It's either your connection with the server got cut, so there was no response so the game just crashed, but I'm assuming the logic behind still ran and sent the response to the casino, which resulted in a loss hence why you lost money or B, there was something wrong that happened with the connection but again, the result still happened and was sent back to them, and only on the receiving end did you disconnect.

There might be instances where any loss in connection, like the moment you were sending data you disconnected, the server didn't receive anything so it just assumed a loss but afaik, it should receive something before the bet actually happens, so I'm assuming my former assumptions, where the data was sent, but you failed to receive the result (which was a loss) was the correct assumption. Technical glitches aren't anything new though, we all use different systems so it isn't odd that it happens.

Because influencers and news outlets often portray memecoins as "successful" coins because of the massive profit growth that some of these have when in reality most of it is merely being manipulated by someone. This showcases the "capability" of meme coins to make someone go from zero to hero, when in reality said capability is actually nonexistent. And while I guess some people do luckily profit off of some of these shitcoins, they're closer, if not already a gamble imo. They might as well just go to a casino or hope to hit the jackpot on a lottery really, heck that's a lot cheaper compared to buying shtcoins imo.

Does crash count? It was an absolute favorite of mine once I discovered it, I always try to squeeze in a few sessions every time I gamble at a casino of crash. It's just rather addicting visual-wise compared to say, dice. Slots were one of my faves in the past but eh, without changing it I gradually got bored of it so Crash is my current favorite. I'd say one of my most least played ones but still enjoy would be plinko? It never stuck to me but whenever I get back to it, it always comes as a kind of fresh experience, so I just let it stay that way

Let's probably give them the benefit of the doubt, the kid might be pretty knowledgeable for his age, and it's "addiction" that's a bad thing, gambling? Not necessarily. The mother can even help in monitoring so that the kid can be kept properly under control. While it may seem like too controlling, hey what can they do, the kids, well, a kid. I myself started gambling at around 18? 19, and I didn't really have issues. Granted I never continued for like, 4 years (my entire college or so) and only came back to gambling after that.

Hrm, I don't think I do, it's pretty random. I usually play in the middle of the day, alone as well, so I don't think others would have any influence on that. I also actively try to not to link everything to patterns, it's the number one gateway to thinking I have this under control when I don't. I think the most notable past I had of losing was peer pressure? I absolutely lost it when people were around me, talking about the game. This was one of my few instances when I started out, playing with others, it was devastating imo. Well it might have really just been me wanting to show I can, well, show something, and that turned out rather badly.

I usually keep playing but not because of the reasons indicated, but just because I had a limit I set, so I'm confident I won't go past that and suddenly go goodbye money in my bank. I get tilted yes, I also take breaks every time I lose, but not to the point where I'd stop, just a bit of breather, take in nature, calm yourself you know, the usual stuff you'd always do when you're talking with an incorrigible person in an argument.

And besides, it's sometimes fun to lookback and see how much of a dumb mad ass I was in some of my sessions. 

Hmm I've never really deviated from the altcoins I've always wanted to buy, I've never had any issues with other altcoins as well (other than me being dumb in the past and selling them at a low price). I guess some would be XRP and BNB? Stablecoins are also one, I've never seen any use in trying to hold them, I've used them before and still use them now, but mostly for transfers and whatnot, for hodling/investing? Not so much. There's also a bunch of altcoins that I used to buy that just died down, so I just gave up on them later on after selling whatever I can.

It depends on what this "new" tech is. I mean, look at NFT, it was completely new and innovative back then but look at what happened. Look at what it's users made the scene be. While the idea was there, it basically ruined the market. Early on though I guess it was a good investment since literally everything was new, and the market was booming so you can get away with making a profit off of something no matter how bad it was.

Just that, there's a LOT of worthwhile investment, idea-wise. Execution wise? They just run away really, scam their investors and get some bit of money off of that.

I think no one said to ignore new altcoins? They were just warned since newer altcoins have higher risk ratio in comparison to old and well-reputable altcoins. New investors should build up their portfolio and the best way to do that imo is to start with well-trusted coins, and then deviate from there slowly since you'd have a passive way of being able to maintain your money.

While thrusting yourself into the newer altcoin market could bring in a lot of profits if done well, newbies don't know how to do it in the first place. It wouldn't be any different from gambling if they just entered and invested in any altcoin they'd see that would look like would grow, especially if you consider how a LOT of new altcoins are just scams, or will end up to be scams.

A tad bit too early, but I guess I was the same really. I started gambling when I was in late high school, nothing too big or even official really. If you've seen a few of my past history, I started gambling in high school with my friends, but it never went outside of that. If he can manage his spending, and if his mother is actually going to help with that instead of actively just stopping it, then I reckon everything should be fine. If they have conflicting opinions and never meet in the middle though, it might create a rift between the two.

It may also have something to do with the lack of perception some people have when comes to money and the meaningful of it. Let me elaborate:

In our daily life we manage certain amounts of money and we are well aware of what those amounts are supposed to mean. A hamburger can cost 5$, a bottle of water about 0,5$-2$, etc. But then we turn on the TV and we hear about governments doing investments and plans for 1 billion $ or we see on the news on your phones that Apple may sue another company for 20 billion $. We only hear those sums of money and we don't truly know what they represent.

With that mind set, someone who wins the lottery and becomes a millionaire is someone who does not know what their new money is capable of, they may think that they can buy anything they want and go into a spending spree, not realizing that a big house in a developed country may be worth a couple of millions by its own. So they spend and spend without realizing the true magnitude of their wealth, and before they even realize, they have to fill for bankruptcy.
[/quote]
I agree. I've had some instances of this happen to me, it was when I first managed to make a successful investment, I spent like $300 and got back to like idk, $1000 - $1500? in the span of like 3-4 months. It was a big amount, especially if you consider how the initial $300 was already a big amount for me. Making up to 5x of that in a few months was insane for me, and I honestly had no idea what to do with it. I spent a few hundreds with my hobbies but I still had plenty left over back then, so I just went ahead and invested again. Never really made the same amount since then.

It's also why I don't blame lottery winners for ruining themselves, regardless it be the way of helping others (donating it willy-nilly) or spending it on anything and everything. We all have greed in us, but a greed that doesn't yet know of what it's upper limits are is scary, since you don't really know when to reign it in.

Or just, idk, offer better service than them. It doesn't need to be new in the first place, just, well, better. A lot of companies underperform, but sometimes due to monopoly people have no choice but to use said service. If a competitor who actually does things right pop up? Take a few years and people would naturally migrate imo.


Isn't this basically any other new casino out there promising anonymity? It usually doesn't last long, and as you've said it operates in a "grey area" so it's highly unlikely for it to be trusted early on, it'd probably take years before it builds up a proper reputation.

Honestly, KYC isn't bad (imo, don't burn me), the process that casinos ask for KYC is bad, dumb, and slow, and suddenly halts the user, freezing their funds without no rhyme or reason. Ofc if a casino can grow and build itself without KYC then sure, I'd go for it, but if it can't, the least it can do is provide quality service when it actually uses it.

It hasn't really affected me really. I was already a gambler before even taking up gambling signature campaigns, heck I'd consider myself as a gambler even way back when I was a highschool student really, minus all the depressing stuff that comes along with it, but a gambler nonetheless imo. It opened up a lot in terms of other people's circumstances regarding gambling though, which a lot of them are rather interesting reads (though a lot of them are also rather similar from each other).

I think you're fine man. No need to quit the campaign, just learn how to manage and deal with gambling habits and tendencies you develop, the bad ones that is. There's a lot of people that you can ask for help here anyway, as long as you're willing to work on it I reckon you should be fine.

I'd slap them with money and/or a ticket to a trip somewhere where they are fully monitored and serviced. Probably the best way to actually tackle the problem is by making them focus on something else, and with supervision at that to make sure said tackling is actually done properly.

If you want the free method, then you'd spend time with them. Actively make them participate in other activities/hobbies, ones that they'd actually enjoy and can take their minds off of gambling. Sure, self-exclusion, website banning and stuff like that can be used, but as long as anyone with the knowhow knows about how the internet works, they can easily bypass that. So actions where someone is personally taking note of what they're doing is probably a 100% better.

Possible. I mean I don't think people who have Bitcoin would suddenly run away and trade their coins for gold (or any other asset)all of a sudden in an economic crisis since there's no connection between the local currencies and Bitcoin in the first place. People would then scramble to come and look for assets that would help them avoid the devaluation of local currencies which inevitably would lead them to Bitcoin (as one of the options that is). It is volatile however, so I guess that's one risk of it in comparison to gold.

At the very least, I don't think I see Bitcoin dropping in value in an economic crisis even if people don't buy it to avoid fiat.

I'm surprised there's such a "specific" answer for it. Does that mean that any other dream I have, say about a certain game, means that I'm trying to shut it down? Honestly sounds really far-fetched to me. And while I do dream even if rarely, it's never in an instance where I was really bothered by it in the long run, heck I often forget about them after a few hours so I guess you remembering about it does have some sense of meaning.

Well, I reckon anyone playing for almost idk, 12-13 hours maybe? would experience the same thing. I don't really think it's saying to shut down gambling, I think it's just telling you to take a break.

I think it's not even a matter of religion really, just a matter of mentality itself. It just so turned out that the mentality of those people who developed the religion viewed gambling as something negative, which I don't blame, I mean the idea that gambling was bad originated from that era after all, it just continued on since no one bothered questioning it simply because they were the minority in each of their community.

It is hilarious how people associate the devil with almost literally anything they don't like though, in their eyes it's like a free pass to hate something.

True. People can want their privacy without having the need to give a reason. Gambling is an activity that is legally allowed in most countries anw, and if it wasn't then that might just be a reason itself. But anyway hiding it isn't anything weird if it was legal, I mean I hide what I eat everyday, hows that any different.

Does this work the same on apps I wonder? Like clearing the data would hard reset everything you see. In the cache thing though, I'm not totally familiar with it but isn't the data stored within a specific cache tagged to your account? That is why your ads are matched whether you view them from a phone or laptop/desktop. At least that's how I think it works, so I don't think clearing the cache would actually work. Not familiar with how they store data so idrk, might be better to if needed, just create a new account and format everything to remove any possible connections, maybe even stop using devices as others have said altogether if possible.

This looks like it's a game of luck, but no it isn't. Anybody who has tried it out would know and realize that after a few flips, you would be able to determine how strong you should start out to make it so that the bottle flips properly the way you want it to. Maybe if it was randomized with varying levels of weight and only like, two, three tries (with no practice), then it could become a possible game suitable for gambling, but eh, I don't really think it would gain traction as a gambling game. Might work on a small group though, since it is kind of fun once you get into it.

It's not that they're ruining the meaning of whitepaper, it's just that the whitepaper is mostly needed for their project to even attract someone to read their use case if there actually is one. In most cases, the whitepaper they have is simply a template used by the majority, with a few keywords changed to match their project. It was a standard that was created to present the project, especially in crypto's case where most projects can be considered as investments, and a lot of people do actually check on it, a matter of understanding it is a separate thing though.