a well regulated militia... requires regulation

and tvbcof does it again.. show off he is a covid denier
thinking hundreds of thousands dont die due to covid

90mill covid cases 2mill deaths
36mil covid vaccines. but no 800k deaths

so on balance vaccines are better than getting covid
yep if there were 800,001 vaccine deaths then it would show covid is less risk than vaccine
but because there is not 100k vaccine death. vaccine is 8x safer than covid
but because there is not 8k vaccine death. vaccine is 100x safer than covid

with people being 10% risk of breathing trouble with covid but 0.001% breathing trouble risk with vaccine. the vaccine is 10,000x safer than covid

Dr david martin.. lets see if he an immunologist... or had any first hand experience of vaccine development or first hand knowledge of covid
.. nope he is a corporate adviser. self admitted on his website

so lets hear if this guy sounds like a dr of medicine or a business spokesmen
if he sounds like a business spokesman then he obviously is just paid to say whats scripted to him

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC3YZDp9V9o

yep. he is sounding like a paid speaker to me

meanwhile relative of mine just had their first jab today(pfizer).. perfectly fine. back at home drinking a JackD&coke.
said the waiting room had on average 10 people at a time coming in and out as their 15 minute waits began or ended and al those whos time ended just got up and left as if they thought waiting time after their jab was a waste of their time.

so this person im related to is older and has more underlying issues than me. so im not spineless and afraid. when its my turn to have it i will.

..
as for the fearful antivaxxers in this threat. when there have been millions of doses given and your finding it hard to find millions of deaths. heck hard to find thousands of deaths.. then it just goes to show thats its not a killer compared to the odds of dying due to covid.

seems antivaxxers might just be afraid of needles,

so its not a 50% nor 5% nor 0.5% nor 0.05% risk.
but hey antivaxxers will always ignore facts and just quote their favourite conspiracy linked scripts

if someone has your back. then your spineless. you have no backbone of your own and rely on others to hold you up

nonsense idiot spam not an issue. if an idiot wants to prove he is even more of an idiot. go ahead
but malicious messages that can cause harm to others. BAN
EG idiots that spam messages advertising people should drink bleach to cure things. ban them

i cant see al capone as a wall street guy
wall street is just office desk guys. reading spreadsheets and tweaking trading bot code

maybe alan turing/einstien would be wallstreet guys. making algorithms and formulaes to trade the market

but al capone would not be at the wall street desk. he would be out around the city as negociator in business meetings physically twisting hands of potential investors

if anything 'mr wonderful':sharktank could go full capone if he go mad enough

there are some funds 'pegged' to the price, but not backed by the coin.

this means what you are buying is a gambling ticket with a buy price. its not actually buying or reserving bitcoin.

true ETF's probably will spring up this year.
regulators do not want the small businesses to get first mover advantage. they want the big wallstreet guys to have the first accepted true bitcoin ETF's and these are taking along time to go through application processes.
hense why 'when etf' has been a question for years

but once the first mover gets it. other smaller companies can use that application as a template for their own versions. thus streamlining the acceptance process if they follow the first mover application like an ingredient list.

lambo @ $200k/btc
moon @ $60m/btc

price hitting lambo is able to happen. but moon..maybe not because each satoshi would cost $0.60 meaning it would cost $135 just to make a btc transaction. and thats when people wont want to touch bitcoin anymore and just play with cheaper altcoins.

i think with a $5/226bytes fee =$2mill/btc
so i think bitcoin will limit out on demand at bughatti value

nah 3 countries
east coast for capitalism
west coast for socialism
 let the mid states of arizona/texas be the wild west no mans land in the middle

trumps been syphoning that money to his golf resorts.
there was $200m for the RNC with $150m going to trump projects and with the amount of golf visits he has reserved and paid for using that money. RNC only got to keep $50m


that 'save america' 75%(of $200m last time i look ages back, can go straight into trumps pocket.

couple weeks ago he wanted congress to sign stuff in his favour and get pledges where the republicans had to put forward their side(25%) over to him to cover costs of his 'petitions'

he is just after the money.
while people are distracted by his speaches inbetween golf games they are not looking at his bank accounts filling up
that $150m-$200m is his golden goodbye retirement package
he is not interested in staying in a job for another 4 years. he just wants distractions to have reasons to sidehustle money into his accounts

first of all aeroplanes and twitter are not a public right. they are a private business service
just like this forum

its up to the service/owner to choose who they allow in. they set a policy for their service.
same with grocery stores. the store manager has the right to ban anyone. no one has the right to just walk in and do as they please. but as long as they are good and do things right they get to use the grocery store

if twitter wants to close down tomorrow and block all accounts.. they can. its their business

the lesson to learn is to not become reliant on such a private business

people have the ability to wiggle their tongue and pout their lips to speak. thats the law of nature to be able to use your mouth.
but it does not mean they have the freedom/right to use and abuse a businesses/social platform/stage for any reason.

you can speak but that does not entitle you to free access to a megafone, microphone, stage or platform

heck even ISP's have terms and conditions. you cant claim some written government right gives you free and full access to anything

you dont even have rights to money. they can debase money, they demonitize money. they can freeze accounts if you abuse money. they allow you certain utility of money. but that does not mean anything to do with 'freedoms'.

so i have a family member having the vaccine today
so if they have nasty adverse reactions more then just the expected pain in arm and normal immune responses. then ill lock my account and never return

meaning any fainting, convulsions, seizures, unconsciousness, allergic reaction, trouble breathing, death. ill stop using bitcointalk.

yep they over 65 yep they have underlying conditions.
..so yea ill play the odds against my account

12hours from time of this post ill have some answers about initial reactions. and heck. ill even extend it for them severe adverse issues over the next month. (though many would say 2 days are fine)

over promising/commited positives ends up with further depression when that new day also goes wrong

its better to be realistic
1. mistakes happen, so what
2. no one gets things right first time
3. everyone used to mess their diapers as a baby. no one was ever a instant adult. we all have to learn slowly
4. if you can spend hours worrying/being upset about failures. then use that time. you have time to try again
5. millionare at 25 means 24 years not being a millionaire. so fail 7300 times(1perday for 20 years), its ok
6. even a kardashian takes 300 pics before picking the perfect one. never perfect first shot.
7. just have fun failing. enjoy life

once people stop thinking they are at 0 and need to be 10 tomorrow. then and only then they can allow themselves to start to see the 123456789 path

maybe giuliani had a $20k a day contract win or lose.
maybe trump thought it was a 'no win no fee' deal like he sees during fox news commercials

maybe trump should have read the contract first.

personally i dont think giuliana should have been hired in the first place. he is just a puppet for payment. some of his actions should earn him being disbarred.

but trump not paying out..
but trump disassociating from people when things go wrong..
.. well thats says alot more about trump than anything

trump never takes responsibility for HIS actions when they go wrong
trump takes responsibility of OTHERS actions when they go right

over all trumps own actions going right are insignificant in relation to the other 2 things just listed

rejection rate closer to 50%?
just because you might find a conspiracy site that links say 10 of its own idiots facebooks where they say no. does not mean thats is only 20 people offered a vaccine.
you cant do non supported backward maths to make something sound like 50%

also even if the vaccine does protect from incubated transmission. with the number of idiots refusing the vaccine and then going around in some form of weird protest to touch random things after coughing into their hand. then yes touch transmission will still happen
EG
an antivaxxer gets sick. they spit on a grocery cart handle.
a vaccinated person touches the handle and later food which their unvaccinated kid eats. the kid then gets mild sickness and then passes it to his grandparents and school class. where the teachers and grandparents get it more severe. tracing it back they would see the vaccinated person was a 'contact' middleman.

a vaccine does not stop touch transmission.

its like someone not smoking to stop risk of lung cancer.. but his idiot family smoke around him.. thus there is still a risk.
hanging around with unvaccinated people that dont give a crap about respecting other people. means the virus will still be in the community. so can you idiot antivaxxers atleast respect people and hygiene as a minimum

all public info so easy to find:
i had a quick look at the analysis.. but they didnt disclose the addresses. so i went and done my own research
the pankkake dude i found his address
1Md5..
and his associated addresses of his wallet
1BASZ..
12NsS..
13Hube..

and found the transaction in question:
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/05ab9bb347c3bf6b0bb52c9b756a924b5ad5db63f45a885db6b170865fbdb285

and yes the 13.5 ends up in a address linked to
3L8z... which links to NF https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7tnv6w (bio: readmore link)

since 2008 the amount of normal people suddenly jumping into the 'buy to rent/lease' schemes skyrocketed.
in many cases landlords are normal people that mortgaged like 4 locations where they charged the renter $1k and $600 paid the mortgage. meaning on 4 locations the landlord would get $1200(4x400) for his own lifestyle spending

though he can have a mortgage break if a tenant is not paying the rent. the landlord is not getting their $1200 income(profit).

browsers pre-2010 were just browsers. you had other programs on your computer like separetly downloaded adobe flash, java, dotnet, etc
but these days all this stuff and all the library of HTML5/javascript/css interpreters built into the web browser is much much more then webbrowsers in the 1990's.. even when you dont use that feature at that specific time its still there running in the backend

you would have thought for instance google.com is just an image, a search box and a button.
in 1990's webeditors would have been like 20 lines of code.
but if you look at all the source code and then look up all the function calls hidden deeper in things like the css you soon see there is thousands of processes occuring just to display a searchbox,image and button

i do not mind movies which try to be more diverse.
but when they then tweak the story line to really push it as an obvious plot. that itself then becomes discriminatory by overtly pushing it.

yes i noted the excess feminism scene in avengers:endgame. also in captain marvel.
it was just too far into feminism for a minute i forgot it was a superhero movie.
and thought it was a feminist meeting documentary.

there is a big difference between
a group of men marching into battle. where there thoughts are lets fight
vs
a group of women that look to each other like 'hey look we are obviously a group of women' lets spend a few seconds actually admiring that we grouped together in some girl power band
..
other DC tv series are excessively promoting feminism. it seems if a female is a superhero she also has to be lesbian or related to lesbian or atleast bi sometimes.. batwoman, supergirl, woderwoman, etc

its like they remove the false-stereotype of 1950's 'women in the kitchen'. and replaced it with women in a same sex relationship.

it just goes too far.

wonderwoman was good. not pushy about amazon feminist culture. it just got on with the movie. so congrats
but tv shows like supergirl.. every episode had to highlight feminism/lesbianism in some way.
im not talking about the plot suggestions that supergirl is stronger than superman. i accept that on its own merit due to biological theory behind the plot.
im talking about how it over emphasises lesbians and then makes all the males single and unsuccessful in life and love.
it got soo bad that when seeing stargirl last year. i was actually waiting for a lesbian plot twist because i had the thought 'its bound to be a thing sooner or later'.. which just then becomes a distraction from any actual superhero tv show plot

i got nothing against the lesbian scenes. but atleast dont go overboard to push it into obviousness, as that distracts from the story line.

its like they think of 30 years of tv has been 80% straight male dominant. they need to push female dominent lesbianism to 240% in 10 years to make up for it