|
Betcoin.tm has many scam accusations. I would not trust that site at all with any satoshi.
|
|
|
|
Something doesn't add up here... In all the time I've played dice, I can't imagine a world in which the average bet on a dice site could be 0.0045 like it is on Pocket Rocket.. Here is an overview of "wagered per bet" amounts (freshly calculated with the latest data of http://dicesites.com ) BitDice.me 0.012845444516 PocketRocketsCasino.eu 0.004479108592 SatoshiDice.com 0.002564731303 Primedice 0.000210989388 Peerbet 0.000057386303 Win88 0.000054232710 dicenow 0.000044876957 As you can see, PRC is not even the highest (BD has 3x higher avg bet!) Also both BD as PRC have very close to 1% profit based on wagered, so seems very realistic to me. And it doesn't make sense to fake both wagered+positive profit since this is a very expensive joke to do on a crowd-sourced bankroll site. Your story and "conclusion" are pretty much completely bullshit. Better yet, I think that "number of bets" is not an interesting indicator at all and "wagered" is much more interesting, because it is a more realistic indicator of the action going on. Especially for investors. So my conclusion would be the opposite: sites like PD/BD/PRC (JD if you like CLAM) are much more interesting than Win88. Of course if you prefer the design/faucet/games there, it's okay too. |
|
|
|
Definitely. I just meant that I don't expect Seals to lose traffic over it because the current players are mostly from US and will probably still play at Seals. Better yet, there might be more players at Seals if more poker players educate about bitcoin because of Stars accepting it  |
|
|
|
|
+ Even if Stars accepts BTC, they wouldn't accept US players which is really most of Seals' current traffic.
|
|
|
|
Nice big win today for this player, 33 Bitcoin profit in one roll! https://pocketrocketscasino.eu/ has the highest payout of any dice site, currently 172.5 Bitcoin can be won in 1 bet! Wow thats great. I remember you updating the thread title when it was increasing. Maybe you need to do the same while it decreases to not do false advertising ? Yeh, those whales gonna be mad when they realize max bet is only 172.6 BTC! |
|
|
|
Looks good. Just some small things: I would call "secret" just "server seed" like all other websites. "Secrets" could be associated with daily secrets. Also I noticed "bet number" doesn't reset. On all other sites this would reset upon resetting the server seed. This makes it slightly easier to check all bets from that session since you know that it must have started at "0". Also filling in the following kelly amount: 5<script>alert('hello')</script>Executes that script However, this isn't a real XSS possibility because there is no way for the attacker to execute this script without having the user literally copy-pasting that in that field. Still could be fixed I guess. |
|
|
|
Sorry, but I just feel obligated to warn people here since this crappy Joomla site looks really sketchy. Be careful guys.
To add some more information: AFAIK it's relatively easy to calculate your own transaction IDs. That's why all on-chain dice sites use a daily secret combined with that ID. So: it's easily possible to hack this holydice.com website OR it's just a scam anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but I just feel obligated to warn people here since this crappy Joomla site looks really sketchy. Be careful guys.
|
|
|
|
|
The dice is claimed to be provably fair but it is not. You:
1. never show unhashed server seed, even after generating new seed
2. don't show the actual algorithm anywhere
Will this be fixed so it's really provably fair?
|
|
|
|
Have you created this account in 2010, or have you bought it from another user? Thanks for the attention (feel free to not reply if you don't want).
bugmenot is a website for site/forum logins. So you don't have to generate an account for every forum if you just want to reply or check a private forum out. The account "bugmenot" seems not to be listed, which could mean that an automatic bot generated the account with 1 of the "obvious" passwords but somehow didn't list it. The current owner obviously "guessed" the password and overtook it. However, it seems very unlikely that it was really used or that the original owner still want access to it. |
|
|
|
|
Actually they have an "extra" 1% buy fee too. So currently:
Buy: PHP 10,017 | Sell: PHP 9,821
Stamp: $221.16
Buy: PHP 10,117 = $228.09
Sell: PHP 9,821 = $221.42
So in theory, compared to Stamp you would actually profit when you sell on coins.ph and a 3% "fee" when buying.
Actually Rebit is still slightly better with 9,841. But it does look like coins.ph is really cheap too and still competing with them on sell-price (obviously from time to time they could be cheaper too, depending on price etc.)
$9-10 seems not the case though (unless you compared when price was just going up/down.)
|
|
|
|
I am not aware of anyone who is lending fiat money to poker players. Actually staking poker players is a normal thing and definitely more like an investment than a loan. Fiat staking happens on sites like 2p2, chipmeup.com and for seals (bitcoin) there is http://sealsdeals.info . Most times staking deals are tournaments though since it's easier to track/agree on. I have personally staked many many bitcoins on the latter one on good players. With tournaments it's a bit easier, if buy-in is 0.01 BTC, I could stake someone for 0.005 BTC (half) for 45% total winnings. Obviously I would stake only good players with a good statistical ROI especially if there is that mark-up (not 1:1 value, 50% for 45%.) The reason why someone would want a stake even if he's good, is because you should have around 100 buy-ins since variance can be rough. So if a player "only" has 0.5 BTC it can be good to be staked for half the buyin at a 0.01 tourney. That being said, I personally never fully-stake people (I think a decent player should have some bankroll) and I am not very confident it will be an EV+ situation here. I don't consider it as begging though. edit: and like I said, I think the "promise" or goal of 150% is a bit vague/strange. Although I am mostly experienced with tournament staking so I am not sure what the best way is for cash game staking. |
|
|
|
|
Do you have any Stats, ROI, PT/HEM graphs, previous username (for stats sites), etc?
People asking poker staking + talking about 150% returns, always seem silly to me (as a hobby yet profitable poker player.)
Also it's unclear what you are offering. 0% or 150% ? Or % of profits? Or life-time all profits? Or .. ? Within which time frame? Etc.
|
|
|
|
Rebit.ph does really not charge anything since a few weeks. I could come up with multiple reasons: 1) site owners are just rich filipinos trying to buy bitcoins without fees on other exchanges (or/and think price is relatively low ATM) 2) site has some big buyers of bitcoin (OTC) and they charge them 3) site just wants to get popular first, has losses now to become "market leader" in PH to earn more in the future Either way, it's good for Filipinos and ppl who send money there I certainly benefit from using their service Also best to post things related to PH in the PH thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=27736.0 |
|
|
|
|
Well their claim of "first provably fair for Investors" was basically a lie, so that would be a first bad sign. Although I was hoping they actually did had the intention of an audit thingy for investors.
I hope it's just a lazy admin or something, so u can still get ur funds. GL.
|
|
|
|
Correct. There is 1 popular free alternative: Free Poker Database (FPDB) - http://sourceforge.net/projects/fpdb/ - does work on multiple OS, and also with support for Seals cash games. I believe the seals HH is missing tournament IDs in the "header" or something, so there "cannot" be support for tournaments. I tested this like a 1+ year ago when seals support was just added to FPDB and did seem to work fine for cash games, setup and usage isn't as easy as HEM/PT though. Hey that's pretty cool to know about. Like sed, it seems, I'm also a GNU/Linux person who wants to know about the free (as in freedom) stuff. Thanks NLNico. Does that work only for the cash games or does it work for tournaments as well ? Like I said: I believe the seals HH is missing tournament IDs in the "header" or something, so there "cannot" be support for tournaments.That was the situation more than a year ago, but I think it's still the same. |
|
|
|
Correct. There is 1 popular free alternative: Free Poker Database (FPDB) - http://sourceforge.net/projects/fpdb/ - does work on multiple OS, and also with support for Seals cash games. I believe the seals HH is missing tournament IDs in the "header" or something, so there "cannot" be support for tournaments. I tested this like a 1+ year ago when seals support was just added to FPDB and did seem to work fine for cash games, setup and usage isn't as easy as HEM/PT though. |
|
|
|
Not sure if hold em manager works with seals with clubs?
No. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
