Lo siento. No hay nadie que sepa hablar español en nuestro pequeño equipo de desarrolladores. No quise faltarle el respeto a su subforo. cinnamon_carter, a veces, utilizar un traductor no es suficiente para que algo se entienda.
Por favor, corrige el texto.
|
|
|
|
Time will tell, i could be wrong, lets see where it is in 6 months and a year from now, As far as this coin is concerned , anything with this many shill and legit posts and trade volume is obviously being 'sponsered' by someone.....
Oh and it was premined.... many people say a small amount but why premine,
If you ninja launch a coin at least the people who are around and mine it at the start get a piece of the action and the developers can get their share too.
When considering a premine most people discuss the % vs. total coins ever.
First, what do you mean by sponsored? You mean someone is spending money to buy the coin to make it look good? And if so, so what? High tide rises all boats. The primine was transparent and clearnly stated as being used by the stabilization fund. At least there is an attempt to do something different. Oh, and for every shill there's always one FUDer and one yelling scam. You've just got to read through the noise. |
|
|
|
I know all about how it works , the links to the code on github may be useful to others, I question the mentality of this. Similar systems have not prevented other large coins from being targeted by large pools I have watched the networks of feathercoin, dodge, ect.... while watching middlecoin and wafflepool at the same time, I do this by running one core with miner d in a virtual machine , one coin gets pegged to higher difficulty for a while, then some miner solve a block, the adjustment steep down in difficulty happens and the large pools hop right on it , in seconds..... last year i used to watch middlecoin sit on say feathercoin for hours at a time, eventually the difficulty would go up and it would switch off to something else (there may be a few switch off's to smaller coins now and again)... but while it was on feather coin all that time it was not on any other coin, then when feather coin difficulty rose it would leave it alone for a while, so all the kgw or your retargeting system does is speed up the process at which the same things take place and make it even harder for any miner who really wants to mine only that coin to get a piece of the action, that is my opinoin, not a popular one since everyone thinks the kgw is a big deal. i suggest someoneone look up older posts i read by Sunny King warning of fast difficulty changes..... I think he made a lot of sense and I can't remember if i read them on the forum here or on one of his forums but there was more discussion of it after the terracoin 25 ths attack last summer....... In todays environment i think difficulty adjusting once a day is probably too long, once an hour is about the minimum I would consider..... My personal feeling is that by most larger coins going to the kgw/similar retargeting systems they have actually made it easier for large hash cow pools to hammer their coin when difficulty goes low. As far as this coin is concerned , anything with this many shill and legit posts and trade volume is obviously being 'sponsered' by someone..... I won't be mining or investing in this coin. If you are I wish you the best. Just consider who may be 'sponsering' the large trade volume you all are discussing at the bottom of the thread. Oh and it was premined.... many people say a small amount but why premine, If you ninja launch a coin at least the people who are around and mine it at the start get a piece of the action and the developers can get their share too. When considering a premine most people discuss the % vs. total coins ever. I would suggest for any premined coin you look at the percentage of the premined coins vs. how many coins exist right now, and how much the premine can be 'exchanged' for bitcoin right now...... Can you explain more details about how Digishield works?
DigiShield re-targets a coin’s difficulty to protect against multi-pools and an over-inflation of easily mined new coins. DigiShield was originally developed for DigiByte, but has since been implemented into Dogecoin and will soon be implemented into more coins including Nautiluscoin. DigiShield re-targets a coin’s difficulty between every block or in the case of DigiByte & Dogecoin, every 60 seconds. We created DigiShield after seeing the threat that multi-pools pose to a crypto currency when they start mining a coin at a very low difficulty in relation to their net pool hash. This allows many coins to be quickly and easily mined before the difficulty increases. Once the difficulty increases the multi-pool leaves a coin, dumps the coins on the market, and then leaves the dedicated existing miners with a very high difficulty and very few new coins to be mined. This leads to a drop in price and frustration among the committed community members & miners of the affected coin. DigiShield protects DigiByte against this threat and helps ensure greater confidence in any coin that implements it by allowing the difficulty to rise and fall almost perfectly in sync with increases or decreases in the net hash of a coin. The secret to DigiShield is an asymmetrical approach to difficulty re-targeting. With DigiShield, the difficulty is allowed to decrease in larger movements than it is allowed to increase from block to block. This keeps a blockchain from getting "stuck" i.e., not finding the next block for several hours following a major drop in the net hash of coin. It is all a balancing act. You need to allow the difficulty to increase enough between blocks to catch up to a sudden spike in net hash, but not enough to accidentally send the difficulty sky high when two miners get lucky and find blocks back to back. The same thing occurs with difficulty decreases. Since it takes much longer to find the next block, you need to allow it to drop quicker than it increases. The KGW (Kimoto Gravity Well) and Earthcoin approaches to difficulty re-targeting are not as effective as DigiShield in protecting against multi-pools. We conducted extensive testing over a five day period and found that an asymmetrical approach was much more effective than the KGW approach. We found that the difficulty needed to be able to decrease by a larger magnitude than it was allowed to increase. When the difficulty was allowed to increase or decrease at the same rate with larger orders of magnitude, some very bad oscillations occurred along with some crazy high difficulties when two lucky blocks were found quickly back to back. The asymmetrical adjustments keep the difficulty from going too high too fast, but allow it to drop much quicker after a large hash down swing as it takes a much longer time to discover the next two blocks for the difficulty adjustment to occur. Both the KGW and Earthcoin approaches to difficulty re-targeting still allow multi-pools a few minutes of easy mining. For example, Earthcoin still gets hit my multi-pools for 11-12 minutes at time. Both approaches limit the amount the difficulty is allowed to change between blocks, which can become a big issue when a sudden hash decrease occurs. While simulating a sudden 10-20 fold hash decrease, KGW can become "stuck" for several hours before the next few blocks are discovered and the difficulty evens out again. The same issue exists with the Earthcoin approach. It can get "stuck" for 20-40 minutes following an 11 minute hash increase from a multi-pool attack. We know a 10-20 fold hash increase is unusual, but it is possible, especially as cryptocurrencies become better known. More than likely, we will only ever see more than a 5-10 fold increase. Nonetheless, we wanted to develop something that protected against even the most unlikely of hash jumps to ensure that we could handle sudden extremes very quickly. In summary DigiShield is a balanced asymmetrical approach to difficulty re-targeting. You don't want to let the difficulty go too high too fast, but you need to give it enough room to catch up quickly. The same thing goes with down swings, since it takes longer to discover new blocks you need to give it more room to go down, but not enough to send it to the floor. DigiShield is by no means the absolute "perfect" solution to the multi pool/ difficulty problem, but after testing dozens of different setups over a five day period including KGW and the Earthcoin approach, the current ratios/ settings in DigiShield out performed any other solution available at the moment. The DigiShield code can be found here between lines 833 & 1007: https://github.com/digibyte/DigiByteProject/blob/master/src/main.cppTake a look at the Dogecoin difficulty chart: http://www.coinwarz.com/difficulty-charts/dogecoin-difficulty-chart. You can see how multi-pools have really been mining most of the coins and leaving the dedicated Doge miners to pick up the slack and get the short end of the stick when it comes to new coins. You can also see when DigiShield took effect and that no longer occurs. Now take a look at the chart for DigiByte: http://www.coinwarz.com/difficulty-charts/digibyte-difficulty-chart. You can see how we would get "stuck" after a multi pool left us and it would take several hours more than our 2.4 hour re-target before the difficulty came back down. Had we not implemented DigiShield when we were hit with the 1 GH - 8GH increase we might have been "stuck" for a day or more. See how quickly the pool hit us and left, and more importantly see how fast the difficulty decreased back to normal levels? Since DigiShield went into effect, you can see how quickly multi-pools hit us and leave, whereby they mine considerably less coins now, upwards of 50-80% less. ^^ for anyone wondering how it works  |
|
|
|
|
I would be greatful if someone can recommend a decent active pool to mine Freicon ,
on p2pool i get about 13% rejects no matter how I adjust difficulty and that is only with 40 ghs
|
|
|
|
someone said the exchange is back up but i agree better not to trade coins now unless buying alts, i am using the buying power of bitcoin to stock up now.... on certain coins..... i don't think there is , cryptorush went south xnigma seems to be off line............ who knows what the going 'bribe' is to be listed on the various new exchanges i see even though they had trouble and are working out of things i still like vircurex since they have been around a long time.... i remember when you could trade all the coins against each other..... that was pretty cool....... to rebuild their reputation they should list some more coins, this would be a solid choice seems to run smooth as silk The coin continues to run smooth, stake is moving perfectly, lots of connections.
Is there an exchange left? In time there will be a big player that offers everything and will exist longer than a couple of months  In the current climate, it's better not to trade anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Note , i am unable to log into bluedragons merged pools at the moment I believe they are under ddos,
Someone is mining however since Photons blockchain is moving fast with difficulty slightly rising last adjustment to "difficulty" : 20997.65212035,-------------
EDIT -- POOL WAS UNDER DDOS FOR SHORT TIME ,
HASH RATE OF BLAKE COIN AND PHOTON CONTINUES TO GROW,
PHOTON JUST UNDER 500 GHS, BLAKE COIN ALMOST 750 GHS ----
WOW , "difficulty" : 32125.10572730 --- Not many people active on Blake Coin and Photon threads in the forum last few days but obviously people are active on the netwowrk.
|
|
|
|
very cool , ill see if i can get the word out there !! We could do with more sell orders here.There is only one at 12 BTC and there have been no trades so far. |
|
|
|
i agree , bitcoin is the only thing to mine if you have any serious hash power , can merge mine with namecoin iX dev and iO too...... besides these the ones merged mined with btc, i doubt any other sha 256 d coin ever has a chance as the network continues to grow, im looking at it right now 63 peta hash and a few days ago was at 58 ...... i bet half of the hash power is being produced by units that people ordered or paid in advance for and are waiting for delivery too. a shame, yet they dont deliver the units until they are almost worthless, with very few exceptions i understand........ i would keep it on the merged pool, the iO coin award is so low now it is hardly worth it, but namecoin, iX and Dev sweeten the pot a bit.... of course this does not apply to 'ninja launches' of new coins that people are going to pump up to fake value that you can cash in on, if you are lucky enough to run across one....... the excitement of the ninja launch style has been replaced by the scam infested ipo proof of stake only coin........ oh welll Bitcoin. It will be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in a future.
May be in the future but I'm looking for one in the present moment. |
|
|
|
i don't think there is , cryptorush went south xnigma seems to be off line............ who knows what the going 'bribe' is to be listed on the various new exchanges i see even though they had trouble and are working out of things i still like vircurex since they have been around a long time.... i remember when you could trade all the coins against each other..... that was pretty cool....... to rebuild their reputation they should list some more coins, this would be a solid choice seems to run smooth as silk The coin continues to run smooth, stake is moving perfectly, lots of connections.
Is there an exchange left? |
|
|
|
sorry i don't buy the stuff i hear not only here but on many coins..... protection from multi pools..... if you have a well designed coin why would you not want as many people with as much hash power to mine your coin...... what are you afraid of ....... unless the only purpose of the coin you are releasing (this or any coin) is to have it 'exchanged' for bitcoin ? if this is the case still , (unless there are 'fake' 'pumped' buy orders) those wanting to 'exchange' will do so , the exchange rate drops down and your coin lives on............ For any project that is operated in an honest manner I would think you would invite as many people to mine your coin with as much hash power as they are willing to throw at your network...... designing retargeting of difficulty that 'discourages' mining seems kind of crazy to me...... Can you explain more details about how Digishield works?
DigiShield re-targets a coin’s difficulty to protect against multi-pools and an over-inflation of easily mined new coins. DigiShield was originally developed for DigiByte, but has since been implemented into Dogecoin and will soon be implemented into more coins including Nautiluscoin. DigiShield re-targets a coin’s difficulty between every block or in the case of DigiByte & Dogecoin, every 60 seconds. We created DigiShield after seeing the threat that multi-pools pose to a crypto currency when they start mining a coin at a very low difficulty in relation to their net pool hash. This allows many coins to be quickly and easily mined before the difficulty increases. Once the difficulty increases the multi-pool leaves a coin, dumps the coins on the market, and then leaves the dedicated existing miners with a very high difficulty and very few new coins to be mined. This leads to a drop in price and frustration among the committed community members & miners of the affected coin. DigiShield protects DigiByte against this threat and helps ensure greater confidence in any coin that implements it by allowing the difficulty to rise and fall almost perfectly in sync with increases or decreases in the net hash of a coin. The secret to DigiShield is an asymmetrical approach to difficulty re-targeting. With DigiShield, the difficulty is allowed to decrease in larger movements than it is allowed to increase from block to block. This keeps a blockchain from getting "stuck" i.e., not finding the next block for several hours following a major drop in the net hash of coin. It is all a balancing act. You need to allow the difficulty to increase enough between blocks to catch up to a sudden spike in net hash, but not enough to accidentally send the difficulty sky high when two miners get lucky and find blocks back to back. The same thing occurs with difficulty decreases. Since it takes much longer to find the next block, you need to allow it to drop quicker than it increases. The KGW (Kimoto Gravity Well) and Earthcoin approaches to difficulty re-targeting are not as effective as DigiShield in protecting against multi-pools. We conducted extensive testing over a five day period and found that an asymmetrical approach was much more effective than the KGW approach. We found that the difficulty needed to be able to decrease by a larger magnitude than it was allowed to increase. When the difficulty was allowed to increase or decrease at the same rate with larger orders of magnitude, some very bad oscillations occurred along with some crazy high difficulties when two lucky blocks were found quickly back to back. The asymmetrical adjustments keep the difficulty from going too high too fast, but allow it to drop much quicker after a large hash down swing as it takes a much longer time to discover the next two blocks for the difficulty adjustment to occur. Both the KGW and Earthcoin approaches to difficulty re-targeting still allow multi-pools a few minutes of easy mining. For example, Earthcoin still gets hit my multi-pools for 11-12 minutes at time. Both approaches limit the amount the difficulty is allowed to change between blocks, which can become a big issue when a sudden hash decrease occurs. While simulating a sudden 10-20 fold hash decrease, KGW can become "stuck" for several hours before the next few blocks are discovered and the difficulty evens out again. The same issue exists with the Earthcoin approach. It can get "stuck" for 20-40 minutes following an 11 minute hash increase from a multi-pool attack. We know a 10-20 fold hash increase is unusual, but it is possible, especially as cryptocurrencies become better known. More than likely, we will only ever see more than a 5-10 fold increase. Nonetheless, we wanted to develop something that protected against even the most unlikely of hash jumps to ensure that we could handle sudden extremes very quickly. In summary DigiShield is a balanced asymmetrical approach to difficulty re-targeting. You don't want to let the difficulty go too high too fast, but you need to give it enough room to catch up quickly. The same thing goes with down swings, since it takes longer to discover new blocks you need to give it more room to go down, but not enough to send it to the floor. DigiShield is by no means the absolute "perfect" solution to the multi pool/ difficulty problem, but after testing dozens of different setups over a five day period including KGW and the Earthcoin approach, the current ratios/ settings in DigiShield out performed any other solution available at the moment. The DigiShield code can be found here between lines 833 & 1007: https://github.com/digibyte/DigiByteProject/blob/master/src/main.cppTake a look at the Dogecoin difficulty chart: http://www.coinwarz.com/difficulty-charts/dogecoin-difficulty-chart. You can see how multi-pools have really been mining most of the coins and leaving the dedicated Doge miners to pick up the slack and get the short end of the stick when it comes to new coins. You can also see when DigiShield took effect and that no longer occurs. Now take a look at the chart for DigiByte: http://www.coinwarz.com/difficulty-charts/digibyte-difficulty-chart. You can see how we would get "stuck" after a multi pool left us and it would take several hours more than our 2.4 hour re-target before the difficulty came back down. Had we not implemented DigiShield when we were hit with the 1 GH - 8GH increase we might have been "stuck" for a day or more. See how quickly the pool hit us and left, and more importantly see how fast the difficulty decreased back to normal levels? Since DigiShield went into effect, you can see how quickly multi-pools hit us and leave, whereby they mine considerably less coins now, upwards of 50-80% less. ^^ for anyone wondering how it works |
|
|
|
Glad you like the network......... Photon was designed with a large block award on purpose , and a large number of coins with no reduction in the block award. 6 months, a year , 5 years from now people who want to join will not be in a position where they can only mine minute amounts of the coin. Right now if you want some Photon and cannot mine for lack of hash power or any other reason buy some at Atomic https://www.atomic-trade.com/Photon is not expensive and is also on sale at AllCrypt https://www.allcrypt.com/marketBoth Blake Coin and Photon were both designed not to enrich developers or allow unfair advantages to anyone -- niether coin was premined. Merged mining is now working and new pools are planned to be added in a few days......also some people are running 'private' pools on the network. With the addition of the third coin in the family B+ we have grown even more and other coins are planned so the network hash rate shall continue to grow stronger. I know that thousands of people downloaded the Photon Windows Wallet in just the first few weeks of it's release so compared to other projects going on that says a lot on it's own. I do not control a few hundred fake accounts in the forum to keep bumping the thread and I am not about fake hype. If a project is solid , honest, and designed well , it may take a while but the word tends to get around. Based on the number and types of unsuccessful attacks against the coin network(s) and merged pools I can see people are paying attention. Its really great
Nice work !
|
|
|
|
|
Between the power of the merged mining pools for Blake Coin, Photon and B+ and some private merged mining pools the network is around 750 ghs now --- nice to see lots of new people on board
|
|
|
|
|
keep your coins in a well secured qt wallet
|
|
|
|
|
The coin continues to run smooth, stake is moving perfectly, lots of connections.
|
|
|
|
Counterparty wiki on github for anyone not familiar with it..... https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/CounterpartyAs others have said these are independent systems built on top of the coins blockchain itself. For bitcoin there are several 'systems' under development since everyone wants to get a piece of the pie and they imagine themselves getting in on the ground floor like getting domains regisgered on the web in the early 90's ..... Obviously things need to have backward compatability ..... look how many people in America still use dial up modems even now !! Millions !! I think that as long as no changes are made so we never see the day we cannot fire up our qt wallet and send /receive coins any of the extras add the possibility of more people getting on board. I wonder how many people are actually using these expanded features in bitcoin now......? |
|
|
|
|
note, although i have been very busy with other projects I am still keeping an eye on this coin and try to spend a day or two a week mining it, difficulty has been pretty steady, healthy blockchain, what are the exchanges waiting for ??\
still exchange or no exchange, without this coin and it's brilliant design & groundbreaking mash up of algorithms we never would have seen many of the most popular non sha 256 d or scrypt 1024 coins now.....
|
|
|
|
I was under the impression manual cash out's were disabled for security reasons....... best to check with BlueDragon747 on that.... you can set the minimum pretty low , the coins are flowing in , literally ................. !!! hey guys,
i did manual cash out from both pool in the OP about 1 hour ago for all 3 coins
i received PHOTON and BLAKE from both pool, but didn't get the Ƀ+
is there any problem with this coin in manual withdraw?
|
|
|
|
Blake 256 cannot be mined with asic's that are for sha 256d you can use a cpu https://github.com/BlueDragon747/cpuminer http://blakecoin.org/Blakecoin_Minerd.7z (not recommended) settings for ny merge pool example minerd --url stratum+tcp://ny2.blakecoin.com:3334 --userpass username:password -t 4 -a blake -s 1 would run 4 cores....... use a gpu https://github.com/kR105/cgminer-althttp://www.blakecoin.org/cgminer-alt-pool-photon1.7zsample conf file..... { "pools" : [ { "url" : "stratum+tcp://ny2.blakecoin.com:3334", "user" : "your user name in the pooll", "pass" : "pool password" } ], "intensity" : "11", "auto-gpu" : true, "expiry" : "120", "failover-only" : true, "gpu-threads" : "1", "log" : "5", "no-restart" : true, "queue" : "3", "scan-time" : "30", "worksize" : "256", "temp-hysteresis" : "4", "blake256" : true, "vectors" : "1", "hotplug" : "0" "no-submit-stale": true, "kernel-path" : "/" "rpcport" : "8984" } for best performance on gpu i recommend low memory and high engine clock speed, (use bitcoin similar settings for your card not litecoin settings) if you have fpga boards see this brilliant work here https://github.com/kramble/FPGA-Blakecoin-Miner and check the Blake Coin thread for how to reprogram/configure..... No asic's exist to mine blake 256 ......yet..... they would be possible to construct ...... I am mining in the new york merged pool , Blake Coin , Photon and BlakeBitcoin all at the same time ...... other coins are in development that will be merge mined also...... in the near future..... http://ny2.blakecoin.com/index.phpI apologize for the extremely noob question but I'm very new to mining.
I have a 5200 kh/s gridseed blade asic miner, can I mine this coin? if so which pool would you recommend, if not could someone please help guide me to some info on what I need to start mining this.
thank you very much in advance.
|
|
|
|
FYI HERE IS MY PERSONAL WINDOWS QT BUILD OF BLAKE BITCOIN OR B+ AS SOME ARE CALLING IT http://www.mediafire.com/download/c9ltozjp1jp40es/b_plus_from_cinnamon_win_qt_BLAKE__BITCOIN.7zLike the original wallet release it shows false positives on the website virus total however only 2.... I would like to point out that even if you compile your own wallets unless you really look over the code do you really know what you are compiling ? I am not going to teach anyone how but a few lines of code added to some c++ can make it do all sorts of terrible things..... Terrible things that might not show up on virus total or other scanners if that code has never been tagged as malware in the wild. So while virus total and other scanning sites are useful tools to help prevent problems the integrity of the person who built the wallet is important too. I see other coins released with things like 'bounty for mac wallet' ..... my position is this; sorry I don't support mac wallets right now. If you want one build it for yourself be my guest but unless I built it myself I will not ever call it an official wallet of a project I am running. Anyone who allows 'strangers' or people with no reputation to build thier wallets is taking a chance even if it comes up clean on virus total. I don't want to alarm anyone. I just want to point out that all virus scanning software including websites like virus total are just layers of protection. Running things inside a virtual machine is always best if you can. Now enough of me hijacking this thread about security ect...... I would say that Blake Bitcoin aka B+ has certainly reached escape velocity from it's launch and you are all welcome to mine Blake Coin, Photon and B+ with me ALL AT THE SAME TIME WITH THE SAME HASH POWER in the NY pool ....... http://ny2.blakecoin.com/index.php |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
