.. there can only ever be 21,000,000 containers of apples"
but reality is people care about how many apples people can eat/consume/share not the apples

so if they GM an apple to be 10x smaller to fit 10x more apples in.
more people can get apples. thus apples. the real value. is 10x less scarce

you will soon learn this when exchanges start measuring market orders in bits or millibits.
the un-importance of btc becomes apparent

,,
if still unsure about scarcity and supply..
if you still think its ok to break the blockchain unit of measure(sat) and have 1000x more divisions

well if you take these two pictures


and still think the supply is still the same
'cos its about them both being the same "one handfull"'
you really dont understand shares. scarcity, supply

windfury you have no clue

and when people have no clue. they throw out a rebuttal of victim carding
and get their buddy the rebuttal for them (social drama to distract topic)

you and doomad are just the replacement dramaqueen of carlton and lauda
lauda is your clone. his buzzword was adhom/. yours is gaslight but both you are playing the same ignorance game and cry victim game when you cant think of a real answer

your not original nor can you even grasp whats really involved in bitcoin
i get it your a PR person for another network
you have gone to some extremes of trying to portray anyone that wants onchain scaling to be some other brand/group/opposition to bitcoin. while then you still promote your other network as bitcoin

your not that smart and its clear what your motivations are.
all you and doomad care about is saying if anyone wants scaling they should offramp to an altnet or fork off to an altcoin

such idiot methodology to avoid scaling bitcoin

and windfury.
your fantasy mission promotion of wanting more full nodes. but less utility for those full nodes to actually use bitcoin.. is a mission that wont win.. so stop fantasising about it
if you want more fullnodes. more people need access to transactions on bitcoin to monitor.. not less
(your not going to want to monitor bitcoin 24/7 if your funds are locked and wont move for 3 months)

have one independant thought not cast down on you by institutional influencers
you as a normal working man with no custodial service, no institutional level customer base..
you have been advocating you want bitcoin to be just for institutional/custodial reserve usage which means you are not then able to use bitcoin onchain anytime you like for yourself
ask yourself why are you shooting yourself in the foot being coaxed to use another network.

why are you saying you want to stop yourself from having the freedom of using onchain anytime for yourself

scaling bitcoin.. yes i said BITCOIN. not other networks pretending to be
    scaling bitcoin means SCALING BITCOIN
its about allowing more utility

and dont turn it into a 'decentralisation debate of full node increase but none of those nodes ever able to USE onchain'..  as thats a silly fantasy mission to aim for
removing onchain utility but wanting more people to monitor onchain.. is a fantasy mission

fact.. common sense.. logic.. psychology:
the less someone can use onchain the less they want to care/monitor onchain

it does not mean slowing down bitcoin

it does not mean off-ramping utility to other networks

it does not mean stagnating bitcoin

and no scaling bitcoin is not the twisted "increase blocksize to 100mb" propaganda

for now. devs say there is absolutely NO problem with 4mb. but the way they implemented the "blocksize" is not actually scaling bitcoin nor allowing for more transaction count

scaling bitcoin is about transaction count ON BITCOIN

again dont turn it into some mythical "this guy is talking about visa numbers by tomorrow"

its about just getting more then estimated allowable numbers than 2010
its scaling not leaping

again SCALING
so the simple solution
remove the cludgy 4x code that mis-represents numbers to keep transactions below a 4x growth while promoting its allowing 4mb potential bloat..
and actually have 4x real transaction count multiple

yes the witness_scale_factor multiple is cludgy code that is not allowing for good full utility of the now deemed safe 4mb

this can be the first step(scale)
other things can be a fee formulae that punish certain transaction makers. IE low confirm spammers
and yes its possible because they already have a fee formulae that adds a premium to legacy transactions

so remove the cludgy bias formulae and witness factor cludgy math around legacy.
and instead just have a formulae that is around a coins confirm count causing a premium the lower the confirms is

summary tl:dr;
remove cludgy witness_scale_factor, allow actual accepted 4mb utility for a real 4x tx count potential
have some fee formulaes(as proven to work) that actually help avoid spam, without blanket 'everyone pay more'
emphasis: stop the propaganda that its about 100mb asap.
emphasis: stop the rumours that more nodes but less node utility is good

when you realise there is no spoon. you can then bend the spoon

block data and raw transaction data has never will never contain a btc.
its a myth
read the raw data it is and always has been in satoshi's

its no longer 2012 where i was buying lots of 'btc' on exchanges.
instead most people buy 0.01btc in blocks
soon it will be an average spend of 0.0001

the price of a btc might seem volatile swinging from 30-31k
but at normal spending habits of $3 to $3.10

in fiat retail/grocery stores
ive seen products go to $4 a week after saying they are on a deal at $3 and a week later be on another deal at $3.50

so forget about the big 'gold bar' $32k lump which no one buys by that lump size..

consider things at the 0.0001 level

already done..
last year you went on a rant that it should involve using centrifuges to separate the materials into layer
i pasted the bit that mentioned that

please sort your memory out or look at your post history
you ask the same questions you get the answers and a few weeks later you circle back as if its a new topic to you where you never asked before

learn and remember
i know it may take you days to read it..
but you have been asking for months..
so how about. stop asking for months and take the days to read it

read it, learn it remember it

thats not evidence
its hearsay
one guy saying another person he hasnt named said something, based from a conversation she had with a further someone else

so where is the mentioned proof he said he will provide

.. its aint in the filing

and to give you a better bit of info
5 fold was probably more like 5% inaccuracy
meaning if there are 10k deaths 500 deaths+- error rate
5% is assumed accepted normal human fault tolerance
dead bodies do have a high accuracy level for a multitude of reasons
most about that families would not accept innacuracies

severe symptom but survive might be 13% inaccuracy
not human fault tolerance. but just not all humans bother making reports about all their issues
(even badecker avoids going to a doctor)

and minor symptoms not involving hospital care might be 99% inaccuracy.. (because most people dont cry and hypochondriac about stuff)

just becasue 150million people did not report that the needle hurt first and second time. meaning lack of 300million reports.. does not mean the death certificates are 0.000x% accurate

just means 150million people dont report "ouch the needle hurt"

maybe try leaving your house and realise that you can still walk the streets and drive around. still go to a grocery store
you can still play sports.

what you are not realising. is private businesses are not part of human rights.
a business can tell a customer not to enter.
a government can shut down a business

but you still have 2 legs and a mouth so you are still free to walk and talk. no constitutional rights have been infringed

its spelled un-educated

..
well if he can only find enough bloodclots to measure in the 4-7 day window of normal bodily repair..

well..
150million americans have passed 2 sessions of that window..
....... those 150million people do not have heartfailure that killed them a week after their vaccination

of the 0.008% deaths attributed to the vaccine
heart failure is not even a major contributor
allergic reaction is