Es posible que tengamos un hardware wallet y pensemos que ya podemos estar tranquilos y dejarlo guardado en algún lugar seguro, son volver a tocarlo en años. Digamos que sí, que podemos hacer esto. No obstante, la casa matriz actualiza el firmware de vez en cuando, y resulta que, en algunas ocasiones hay limitaciones para poder actualizar el firmare desde una versión antigua hasta la vigente. Recientemente he leído casos de gente que no tocaba su Ledger Nanos S desde hacer algún tiempo, y cuando han ido a usarlo se han encontrado que su firmare estaba tan desfasado que el sistema no les dejaba actualizarlo. Moraleja: es buena práctica actualizar el firmware cuanto menos un par de veces al año, y estar al tanto de los cambios al respecto. No es que te vayas a quedar sin tus criptoactivos de golpe, pero el susto te lo puedes llevar. Indico lo que dejé escrito en el foro en inglés para mayor referencia: En la página de soporte de Ledger para la actualización del firmare se indica que ( https://support.ledger.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002731113): Firmware versions below 1.3.1 cannot be updated with Ledger Live. Please submit a support request to get a replacement device.
También hay una recomendación general de Ledger para actualizar el firmware regularmente (ver https://support.ledger.com/hc/en-us/articles/360003117594) Do I have to update my Ledger Nano S if I am not using it?
We recommend regularly updating your devices to benefit from the optimal security level and user experience offered by our products.
Supongo que este asunto puede afectar a cualquier hardware wallet en un momento u otro. |
|
|
|
En Meta (ver Create an option to get an e-mail notification someone logs in) estábamos discutiendo la conveniencia de poder notificar al usuario cuando alguien accede a su cuenta desde una IP distinta de las habituales, con matices. Todo esto vino a cuento de que un usuario de cierto rango indicó que su cuenta había sido hackeada en silencio, enviándose PMs desde su cuenta sin su consentimiento, a fin de refrendar ciertas operaciones de compra/venta de BTCs fraudulentas. Esto nos suena con otra casuística, tal y como le sucedió a @bbvedf. @Theymos aún no está por implementar la notificación por correo, pero si ha implementado la posibilidad de que podamos ver de manera personal nuestro log de conexiones de los últimos 30 días, con las IPs de acceso asociadas: It's tricky to get email notifications right so that they're not too spammy. Maybe later. For now, I added this page where you can see your IP logs for the past 30 days: https://bitcointalk.org/myips.php . You could pretty easily write a userscript to periodically check this and warn you if it's weird. (But don't scrape it on every pageload.) I don't want to make older IP logs automatically accessible because that'd give a hacker a bunch of useful/sensitive information. But 30 days is probably not too harmful. Esto es interesante para poder ver si nos han hecho un hackeo silencioso durante los últimos 30 días, y obrar en consecuencia (cambiar el password por ejemplo). Edit: El listado mostrado va con un cierto desfase que aún no he podido determinar. He hecho un logout de mi sesión y he vuelto a hacer login en la cuenta, sin que aún vea el registro en el log de IPs. Relacionado: https://bitcointalk.org/privacy.php |
|
|
|
El pasado 30 Mayo, durante un breve intervalo de 5 minutos, Kraken permitió realizar un viaje en el tiempo para algunos afortunados, ofertando BTCs a precios de Julio de 2013 (sólo en dolares canadienses). El precio ofertado fue de $101 CAD en lugar de los $11299 CAD, una caída del 99% ni más ni menos. Durante ese efímero viaje en el tiempo, se vendieron 1391 BTCs. He leído que la gran mayoría fue comprado por un mismo comprador, además de varios minoritarios adicionales. Claro que la otra cara de la moneda es el vendedor, el cual aparentemente erró al introducir el precio de venta y provocó la venta inmediata de su lote de BTCs a precios de saldo. Uno díría que podrían haber alertas más firmes implementadas para avisar en casos tan flagrantes de error humano en las órdenes de venta ... Ver: https://www.criptonoticias.com/mercados/precios-trading/precio-bitcoin-dolares-canadienses-99-minutos-kraken/ |
|
|
|
Este post pretender ser un aviso a navegantes. Desde hace algunos días, se ha incrementado notablemente el número de cuentas baneadas por realizar plagio. Lo llamativo no es el incremento cuantitativo de por sí, sino que hay un buen número de cuentas baneadas que son de un rango elevado, algunas de ellas conocidas en ciertas partes del foro, con algo de prestigio asociado. La hipótesis que corre, que no sé si refrendada, es que hay un “bot” al acecho, buscando plagio en los historiales de las personas por doquier. Una vez detectado, lo reporta a los moderadores para su validación y consecuente penalización. Desconozco si el bicho ha sido puesto en marcha por parte del foro o por parte de algún usuario convencional, pero está dando sus frutos. Debo reconocer que pensé en crear algo similar hace algún tiempo, pero concluí que el trabajo desde un proceso externo al foro el trabajo sería tremendamente lento y potencialmente no demasiado exitoso. Lo lógico era hacerlo desde un acceso directo a la Base de Datos de posts, para lo cual se requiere que sea un proceso elaborado desde el propio foro de una manera u otra. El tipo de plagio buscado por el proceso diría que es más endógeno que exógeno. Es decir, probablemente se esté mirando posts plagiados de otros posts dentro del propio foro, y no tanto con relación a una fuente externa. Dado que las normas manifiestan que el plagio no está permitido, no es de extrañar que sea una de las causas más perseguidas, entre otros motivos por ser demostrable con relativa sencillez (no así su detección), y su recurrencia como caso de uso. Sólo hace falta darse un paseo por Meta para ver el número de casos que intentan apelar el baneo. Hay hilos interesantes creados al respecto, como por ejemplo: A wave of bans: 400 yesterday, 300 the day before. What changed?. [UNBAN APPEAL] Total list + Unban progress. Viendo los hilos anteriores, destacaría que: - El baneo afecta a todos los rangos (ver re: A wave of bans: 400 yesterday, 300 the day before. What changed?). - Hay 98 miembros baneados del top 1000 meritados (ver re: A wave of bans: 400 yesterday, 300 the day before. What changed?). Asociado a este incremento, parece que se ha otorgado a los moderadores una cierta flexibilidad para que, en lugar de aplicar un baneo permanente, se aplique un baneo temporal de algunos meses y además un baneo temporal de poder llevar una firma durante uno o dos años. Esto se aplicaría en todo caso en ocasiones excepcionales, donde el infractor se considera que es un “positivo neto” para el foro (es decir, aporta al foro y no tiene recurrencia múltiple en la infracción detectada). Lo que se ha de tener muy presente es que las normas se aplican sin límite retroactivo, de manera que no son pocos casos de baneo por plagio que se han dado recientemente, en los cuales el plagio sucedió hace años (he visto casos de plagio producido en el 2015, y creo que alguno anterior también). Lo curioso es que eran otras épocas, y la norma respecto del plagio ni siquiera estaba escrita entonces: Estaba redactada en Noviembre 2016 (regla número 33): https://web.archive.org/web/20161121133329/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0Pero no en Mayo 2016: https://web.archive.org/web/20160506061123/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0Dicho todo esto, el objetivo no es más que dejar patente que es mucho mejor ser original y no contemplar el <ctrl>C + <Ctrl>V como un atajo para nada. Tampoco es que en la mayor parte de las ocasiones se esté plagiando gran cosa, pero lo que cuenta es el hecho de querer aumentar el número de posts, normalmente con fines económicos y a menor esfuerzo, mediante tales mecanismos. Por cierto, que he visto también algún caso de cuenta comprada a la cual el histórico de posts adquirido le han causado una mala pasada, al haber plagio en el histórico del dueño anterior. Pero eso es potencialmente otra historia. |
|
|
|
It was all over the news yesterday in Spain, with images of crypto-ATMs being confiscated by the police force, wheeled out of a store that sold IT equipment. The two ATMs that were decommissioned where the stars, leaving the eight detained members of the crime gang in as secondary actors in the show. Europol worked alongside Spanish Guardia Civil for months to uncover the money laundering scheme, which seemed to be provided as a service to other criminal groups. The estimate is of around 100K Euros being washed each day. In went the cash into the ATM, switched to BTC, and back to FIAT in Colombia. The ATMs were as legal as you can get now, belonging to a sort of franquise. It appears they used a bunch of fake ID cards to perform the operations, making sure no single TX was over the radar limit. The police also decommissioned a bunch of crypto wallets, whose TXs add up to an equivalent of 9M Euros in a three month period. Pretty over the top it they wanted to stay under the radar. Not the ideal news for BTC ATMs. These two ATMs now have the arguable honour of being the first ATMs to be detained in Europe (so as to say …). See Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0f628fNzFkk |
|
|
|
El objetivo de este hilo es reflejar las personas que, en algún momento u otro, han logrado escalar de rango, siendo personas que postean en nuestro foro local, y que han recibido al menos un sMérito en él. Lógicamente, las personas de la lista mostrada serán un subconjunto de las reflejadas en el hilo Méritos obtenidos en el foro español por cada miembro del foro. Datos a 05/04/2024En resumen, en nuestro foro local se ha meritado a 571 personas, de las cuales 222 han escalado de rango en algún momento, méritos mediante. Como resultado tenemos (*): 21 Legendary 7 Hero Members 6 Sr. Members 12 Full Members 51 Members 125 Jr. Members que han precisado sMéritos para escalar de rango.
(*) Nota: No todos los miembros listados tienen su foco principal en el foro Español. Relación Completa (no caben todos en la lista de este post): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14YERBif4m4Jyrz1JFilOMvKzC5Z1YdrcEqcrwm8sWDg/edit?usp=sharinguser_id Nombre Actividad Méritos M.Recibidos M.Inicial Rango RangoInicial M.Español % Español
980501 Artemis3 1988 1561 1561 0 Legendary New Era Newbie 436 27,93%
1554927 bitmover 2268 5851 5851 0 Legendary Old Era Newbie 23 0,39%
87930 bitserve 1820 1464 1214 250 Legendary Sr. Member 64 5,27%
903175 Csmiami 1582 1319 1219 100 Legendary Full Member 516 42,33%
215813 Daltonik 2506 1490 1240 250 Legendary Sr. Member 2 0,16%
1582324 DdmrDdmr 2282 10694 10694 0 Legendary Old Era Newbie 3948 36,92%
1107222 Don Pedro Dinero 1274 1474 1374 100 Legendary Full Member 813 59,17%
1593137 famososMuertos 1708 2691 2691 0 Legendary New Era Newbie 2157 80,16%
2850161 Hispo 1176 2081 2081 0 Legendary New Era Newbie 1585 76,17%
1137579 icopress 1596 7615 7605 10 Legendary Member 6 0,08%
97582 joker_josue 1624 4456 3956 500 Legendary Hero Member 4 0,10%
1153977 LUCKMCFLY 2380 1848 1748 100 Legendary Full Member 1007 57,61%
1894120 madnessteat 2212 1945 1945 0 Legendary Old Era Newbie 2 0,10%
2033515 mikeywith 2198 6317 6317 0 Legendary Old Era Newbie 14 0,22%
1280964 MinoRaiola 2086 1559 1549 10 Legendary Member 1 0,06%
1192397 paxmao 2170 1575 1475 100 Legendary Full Member 351 23,80%
991374 Porfirii 1750 2022 1772 250 Legendary Sr. Member 1345 75,90%
907642 Silberman 2478 1327 827 500 Legendary Hero Member 707 85,49%
1099980 Trofo 2450 2516 2416 100 Legendary Full Member 4 0,17%
1138727 VB1001 938 2540 2540 0 Legendary New Era Newbie 595 23,43%
1068464 Xal0lex 2422 2319 2219 100 Legendary Full Member 4 0,18%
1171087 2stout 2310 583 483 100 Hero Member Full Member 1 0,21%
3193408 albert0bsd 830 658 658 0 Hero Member New Era Newbie 136 20,67%
2812492 darxiaomi 1274 950 950 0 Hero Member New Era Newbie 636 66,95%
821717 MA40 782 523 273 250 Hero Member Sr. Member 219 80,22%
80810 solosequenosenada 952 542 292 250 Hero Member Sr. Member 264 90,41%
2627711 Symmetrick 520 11957 11957 0 Hero Member New Era Newbie 1 0,01%
849090 tomahawk9 2086 994 744 250 Hero Member Sr. Member 30 4,03%
1176794 ChiNgadOr 1680 278 178 100 Sr. Member Full Member 98 55,06%
1414197 danadc 938 296 296 0 Sr. Member New Era Newbie 164 55,41%
2434463 FinneysTrueVision 1624 333 333 0 Sr. Member New Era Newbie 3 0,90%
2587024 FullNode 505 270 270 0 Sr. Member New Era Newbie 118 43,70%
3357194 takuma sato 285 408 408 0 Sr. Member New Era Newbie 11 2,70%
2424395 womanderful 489 463 463 0 Sr. Member New Era Newbie 451 97,41%
3575638 criptoevangelista 224 475 475 0 Full Member New Era Newbie 5 1,05%
3532447 darbitmobilerecovery 280 223 223 0 Full Member New Era Newbie 207 92,83%
1126401 dgcarlosleon 356 118 118 0 Full Member Old Era Newbie 1 0,85%
890719 Drawesome 205 135 135 0 Full Member New Era Newbie 117 86,67%
1267993 Leteravian 322 158 158 0 Full Member Old Era Newbie 2 1,27%
3344622 Magicalking 378 135 135 0 Full Member New Era Newbie 11 8,15%
2085659 MbyzIco 410 158 158 0 Full Member Old Era Newbie 131 82,91%
1555374 NadiaHel 336 203 203 0 Full Member Old Era Newbie 135 66,50%
2521019 nomteck1 240 139 139 0 Full Member New Era Newbie 2 1,44%
1982477 tim-bc 538 175 175 0 Full Member Old Era Newbie 5 2,86%
1950519 Wimex 616 140 140 0 Full Member New Era Newbie 128 91,43%
1097101 Zarg0n 448 170 170 0 Full Member Old Era Newbie 170 100,00%
1870482 adriaparcerisas 368 12 12 0 Member New Era Newbie 9 75,00%
1208074 agu3000 276 31 31 0 Member Old Era Newbie 27 87,10%
3543333 airbin 81 28 28 0 Member New Era Newbie 26 92,86%
1729905 alberbeni 92 13 13 0 Member Old Era Newbie 11 84,62%
2250773 anderson697 98 10 10 0 Member New Era Newbie 10 100,00%
2169218 bbvedf 588 61 61 0 Member Old Era Newbie 58 95,08%
2387858 BentechCrypto 123 15 15 0 Member New Era Newbie 15 100,00%
2363885 Bitmagister 94 19 19 0 Member New Era Newbie 17 89,47%
389306 bitrefill 238 52 52 0 Member New Era Newbie 3 5,77%
1683386 Byzantium101 249 13 13 0 Member Old Era Newbie 11 84,62%
2889812 Cryptomint9 76 23 23 0 Member New Era Newbie 7 30,43%
3536303 Cuenta Alternativa 182 66 66 0 Member New Era Newbie 38 57,58%
1890148 daniel.roman 130 15 15 0 Member Old Era Newbie 15 100,00%
2049993 DoriangrayTW 73 61 61 0 Member Old Era Newbie 11 18,03%
2232583 drgomez89 294 26 26 0 Member Old Era Newbie 1 3,85%
2426802 DRMKtoken 62 13 13 0 Member New Era Newbie 13 100,00%
1966130 electrobit 317 81 81 0 Member Old Era Newbie 76 93,83%
1179401 EnemyDown 76 11 11 0 Member Old Era Newbie 11 100,00%
1752016 evdoksi 100 24 24 0 Member Old Era Newbie 24 100,00%
1950645 FabiAdr76 72 10 10 0 Member Old Era Newbie 8 80,00%
1583780 Gardar 168 13 13 0 Member Old Era Newbie 13 100,00%
2276592 germanking3 168 44 44 0 Member Old Era Newbie 44 100,00%
75953 goddog 168 47 47 0 Member Old Era Newbie 5 10,64%
2359691 Helana 80 70 70 0 Member Old Era Newbie 11 15,71%
1147564 heraware 105 17 17 0 Member New Era Newbie 1 5,88%
1481439 LorenoCoin 293 11 11 0 Member New Era Newbie 10 90,91%
1018610 luna2017 252 13 13 0 Member Old Era Newbie 2 15,38%
3554014 MadHatters 155 11 11 0 Member New Era Newbie 6 54,55%
1349952 manbago 119 15 15 0 Member Old Era Newbie 15 100,00%
2289584 MARK21 62 24 24 0 Member New Era Newbie 24 100,00%
1711698 mcdouglasx 235 51 51 0 Member New Era Newbie 5 9,80%
2227721 mrjohanr 70 17 17 0 Member New Era Newbie 17 100,00%
1973774 nekludov 157 15 15 0 Member Old Era Newbie 14 93,33%
1414566 Neo-Design 154 15 15 0 Member New Era Newbie 1 6,67%
2750581 Norkys.2020 76 20 20 0 Member New Era Newbie 19 95,00%
1567662 ODIO13 90 17 17 0 Member Old Era Newbie 16 94,12%
451380 paddy_exchange 136 20 20 0 Member Old Era Newbie 16 80,00%
1381644 poloniex777 234 25 25 0 Member Old Era Newbie 25 100,00%
2281819 Radiante 280 15 15 0 Member New Era Newbie 9 60,00%
1734526 rillater 156 14 14 0 Member Old Era Newbie 6 42,86%
1363524 Ruso21 115 12 12 0 Member New Era Newbie 2 16,67%
995835 SamaelDNM 732 18 18 0 Member Old Era Newbie 3 16,67%
1543660 Seresjen 328 10 10 0 Member Old Era Newbie 9 90,00%
163012 sinuari 117 62 62 0 Member New Era Newbie 57 91,94%
1944251 sitwac 200 73 73 0 Member Old Era Newbie 72 98,63%
1092411 siulynotb 79 54 54 0 Member Old Era Newbie 54 100,00%
2330448 sweetstar78 110 17 17 0 Member New Era Newbie 1 5,88%
2417325 TheGhostMan 156 63 63 0 Member New Era Newbie 51 80,95%
1891055 vladimirhf 590 39 39 0 Member Old Era Newbie 1 2,56%
2171012 WillyAp 644 16 16 0 Member New Era Newbie 1 6,25%
3518461 zenaku 63 20 20 0 Member New Era Newbie 18 90,00%
2142712 2tf 35 1 1 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 1 100,00%
1131597 Acido213 52 2 2 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 2 100,00%
2515731 Aelf Spanish 276 1 1 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 1 100,00%
1802254 afeno 175 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
1975036 AirdropsMob 34 6 6 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 4 66,67%
2801319 alexisenrique 39 20 20 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 20 100,00%
2033580 Andreina0107 76 4 4 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 4 100,00%
2315770 Antra 34 4 4 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 4 100,00%
1498734 Aurora Castro 217 5 5 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 5 100,00%
2670985 Axel-Spanish 128 4 4 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 4 100,00%
342067 backspacer 41 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
2663379 Bitcoinauta 30 5 5 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 5 100,00%
2815250 Bittothefuture 35 13 13 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 2 15,38%
1676972 Blid 66 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
1406277 calimero5001 42 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
2137066 CallMEBruno 89 2 2 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 2 100,00%
1800324 CasinoExpert 56 20 20 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 10 50,00%
1125622 cesarvasq 42 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
1131325 charlie-gama 133 1 1 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 1 100,00%
1640898 cjota 41 1 1 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 1 100,00%
2741227 coinary 57 8 8 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 8 100,00%
1983627 Coinbaker_criptobakery 36 12 12 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 9 75,00%
2126199 coincentrado 36 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
2898085 coinsolidation.org 68 7 7 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 5 71,43%
1050788 cripteles 92 3 3 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 3 100,00%
1182787 CriptoMinero02 109 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
2230964 Criptopeso 38 3 3 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 3 100,00%
3583126 CryptoDeivid 40 24 24 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 19 79,17%
1298015 CryptoGloria 37 3 3 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 3 100,00%
1486035 Cryptotango 37 2 2 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 2 100,00%
1202590 Daisel 45 5 5 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 4 80,00%
1653300 Daniterse 64 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
1875125 Dante.dadc 98 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
1742229 DarkEagleMan 84 5 5 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 3 60,00%
1434613 dazz. 69 3 3 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 33,33%
1704984 djmuler 41 2 2 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 2 100,00%
1615625 dualcore156 94 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
2552214 DUPONDIUS 101 9 9 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 6 66,67%
50096 EcmSeer 45 2 2 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 2 100,00%
1041260 eDave 55 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
1393485 EdChain 271 2 2 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 2 100,00%
2120910 emitofu 97 2 2 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 2 100,00%
1561483 ennriqe 41 5 5 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 5 100,00%
2006836 erikc0in 71 2 2 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 2 100,00%
1994019 Felipinho 84 1 1 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 1 100,00%
521500 feltoxXx 77 2 2 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 2 100,00%
2593105 Filmgrid 44 3 3 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 2 66,67%
1874977 frillyblockG 61 1 1 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 1 100,00%
1326387 fsaemichigan 305 1 1 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 1 100,00%
2375126 funnychain 50 4 4 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 4 100,00%
2807420 FXforfun 48 89 89 0 Jr. Member New Era Newbie 87 97,75%
1158359 gabygabyD 420 7 7 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 2 28,57%
1879618 GaretJohanKay 350 2 2 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 2 100,00%
1545822 GARPACHO 154 4 4 0 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie 4 100,00%
|
|
|
|
No había oído esto del Sim Swapping, y aunque su nombre es ilustrativo, hace falta entenderlo y comprender el riesgo que entraña nuestro traspaso cada vez mayor de prestaciones de seguridad a nuestro movil. Claro que lo intentamos proteger con claves, lectores de huellas y demás, pero el corazón de todo, nuestra SIM, puede traspasarse de manos sin ni siquiera entrar en contacto físico con nuestro teléfono … ¿cómo? recorriendo al eslabón más débil de la cadena: el empleado de las compañías de telefonía (y algo más, claro está). El Sim Swapping no es un problema tremendamente frecuente, pero no por ello es menos alarmante. La técnica consiste en engañar a las compañías de telefonía, y hacerles creer que el dueño ha perdido/dañado su móvil/sim, precisando crear una sim alternativa. Claro que en este caso, el reclamante es un chorizo tecnológico, el cual espera hacerse con una sim con nuestro número de teléfono. En su origen, el timador estudia a sus victimas y recaba información sobre ellas, pudiendo por ejemplo recurrir a técnicas de phishing o alternativas para obtener datos confidenciales (teléfono, fecha de nacimiento, dirección, etc.). Si logran recabar suficientes datos de ti, y dar con un operador de telefonía que se crea su historia, el timador saldrá con una tarjeta sim con tu número de teléfono (y tu sim probablemente quede desactivada en el evento). Como sabemos, la verificación en dos pasos con el móvil como garante mediante sms es habitual como medida de seguridad, incluso de bancos. Con tu sim ahora clonada, si el timador tiene suficiente información tuya, puede validar operaciones en las cuales un sms a tu móvil es parte del garante de la seguridad (por ejemplo, movimientos bancarios). El timador de esta historia, un tal Joel Ortiz de 21 años de edad, tenía por objetivo gente que trabaja en la industria de las criptomonedas. Sin que el artículo detalle exactamente cómo logró obtener información clave para su operación, el timador se hizo con más de 7,5M$ en criptomonedas de cuanto menos 40 personas que acudieron a Consensus, una evento de Coindesk, usando como base el Sim Swapping. El artículo cita que en uno de los casos el timador logró hacerse con 1M$ de las cuentas en exchanges de uno de los timados. Los eventos tuvieron lugar en verano del 2018, y la condena a 10 años de cárcel ha salido ahora. Ver: California Jails Student for 10 Years for $7.5 Million SIM-Swap Bitcoin Hack y Qué es el fraude "SIM swapping" y cuáles son las reglas de oro para evitarlo. |
|
|
|
1. IntroductionOk, I’ve made up that gene, but it represents rather well what I want to depict in this post: A few weeks ago, we got our first Newbie that made it to Hero, needing Merit in the process (see ). The post also shows those that made it from Member to Hero, and a few others that were on the ranking-up pipeline, very near to reaching the Hero rank. While creating that post, I was surprised to see that many of those listed posted also (and is some cases exclusively) on the Local boards. That discovery led me to this post, where I’m going to try to depict the share that Local Boards have in accounts, being Merits de driver used to analyse the information. A complete lists of all merited users and their stats can be obtained here, baring all the merit history in the calculus (data as of 12/04/2019): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EwdBrA9GoFgEgFhVEKgvc8BF6pTBRaw1AiPrrZM8aq0/edit?usp=sharingColumns (non-trivial): nMeritsLocal: Number of Merits earned on Local Boards. nMeritsGlobal: Number of Merits earned on Global (English) Boards. nMeritsDel: Number of Merits earned on deleted posts (or on non-retrievable posts). nMeritsTotal: Total Number of earned Merits. nMeritedLocalBoards: Number of distinct merited Local Boards a person has been merited on. BestLocalBoard: Local board on which the user got most of his local board merits on. nMeritsBestLocalBoard: Number of merits obtained in the best Local Board. PMeritsLocal: % of merits on (all) Local Boards. TotalGroup: Total number of earned Merits (group cluster). LocalGroup: % of earned Merits on (all) Local Boards (group cluster), excluding deleted posts. TypeGroup: Earned merits: Only on Local Boards, Only on Global Boards, Local and Global Boards (disregarding merits earned on deleted posts in this case). It’s rather interesting to play around with the list and filter/sort by diverse criteria (most merited, greatest %, by best local board, etc.). Note: Deleted/non-retrievable posts should ideally be attributed to Local Boards or Global Boards in this analysis. This is not feasible, which means that some people may have been merited on certain boards which we now do not know of, since the post was deleted or is now irretrievable. 2. Overall viewAn overall view of merit distribution in relation to forum members that post in Local Boards, Global Boards or both, can be seen here:  We can see above that, out of the 360.195 earned Merits as of last Friday (12/04/2019), 65,10% go to the Global Boards, 29,78% to the Local Boards, and 5,12% to posts that have been deleted (could include other concepts here too such as posts not retrievable from the scraper). What’s also interesting in the above data is that, out of the 27.733 merited users, 15.928 (57,43%) were merited only on Global Boards(*), 8.331 (30,04%) only on Local Boards(*), and 1.910 (6,89%) on both (an additional 1.564 (5,64%) have their merits based on deleted or non-retrievable posts). (*) I excluded deleted merits from the group creation. Some of them do have in addition some merits tied to deleted posts.
What’s even more interesting is that that the average merits per user for those that post on both kinds of boards is way above the rest of the boards: 54,08 merits/user vs 11,69 of those that post only on Global Boards and 7,83 on Local boards exclusively. Now all those groups have a fair share of (statistical) standard deviation, so interpretation is delicate, especially when one of the groups is significantly smaller than the others. The above is not to be taken verbatim: Posters merited on both local board and global boards are not merited per se on average five times more than those who only post on global or local boards. The above figure is not breaking down what marginal contribution each kind of board has to the average. It does denote though that many of the better merited forum members do have something to do with local boards to some extent. I then delimited the data to the top 100 vs rest, and the result is this:  As we can see, the top 100 merited people consist of those merited on both Local and Global boards (43%), Only Global (54%) and Only Local (3%). That distribution is fairly different from what we was on the first chart, and shows the importance of local boards in combination with global boards for the top 100 merited people. Nevertheless, the local merits represent only an average of 13,76% for them, vs 84,49% of the global boards. Average merit/person is similar for Local and Global and Only Local groups, and lower for those Only Local (but the group is very small). 3. Number of Merited Local Boards per person The above image shows how many Local Boards a person has been merited on. As expected, those merited on Local Boards are almost always merited in a single Local Board. There are nevertheless a few exceptions. Specifically, 74 people have been merited on two Local Boards, 4 on three Local Boards, 2 on four Local Boards and 1 on, … roll of drums …, 9 Local boards. All the data can be seen in the file linked in the introduction (simply order by nMeritedLocalBoards descending). The profiles merited in more than two Local Boards are: user_id name rank nMeritedLocalBoards nMeritsLocal nMeritsGlobal BestLocalBoard url
1267993 Leteravian Full Member 9 141 4 Turkish https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1267993
1038373 narghat Jr. Member 4 7 0 Turkish https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1038373
1606609 Furgon Chino Member 4 8 4 Japanese https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1606609
1891055 vladimirhf Member 3 5 3 Portuguese https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1891055
217199 sbogovac Legendary 3 9 10 Dutch https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=217199
1018610 luna2017 Member 3 13 0 Russian https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1018610
1311641 tvplus006 Sr. Member 3 91 299 Russian https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1311641
@ Leteravian has been merited on the following Local Boards: Arabic, Croatian, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish and Turkish, and has been inactive for a month now. 4. Percentage of Merits earned on Local Boards The above shows the number of people that have a certain range of earned merits (rows), and what percentage of those merits come from local boards (columns). I’ve excluded from the calculation the merits earned on deleted posts, so a person with merits on both local board and deleted will show as 100% local on this table. For example, for those 76 people who have earned over 500 merits, 40 have earned no local board merits (and are therefore Only Global), 13 have less or equal to 10% earned on local boards, and only 1 has earned all his merits on Local Boards (@mole0815). Roughly, for those merited on Local Boards, it’s a rather even 50:50 between those that have earned there under half of their merits, and those that have earned over half of their merits there. 5. Average Merits per Best Local board (per person) The above image shows the best Local Board distribution on merits, and the average per person merited on them. I’ve only considered here the best local board per person (so the total is a few hundred merits short). For those merit exclusively on Local Boards(left side table), the highest averages go to the French German (11,62), Turkish (11,26), and Italian (10,91) boards. The lowest are Hebrew (1), Indian (2,18), Korean (2,23), and Romanian (2,81). For those merit both on Local Boards and Global Boards, the highest averages go to the Romanian (111,47), Dutch (101,35) and Japanese (98,33) boards. That is on average around six times the figures of those that are only merited on Local Boards. Now we have to be very careful here, since those averages are influenced by many amongst those top merited. For example, @LoyceV has been merited on the Dutch Local board (1 merit) and therefore drives the average pretty high there (since he is in the Local and Global group). @Suchmoon has received 5 merits on the Russian Local Board, but has less influence in the Russian Average. 6. Final considerationWe could take the top n forum members out of this analysis, but then we lose precisely many heavyweights that got merited on both Local Boards and Global Boards, and therefore cripple the "multilingual gene", which is what I wanted to see here. The message is that we must not take those averages verbatim, but people that are merited on both local boards and global boards have, in general, better averages than those that are only global board or only local board. It’s also interesting to compare the average merits on the left hand side table, with the AvgMeritsLocal or the right hand side table, and AvgMeritsLocal vs AvgMeritsGlobal on the right hand table.
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction.I’ve managed to get my hands on inner information as to the KYC Process, and how it is rolling-out. The information was entrusted to me under the strict imperative of not doxing anybody. This analysis therefore abides by that imperative, and no list will be provided with ties from account to person. I have been asked though to pass the raw data along to Cambridge Analytica … 2. KYC Pipeline.As per the raw data received, the pipeline KYC clearance process is going extremely swift, on the verge of being world record breaking. In fact, the company in charge of the process, whose name cannot be disclosed due to my NDA agreement, has undergone the task of hiring hundreds of people at a decent salary (in HoweyCoins). Strangely enough, production plants of corporations such as Nike, Adidas, Apple and Zara have reported severe rates of no-show today, leaving them with a lack of qualified personnel. The KYC pipeline process so far is as follows:  3. Breakdown by Gender.The 1.166.830 approved accounts (out of 2.558.034) that have already cleared their KYC process have the following distribution by gender:  4. Breakdown by Age.The 1.166.830 approved accounts broken down by age show as follows:  I have asked the KYC company to recheck the above 100 data, and they claim that it is correct beyond doubt. 4. Breakdown by Country.
The 1.166.830 approved accounts broken down by country show as follows:  5. AnecdotesWithout doxing anybody, I can safely provide this information as true: 1. A, lets call him farmer John Doe, has provided his ID to give clearance to 13.310 accounts. John Doe currently gives employment to over 500 people, and is considered one of the wealthiest people in his country. 2. Multiple Photographs seemed unearthly. Nevertheless, advances biometrics confirm them to be real (although the tend to wear a full exoskeleton to mingle amongst the commons). 3. Some non-doxed KYC verified account owners: D_N_LD TR_MP, VL_DIM_R PUT_NG, MR. BE_N, W_LLY, B_B SPON_E, MR. SP_K, DR. W_O, DA_ROS, N_COL_AS M_DURO, K_M J_NG _N, FAT_ER X_AS, J_HN SN_W, and so on. 4. Many KYC applications were submitted along with personal notes, in an attempt to bribe the reviewers through ample amounts of altcoins. These applications have been given top priority. 5. A Mr. J_HN MC_F__ application has been rejected, on the basis of not stating a country of residence (“open ocean” apparently). Reviewers were not too inclined personally to approve the submission either, after having lost vast amounts in pump & dump processes.
|
|
|
|
I was updating the Merit Dashboard, when I came across the first forum member that has reached Hero Member rank starting-off from being a Newbie. a) From Newbie to Hero (0 Merit airdrop):user_id name posts activity merit startedwith rank datecreated url
1424178 mole0815 2162 490 590 0 Hero Member 2017-12-12 14:59:25.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1424178
There are more on the way, that should reach the Hero Rank from Newbie in the coming weeks: user_id name posts activity merit startedwith rank datecreated url
1574226 mu_enrico 867 462 614 0 Sr. Member 2018-01-03 12:50:19.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1574226
1580039 asche 3338 462 493 0 Sr. Member 2018-01-04 08:00:55.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1580039
1582324 DdmrDdmr 2057 448 1992 0 Sr. Member 2018-01-04 14:28:20.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324
1762404 Alex_Sr 919 448 679 0 Sr. Member 2018-01-27 14:06:44.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1762404
1560793 sncc 528 448 506 0 Sr. Member 2018-01-01 16:24:19.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1560793
1554927 bitmover 2233 434 665 0 Sr. Member 2017-12-31 11:09:51.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927
1855828 taikuri13 1668 420 503 0 Sr. Member 2018-02-19 18:38:30.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1855828
1827294 Husna QA 413 406 540 0 Sr. Member 2018-02-12 09:51:31.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1827294
user_id name posts activity merit startedwith rank datecreated url
1082600 kenzawak 4517 546 598 10 Hero Member 2017-07-27 09:50:43.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1082600
1169179 BitCryptex 816 518 651 10 Hero Member 2017-09-25 13:17:36.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179
1275282 joniboini 2282 518 913 10 Hero Member 2017-11-02 21:27:07.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1275282
1291828 iasenko 2339 518 855 10 Hero Member 2017-11-07 20:39:50.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828
1339716 coinlocket$ 3966 504 822 10 Hero Member 2017-11-22 20:49:45.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716
On the way: user_id name posts activity merit startedwith rank datecreated url
1304130 pandukelana2712 557 462 529 10 Sr. Member 2017-11-12 06:20:14.000 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1304130
Note: Others have reached Hero Member (41 in total) from other ranks that allowed them to have an initial Merit airdrop. The above focused on those that started with cero handicap. Edit 1: I'm amazed that the vast majority of the above have been merited on Local boards and English boards. I'll see if I can complement that fact tomorrow. Edit 2: Note -> I created a rather more complete topic recently called Stats on the Rank pipeline - How many are we on the way to ranking-up (II) ?, which included all the ranked-up members (from/to) that needed merit in the process, as well as the pipeline-status (the referenced thead has a link to a google sheet with all the names and so on). This post was really a quick post to emphasize on the first Newbie to have made it so far under the Merit System, and while at it name the next upcoming Heroes. |
|
|
|
Update 29/03/2019: Included the data for all 21 Local Boards: - French, German, Philippine, Russian and Spanish were the original ones, and are depicted in further detail in the OP. - Arabic, Chinese, Croatian, Dutch, Greek, Hebrew, India, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Scandinavian and Turkish have been added to the Merit Dashboard. I have not created an entry in the OP for these additional 16 Local boards (that’s what the Dashboard is for), but if anyone wants it for a specific local board, I can capture the screen and comment it here.
1. Introduction.Recently, my local board (Spanish) seems to be a bit rather scarce of posts. There are a bunch of decent posters there that keep the local board beating (most of them also post in the general English sections), but engaging and building activity there is painstaking. That motivated me to take a look into post evolution on my local board (see Análisis - Número de posts en el foro Español), and I thought that it would be interesting to do for other Local boards. Now creating a specific post thread for each local board is too cumbersome, so I’ve tried to compromise a solution (less information that a static analysis) that can be viewed on the Merit Dashboard ( go to the last table labelled "Post Count Evolution"), and extended further if I have time. I’ve currently drawn up the data for the following local boards: French, German, Philippine, Russian and Spanish, over an 18 month period (to see recent tendency, and draw a line somewhere at retrieving information manually). In summary, what I’ve done is the following: - Retrieved total post count for each depicted Local Board at regular time intervals, close to being one month apart on each reading. The dates I’ve chosen are not end of month nor beginning of month. That is due to the fact that there is more snapshots available on the WayBackMachine around the 25th of each month. The actual date selection is not that essential, since I’m going to focus on Net Post creation in readings that are as close to being one month apart as possible. The data retrieved is at local board level + first level of child boards. This tasks is manual, number by number, and I may have mistyped a number or two in the process (although I did my best to avoid doing so). It’s an interim sort of task, boring, tedious and repetitive. - I then calculated the number of net posts created between two consecutive readings, and that is the data that shows on the Dashboard. That is, I’m focusing not on how many posts exist at a given time, but the number created roughly in a month. It’s important to emphasize that I’m looking at net posts created, and not number of posts created. Net posts = number of created posts – number of deleted posts +/- number of moved posts.When you compare the number of posts between two readings, what we are really seeing is the number of Net posts created, as we cannot retrieve (without inner data files) the number of created posts on its own. The results are interesting, but you need to be careful interpreting the data, and especially with the outlier net posts created at times: - Sometimes, a certain month’s reading for a specific child board is negative. I can only assume that the reason is that more posts have been deleted/moved than created. On occasions, these negative net post readings are pretty large, so I assume that a heavy moderation clean-up took place. - The opposite can also happen, with abnormal positive net posts created. That may be due to threads being merged as I saw on the Philippine local board. - It could be a typo on my behalf, but I re-checked most outliers to minimize this possibility. Having said that, a certain background under the scenes type of context is necessary to understand the outliers, but the general trend can be seen regardless. 2. French Local board. The top line chart ("Total PostDiff") shows how the number of net post creation has evolved over the last 18 months, going from 10.991 net posts created in the month running up to the 25/11/2017 to the 1.435 net posts created over the month leading up to the 26/03/2019. That is a hell of a drop, and Altcoins seem to have a lot to do with it (as can be seen on the lower chart). On the Merit Dashboard, you can play around to filter by a specific child board/s and therefore have the charts adjust to the selection (use the Subsection filter or click/multi-select from the numerical table above the charts). Adding a screen capture for each child board here would be over the top, so it’s better to play with the Dashboard. The Recent Share pie show that Altcoins represent 49,15% of the net posts created over the last 18 months, followed by Débutants (10,90% - Beginners) and Hors-sujet (10,04% off-topic). The French local board behaves pretty smoothly, with barely any negative values in the data table, so the overall 18 month pie is likely pretty reasonable. Even so, if you filter the data to specific monthly readings (click or multi-select the columns on the data table), the distribution ratios vary. For example, if I select the columns "25/01/2019", "23/02/2019" and "26/03/2019", then Altcoins is down to 25,85% of net post share, and has been overtaken by Hors-sujet (32,30% off-topic). 3. German Local board. The top line chart ("Total PostDiff") shows how the number of net post creation has evolved over the last 18 months, going from 10.918 net posts created in the month running up to the 25/11/2017 to the 2.976 net posts created over the month leading up to the 26/03/2019. The drop is less than half of the French Local Board, having a similar starting point. The Recent Share pie show that Altcoins represent 50,11% of the net posts created over the last 18 months, followed by Trading und Spekulation (20,38%) and the Main default (9,13%). Even so, if you filter the data to specific monthly readings (click or multi-select the columns on the data table), the distribution ratios may vary. For example, if I select the columns "25/01/2019", "23/02/2019" and "26/03/2019", then Altcoins stays at 50,50% of net post share, followed by Trading und Spekulation (22,12%). These values are very similar to the overall 18 month values. 4. Philippine Local board. The Phillipine local board is rather simple, with a Main board and a single first level Child board (Altcoins). The top line chart ("Total PostDiff") shows how the number of net post creation has evolved over the last 18 months. This case has some outliers: - 25/11/2017: -34.454 net posts in a month running up to the date. - 27/12/2017: -9.354 net posts on the Main board in a month running up to the date, and +20.522 created on the Altcoin board. What seems to have happened is a purge of the main board, and the creation of the Altcoin, largely from threads moved from the main board. - 25/01/2019: A boost on the Altcoins of 25.631 net posts. I cannot conceive how that is possible, unless there was another section that was merged. A massive outlier, just around the time the local board was rebranded from Philippines to Pilipinas. The Recent Share pie is messed up with the outliers, so one should really narrow down the selection to exclude the outlier months. Doing so (excluding 25/11/2017, 27/12/2017 and 25/01/2019) the share is of 70,69% of net posts created on the Main board, and 29,31% in Altcoins. 5. Russian Local board. The top line chart ("Total PostDiff") shows how the number of net post creation has evolved over the last 18 months, going from 219.324 net posts created in the month running up to the 25/11/2017 to the 28.699 net posts created over the month leading up to the 26/03/2019. The maximum was 354.315 net posts on the month running up to the 24/04/2018, and the minimum was -11.916 on the reading of the 26/07/2018 (likely a large purge). The Recent Share pie show that Altcoins represent 63,51% of the net posts created over the last 18 months, followed by Paзнoe (14,36% - Miscellanea) and Tpeйдepы (5,15% Trading). Even so, if you filter the data to specific monthly readings (click or multi-select the columns on the data table), the distribution ratios vary. For example, if I select the columns "25/11/2018", "26/12/2018" and "25/01/2019", then Altcoins represents 79,05% of net post share. There are quite a few negative value readings, so I figure that there is constant purging of threads. 6. Spanish Local board. On this local board I have already excluded the data for the month leading up to the reading of the 26/03/2019. This is a massive outlier, with net negative large numbers for posts on the Altcoin and Market and Economy boards (I assume some massive clean-up has taken place). I’ve also excluded the reading of the 25/11/2017, since there were 1.876 net negative posts in the Beginners and Help child board (Primeros pasos y Ayuda). The top line chart ("Total PostDiff") shows how the number of net post creation has evolved over the last 18 months, going from 6.032 net posts created in the month running up to the 27/12/2017, to the 842 net posts created over the month leading up to the 23/02/2019. The post number decline is more pronounced from December 2018 onwards. The Recent Share pie show that Altcoins represent 71,70% of the net posts created over the last 18 months, followed by Mercado y Economía (11,57% Market and Economy) and Principal (7,17% Main board).
|
|
|
|
1. Introducción.Recientemente, hemos comentado como la actividad en el foro español ha caído notablemente. Esto no está desligado de la caída global del número de posts en el foro en su globalidad, pero si tenemos la percepción de que el número de posts en nuestro foro local es ínfimo en relación al potencial que se le presupone, dado la extensión de nuestro idioma en el mundo. Para ver en qué grado es cierto lo anterior, he recopilado información del número de posts en nuestro foro local, a intervalos próximos a un mes entero (*), y luego derivado la variación del número de posts entre cada dos meses. (*) El número de posts lo he obtenido a partir de las estadísticas del foro tanto actuales, como históricas, usando los datos archivados en WayBackMachine (por ejemplo http://web.archive.org/web/20171025160956/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php). Esto tiene no obstante algunas connotaciones:a) No hay datos almacenados para todas las fechas, por lo que he elegido las que más cerca quedan de darnos intervalos de aproximadamente 30 días (no todas cumplen exactamente, ya que por ejemplo la lectura del 31/01/2019 sería deseable que fuese del 25/01/2019 – pero no hay registro archivado de la estadística para esta fecha). b) El número de posts de una lectura conjuga varios elementos que influyen en el valor mostrado: - Nº de posts creados (el objetivo) - Nº de posts borrados - Nº de posts movidos de sección - Procesos "masivos" de limpieza de los hilos (abarca los dos anteriores) Es decir, los datos del gráfico no muestran exactamente el número de posts creados, sino el número de posts neto resultante (altas-bajas de posts). He tomado como referencia la lectura de datos de los últimos 18 meses. En las gráficas, he tenido que omitir en algún caso algún mes, por desvirtuar la escala. Por ejemplo, según observo, este mes se ha procedido a realizar un proceso de limpieza importante. Como consecuencia, el número de posts netos creados es negativo. De hecho, la comparativa entre la lectura de hoy, y del 23/02/2019 indica que hemos destruido 51.741 posts netos en el foro español. Esto desvirtúa las escalas gráficas, y lo he omitido de los mismos. @ franckuestein (quien ahora sl el moderador único - @vgo ya no figura como moderador) nos podrá indicar exactamente cómo/cuándo/por qué sucede lo anterior: hay un aparente proceso de borrado en las secciones de Mercado y Economía (-20.573 posts), Mercadillo (-3.211 posts) y Altcoins (-28.290 posts). 2. Evolución del número de posts por sección dentro del foro español. La tabla superior representa el valor del número de posts de cada sección del foro español, en fechas determinadas. Las secciones las he tomado en su primer nivel, y no he bajado al segundo nivel (Servicios, Trading y Especulación, etc.) dado que no logro obtener datos para las mismas fechas en las secciones interiores. La segunda tabla representa la diferencia de posts entre dos fechas consecutivas. Esta es la báse de los gráficos, y representa por tanto el número de posts netos creados en aproximadamente un mes. Cuando el valor es negativo, quiere decir que se han destruido más posts que creado, como es el caso entre la lectura del 25/03/2019 y el 23/02/2019, donde se han destruido 51.741 posts netos. Como he indicado, esto sucede periódicamente debido, entiendo, a proceso profundos de limpieza de posts. Gráficamente se ven mejor las cosas, por lo que a continuación dejo los gráficos de evolución asociados, con las salvedades indicadas en la introducción: Todo vs Altcoins (foro Español) Se observa una clara correlación entre el total de posts creados, y el número de posts creados en Altcoins. No es de extrañar, pues Altcoins tiene un gran share de la cuota del número de posts creados, tal y como veremos más adelante. Lo que es llamativo es el descenso brusco que se produce desde Noviembre 2018 en adelante. Como digo, aquí estamos mirando el número de posts creados netos, por lo que si se estuviesen borrando posts en cantidades notables, sería parte de la justificación, pero sobre los meses graficados diría que no es el caso, y que el motivo en primera instancia es la menor actividad (¿puede que las ICOs/ann/bounty estén en caída libre?). Principal vs Mercado y Economía vs Hardware y Minería (foro Español) Sería interesante poder desgranar un nivel más algunos casos, como el de Mercado y Economía, donde Servicios y Trading/Speculación tienen su peso específico, pero como indicaba anteriormente, no puedo obtener los datos necesarios con las mismas fechas. Las caídas son notorias, algo más suaves que en la gráfica anterior, pero de peso. Esquina Libre vs Mercadillo vs Primeros pasos y Ayuda (foro Español) Tónica similar, con un número de posts muy bajo en 2019. Primeros pasos y Ayuda, que es la puerta de entrada, resulta un tanto desoladora en términos de actividad. 3. Share de posts por sección del foro EspañolComo se observa en las gráficas anteriores, Altcoins se lleva la palma en número de posts. En la siguiente gráfica se observa el share de cada sección del foro español.  La gráfica de la izquierda muestra el share de cada sección respecto de la totalidad de posts del foro español. Altcoins es la principal, con un 34% del share, seguida de la sección Principal con el 21%, con Mercadillo cerrando con el 4% del share. Lo anterior es con la perspectiva de todo el históricos de posts. No obstante, si nos ceñimos a ver dónde se crean más posts en un mes (31/01/2019 .. 23/02/2019 – descartando ir un mes más por los valores negativos), se observa que el share real de Altcoins es del 70% de los posts, seguido de Mercado y Economía con el 12% y Esquina Libre con el 8% de los posts creados. Cierra Hardware y Minería con el 1%.
|
|
|
|
En el foro en inglés, se han hecho eco de la noticia de que Digitec Galaxus, el mayor minorista Suizo online, acepta pago en criptodivisas como alternativa de pago. A Digitec Galaxus lo equiparan a una especie de "Amazon Suizo", facturando 261 millones de USD en 2018. No está mal… (ver El mayor minorista suizo en línea Digitec Galaxus ahora acepta criptomonedas). He visto que nadie había reportado el proceso de compra en criptodivisas, así que me he lanzado a ello, y replico aquí lo que indiqué en el foro en inglés: Me he interesado por el proceso de pago, y he creado una cuenta con datos falsos, a fin de conocer el proceso de pago. Durante el proceso de compra, los importes está en francos suizos, pero es durante el check-out que uno tiene acceso a seleccionar el método de pago en crypto (BTC, BCH, BSV, ETH, XRP, BNB, LTC, TRX, NEO y OMG), para importes superiores a los 200 francos suizos. El pago en sí se hace a través de Datatrans/Coinfy, habiendo un recargo del 1,5%, y 15 minutos de ventana para completar la TX con el precio congelado. Las pantallazos relacionados con el proceso de compra en criptodivisas son del estilo de (el contador de 15 minutos figura en la parte superior de la pantalla): A – Método de Pago  B – Condiciones de Pago en Critpodivisas  C – Opciones de Pago en Critpodivisas  D – Pago en BTC  E – Pago en ETH  |
|
|
|
Por curiosidad, he listado los hilos del foro español con más méritos (sumando todos los méritos otorgados en el hilo). Datos actualizados a 05/04/2024.El resultado completo se puede ver en el siguiente documento: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q-b45elSpT6CJmDuWS6WQdsPsj8NC9eRIQwfML9n9mo/edit?usp=sharingEl top 100 es el siguiente: | Hilo | Subsección | nMerits | nUsersFrom | nUsersTo | | _____________________________________________________________________ | _____________________________ | ________ | _________ | _______ | | Atascado! no, ¿atascado? si, no confirmado. | Principal | 295 | 15 | 12 | | Foro local Español - situación actual | Esquina Libre | 231 | 17 | 16 | | [2024|Se Avecina... ATH, luego Halving(!?) | Principal | 229 | 13 | 14 | | Red de Bitcoin, utilizada para almacenar NFTs ... | Principal | 189 | 7 | 5 | | Dudas sobre las campañas de firmas en el foro. | Primeros pasos y ayuda | 186 | 11 | 10 | | Víctimas de Ransomware ahora - y demás | Principal | 171 | 7 | 17 | | España- Nuevo anteproyecto anti-fraude – atentos a los tenedores de cripto ... | Mercado y Economía | 161 | 10 | 14 | | Javier Milei y Criptos, lo que se viene. | Principal | 141 | 13 | 13 | | TX de BTC envía 0,0740544 BTC … y paga 19,82108632 BTCs en fees | Principal | 137 | 5 | 11 | | Coronavirus Mapa y datos en cada país | Principal | 130 | 12 | 16 | | Candidatos o Especulaciones; siguiente(s) país(es) por hacer "legal" al bitcoin? | Principal | 126 | 7 | 10 | | La delincuencia del siglo XXI trabaja en Bitcoins | Principal | 118 | 5 | 13 | | NIST aprueba encriptados resistentes a computación cuántica. | Principal | 115 | 9 | 11 | | Nuevo ATH! | Principal | 111 | 13 | 15 | | Nuevo sistema de meritos en Bitcointalk | Esquina Libre | 109 | 10 | 11 | | Txs:2024:El Salvador, primer país en usar bitcoin. Re[2021-22-23] | Principal | 105 | 11 | 8 | | Un hombre asevera tener 100 BTCs inaccesible por no acordarse de su mejor amigo | Principal | 99 | 8 | 10 | | SOBRE SHITCOINS.CLUB Y LA INTERRUPCIÓN DEL SERVICIO | Principal | 97 | 8 | 9 | | Cada vez menos Bitcoins en los exchanges. (+encuesta) | Principal | 89 | 5 | 8 | | Boletín de Análisis Técnico | Mercado y Economía | 89 | 8 | 8 | | Bitcoin se vuelve una moneda. | Principal | 85 | 11 | 12 | | Encuesta - ¿Por qué crees que la actividad en el foro español es tan baja? | Principal | 82 | 14 | 23 | | Europa - bitcoin y la inflación | Mercado y Economía | 80 | 6 | 8 | | Bitcointalk Ranking-up pipeline - Aquellos cercanos a su siguiente rango | Esquina Libre | 79 | 10 | 6 | | CEO de Blackrock: EEUU está poniendo en peligro su estatus de moneda de reserva. | Principal | 77 | 3 | 9 | | [Rumor] ¿Alemania relaja impuesto a Bitcoin? | Principal | 77 | 5 | 8 | | Cripto - el patetismo de suspender (temp) el servicio de Telegram en España | Principal | 75 | 5 | 7 | | Cuanto bitcoin le comprarias a un hijo o hija tuyos? | Principal | 75 | 7 | 9 | | ¿Alguien sabe qué mierdas está pasando? | Principal | 74 | 8 | 8 | | Me he comprado un piso con bitcoin | Mercado y Economía | 73 | 11 | 6 | | ✅ [ANN] DeepOnion ONION 🌍 Moneda Digital Privada 🌍 Nueva App de DeepVault ✅ | Altcoins (criptomonedas alternativas) | 70 | 18 | 15 | | Un poco de Lightning Network (red de rayos) | Principal | 69 | 7 | 9 | | [LISTA] Campañas de firmas que permiten postear aquí | Mercado y Economía | 69 | 10 | 7 | | Torneo de poker de Bitcointalk ♠️♥️♣️♦️ 2023 | Principal | 69 | 9 | 7 | | 🥕 [Discusión general/noticias sobre Taproot] 🥕 | Principal | 67 | 12 | 6 | | Chivo Wallet una realidad | El Salvador | Principal | 63 | 7 | 3 | | [2024|Se Avecina... ATH, luego Halving(!?) | Mercado y Economía | 62 | 12 | 9 | | Proyecto de ley propone restringir servicios para Bitcoin y monedas PoW en la UE | Principal | 62 | 7 | 3 | | Balas esquivadas | Principal | 62 | 7 | 10 | | Pasará el Mercado de Capitalización de BTC 1T de dolares. | Principal | 62 | 4 | 8 | | Cripto Invierno Genera Ola De Despidos. | Principal | 61 | 6 | 7 | | Los cajeros ATM Bitcoin ya superan las 6.000 unidades en activo | Principal | 60 | 9 | 11 | | El departamento de justicia de EEUU hace formal una gran incautación de BTC | Principal | 60 | 4 | 7 | | ÚLTIMA HORA: Binance adquirirá FTX | Mercado y Economía | 58 | 8 | 7 | | BCN ฿ Community-> Next / Ardor meetup with the developer Lior Yaffe | Principal | 58 | 5 | 1 | | Records Guinness relativos al bitcoin | Principal | 57 | 8 | 5 | | (Por diversión) Cómo imagino a algunos usuarios del foro | Esquina Libre | 56 | 12 | 1 | | Bitcoin cae a USD 34,000 ¿Qué esta ocurriendo? | Mercado y Economía | 56 | 4 | 8 | | La cantidad de nodos de Bitcoin está disminuyendo, considera contribuir a la red | Principal | 53 | 4 | 8 | | Donald Trump - Biden - Bitcoin | Principal | 51 | 8 | 10 | | Preguntas Simples De Un Usuario "No No". Sin Penas Voy A Preguntar. | Primeros pasos y ayuda | 51 | 7 | 5 | | Compro bitcoins CERRADO | Mercadillo | 50 | 1 | 1 | | Árbol genealógico descendente del Bitcoin. | Principal | 50 | 7 | 1 | | [CERRADO] Escucho Ofertas para Little Single (Esperando salir de la Aduana) | Mercadillo | 50 | 1 | 1 | | [ANN] [NTXcoin] NTXCoin-20% libre+75% Anuncio IPO Siguiente sistema Exchange | Altcoins (criptomonedas alternativas) | 50 | 1 | 1 | | [Especulación]:El futuro de Coinjoin y los mixers, la batalla por venir. | Principal | 50 | 6 | 5 | | Metamask: "Dame tu dirección IP" | Principal | 49 | 4 | 8 | | ¿Experiencias con DEX? | Principal | 48 | 5 | 6 | | ¿Llegaremos a los 160K USD en el próximo halving? | Principal | 48 | 3 | 9 | | Google Trends se ha vuelto loco – Búsqueda del término BTC en máximos | Principal | 47 | 9 | 6 | | ¿Que tan legales son los Mixers? | Principal | 47 | 5 | 8 | | El Salvador comienza a minar Bitcoin con energía geotérmica de sus volcanes | Principal | 47 | 2 | 7 | | Esto es para leérselo bien: EU – Nueva regla para la traza de las criptomonedas | Principal | 46 | 7 | 6 | | [OPEN]Hablemos del Caso W.M: Charla abierta a todos, mezclemos ideas, opiniones! | Principal | 46 | 7 | 6 | | Ciclo Andreas M. Antonopoulos | Principal | 45 | 10 | 4 | | Méritos obtenidos en el foro español por cada miembro del foro | Esquina Libre | 45 | 14 | 4 | | 19/05/2011. ¡Creación Tablero Local en Español! ♬♪♫ ヾ(*・L。E・)ﾉ ♬♪♫ | Principal | 45 | 8 | 5 | | Cada vez uso menos Bitcoin y mas Altcoins. | Principal | 45 | 8 | 10 | | Logran hackear un Trezor One y recuperar un equivalente a 2M$ en BTC | Principal | 45 | 6 | 8 | | Estonia – Si esto es así, es una (peligrosa) aberración … | Principal | 45 | 7 | 8 | | Y a ti como te va con las cripto apuestas? | Principal | 45 | 8 | 8 | | El mundo Crypto es mucho mas generoso que el tradicional. | Principal | 45 | 4 | 7 | | [LISTA] Campañas de firmas que permiten postear aquí | Primeros pasos y ayuda | 44 | 12 | 5 | | El Salvador: ¿Proyecto "Bitcoin City"? | Mercado y Economía | 44 | 6 | 6 | | ¿Comprarías este producto para almacenar BTCs? | Principal | 44 | 4 | 6 | | [Noticia] Craig Wright gana juicio / Precio de BitcoinSV se dispara 20% | Principal | 43 | 10 | 7 | | Emisión ilimitada de Bitcoin. ¡Qué fiasco! | Principal | 43 | 8 | 7 | | No es por abrir otro hilo más con algo parecido, pero … | Principal | 43 | 5 | 5 | | La SEC y su disputa con las Exchanges | Principal | 43 | 3 | 7 | | Cual es la forma mas barata de comprar bitcoin? | Principal | 43 | 7 | 5 | | Peter Schiff reconoce que el Bitcoin es Rentable. | Principal | 42 | 3 | 7 | | Legalizacion de mineria en Venezuela | Principal | 42 | 3 | 5 | | Encuesta–resultados – Tus Bitcoins serían heredados si la palmases ahora mismo ? | Principal | 42 | 5 | 8 | | sMerit - Generosos y Tacaños - Foro Español | Esquina Libre | 42 | 13 | 6 | | Una de Maximalistas Tóxicos | Principal | 42 | 9 | 10 | | Gobierno de Buenos Aires implementa "identidad en blockchain" - ¿bueno o malo? | Principal | 41 | 5 | 7 | | En 40 escuelas de Argentina los jóvenes aprenderán sobre Bitcoin | Principal | 41 | 8 | 6 | | (Noticia) Binance excluye al Banco de Venezuela de los pagos P2P | Principal | 41 | 2 | 4 | | La Jerga Del Foro bitcointalk...y la Blockchain | Primeros pasos y ayuda | 40 | 9 | 2 | | ¿Te gustaría que Bitcoin fuera PoS? | Principal | 40 | 6 | 5 | | Este año veremos un nuevo ATH? | Principal | 40 | 6 | 7 | | Las hardware wallets también sufren el efecto "obsolecencia programada" (?/!) | Principal | 40 | 7 | 7 | | ¿Qué de este 2023 te parece relevante para mencionarle en el cierre de año? | Principal | 40 | 8 | 10 | | Rusia dice que los mineros de criptomonedas consumen el 2% de la electricidad | Principal | 40 | 6 | 5 | | ¿Cuánto pagarías por tener todos los BTC del mundo? | Principal | 39 | 8 | 9 | | ¿Cuántos usuarios tiene Bitcoin? Estimaciones actualizadas | Principal | 39 | 3 | 4 | | Microstrategy formaliza ante la SEC a Bitcoin como su principal reserva de valor | Mercado y Economía | 39 | 5 | 6 | | Alarmistas o Pitonisos – Coinbase en medio de rumores de insolvencia | Principal | 38 | 7 | 5 | | Jolín (por no poner joder) con los artículos patrocinados del ámbito cripto | Principal | 38 | 8 | 8 | | ¿Alguien confía en buen grado en el Sistema de Confianza (Trust) del foro? | Esquina Libre | 38 | 7 | 4 |
El top 50 de los hilos meritados en los últimos 60 días es el siguiente: Nota, en esta última lista, sólo contabilizo los méritos de los últimos 60 días sobre cada hilo, no el total del hilo. |
|
|
|
1. Introduction.Almost a year ago, I created a post on how the ranking-up pipeline looked like (see Stats on the Rank pipeline - How many are we on the way to ranking up? extension), and I thought that it may be interesting to create an updated version of the analysis to take a look at how things stand now. Most of what I’ve included here can also be retrieved and followed with weekly updates on the Merit Dashboard, selecting the tabs labelled “Ranked-up” to see those that have ranked-up under the Merit System, and “Ranking-up Pipeline” to follow the core of this post dynamically. 2. Ranked-up under the Merit SystemAs a general context, the following is a summary of what I make as the amount of forum members that have ranked-up under the Merit System ( needing at least 1 sMerit in the process):  What the table shows is that 13.229 people have ranked-up (as of last Friday), making it: - Legendary: 10 (from Hero Member). - Hero Member: 38 (22 from Sr. Member, 11 from Full Member and 5 from Member). - Sr. Member: 100 (63 from Full Member, 6 from Member, 1 from New Era Newbie and 30 from Old Era Newbie). - Full Member: 174 (84 from Member, 13 from New Era Newbie and 77 from Old Era Newbie). - Member: 3.183 (437 from New Era Newbie and 2.746 from Old Era Newbie). - Jr. Member: 9.724 (4.783 from New Era Newbie and 4.941 from Old Era Newbie). One curios thing that stands out is that the number of accounts that have made it to Jr. Member are currently now nearly half and half between New Era Newbie (first merit >= 17/09/2018) and Old Era Newbie (first merit < 17/09/2018.). We could cross this data with last active to get some more insights, but that is not really the objective here. A full list of the ranked-up members can be retrieved from the Merit Dashboard, but I’ve also provided an easier (static – i.e. not updated weekly) access here to the complete list of ranked-up forum members: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-Kt6olnf_vTnNXa-l_LVX2as3Rwz-K727OMForuAYDA/edit?usp=sharing . Note that the column "started with" is sometimes slightly off when the person has been merited between the creation of the forum’s merit.txt file, and my profile scrape a few hours later.
3. Ranking-up pipeline - SummaryThe ranking-up pipeline summary looks like this:  Out of the 27.147 merited profiles, 1.390 are not really in the ranking-up pipeline (Legendaries, staff, etc.), so we get a net of 25.757 profiles that are included in the ranking-up pipeline. We could go a step further and discard profiles that have not logged in x months, but I don’t think it is worth doing that yet (besides, they may revive as accounts). Out of those 25.757 profiles, 62,10% lack just the merits for ranking-up to their next level, 15,25% lack just the Activity, and 22,35% lack both. An additional 76 people are Heroes with the minimum activity (775) and the necessary merits (earned + airdropped), and whose formal conversion requires the activity to build a bit more and/or the ranking Legendary algorithm to kick-in. 4. Ranking-up pipeline – by RankThe ranking-up pipeline summary by Rank looks like this:  The above gives us a breakdown of the table is section 3, by Rank. There’s a new segment category here, “3. Soon may rank up to Rank”, indicating that those people are within 20% of the required Merits and Activity (on both accounts) to reach their next rank. They are not the only ones, since those that are near the merit or goal rank individually are also near to their goal (more on that later on). Interesting to see:- 660 profiles would be legendries (or at least postulated at the minimum required activity threshold) with the old system, but not under the Merit System. - 1.210 Sr. Members would have been Heroes under the old system. - 2.657 Full Members would already be Sr. Members under the old meritless system. - 4.460 Members would have been Full members by now under the old system. - 7.009 Jr. Members would now be Members under the old system. - There are 3.284 Newbie accounts, with at least 1 Merit that have not ranked-up due to lack of activity. That is surprising, but there are likely causes such as nuked and being here for just to make a couple of questions or comments. 5. Ranking-up pipeline – by Rank and segment of Merits and ActivityThis breaks down what we saw in the previous chart, in order to show us just how close or distant each profile is within a given segment, creating subsegment quintiles for Activity and Merits. Hero and Sr. Member: Notice how there are 607 (out of 660) Heroes that we can now see that have only somewhere between 40% and 60% of the Merit goal, while having the required activity. Only 10 profiles are very near their goal (activity >= 100% - minimum for Legendary; merits between 80% and 100%). I’m not going to detail it all here, but the pattern is similar on all ranks. Full Member: Member and Jr. Member: A complete list can be obtained here (second tab): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-Kt6olnf_vTnNXa-l_LVX2as3Rwz-K727OMForuAYDA/edit?usp=sharing. 6. Ranking-up pipeline – Next to rank-up (within 20% of goal in terms of Merit and activity)Next Legendries:user_id name rank NextRank activity merit startedwith segment_activity segment_merit url
1067333 micgoossens Hero Member Legendary 630 1649 101 [80%..100%) [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1067333
188198 Piggy Hero Member Legendary 672 1234 250 [80%..100%) [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188198
181806 HairyMaclairy Hero Member Legendary 770 1219 251 [80%..100%) [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=181806
1000199 krogothmanhattan Hero Member Legendary 686 1124 250 [80%..100%) [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000199
897509 xtraelv Hero Member Legendary 644 1119 101 [80%..100%) [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509
107200 mOgliE Hero Member Legendary 770 1115 1000 [80%..100%) [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=107200
406432 warningsigns Hero Member Legendary 896 1082 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=406432
258048 bcmine Hero Member Legendary 1013 1055 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=258048
351590 soulgate Hero Member Legendary 938 1050 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=351590
94331 lavajumper Hero Member Legendary 868 1026 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=94331
265513 NattyLiteCoin Hero Member Legendary 914 1021 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=265513
361695 jiggytom Hero Member Legendary 980 1016 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=361695
14716 rb1205 Hero Member Legendary 797 1016 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=14716
657268 Lionidas Hero Member Legendary 1008 1012 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=657268
174939 punkrock Hero Member Legendary 814 1010 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=174939
116332 IGHOR Hero Member Legendary 960 1009 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=116332
493987 xRaVeNx Hero Member Legendary 924 1009 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=493987
352642 fitraok09 Hero Member Legendary 938 1008 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=352642
3722 Unthinkingbit Hero Member Legendary 932 1008 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3722
415400 kken01 Hero Member Legendary 896 1007 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=415400
163494 EbonHawk Hero Member Legendary 869 1007 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=163494
669062 Apriand Hero Member Legendary 868 1007 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669062
263267 xcbtrader Hero Member Legendary 867 1006 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=263267
82566 No_2 Hero Member Legendary 839 1006 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=82566
8516 kangasbros Hero Member Legendary 812 1006 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=8516
92246 Timetwister Hero Member Legendary 992 1005 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92246
153149 arallmuus Hero Member Legendary 980 1005 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153149
4248 keystroke Hero Member Legendary 876 1005 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=4248
180891 kaene Hero Member Legendary 784 1005 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=180891
73326 elbill Hero Member Legendary 924 1004 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=73326
142966 principiante Hero Member Legendary 840 1004 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=142966
161207 CosaNostra Hero Member Legendary 836 1004 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=161207
146519 giveen Hero Member Legendary 826 1004 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=146519
69553 C10H15N Hero Member Legendary 810 1004 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=69553
1626 idev Hero Member Legendary 1008 1003 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1626
185404 illodin Hero Member Legendary 966 1003 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=185404
112887 AzzAz Hero Member Legendary 946 1003 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=112887
341982 mexxer-2 Hero Member Legendary 924 1003 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=341982
36319 SgtMoth Hero Member Legendary 909 1003 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=36319
150593 valley365 Hero Member Legendary 896 1003 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=150593
130165 samsonn25 Hero Member Legendary 882 1003 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=130165
238821 david123 Hero Member Legendary 966 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=238821
394642 Cripto DeD Hero Member Legendary 952 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=394642
182223 murderouskirk Hero Member Legendary 938 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=182223
106965 TracerX Hero Member Legendary 918 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=106965
183158 JorgeStolfi Hero Member Legendary 910 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=183158
339589 Atomicat Hero Member Legendary 910 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=339589
64396 Mapuo Hero Member Legendary 905 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64396
223359 noise23 Hero Member Legendary 887 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=223359
207035 bitcasino.io Hero Member Legendary 866 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=207035
119702 oddwh Hero Member Legendary 854 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=119702
100786 nwoolls Hero Member Legendary 840 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=100786
253843 Relaxedsense Hero Member Legendary 809 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=253843
102378 lukyforvar Hero Member Legendary 796 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=102378
321133 SuperClam Hero Member Legendary 784 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=321133
60653 CoinDiver Hero Member Legendary 778 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=60653
382626 ZACHM Hero Member Legendary 777 1002 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=382626
4839 fornit Hero Member Legendary 989 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=4839
230980 patmast3r Hero Member Legendary 980 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=230980
34011 abracadabra Hero Member Legendary 954 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=34011
380642 bennana Hero Member Legendary 952 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=380642
400415 lestherat Hero Member Legendary 943 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=400415
56297 Bitware Hero Member Legendary 933 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=56297
166737 JuanHungLo Hero Member Legendary 922 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=166737
17928 piuk Hero Member Legendary 910 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=17928
365501 The Frisian Hero Member Legendary 899 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=365501
103911 Mad_Max Hero Member Legendary 896 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=103911
51908 Blazr Hero Member Legendary 882 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=51908
17337 desired_username Hero Member Legendary 867 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=17337
13672 filharvey Hero Member Legendary 865 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=13672
451278 leps Hero Member Legendary 859 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=451278
376375 Glucose Hero Member Legendary 859 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=376375
537728 Unread Hero Member Legendary 840 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=537728
390821 svetoch Hero Member Legendary 826 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=390821
110699 BitJohn Hero Member Legendary 826 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=110699
172727 jtoomim Hero Member Legendary 818 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=172727
246704 snortex Hero Member Legendary 815 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=246704
506438 rizzlarolla Hero Member Legendary 798 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=506438
64847 DanielBTC Hero Member Legendary 790 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64847
232008 jsmit332 Hero Member Legendary 789 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=232008
107705 BTCtrader71 Hero Member Legendary 785 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=107705
29155 BkkCoins Hero Member Legendary 784 1001 1000 [>100%] [>100%] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=29155
557989 BTCforJoe Hero Member Legendary 882 971 500 [>100%] [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=557989
370611 bill gator Hero Member Legendary 1008 945 500 [>100%] [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=370611
805820 Lafu Hero Member Legendary 1092 918 501 [>100%] [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=805820
112493 Pmalek Hero Member Legendary 882 918 501 [>100%] [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=112493
164749 stompix Hero Member Legendary 1008 904 500 [>100%] [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=164749
225292 romanornr Hero Member Legendary 674 900 550 [80%..100%) [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=225292
580327 eddie13 Hero Member Legendary 1064 855 500 [>100%] [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=580327
906023 poptop Hero Member Legendary 798 849 500 [>100%] [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=906023
901859 buwaytress Hero Member Legendary 924 838 502 [>100%] [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=901859
579628 bob123 Hero Member Legendary 840 831 250 [>100%] [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=579628
846936 sabotag3x Hero Member Legendary 1050 820 500 [>100%] [80%..100%) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=846936
I can't get any more names on this post, so I've added the full list of Next ranking-members here (third tab called "Soon will rank-up"): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-Kt6olnf_vTnNXa-l_LVX2as3Rwz-K727OMForuAYDA/edit?usp=sharing.
|
|
|
|
El presente hilo tiene por objeto reflejar el número de méritos obtenidos en el foro español, y contrastarlo contra el número de méritos ganados en general de cada partícipe. Únicamente se reflejarán aquellas personas que han obtenido al menos 1 mérito en nuestro foro local. Mi idea es ir actualizando este hilo periódicamente. Datos actualizados a 05/04/2024.Desafortunadamente, no hay manera de poner la información en un solo post, al superarse el tamaño máximo, por lo que lo he de partir en 3 partes. Todos los rangos no regulares han sido convertidos a rangos regulares (ej/ Staff, Copper Member, etc.). 1. Legendary (52): Baneado user_id rank name merit nTotalEarnedMerits nTotalSpanishEarnedMerits % Spanish
N 102607 Legendary AbraxasCcs 1032 32 32 0,00%
N 209286 Legendary aleix 1100 100 76 0,00%
N 148969 Legendary Anillos2 1003 3 3 0,00%
N 88617 Legendary Antuam 1005 5 5 0,00%
N 980501 Legendary Artemis3 1561 1561 436 0,00%
N 65636 Legendary babo 4073 3073 12 0,00%
N 91068 Legendary BitAddict 1001 1 1 0,00%
N 1554927 Legendary bitmover 5851 5851 23 0,00%
N 87930 Legendary bitserve 1464 1214 64 0,00%
N 301936 Legendary BRE 1014 14 1 0,00%
N 903175 Legendary Csmiami 1319 1219 516 0,00%
N 131952 Legendary cyclops 1001 1 1 0,00%
N 27470 Legendary cygan 7573 6573 19 0,00%
N 85033 Legendary d5000 5869 4869 1569 0,00%
N 215813 Legendary Daltonik 1490 1240 2 0,00%
N 1582324 Legendary DdmrDdmr 10694 10694 3948 0,00%
N 1107222 Legendary Don Pedro Dinero 1474 1374 813 0,00%
N 17768 Legendary dserrano5 1029 29 27 0,00%
N 169515 Legendary EcuaMobi 1468 468 22 0,00%
N 1593137 Legendary famososMuertos 2691 2691 2157 0,00%
N 1852120 Legendary fillippone 15245 15246 41 0,00%
N 130780 Legendary foroplus 1052 52 52 0,00%
N 225121 Legendary franckuestein 1130 130 89 0,00%
S 199420 Legendary freemind1 1014 14 5 0,00%
N 2850161 Legendary Hispo 2081 2081 1585 0,00%
N 1137579 Legendary icopress 7615 7605 6 0,00%
N 97582 Legendary joker_josue 4456 3956 4 0,00%
N 1153977 Legendary LUCKMCFLY 1848 1748 1007 0,00%
N 70416 Legendary LuisCar 1017 17 17 0,00%
N 1894120 Legendary madnessteat 1945 1945 2 0,00%
N 115900 Legendary maikelblogo 1009 9 9 0,00%
N 23092 Legendary malevolent 1721 721 1 0,00%
N 2033515 Legendary mikeywith 6317 6317 14 0,00%
N 1280964 Legendary MinoRaiola 1559 1549 1 0,00%
N 64400 Legendary nikkus 1005 5 3 0,00%
N 29395 Legendary paraipan 1004 4 4 0,00%
N 1192397 Legendary paxmao 1575 1475 351 0,00%
N 263246 Legendary pazor_true 1025 25 2 0,00%
N 381391 Legendary pereira4 1183 183 15 0,00%
N 80095 Legendary pinger 1001 1 1 0,00%
N 991374 Legendary Porfirii 2022 1772 1345 0,00%
N 334783 Legendary seoincorporation 2897 1897 1160 0,00%
N 42880 Legendary Shawshank 1608 608 608 0,00%
N 907642 Legendary Silberman 1327 827 707 0,00%
N 194794 Legendary SUPERANTONIO 1037 37 37 0,00%
N 82365 Legendary thehun 1037 37 6 0,00%
N 1099980 Legendary Trofo 2516 2416 4 0,00%
N 557798 Legendary TryNinja 6948 6448 13 0,00%
N 1138727 Legendary VB1001 2540 2540 595 0,00%
N 53862 Legendary vgo 1019 19 19 0,00%
S 129969 Legendary vingaard 1011 11 11 0,00%
N 1068464 Legendary Xal0lex 2319 2219 4 0,00%
2. Hero Member (28): Baneado user_id rank name merit nTotalEarnedMerits nTotalSpanishEarnedMerits % Spanish
N 1171087 Hero Member 2stout 583 483 1 0,00%
N 3193408 Hero Member albert0bsd 658 658 136 0,00%
S 655931 Hero Member angaper 507 7 6 0,00%
N 459805 Hero Member Bardman 516 16 5 0,00%
N 525996 Hero Member carlosmnk 506 6 6 0,00%
N 159836 Hero Member coradan 503 3 3 0,00%
S 874624 Hero Member Criptomen 501 1 1 0,00%
N 2812492 Hero Member darxiaomi 950 950 636 0,00%
N 99387 Hero Member de_xt 535 35 8 0,00%
N 73326 Hero Member elbill 1005 5 5 0,00%
N 202862 Hero Member enerbyte 501 1 1 0,00%
N 76332 Hero Member fernarios 501 1 1 0,00%
N 899832 Hero Member Granxis 536 36 1 0,00%
N 88798 Hero Member josegines 531 31 4 0,00%
N 102378 Hero Member lukyforvar 1002 2 2 0,00%
N 821717 Hero Member MA40 523 273 219 0,00%
N 522205 Hero Member mr.relax 863 363 2 0,00%
N 21434 Hero Member Narydu 510 10 4 0,00%
N 221114 Hero Member Noolz39 503 3 1 0,00%
N 142966 Hero Member principiante 1009 9 9 0,00%
N 186511 Hero Member Roman1974 551 51 51 0,00%
N 80810 Hero Member solosequenosenada 542 292 264 0,00%
N 2627711 Hero Member Symmetrick 11957 11957 1 0,00%
N 870608 Hero Member th3nolo 669 169 149 0,00%
N 849090 Hero Member tomahawk9 994 744 30 0,00%
N 507017 Hero Member VictorGT 523 23 11 0,00%
N 263267 Hero Member xcbtrader 1006 6 6 0,00%
N 366752 Hero Member zerobyte1969 505 5 5 0,00%
3. Sr. Member (27): Baneado user_id rank name merit nTotalEarnedMerits nTotalSpanishEarnedMerits % Spanish
N 257466 Sr. Member brokk 254 4 3 0,00%
N 1176794 Sr. Member ChiNgadOr 278 178 98 0,00%
N 975365 Sr. Member cigaLeider 279 29 29 0,00%
N 230888 Sr. Member daeminium 252 2 2 0,00%
N 1414197 Sr. Member danadc 296 296 164 0,00%
N 224342 Sr. Member enunrom 265 15 15 0,00%
N 340569 Sr. Member EtherCoin 255 5 3 0,00%
N 2434463 Sr. Member FinneysTrueVision 333 333 3 0,00%
N 1000905 Sr. Member Frinky 262 12 12 0,00%
N 2587024 Sr. Member FullNode 270 270 118 0,00%
S 262282 Sr. Member glynbueso 255 5 5 0,00%
S 674078 Sr. Member Gothorum 429 179 173 0,00%
N 885730 Sr. Member ihnattm 269 19 13 0,00%
N 804317 Sr. Member InstaForex Yendi 253 3 3 0,00%
N 495 Sr. Member juengasa 252 2 2 0,00%
N 882182 Sr. Member JungleOnion 279 29 3 0,00%
N 120266 Sr. Member Liberto 254 4 4 0,00%
N 61357 Sr. Member lopalcar 254 4 4 0,00%
N 37724 Sr. Member Nubarius 253 3 3 0,00%
N 298279 Sr. Member oskuro 251 1 1 0,00%
N 3357194 Sr. Member takuma sato 408 408 11 0,00%
N 863921 Sr. Member timotron 281 31 26 0,00%
N 676934 Sr. Member USBitcoinServices.Com 267 17 5 0,00%
N 808986 Sr. Member vitocorp 255 5 5 0,00%
S 64734 Sr. Member vitruvio 331 81 50 0,00%
N 2424395 Sr. Member womanderful 463 463 451 0,00%
S 909172 Sr. Member yla1974 380 130 2 0,00%
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction.Back in November 2018 (see Analysis - DT Depth 2 - Profile Distribution), I took some time to take a look at how DT trust looked from an overall point of view. What I did then was retrieve all trust scores from a DT depth 2 point of view, and see how many forum members had what range of trust score based on this view. After all, DT depth 2 is the most common view most forum members, and it seemed interesting to see what they saw. Since then, the DT configuration has been shaken quite a bit, and it seemed interesting to perform a similar updated analysis. On this occasion though I will not analyse all user profiles (basically because I lack a complete recent full user profile DB scrape), but rather I’ll focus on those forum members that are included in at least one Custom Trust List (be that trust relation of Trust or Distrust). This gives us the view of those included in trust lists from a DT depth 2 viewpoint. The base considered is that of the 8.868 forum profiles included in a Customized Trust Network. Trust has 3 components (A: B /C), where: A is the Trust Score. B is the number of unique users who have given the profile negative feedback. C is the number of unique users who have given the profile positive feedback. I’ve included a complete list with all the underlying information here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SBM3pmp0wVSETROtFUynE6yFvBbtTUS-DwSJQcXTiN8/edit?usp=sharingNote that the trust scrore was scraped yesterday, and already today I can see changes in relation to the current DT Depth 2 scores. 2. Trust Score (A) - DistributionTrust Score (A) has the following distribution across those included in a Custom Trust List:  Things that stand out: a) 1.608 profiles have positive trust (18,13% of considered profiles), 1.428 have negative trust or unknown (16,10%), and the remaining 5.832 profiles have this value set to cero (65,77%). b) Positive trust is concentrated on Legendries (441), Hero Members (329), Sr. Members (298), Full Members (198), and Members (151) … and strangely enough Newbies (123). d) Negative or unknown Trust is concentrated on Sr.Members (309), Full Members (274) Newbies (263), Heroes (202), Legendries (186) and Members (150). e) There are 49 entries will a Null value, corresponding to profiles with the value ?? (unknown), a deliberate part of the Trust score algorithm. Top 30: 682: -0 / +74 Legendary 346731 minerjones https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=346731
553: -0 / +56 Legendary 134378 Blazed https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=134378
419: -0 / +42 Staff 54791 Dabs https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=54791
358: -0 / +42 Hero Member 1000199 krogothmanhattan https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000199
340: -0 / +34 Legendary 113670 Mitchell https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=113670
335: -0 / +36 Legendary 352429 BitcoinPenny https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=352429
329: -0 / +36 Legendary 160943 greenplastic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=160943
320: -0 / +32 Legendary 402550 digicoinuser https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=402550
318: -0 / +34 Legendary 353680 chronicsky https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=353680
314: -0 / +34 Legendary 206143 Lesbian Cow https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=206143
309: -0 / +32 Legendary 881377 Hhampuz https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881377
300: -0 / +30 Legendary 133846 monbux https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=133846
300: -0 / +30 Legendary 224612 bithalo https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=224612
296: -0 / +31 Hero Member 369879 Zepher https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=369879
289: -0 / +30 Legendary 18640 SebastianJu https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18640
270: -0 / +27 Legendary 279158 wheelz1200 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=279158
270: -0 / +27 Legendary 81962 monkeynuts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81962
258: -0 / +27 Legendary 15728 TECSHARE https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=15728
250: -0 / +25 Legendary 81292 Stunna https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81292
242: -0 / +29 Legendary 507936 DarkStar_ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=507936
240: -0 / +24 Legendary 25960 smoothie https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=25960
240: -0 / +24 Legendary 47306 Pistachio https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=47306
230: -0 / +23 Legendary 109430 TookDk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109430
230: -0 / +23 Legendary 37522 Tomatocage https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=37522
230: -0 / +24 Legendary 65034 dozerz https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65034
Bottom 30: trust rank user_Id Name URL
-9999: -14 / +0 Jr. Member 2228377 SmartPayMINT https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2228377
-9999: -17 / +1 Full Member 298715 arguelles84 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=298715
-9999: -17 / +20 Legendary 358020 Quickseller https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=358020
-9999: -14 / +4 VIP 67058 TradeFortress ?? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67058
-9999: -14 / +0 Hero Member 874254 game-protect https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254
-9999: -21 / +15 Hero Member 89329 master-P https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=89329
-8192: -13 / +0 Jr. Member 1764044 alia https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1764044
-8192: -13 / +0 Sr. Member 355462 Thule https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355462
-8192: -13 / +0 Newbie 650557 magic max https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=650557
-4096: -12 / +0 Full Member 709833 Embroiderymate https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=709833
-2048: -11 / +0 Newbie 2472107 H8bussesNbicycles https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2472107
-2048: -11 / +0 Newbie 2536607 gwsukabokepjepang https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2536607
-2048: -11 / +0 Legendary 8198 Inaba https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=8198
-2048: -11 / +0 Sr. Member 840084 VINSIN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=840084
-2046: -11 / +2 Hero Member 177007 Pierre11 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=177007
-1024: -10 / +0 Newbie 2143568 BitMiner713 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2143568
-1024: -10 / +0 Sr. Member 696473 Skeptical One https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=696473
-1021: -10 / +3 Legendary 60727 lenny_ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=60727
-1006: -10 / +18 Sr. Member 343899 BiPolarBob https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=343899
-512: -9 / +0 Legendary 197593 amaclin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=197593
-512: -9 / +0 Full Member 44366 BFL https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=44366
-512: -9 / +0 Full Member 397854 Ninjahitoko https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=397854
-512: -9 / +0 Member 63314 BFL_Josh https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=63314
-512: -9 / +0 Member 800061 The Prince Of Egifts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=800061
-256: -8 / +0 Sr. Member 911719 4x4et https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=911719
Global distribution:  4. Unique users that have given positive ratings to a profile (C) - DistributionGlobal distribution: 
|
|
|
|
This morning I read an interesting local article in relation Puigdemont, infamous ex-catalan president, and now a fugitive from the Spanish Judicial System that wants to trial him for rebellion. Rather than focusing on the political side of things, I was more concerned with the economical facet. The complete article can be found here: (see Puigdemont quiere que su república digital cuente con un banco y una criptomoneda], which translates as: Puigdemont wants his digital Republic to have a banc and a cryptocurrency). The core of the article’s content seems to be derived from what Joan Canadell (a Catalan pro-independence businessman of certain entity, with ties to the political sphere) has explained recently, and therefore has it’s weight in terms of aspirational feasibility. Making an effort to leave the political elements aside, what stands out after reading through the article a couple of times is the fact that there is a wish to create a cryptocurrency for those that are pro-independents to be able to pay their goods with (that would be 50% of the region of Cataluña in the best case scenario). Out of the payments one were to make with this cryptocurrency, a percentage would be transferred to the (seven second) Republic. In other words, this cryptocurrency would inherently be born alongside a digital taxation to finance the Republic. The cryptocurrency at hand would not be anything like Bitcoin, which is solely a means for speculation (not my words - theirs), but rather a stable coin, tied to the Euro on a 1:1 ratio. The bank they want to create is pretty universal too in terms of aspiration: You would be able to access the bank through an app, if you have your Catalan republican identity. The bank obviously would offer all it’s charms: heart-felt identity, way lower fees, and much more efficient than other existing banks. Of course in legal terms, the app-bank would not be able to act as a proper bank in all sense (i.e. bank deposits and credits could not legally be part of it’s portfolio with current legislation), and would rather be more like a financial entity than a self-made bank. Some of these things are in development, although in my opinion, the chances of them becoming a real thing are pretty slim, and likely the conservation of one’s economical portfolio will conflict with their political aspirations, let alone legislation. |
|
|
|
Hace años que se empezó a diseñar y programar un nuevo software que de soporte a Bitcointalk, y que dé origen a lo que coloquialmente llamamos el nuevo foro Bitcointalk. De hecho, los requisitos se publicaron allá por marzo 2014, y desde entonces ha ido un tanto a trompicones. El subforo que versa sobre el nuevo foro es el siguiente: New forum software). En nuevo software estaba tomando cariz de mito, pero últimamente @theymos publicó un post (ver re: What is wrong with the development of new software ?), en el cual indicaba que el software estaba sustancialmente completo, y animaba a la gente a bajarse el software del foro y probarlo por sí mismo. Del desarrollo de software entiendo algo, por lo que sorprendió que la sugerencia fuese orientada a bajarnos el software, y no probarlo en algún sitio donde ya estuviese hospedado por parte del foro, a la vista de todos o, cuanto menos, de un conjunto de probadores ocasionales voluntarios. Es ahí que le dediqué unas horas para comprender más qué estaba pasando. En resumen, me di cuenta que no se está buscando implementar un nuevo foro, sino un software (llamado Epochtalk) que es un software de base para implementar foros de toda índole, entre los cuales, uno podría parametrizar y derivar la implementación para el nuevo foro de Bitcointalk. No sé si os lío aquí, pero el punto clave es entender que no se está creando un foro, sino un implementador de foros. Para ello, el nivel de abstracción preciso es mucho mayor, y la complejidad del diseño e implementación es exponencialmente más grande que un mero rediseño de Bitcointalk. La idea es que Epochtalk sirva para implementar multitud de foros, y no sólo éste. Dicho esto, comprendo por qué se tarda tanto en su desarrollo, y comprendo la complejidad que entraña (otra cuestión es si era el mejor camino, y para qué hacerlo así). El usuario @lulucrypto (un chaval francés de 20 años) ha cogido el software de Github, y ha procedido a publicarlo en una instancia que él ha creado para poder probarlo (ver el hilo Cryptos-Currencies.Com : First forum using Epochtalk). En el hilo encontrareis tanto la URL de prueba por si os interesa echarle un vistazo, como los errores que hemos ido encontrando 4 o 5 que nos hemos aventurado a usarlo. Importante: Si no queréis correr el riesgo de que se sepa quienes sois, no debéis probar la instancia antes citada, dado que no sabemos qué sucede con la traza de IP (podéis usar Opera con vpn en todo caso, o usar vuestra propia vpn), y nunca debéis crear usuarios con la misma contraseña que usáis en el foro. Yo me he aventurado a probarlo y no soy tan optimista de que esté prácticamente listo aún. Es más, para mí lo ideal es probar una migración de Bitcointalk, aunque sea parcial. Nuestro objetivo aquí al fin y al cabo es usar el foro Bitcointalk, y no implementar el nuestro. A su vez, elementos clave como los méritos no están en el entorno de pruebas, y hay fallos relativamente obvios que no deberían estar si el producto está casi listo. Eso sí, estará mas cerca que ayer ... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
