I really don't get the surprise or outrage at this. Fuck yes, I want the CIA to be able to do all the shit in this document, and more. I want them to be able to see through fucking walls, to be honest. Y'all don't get this privacy shit, so let me break it down.

YOU ARENT THAT FUCKING IMPORTANT. The government is not trying to spy on regular people. There are more people than analysts, exponentially so. there is no way they have the time or resources to listen in on individual citizens in a meaningful way, because there is a whole nations worth of communications to sort through, every 24 hours. If you feel some kind of way about 'radical Islamic terrorism', then why would you feel some kind of way about our government having the tools to catch said terrorist?

So unless you are:

A international drug dealer
A self radicalized crazy head
A spy
President Trump

you really aren't cool enough for the government to be spending money to watch you look at interracial porn and read the forum.

This is was not a win for the common guy. Far from it. This is a huge blow to our national security, in the face of growing conflict with multiple nations. And the timing is suspect, giving the growing scrutiny on the intelligence community after Trump's seemingly erroneous accusations.

It's useless man. You can't reason with blind hate. Have fun, but don't try to sway these dudes. This is the "Muslims react to pork like vampires" crew. We all are grown, despite having these arguments, deep down of course these guys know that all Muslims aren't the same. The revulsion at the religion is a convenient foil for hatred of the skin. Populism is a response to thinking one is losing their place in the world, a reactionary thing. The people that hold these views, that display clear intelligence but hold such dated concepts, this is fear. Xenophobia.

How can you hate something you don't even know?

LOL, so you would rather have a reality television host, that won't release his taxes or divest, but you are afraid of a lesbian with decades of political experience, that has actually served in the White House?

What's your beef with lesbians? I thought Rebuplicans believed in meritocracy. If she does eat box, how would that affect her ability to lead? I wanted Bernie, but either one of them has more experience that the POTUS.

Are you that afraid of a woman, bro?

And don't you think it's odd, how we got leaks on Flynn and Sessions, but this damning evidence that would certainly sink the Clintons forever, make them out to be the AntiChrist you guys paint her as (she just a really rich old white woman as far as I see), has never surfaced after all these years?

And if she is lesbian, she keeps her shit tight. Trump can't even have pissplay with sex workers without fucking it up.

So, I think I favor the ninja lesbian over the failed businessman. Maybe we wouldn't have all these leaks. Running a child sex ring (ROFL, you guys are on that shit) must make for a shrewd ship.

Trump could suck dicks on camera for Scooby Snacks. I could give a single fuck. I just want someone with policies that make fucking sense. Put Bill back in that bitch. He wasn't even that fond of us, Blacks, but at least we wouldn't be buddy fucking Russia and calling our intelligence agencies and media the enemy. Got caught getting his dick sucked, and lied about the shit, but still wasn't derp enough to accuse the media of being the enemy. And when the Monica shit was going down (which was childhood popcorn) the media was not friend of the Clintons.


Hell, I'd take Bush Jr again, for 3 more terms, at this point.

Although I hate to see any kind of draft, one of the duties of living in a place is being prepared to defend it against foreign aggression. With that being said, I find it highly unlikely that Sweden will actually go to war with Russia, so the worse that will come of this is that alot of young adults will get a salary, a free resume builder, and discipline. The armed forces aren't for me, but they do build character and discipline. I'm for anything that builds a better person. And soldiers put their lives on the line for defense of home, which I have the utmost respect for.

Well, I think it's the same shit on a different day. We still aren't targeting the countries that actually produce terrorist (the US and Saudi Arabia. I shit you not. When I found out we actually produced roughly half of the guys we pop for terrorism, I shit a brick). I feel this is the case because Trump has financial interests that he does not want to piss off. It targets people for religion still, with prettier words. Since we founded the country in the pursuit of religious freedom, I think it's bullshit. I know alot of you hate Muslims (despite the fact that most of us don't even know one), but if you want to paint all followers of Islam with the same brush, then do so. Don't treat the ones you like different just because you make money with them. Be an asshole unilaterally, I say.

Compare Snopes (we can all agree this is an  unbiased source):
http://www.snopes.com/2017/02/14/countries-terrorists-come/

With this (more statistics specifically on Americans that engage in terror):
https://www.newamerica.org/in-depth/terrorism-in-america/who-are-terrorists/

The second source is seeming non partisan, you can check the credentials of each of the researchers on the bottom of the page (everyone is pretty experienced, and you can't really lie about this, it's a matter of public record that is easily fact checked.)

So why are we focusing on those particular countries, that don't have Trump towers, when the countries that are the problem (and have Trump Towers) are ignored? The numbers don't lie.

In the USA, the president functions as a part of the government, as head of the the executive branch. This is one of three branches of our government, which all have equal power. He can only make very broad policy decisions, but has complete control over the American war machine. Most laws need to pass through the legislative branch, the arm responsible for passing laws. But the executive order can be used to great effect, as these zing merrily past the legislative branch into actuality. Like the travel ban, for example. Congress would have never let that pass, had it been a bill (see my avatar). It was too poorly written, which is why it was appealed in its first iteration.

But, the legislative branch has the power to impeach the president. This won't happen, unless some very, very serious shit comes to light (like the Russian or Azerbaijan affairs), because there is a majority of members that are the same party as Trump. So, the government is stronger than the president, as he is just a government employee, but because his party controls 2 of the 3 arms of the government, he is beyond reproach at the moment.

All of the Abrahamic faiths have pretty rigid tenats to follow, if you are Orthodox/traditionalist/conservative. I think Judaism has it the worst. Would you consider the practice of Judaism slavery? They have very strong edicts on diet, appearance, and behavior. In fact, being the stewards of the old convenant, I would say they probably had the worst of it. The Lord was quite specific in the covenant he has with them.

I read Politico about 6 times a day (literally), so I was surprised you chose this source. So I read the article (looked at the pictures mostly, not alot of text). I didn't really get a lesbian vibe, more of an asshole vibe from Hillary. Huma is floating around the background holding some shit for Hillary (giant bag, papers). Reminds me of Anne Hathaway in the 'Devil Wears Prada'. But nah, this is no more close than I would expect two females that have been working together for almost a decade to behave. And Weiner is seriously, seriously into poon; I'm thinking he wouldn't have married a lesbian. This is not a one chick dude. At one point, she was putting out, even if that may have changed.

Unfortunately, this won't work. Any other sources?

I concur, this is sad. And I won't be an apologist, conservative interpretations of the "chastisement" verse actually do believe it's okay to hit a female. But, modern Islamic interpretations don't still abide by this. Like Christianity or Judaism, there are many different sects with variations on the original theme. But this shit is disgusting. He needs to get his ass kicked around a bit. He has forgotten his father's face.

FYI, an imam that doesn't support violence against women:
http://muslimmatters.org/2013/12/21/end-hitting-women-islamic-perspective-domestic-violence-imam-abdullah-hasan/

It's gonna be downright bigly, how motherfucking good this water is gonna be 

This slow motion train wreck has some benefits. This is the most entertaining careen off of a cliff that I have seen in a while. Wylie Coyote-esque in its scope.

For once, we agree. Unless I misunderstood you, but your words seemed clear. You wrote with a beautiful plainness, and I applaud you.

Well spoken, sir. And you can have a cookie as well (that is a compliment of mine, not an attack).

Edit: actually, I read some of your recent posts on religion, and I have a new found respect for you. I apologize for judging you man. I don't agree with your political views, but it is obvious to me you walk the Lord's path.

Edit edit: I really read through you, and I'm confused. Are you a follower of Trump? I saw some anti Hillary stuff and assumed, but after actually listening to you, I'm confused.

You get a cookie. And you can sit with us

He's like a dead baby joke. You know its going to end badly, but you keep listening because you have to hear how it ends.

But it's not the man that keeps surprising me. This, so far, is textbook Trump. It's his supporters. Despite how farcical this gets, despite how damning the Russian thing develops, he can do no wrong. They have literally associated this human man with God. They decry the media, but have swallowed the party line without truly dissecting the rhetoric. I knew we were sheep, but I did not know we would run gleefully to slaughter.

But in his defence, he is doing exactly what he said. Despite the consequences.

When history has a chance to reflect on this, people will be put on sides, depending on their words and actions. I feel for those that chose the wrong side.

Amen. If you are concerned about associating your ID with Facebook, then you obviously don't use Facebook. It's literally a fucking collection of people's faces. And names. And daily activities. The government can do this for you, and probably already has. This is to cut down on anon troll assholes, and I have no problem with that. When one uses Facebook, you have essentially given away your right to privacy, ESP from state actors, given the nature of the service.

But I will say, I haven't heard about this before today.

Planet Earth. The 3rd rock, if you will. But since I have had my head under a rock apparently, when I missed solid evidence of Hillary Rodham Clinton being a lesbian. Surely you can point me to this prolific evidence? I imagine you should be able to provide lots of links, from reputable sources, no?

Sure, I'm only 30. And I have as well. I am not an apologist for Christianity. I have seen absolute evil being put forth as the work of the Lord. I'm Christian, and pretty serious about it, but if we could get past our differences and sit down, you would find we have similar views about organized religion. It can be beautiful, but when misapplied, like it usually is, to advance some agenda of a person or group and not the Lord's Kingdom, it can sometimes produce atheists, such as yourself.

Really? Link me to some evidence. Something reputable.

LOL, you may notice that Saudi Arabia was not included in the travel ban, despite being one of the greatest sources of extremist. Seems like he may have a few Saudi friends as well.

Why do I want a possible treason committed by the POTUS to be exposed? Guess I'm just old fashioned.

And how much do you respect ole Bamster? Should I read your posting history? Because I think we would all know what we would find. Take your lumps lIke a man, like we did.

And why am I supposed to be kissing Clinton ass again? I have issues with her as well. Its just, she never said she was gonna grab anyone by the pussy. And then get elected. And then fuck it all up.

Now maybe Bill might have grabbed some pussy. I'd put money on that.

And yall are fucked in '18

Have you checked the odds on 45 getting impeached?

Bigly.

But unless that person doesn't work, they should show up in the system. With a job.

Ah damn. You are one of those PizzaGate guys.

Let me tell you a secret. Really rich people do perverse shit, because they can.

Also, are we really gonna deny the small army of females that claimed the president sexually assaulted them? I wasn't going to bring it up, because it honestly doesn't reflect on the current shitshow, and it is unproven. There is enough to point out without bringing conjecture into it. Like saying that a surrogate wrangles pussy for a former president and his wife.

Good old number 45. The first president with rape charges.

This is going great, guys.

Again, fuck the Clintons. For some reason, conservative think we put her (or them) in that hallowed, Christ-like place that the dim put Trump. If she fucked up, lock her up. But don't have ignore the orange elephant in the room.

Oh, we won't be seeing to many Rebuplican faces come 2018. They fucked the dog with this one. If you think the GOP will do bigly in 2018, check out the town halls our elected officials are running from. Unpresidented, to say the least. Never any protest like this last administration. Also, if the Russia shit goes south, the entire GOP will go down in flames. Which is disappointing. You guys have it right on gun control and small government.

Comrade, this is going to get interesting.

And the best part is, it's quite obvious that they have dirt, but they are trickling it down from least to greatest. You think these leaks are just falling out in order of severity die to chance? You don't get to shit test our intelligence services. They kill foreign leaders. Made the wrong enemies, the deep state will get deeply in that ass.



As if fucking with people's health care was gonna fly. WEAK!