It's all well planned of course; Peter can make a censorship victim claim if they ban him too, or they can continue to tolerate his sophistry. Banning is better IMO, Yes, the stalinist/fascist mentality of you and your idols will be exposed better that way. You should repeat banning and censoring as much as you can. |
|
|
|
Right now im leaning on not increasing the block size until the time is right... when is it right? When a 0 fee transaction cannot get included in a block for more than 5 days (current bank wire transfer times). By then hopefully we solve the technical problems and are in need for smaller fees.
Yep, you're sensing it right, I have come to the same conclusions only maybe from a different perspective. We will get to the block-size increase decision eventually as the Time Goes By. Thanks just got into the debate and wanted to see if I fully understood what the problem was about... so why can Gaven not see this? I mean it took me like an hour to get the facts down and realize its a bad idea right now? whats his view? You can't possibly have missed all this lulz ?  Gavin has been compromised by Mike Hearn and his merry band of socialist shills who are attempting to press urgency under the pretense that the cap is stalling Bitcoin MAINSTREAM adoption. Everybody knows that the year around the last halving (Spring 12 - spring 13) saw a tenfold increase of txs. This will be prevented next year if the Politbüro will be successful to block the stream with the limit. But they won't. We will have alternate clients that are ready. |
|
|
|
You dumb fucks can fork off to infinite altcoins you delude yourselves with.
Yes you can! And you will! Your stalinist and bolshevik ideas of 'consus' within a Politbüro, fearing competition as hell, censoring opposition, will be forked off into nirvana. |
|
|
|
It's disturbing to see one man capable of such consistent and immovable sophistry. He's very talented in that department. Wouldn't be surprised if Peter & Mike privately pitched each other propaganda material & ideas.. Truly a disturbing merry bunch of sociopaths Whining nobodies. I think, you're being too critical about Peter & Mike.  You know very well who is somebody and who is not. Nobody is discussing the 'ideas' of the two notorious ad hominem clowns here (despite full time propaganda spamming by brg). |
|
|
|
It's disturbing to see one man capable of such consistent and immovable sophistry. He's very talented in that department. Wouldn't be surprised if Peter & Mike privately pitched each other propaganda material & ideas.. Truly a disturbing merry bunch of sociopaths Whining nobodies. |
|
|
|
Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.
I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there. Sure, let's see you on the other side  Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again. Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs? You prick, bitcoin delivers perfectly and fits its market marvelously. Yes, 'perfectly' as long as the stream blockers are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core" (ICEBREAKER) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=68655.msg12067133#msg12067133Boring I agree. Bitcoin will remain boring as long as the stream blockers are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core". |
|
|
|
Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this.
I'm quoting this for postery. Can't wait to pull it out of my bag again, and again, and again. As you which but I won't have any merit on this prediction as it is just 5th grader economics 101 class so there is nothing really impressive there. Sure, let's see you on the other side Although knowing how little honor you shills have I wouldn't be surprised if you don't show your face here ever again. Huh? What is honourable about using a system that doesn't deliver and does't fits the market needs? You prick, bitcoin delivers perfectly and fits its market marvelously. Yes, 'perfectly' as long as the stream blockers are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core" (ICEBREAKER) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=68655.msg12067133#msg12067133 |
|
|
|
Reminding people here that not everyone has the same perspective of the people that seem to be shouting the loudest on this thread. I think that Peter R's work is valuable and I respect his opinion. I support BIP101 because at this time it is still the only implementation of Bitcoin which increases the blocksize. I think that a third alternative will most likely be adopted which I would support as well instead of BIP101 as soon as it is implemented, especially if it represents a middle ground between these two extremes. I do not support censorship and I do not think that XT is a take over or a coup of Bitcoin. Here is an article I have written on the subject explaining my perspective: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1164464.0This is why I think that leaving the block size at one megabyte would not be good for Bitcoin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946236.0 I wish I could censor you outta my thread, you're so damn boring q.e.d. and you are also posting in his thread. That's exactly the mentality of the censors. O nausea! nausea! nausea! |
|
|
|
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be. The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant. At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.By whom? By market participants that want and need bigger blocks and don't give so much interest anymore about Core implementation. This minority, no matter how loud it is, is still a minority, therefore if you want bigger blocks better fork off into your own altcoin Don't worry that's going to happen when the economic incentives will get there as blocks will be filled out. At that point bitcoin core will be left out in the dust, there is absolutely no doubt about this. Yes, either that, or the stagnators are successful to "prolong the stalemate, which is the preferred outcome of Team Core" (ICEBREAKER) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=68655.msg12067133#msg12067133 |
|
|
|
More nonsense appeals to authority. The most authoritative organisation in the world is the United Nations. Complete nonsense. The UN is ruled by a majority (of authoritative and less authoritative countries). It is authoritative, but clearly not the most authoritative. Saudia Arabia, North Korea et al. are more authoritative. Thinking before posting is never a disadvantage. |
|
|
|
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be. The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant. At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.By whom? Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years. Yes, unfortunately. The result is visible on the chart since the stagnators are in charge. But then, Peter R. stepped in and told the geeks something about socionomics and the market: good one we sure learned a lot from his 5th grader economics 101 class ! Yes. Bitcoin requires interdisciplinary geniuses. Bitcoin cannot be brought forward alone by twenty year old children without any life experience (todd, buterin, nullc, theymos et al.). |
|
|
|
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be. The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant. At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant.By whom? Gavin hasn't done anything significant in Bitcoin in almost two years. Yes, unfortunately. The result is visible on the chart since the stagnators are in charge. But then, Peter R. stepped in and told the geeks something about socionomics and the market:  |
|
|
|
even MP seems more legit.
Yes, this is the idol of the clowns with their vulgar language here. But you don't represent Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
The clowns you refer too are the ones actually working on Bitcoin development which make them more relevant than Peter could ever hope to be. The clowns I refer to are you and alikes. Gavin (the lead developer before core got compromised) was one of them who made Bitcoin relevant. At the moment core is compromised and hijacked by stagnators. It won't last. They'll be forced to deliver bigger blocks or to become irrelevant. |
|
|
|
ah finally!  Yes. that's the difference between him and a '50 posts a day spammer' like that brg0815. |
|
|
|
vomits his bile
Everybody out there is talking about the ideas of Peter R. Nobody is talking about the ideas of the brg and that mod. Which is no surprise. |
|
|
|
New wave of banning idiocy in their spheres at the moment.
Indeed. I was banned earlier today. And it looks like Adrian-X was just banned too. For the record, here is the censored submission: *FUD* I support the censorship Your thread was nothing but typical disingenuous FUD attempt to "teach the controversy" It shot to the top of reddit in 10 minutes and every sensible posts in there was promptly buried under downvotes Great to know the censorship cheerleaders on the other side. Vote brigading = censorship. Spare us the hypocrisy you stupid shill. What are you doing here anyway? Is it so lonely in your bitco.in circle jerk you have nothing to entertain yourself with? The banning enthusiasts want to ban all they can. Again and again. q.e.d. just fork off already, hmkay? As you see, we write wherever we want; until we are banned. That ruins the reputation of the Politbüro and its cheerleaders more and more. |
|
|
|
New wave of banning idiocy in their spheres at the moment.
Indeed. I was banned earlier today. And it looks like Adrian-X was just banned too. For the record, here is the censored submission: *FUD* I support the censorship Your thread was nothing but typical disingenuous FUD attempt to "teach the controversy" It shot to the top of reddit in 10 minutes and every sensible posts in there was promptly buried under downvotes Great to know the censorship cheerleaders on the other side. Vote brigading = censorship. Spare us the hypocrisy you stupid shill. What are you doing here anyway? Is it so lonely in your bitco.in circle jerk you have nothing to entertain yourself with? The banning enthusiasts want to ban all they can. Again and again. The ad hominem talkers expose themselves. Again and again. Which is great. q.e.d. |
|
|
|
New wave of banning idiocy in their spheres at the moment.
Indeed. I was banned earlier today. And it looks like Adrian-X was just banned too. For the record, here is the censored submission: *FUD* I support the censorship Your thread was nothing but typical disingenuous FUD attempt to "teach the controversy" It shot to the top of reddit in 10 minutes and every sensible posts in there was promptly buried under downvotes Great to know the censorship cheerleaders on the other side. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
