Hey,

On http://www.satoshipoker.org/tournaments.php I can see:

10000 Guaranteed    Announced    2013-06-03 14:00:00    NL    Holdem    0    s500

But it's still Announced and not yet to be seen in the client. Will this one still be played? Would be great, thanks

Bought 3+1 tickets.

Lower % to next sounds good to me.

Good luck

Congrats

Hash:

26f4869fa0869f1302a23b3ae017ce5636fda97670f3ed6efc0cd6aa9afac82920cac55737b5467 e5bff200df95928d4599513893fe550d960435541186a8c0e

Game address:

145LeEmzuvvKRCf7ey7SvbGxJmSaMXect5

My own address:

1Fcn7M1AjgA9RFPm59RqiTCCD6tKKS5vN9

<!--
PROVABLY FAIR GAME INFO

message: "Random number is 884898." Hash:
message & hash: "Random number is 884898. Hash: 893836bae22b329e36ca90d7d198a86a87685f219ab534b327d2dca8e7a0eb5f3a26c9b24776186 caffffd22d82feb1f22d46c7de43d6603ed4364eb2ebfaa48"

final hash: 26f4869fa0869f1302a23b3ae017ce5636fda97670f3ed6efc0cd6aa9afac82920cac55737b5467 e5bff200df95928d4599513893fe550d960435541186a8c0e

secret key: 472069551254777129664062
//-->

Got the payment, thanks. Good luck with your website

Damn dude. Why you cannot follow it?

You said:
Which I already AGREED with before. THAT is why I said my argument was ONLY based on your very first argument.





Ok I will explain it 1 more time.

My argument "faster = more luck, less skill" was based ONLY and ONLY on your "more fun" argument. By that time, you did not say anything about hourly etc. Also I CANNOT look into the future. So my "faster = more luck, less skill" was BASED ONLY on "more fun".

When you said "yeh but it is hourly" I ALREADY AGREED WITH YOU. I already said it can be faster cuz it's hourly.

Then still you have to say:


Which obviously is NOT true. And I DO understand and ALREADY agreed it can be a bit faster.


In my opinion, we already agreed many posts ago. But still you have to insist that I don't understand you, which is not true.


I have never ever said that. There are many players which are better than me on SP and I also like to donk in the small games. For me it's a hobby, not a profession. Still I do have a profit in 4 digits over the years so I do not think I am the biggest fish either.


If you still don't understand the logic in this, especially as a math teacher, I will probably just give up. We both agree already, I don't understand why you still have to argue or insist that I don't understand you.

Lol.. you said faster is better cuz it's more fun and exciting. That's what i replied at. Has nothing to do with hourly. Read back your comments if you can't follow it.

Edit: and 5 min instead of 10 seems ok to me. Just the 1 or 3 is too fast.

Lol, bybitcoin..

You said:
I said:

This is 100% true. Faster levels provoke more all-ins preflop and therefor more luck and therefor more chance for the "fishes" to win. I have played 60 SatoshiPoker tourneys in the last 2 days and I do not see much people be very loose in the 1K GTD. Yet everyone is very loose and easily go all-in in the Super Turbo. Why? Because of the fast levels. If you do not understand this, then you don't understand the basics of poker.

Then after my first reply, you come up with this late registration strategy, which is (like I said) another "issue". Fast levels slightly "solve" this problem, even though I think it's not the best solution (cuz you can just remove late reg.)

And now you come up with "hourly tournaments should be finished within the hour". Which in some cases, like freerolls, I might actually agree (actually I might disagree too, tbh idc about when it's finished.) Still this has nothing to do with the fact that "fast structure = more luck". You really cannot argue with that :\

And my suggestion and/or solution would be: less freerolls, higher pricepool, same structure (so it's not all luck) OR only the freerolls a little bit faster and let the GTD be played normally. But of course that's up to the admins. I do think there was a lot of action last 2 days with all the tourneys so that's good for SP of course

edit: to be honest I think we agree on most parts, you just didn't formulate your opinion well and come with new 'arguments' every time :p

Ok, great, thanks and good luck

Wtf.. again hehe.. xD 1k gtd #179296, HU, I lose all-in so I should be second. 7-8 :p I also did not late registered in this one, so I am lost about the logic now :p

edit: and again, same situation, only the s100 turbo #171127, I was second.

Are YOU serious?

Faster levels = more fishy and luck. That is just by definition.

The fact that you can easily win by registering in the last seconds of late reg is a separated "issue" (and profitably for myself so far.) My solution to that, would be to just disallow late reg.

I think I played in like 50 of them in last 2 days.

The logic to me seems this: there is a late reg. If the tourney finishes before the late reg, or it's ITM before end of late reg, the position of prices are calculated by the total time that you played.

Expat living on a nice tropical island hehe

Hehe yeh I did read all I also read your group buy topic because I live in the Philippines (but not really interested in mining, still interesting to read though)

Good luck with the lotto, hope more people will join

I am still not sure about that 80/20 but you seem like a nice and fair guy, so I just bought 1 ticket, let's get this started (I could not be bothered to sign it btw :p)

Ah ok nice   I just replied like that cuz i didn't see it on the homepage with the logos. I will just give it a try later.

Good luck with your poker client

And you accept bitcoins? Or is this just some spam?

Lol I was playing this s1000 gtd earlier. I saw it 5 min late but there was late reg so it's ok. Then some guy became 4th. So it was tball, ddr and me. Then tball lost and became 3rd (or so I thought.) Then heads-up, prices were s650 and s350 so I decided to just go all-in a lot because I was ITM anyways. Then after few all-ins I lost so I was second. Well not.. tball was second and I was third. Why is that? xD I never experienced like that on partypoker etc, I would think that if I am heads-up I will be second or first :p (this was tournament #164860, I think tball had the same in tournament #164859)

Yeh, but also much more fishy and more luck than "skill".

A lot of players, including me, mostly play with many tables at the same time anyway :X :p so for me this is no problem :X only with the HTML5 client it might be confusing (or even impossible to play multiple.)

Sounds interesting, I used to love all tycoon games when I was a kid.

Small question though, do you have any previous games that you made and can show us? Not meant offensive but that would give us an idea of the possibilities.

edit: ah didn't read completely but I see now "If this project funding request is successful I have game developers lined up ready to start working, its just a matter of funding at the moment.", do you happen to have games from them though?