Yes, that name exists. Gotta email them for password recovery (expect some serious questions / validation methods.) GL.
|
|
|
Ledger doesn't publish any source at all, at least the Trezor source is still available for audit. I don't agree with their decision but to consider Ledger all of the sudden better now, seems silly.
|
|
|
I don't know much about it, but a license that doesn't allow commercial usage only would make more sense to me.
|
|
|
I am wondering what amounts you use to calculate "Bank turnover" (and therefor "Expected annual return".) I mean BitDice's BR has 2 big investors on 10x kelly. Their virtual bankroll is 4340. The 1 BTC investor's share is 1/4340 not 1/960. So I am not sure if you use 960 or 4340. It looks like 960 though, which would give x4.5 higher wrong results than the real expected results. With DiceNow it's the same.
Time to re-read what I said. Although I removed my investment at BD because I cannot put my own kelly, their math does work out imo. Their profit is even closer to expected than any other site: Profit: 870.8 BTC EV: 873.2 BTC Profit/EV: 99.7%
|
|
|
Let's do 1M first, hehe
|
|
|
I have 2 (obviously new and sealed) white Trezors for sale here in the PH. $99 (Stamp price) each including local shipping with LBC or Air21. That's a decent discount and with local shipping you should get it in a few days (+ no troubles with any customs.) PM me if interested.
|
|
|
So I guess with the falling BTC price you can finally pay him back all his money soon. That's actually good news.
|
|
|
We have developed a specific solution to this issue : a stand-alone roll server, to be deployed on a machine managed by large investors, or an highly trusted third party. Would there be a risk of that trusted party to take advantage of the seeds? I assume so since there seems to be only 1 "server seed". We had some kind of discussion about "provably fair for investors" before, and I do agree that only "an audit method" (not really provably fair) is realistic at this moment (for a quick game like dice.) In "my method" I assumed the dice site AND audit server would generate a seed (see here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=774458.msg9147921#msg9147921 ) So in that situation both the dice site and "auditors" would need to collude and cheat together. Also great against hackers, would need to hack both servers to cheat with the seeds.
|
|
|
I must say ireally like the idea behind this website Note: It does not seem to be updating properly the past few days. Thanks. Yeh the "total" statistics are still updating every 15 minutes automatic. But I am having some problems with the historic data (graphs and top 10) Basically I am triggering that update manually, so that is a bit off time to time. I am looking for a permanent fix
|
|
|
No website (not automated). Not provably fair. And a house edge of 16.6% (?!) Ehhh.. is this a joke?
Sorry to say, but within the bitcoin community those things aren't really accepted, I highly doubt you will get players this way.
Using marcotheminer as escrow is fine though and donating some to charities is obviously good. But this is not going to work this way.
|
|
|
He was "only" able to withdraw 40 coins. I am personally still curious for the technical details. Stunna said he will still share that info later.
|
|
|
Thanks all. I am still planning to add more sites and features. Just don't have that much time lately with the holidays The current sites should be all updated automatically every 15 minutes though, so site is still okay
|
|
|
Just-Dice.com number 2 in "most invested dice sites" But I guess it's ok since it is still much less than a JD BTC site
|
|
|
I understand very well that the site earns only 1% compared to PD and therefor the affiliate earnings will be also around 100x less than PD. Even if BitDice would give all house profits it will be 10 till 20 times less. Still I would personally prefer "something" (even if it's 100x less than PD so 10-20% of house commission) than nothing. I referred 170 people in the last 40 days to the .me sites. Now while this might have been only a few new players that really wagered money, still for me it would be satisfying to at least see some affiliate commission on it (more on principle than the actual profits I guess) Obviously either way, I will keep my website the same so I am not "demanding" it, just asking hehe PRC (also invest-model) also has an affiliate program, so it must be possible.
|
|
|
|