I see people here repeatedly commenting on how ridiculous OP's claim is. *Yes,* it is ridiculous. You cannot simply sell a method to earn $1000 a day for $15, that's a given. The problem is by commenting over and over again on his thread, all you are doing is giving him more attention. This is most likely a scam, and the last thing it needs is more people clicking on it. I hope that after my post (which should not even have been necessary in the first place) we can let this thread die. The OP is not even bothering to bump it himself anymore. 

Oh, I see what you mean. No, I don't see why whether it's Visa or MasterCard would make the situation any different. Regulation is on the side of the government and their legislation, not on the side of the merchants. They are not the ones deciding to implement KYC laws that make it harder for people to do financial transactions. In fact, regulations such as that hurt card companies which in turn sell less and process less transactions as a result of the regulations imposed by the governments. That being said, I do believe some of it is necessary, albeit that's a completely different topic.

I can confirm this. I used to have an account with them quite a bit back when they were just starting out. They used to be much more relaxed with following international card-related policies and the American KYC regulations, which allowed me to get a card with ease. Now it is even impossible for me to access their website. They block access from IPs outside the European Union so that they don't have to deal with any legal complications that may arise from knowingly or unknowningly offering service to someone in a restricted region.

Actually, whether and how Bitcoin is taxed (or not) depends on how you are classifying it in your accounting system. If you classify it as an asset or capital, it might not have to pay taxes until you actually convert them into a  fiat currency, at which point they would be considered capital gains. Otherwise, if you account for it as a currency, you would have to pay taxes like you would with any other currency. If you pay sales tax for items you sell in fiat, for example, you would have to do the same for a transaction done with Bitcoin if you consider it a currency for accounting purposes. There is more than one way to do it, and I would be surprised to find out that there aren't many more than the ones I described, as I am not an accountant myself but have done basic accounting in the past.

I am still not fully sure about SpectroCoin. I recently posted in one of their threads about whether their card fee would stack up through different payment periods regardless of whether the card had any balance in it or not. In the website it claims that it does not and that it will only take money out of the card if the card has any balance inside it. The support team, however, said otherwise. In their thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577176.msg21641997#msg21641997) I asked about it and they said that it stacks up and is deducted according to the amount of months that it has been used, regardless of whether they are active or not. It seems to contradict my experience and I am therefore waiting on clarification on their part. They are also in the quarantine section of the OP here, but I asked about what the reason for that was and nobody seems to have answered to me, so I remain unsure about that one. Please share any experience you might have had.

Ehhh, I would not quite say that the government is loyal to Bitcoin. Sure, they don't prohibit it or ban it, but that is mostly because it would likely bring attention to it and because of the repercussions that passing a banning law against something as basic as a cryptocurrency would bring. In the government's eyes, Bitcoin is something they can quite literally not control like the dollar. They can't create any of it or devalue it like they can do with the dollar and therefore cannot create value if they need to. It is basically a digital version of gold in their eyes. On the bright side, once Bitcoin does become popular, it will be impossible to stop it or any sidechain that may develop and a small amount of regulation through taxation and exemptions will be what keeps them from breaking down, as you can see from this piece of news.

I would not recommend taking part in these ICOs. While I have personally had a good experience with UQUID, I am not sure that participating in an ICO would be beneficial for those buying into the token, as it would probably end up with the company wrongly estimating what is needed to complete certain parts of the project as it has already happened with many other ICOs in the past. What is most likely to happen is that the funds will be misappropriated or will run out before the promised features are released to the public.

This actually sounds like a quite good idea, as long as you don't get caught doing it. It is basically a Netflix/Hulu except with much more diverse content from different platforms and only having to pay a smaller amount for all of it. I assume a decent number of these shows and movies you have gotten through alternate means such as torrenting or stream ripping (which I don't really mind). While I have no need for such service, I do need to warn you and anyone interested in using this service that if this gets much too popular, it can start attracting DMCAs which could end up in the server being forced to be taken down. As long as this is kept private, it should not really be an issue, but it is still important to keep in mind what kind of service this is and what it entails.

So recently I loaded $2 into my card after not having used it for somewhere around a year and I was able to completely use those funds to purchase items online without your platform having deducted anything from it even though it technically should have deducted over $10. Because of this, I am not sure of what your real policy is or what is going to be happening to my card. I have yet to be deducted any of those months' balance. In case you need to know, I did not use the card at all over that time; I had completely forgotten I even had it.

Hold on, I was just lurking here and came into your thread almost on accident. I have a card with you that I did not use for a while but it also did not have any balance in it since the terms said that no money would be deducted from the card for the monthly fee if the fee was zero. Now by reading this I understand that I will be deducted for all those months at which my balance was at zero. Is this correct? If so, then why wouldn't an individual customer just get rid of that card and buy a new one, since it would already be a smaller price? I just don't quite see the sense in it unless there is something obvious that I am missing or if I am misunderstanding what you mean by money being deducted for all unpaid months. Thanks.

That can't be the reason why. I have always been using the virtual card, not a physical one, and I have been able to do that ever since UQUID announced that they were going to have to look for a new contract with the same or a different card issuer. If you are talking about the button then there is definitely something wrong, as I have always had that button ever since I bought my first debit card with UQUID. I feel like the real problem is that you are not quite able to find the right place to check your card details. It would be a very bizarre glitch for this to not show up for you.

Are we talking about real referrals here or are we talking about botnets/spammers that could possibly get you banned in some, if not all crypto/referral sites? Also, does it have anything to do with marketing a page or setting up a website to do with indexing categories of websites with which referral links are used? I assume not considering that there is actually a price per referral, which still makes me question if these are actually bots we are talking about. These would be pretty much useless as you can already get them from other sources.

Even though you don't directly mention this, I am assuming this method is for sale rather than you just giving it away, correct? If so, you really should be elaborating on what this method entails and what is required from an individual before being able to execute this method. Also some sort of guarantee should be given rather than just hypotheticals. I would usually offer myself for a vouch, but given the nature of this product and how I have no real way of testing it out, I will pass on this. I would still like to know if anyone is able to make any decent money with this method by using it with different websites where referring people is required. Also, does this only work for bitcoin/crypto-related websites?

Just go to your card details where you have to enter your pin. When it shows up, you click on the details button next to your card. Afterwards, you will get a pop-up that looks like the following image:



The access token will then be shown to the right. I have cropped it out of this screenshot for obvious reasons.

I have a friend using the Spectrocoin Bitcoin Debit Card that they seem to be offering for a cheap price withou need for ID verification and while looking at your post I realized that this one is posted under "Quarantine." What reason is there for this? I was considering SpectroCoin myself, so I would like to know what issues they have had that I could have if I do decide to get this card. The website and service look legit and it seems to be working fine right now.


What.

Since I got no official response on the UQUID thread, I tried doing this myself. When you go to your account, click on the link that takes you to your list of cards. Once there, click on whichever card it is that you want to access or use. Click it for more details and then it might be necessary to click another button to show the full details of the card. One of the options says "Access Token". Copy the value in that field and then go to the website URL that they have posted in the notice that shows up in your account. After that, click on the Register/Activate button and create a new account by pasting in the token into the respective field. After that you should have access to all the transaction history and balance on your card.

As for the future, I hope they figure out a new contract soon, since I could not find any way currently to load the card or do much else other than check its balance or pay with it.

Edit: I just realized this *is* the UQUID thread. Still no official answer to my previous question, however.

I do not actually think this is true. At least I don't think that anytime soon Bitcoin or any similar crypto-currency will be preferable to have for everyday transactions. Besides the usual obstacle of most places not accepting Bitcoin as a payment method, there is the safety issue (imagine how easy it would be to steal from people's wallets if they do not secure their phone) and the transaction fee issue (low value transactions still have to pay very high relative fees in order to be confirmed in the blockchain). I see the latter more easily solvable by a side-chain or a separate service that does not work on top of the blockchain. Imagine an Apple Pay that allows for transactions in Bitcoin value rather than through credit cards.

As a clarification to anyone looking to buy this guide: Do note that while the VCC methods are legitimate, there is no mention of how to load them. The guide itself says that loading VCC cards is out of the scope of the guide. The main reason for you to obtain any of these VCCs would be in order to verify free trials such as Amazon Web Services, Azure, or even commercial end-user sites such as Netflix or Amazon Prime. I would not recommend it if your main objective is to obtain a card that you can load using Bitcoin, as this is not covered at all. Otherwise a great guide.

You might have better luck offering this domain in the Auctions sub-forum under "Marketplace." This is often the place where bitcoin or crypto-related domains are sold since the bids are a more accurate measure of the domain's value. It has also become the place where most domain buyers look for domains to buy, since as the value goes up only those who are truly interested on using the domain (or believe they can sell it for an even bigger profit) lurk. You should also post other information related to the domain on your post to save potential buyers the clicks.

Ah, I see. How about on accounts that have used a promo before but not this promo? For example, if the account used a referral code in the past but not a GitHub Education Pack code, would it work? In the past I have had it so that by sending in a support ticket explaining the situation I get the credit from the GitHub Education Pack on top of the credit from the referral code for a total of $60. Do you have any experience with this or have you heard or read about this working consistently?