The key thing the Stolfinator doesn't understand about being a socialist is, one man's free stuff is another man's indentured servitude. He keeps preaching this "more just society" nonsense while supporting a pro-slavery ideology.
Capitalists are collectivists as well, since they promote a market which is per se a state bastard. People who live beyond the state (rain forest) don't need a market. They don't trade with aliens. They are self-sufficient (anarchy). |
|
|
|
Classic has no roadmap or anything. Even if we disregard the safety risk of 2 MB blocks right now, we would have this same discussion very soon (if the growth is going to increase). There's a proposal that aims to fix the validation time being quadratic; we should wait for that to be implemented.
Lauda, so in addition to the 'quadratic' risk (for which you admit there is a fix but core is not implementing), you're also giving us the 'nothing is better than something' argument. Really seems like you're shilling hard for core/blockstream. Not that I think they are paying you or anything. You just have a huge bias and seem to always support their position and actions. That's my OPINION and my impression. Just saying. He is shilling for the Politbüro. He loves censorship and totalitarianism. He tries to sell us a non-consensual monster fork that gives us 1.35MB as a 'short term scaling solution' in the year of the Great Halvening. |
|
|
|
GPU's are enough to secure an Altcoin/BS-Chain with nearly zero value. |
|
|
|
What's the Classic position on opt-in RBF?
Our polling shows that there is almost no support for it (and lots of opposition towards it). For this reason, opt-in RBF will not be included in Bitcoin Classic. Classic is censoring supporters of RBF! It's literally worse than the Khmer Rouge!  Good luck with your Toomin dictatorship and its (feature) killing fields. You can take our RBF, but you will never take our freedom! Says the one who supports censorship the most and opens threads that are censored by himself. Noone with half a brain listens to your orwellian BS. Orwellian? Like how Big Brother Toomin memory-holed RBF, by removing even the option to enable it? At least I know the difference between the Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft and a democracy. That's pathetic, given that you live in the Confoederatio Helvetica!  You know nothing. If the people in Switzerland want to decide and vote upon any option, we can! If we decide to not enable BS that the Politbüro programmed, we do! |
|
|
|
What's the Classic position on opt-in RBF?
Our polling shows that there is almost no support for it (and lots of opposition towards it). For this reason, opt-in RBF will not be included in Bitcoin Classic. I hope you aren't giving votes to people like me. We know nothing! I hope they will. Such is democracy. Here in Switzerland, wherever the entire population can vote on individual acts, everything works better than elsewhere on the planet where experts and Politbüros are deciding. The Core developers and cheerleaders prefer to speak on armed squares. The Bitcoin Classic people prefer those squares: http://www.myswitzerland.com/en-ch/landsgemeinden.htmlDid you vote to get rid of banking secrecy? Did you vote to betray all those who trusted Swiss banks to protect their families' saving from predatory governments? Did you vote to peg the Franc to the Euro? Did you vote to suspend/relax that peg? Did you vote for negative interest rates? We can vote to everything, as soon as we decide to, you noob. Educate yourself! |
|
|
|
What's the Classic position on opt-in RBF?
Our polling shows that there is almost no support for it (and lots of opposition towards it). For this reason, opt-in RBF will not be included in Bitcoin Classic. Classic is censoring supporters of RBF! It's literally worse than the Khmer Rouge! Good luck with your Toomin dictatorship and its (feature) killing fields. You can take our RBF, but you will never take our freedom! Says the one who supports censorship the most and opens threads that are censored by himself. Noone with half a brain listens to your orwellian BS. |
|
|
|
What's the Classic position on opt-in RBF?
Our polling shows that there is almost no support for it (and lots of opposition towards it). For this reason, opt-in RBF will not be included in Bitcoin Classic. I hope you aren't giving votes to people like me. We know nothing! I hope they will. Such is democracy. Here in Switzerland, wherever the entire population can vote on individual acts, everything works better than elsewhere on the planet where experts and Politbüros are deciding. The Core developers and cheerleaders prefer to speak on armed squares. The Bitcoin Classic people prefer those squares: http://www.myswitzerland.com/en-ch/landsgemeinden.html |
|
|
|
Experience is important but it is not the only factor. If the experienced group doesn't have the right goals, then you end up reaching the wrong ones.
In any case the Core developers are definitely better than those behind Classic. Yes, better in producing BS and collaborating with Totalitarians. An example, please, of Core developers "collaborating with Totalitarians"? An example? LOL. Everybody knows that they constantly 'communicate' via totalitarian forums. |
|
|
|
I answered this earlierSensible bounds on memory usage per tx or time based rules mitigate or solve this entirely. If you are putting so much into a tx, then you are exceeding isStandard() rules anyway. There is currently no solution and you are wrong. XT introduced a per transaction limit (if I'm correct). Core will address this via BIP 143 ,which is an actual improvement unlike the workaround in XT, and a limit. However this is node policy, miners can still create a transaction that would take too long to validate and that would harm the network. Experience is important but it is not the only factor. If the experienced group doesn't have the right goals, then you end up reaching the wrong ones.
In any case the Core developers are definitely better than those behind Classic. Yes, better in producing BS and collaborating with Totalitarians. |
|
|
|
The core development team had more than enough time now to design a version of Bitcoin that allows scalability.
Core has already designed "a version of Bitcoin that allows scalability." Is that the one that Nobody Wants tm? Nobody Wants a contentious hard fork and subsequent catastrophic consensus failure, except XT/Unlimited/Classic dead-enders (but you guys don't matter, because Bitcoin is not a democracy). The people who matter support Core. Here, have some Fact Welfare you poor, low-information Toominista. https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-core/capacity-increasesWhy don't you follow your role model Mike Hearn's example, and ride off into the sunset? You've got the whining part down, now you just need to GTFO.  You are always so angry. I love that about you....  These angry-miCE threads are amusing.  |
|
|
|
So whataya got for me?
A list of Core supporters that prove you are liar: Please pout more about now "Nobody Wants" Core's scaling roadmap. It's funny!  Ah, your Politbüro. Boring without picture.  |
|
|
|
|
Poor miCEBREAKER needs to clutch the last straw, the miserably failed tactics of his totalitarian idols. Your self-destroying agitation is a great support to trigger the fork even faster than without your efforts.
|
|
|
|
There would be no war if people weren't selfish and following their own agenda
Well, we agree on something finally. So... when are you lot going to stop DDOSing, Spreading FUD, Lying, Manipulating, and following a whiny & childish scorched earth policy of trying to destroy Bitcoin if you can't control it??Nobody can control bitcoin. Only forkers want to destroy bitcoin... by forking it. By a non-consensual 'soft' fork. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
