Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 07:34:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 »
721  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. [NooNooPol] on: August 19, 2015, 07:46:16 PM
Cypherdoc's stalkers are still 'alive' ...
While nobody is upgrading to core 0.11.0

Your first and most obvious mistake is always assuming all nodes are equal.

903 nodes now.

I'm surprised that nobody is upgrading to core 0.11.0 anymore since one week. It stopped abruptly.
Does nobody in the Bitcoin community trust the blockchainers and their cheerleaders who behave like warriors and censoring enthusiast?
722  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. [NooNooPol] on: August 19, 2015, 07:26:04 PM
Cypherdoc's stalkers are still 'alive' ...
While nobody is upgrading to core 0.11.0 since 1 week.
723  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. [NooNooPol] on: August 19, 2015, 11:43:44 AM
Cypher I told you you will get #REKT...

You're the one getting rekt and don't even know it, lol.
.
XT continuing to ramp. 848!

theymos:

Satoshi definitely intended to increase the hard max block size. See:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1347.0

I believe that Satoshi expected most people to use some sort of lightweight node, with only companies and true enthusiasts being full nodes. Mike Hearn's view is similar to Satoshi's view.

I strongly disagree with the idea that changing the max block size is a violation of the "Bitcoin currency guarantees". Satoshi said that the max block size could be increased, and the max block size is never mentioned in any of the standard descriptions of the Bitcoin system.

IMO Mike Hearn's plan would probably work. The market/community would find a way to pay for the network's security, and it would be easy enough to become a full node that the currency wouldn't be at risk. The max block size would not truly be unlimited, since miners would always need to produce blocks that the vast majority of full nodes and other miners would be able and willing to process in a reasonable amount of time.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=140233.msg1492629#msg1492629
724  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Five XT Secrets Mike Hearn Doesn't Want You To Know on: August 19, 2015, 09:21:54 AM
Heaven help us, Mike Hearn is a "DICK-tator"

Thank goodness for altcoins.

Bitcoin XT is an altcoin, sweetie.

No, it is one of several clients that are mining the bitcoin blockchain. First bitcoin block mined already.
725  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What's up with all these people switching to BitcoinXT? on: August 19, 2015, 09:14:40 AM
I've been looking around in every Bitcoin community I'm a member of, and almost every day I can see someone saying they switched to BitcoinXT.

I think you meant to say NotXT.  NotXT+XT node count really took off when it came out:


I don't think that you really believe in that BS, which seems to be your last hope.
Since 1 week there are (net) zero node upgrades to 1MB-0.11.0, while the XMB-0.11.0 version went to 800.

You can't tell how many of those 800 nodes are being spoofed by NotXT and Pseudonode.

Not that it matters.  Nobody is going to want XT after this news gets out:

Bitcoin XTs Tor IP blacklist downloading system has significant privacy leaks.

The reality is:

1) It is open source and can/will be changed as soon as the 1MB'ers/sidechain usurpators are forked away and
2) 'Nobody is going to want to' upgrade to 1MB-0.11.0 since the XMB-0.11.0-Client is ready to download.

726  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What's up with all these people switching to BitcoinXT? on: August 19, 2015, 08:44:04 AM
I've been looking around in every Bitcoin community I'm a member of, and almost every day I can see someone saying they switched to BitcoinXT.

I think you meant to say NotXT.  NotXT+XT node count really took off when it came out:


I don't think that you really believe in that BS, which seems to be your last hope.
Since 1 week there are (net) zero node upgrades to 1MB-0.11.0, while the XMB-0.11.0 version went to 800.
727  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. [NooNooPol] on: August 19, 2015, 08:33:18 AM
....in cypherdoc's thread... attract those thinkers.


Fools will waste their life discussing something which is soon to be an outdated non-issue.

While you all were busy circle jerking, I was solving the problem.


q.e.d.

This thread is for warriors, BREAKERS, destroyers or people who seriously write sentences like that: "While you all were busy circlejerking, I was solving the problem."

Since 1 week there are (net) zero node upgrades to 1MB-0.11.0, while the XMB-0.11.0 version went to 800.
728  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. [NooNooPol] on: August 19, 2015, 07:31:20 AM

Nobody I can think of advocated censoring or sterilizing anything.  For all we know cypherdoc himself picked up his ball and went home.

You're  still as stupid ever and willing to throw loose  allegations around like vomit.

You're still going to lose because of all your unethical tactics.

... and here comes the compromised shill to lecture others on ethics. Have you no shame?

He's always welcome on my thread even if he is the kind of pansy who messed up his own and tried to blame others for it.  Cypherdoc is his own worst enemy when he flaps his gums in the presence of people smart enough and informed enough to matter.

BTW, cypherdoc:  Gold up, Bitcoin collapsing...thanks in no small part to your own efforts.


Your thread? 'Your' thread is nothing more than a stalker's thread, and you have never been something different in cypherdoc's thread. You will never be able to attract those thinkers. Your followers here will be cyper's other stalkers, the warriors and destroyers. Their popescu style 'language' says it all. Their language and mentality is one of the reasons why they are loosing ground against Gavin so fast. You can't win an idealist community that way. You are downvoted everywhere.

BTW: Gold collapsing ...



729  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 18, 2015, 02:31:32 PM
My topic was also moved to the Meta section:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1155952.msg12173342#msg12173342

Incredible.

My block size speculaction poll still in the Speculation section:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1154751.0

Incredible ...
730  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 18, 2015, 02:14:11 PM

I FUCKING HATE CENSORSHIP.  Angry

Yes, but their illiberal terror is the best turbo booster for big blocks.
Either they don't realise it, or they love big blocks.
731  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 18, 2015, 12:33:52 PM
10% of network:



707
732  Economy / Speculation / Re: Block size on: August 18, 2015, 08:28:17 AM
432 views - 24 votes.
Does that mean that most users have no opinion or that they don't care?
733  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 18, 2015, 08:18:05 AM
You - brg444 - captured this thread with 18 (!) posts this morning alone. Not funny. Do you really think it's necessary that you comment everything?

You wouldn't be trying to censor me would you?  Angry

I am not a cheerleader of the censors over there. I only asked.
734  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 18, 2015, 08:09:34 AM
You - brg444 - captured this thread with 18 (!) posts this morning alone. Not funny. Do you really think it's necessary that you comment everything?
735  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 17, 2015, 02:18:55 PM
Quote of the Year (2012): "I lean towards Anarchism"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Theymos
736  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold UP. Bitcoin XT collapsing. on: August 17, 2015, 12:31:09 PM

that was very funny. I'm surprised you didn't quote it.
 

It's been a long, popcorn-and-comedy-filled day.   Cheesy

And I'm still looking forward to even more lulz in the responses to Luv Khemani's [bitcoin-dev] "Miners are struggling with blocks far smaller than 750KB blocks and resorting to SPV mining" post!  Uh-oh, it looks like the good ship Gavincoin is on a collision course with wackiness!   Tongue

Although flattering, that other thing wasn't even in the top 10 of the funniest stuff I saw in the Great Gavinista Massacre's preamble, execution, and aftermath.

On a lulzy buttrage scale of 1 to 10, it rates about 1.5 Frap.docs.


It looks to me, that the bigger blocksize group tries to find a consensus in an open debate, while the 1MB group is absolutely fine with censorship and dividing(splitting) the community in 2 camps.

Moderation is not censorship.  Your social engineering attack has failed.

The sooner you Gavinistas are herded into /v/bitcoinxt to circlejerk yourselves the better.

Still here instead of fighting together with your totalitarian idols?
737  Economy / Speculation / Block size on: August 17, 2015, 10:04:18 AM
Enthusiastically discussed on places like Cypherdoc's thread or reddit (before the ban).
738  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 17, 2015, 09:37:03 AM
The 1MB'ers are happy watching that adoption isn't growing anymore. Stupidity at its best.
739  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 17, 2015, 08:26:53 AM
Go on smoothie.  Go on evoorhees.  Fuck off to greener, censorship-free pastures where may you attempt to attack Bitcoin all you want.

Don't let me stop you.  You're free now...move into the light...   Cheesy

iCEBLOW throwing his weapons.  or, blowing his weapons.

or, in medical terms, engaging in "projectile vomiting".

You are also welcome to fuck to https://voat.co/v/bitcoinxt, where your XT junta will not be "suppressed" by moderators enforcing rules.

Why are you supporting theymos' "epitome of authoritarianism" and "censorship" by gracing his forum with your presence?

What are you so afraid of, that you agree with all this censorship ?

There is no censorship here or on the subreddit.

If you disagree, prove it by defecting from Core's flagship forums to https://voat.co/v/bitcoinxt.

Vote with your feet.  Knock us out with the alleged Gavincoin consensus of your supposed XT socioeconomic majority.

On Passing-by ...

 O iCEman, here is the great thread: here hast thou nothing to seek and everything to lose.

Why wouldst thou wade through this mire? Have pity upon thy foot! Spit rather on the gate of this thread, and — turn back!

http://4umi.com/nietzsche/zarathustra/51
740  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: August 17, 2015, 07:57:54 AM
..and all pro XT and angry censorship postings are removed from the front of /r/bitcoin. Disgraceful.

Indeed. They will be making "A List' next....

I was told that "book burnings" would be next.   Huh

Can you please get your Theymos Is Literally Hitler narrative sorted out?  It's getting confusing.

And why are you still here in the land of oppression, instead of running free and wild at https://voat.co/v/bitcoinxt ?


And why are you still here, in cypher's world of free speech, instead of running with your soulmates, the supressors and illiberals?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!